切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (05) : 543 -550. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2020.05.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

早期目标导向治疗后检测乳酸清除率对连续性血液净化治疗脓毒性休克患儿时机选择的指导作用
谢友军1,(), 莫武桂1, 韦跃1, 韦蓉1, 唐育鹏1   
  1. 1. 广西壮族自治区妇幼保健院重症医学科,南宁 530003
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-02 修回日期:2020-09-15 出版日期:2020-10-01
  • 通信作者: 谢友军

Guiding effect of lactic acid clearance rate detection after early goal-directed therapy on timing selection of continuous blood purification for septic shock in children

Youjun Xie1,(), Wugui Mo1, Yue Wei1, Rong Wei1, Yupeng Tang1   

  1. 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning 530003, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
  • Received:2020-04-02 Revised:2020-09-15 Published:2020-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Youjun Xie
  • Supported by:
    Self-Financing Project of Health and Family Planning Commission of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region(Z20170786)
引用本文:

谢友军, 莫武桂, 韦跃, 韦蓉, 唐育鹏. 早期目标导向治疗后检测乳酸清除率对连续性血液净化治疗脓毒性休克患儿时机选择的指导作用[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(05): 543-550.

Youjun Xie, Wugui Mo, Yue Wei, Rong Wei, Yupeng Tang. Guiding effect of lactic acid clearance rate detection after early goal-directed therapy on timing selection of continuous blood purification for septic shock in children[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2020, 16(05): 543-550.

目的

探讨接受早期目标导向治疗(EGDT)方案后,检测脓毒性休克(SS)患儿乳酸清除率,对其进一步采取连续性血液净化治疗(CBP)时机选择的指导作用。

方法

选取2017年1月至2019年12月,广西壮族自治区妇幼保健院新阳、厢竹院区儿童重症监护病房(PICU)收治的接受EGDT方案后,乳酸清除率<10%,并且符合本研究纳入与排除标准的36例SS患儿为研究对象。采用信封法,将其随机分为研究组(n=21,立即进行CBP治疗)与对照组(n=15,先进行集束化治疗,若患儿器官功能进行性恶化,再进行CBP治疗)。采集2组患儿的一般临床资料,入院时(d0)、入院后第3天(d3)、入院后第5天(d5)血浆白细胞介素(IL)-6、10与肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α水平,以及血浆乳酸浓度达标时间、尿量达标时间、CBP治疗时间、机械通气时间、PICU住院时间,并采用重复测量资料的方差分析,或成组t检验进行统计学比较。2组患儿性别、年龄与原发感染部位构成比及治疗前血浆乳酸浓度、小儿危重病例评分(PCIS)等临床资料分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。本研究遵循的程序符合广西壮族自治区妇幼保健院伦理委员会所制定的医学伦理学标准,并得到该委员会审批[审批文号:(2017-1)4-16号]。本研究与纳入研究患儿监护人均签署临床研究知情同意书。

结果

①2组患儿d0、d3、d5血浆IL-6、IL-10、TNF-α水平,经重复测量资料的方差分析结果显示,对于血浆IL-6、IL-10水平,不同处理措施与时间因素有交互效应(F处理×时间=14.937、P<0.001,F处理×时间=5.314、P<0.001),而对于血浆TNF-α水平,不同处理措施与时间因素无交互效应(F处理×时间=2.918、P=0.092)。进一步固定时间因素进行分析的结果显示,研究组患儿d3血浆IL-6、IL-10、TNF-α水平,均显著低于对照组,并且差异均有统计学意义(t=-4.957、P<0.001, t=-6.545、P<0.001,t=-2.638、P=0.012)。进一步固定处理措施因素进行分析的结果显示,研究组、对照组患儿血浆IL-6、IL-10、TNF-α水平均呈进行性下降趋势,组内不同时间血浆IL-6、IL-10、TNF-α水平两两比较,除研究组患儿d3与d5血浆TNF-α水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),其余指标比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。②研究组患儿血浆乳酸浓度达标时间、尿量达标时间、CBP治疗时间、机械通气时间、PICU住院时间分别为(4.7±1.2)d、(4.3±1.5)d、(3.4±1.2)d、(7.1±1.7)d、(10.1±2.4)d,均显著短于对照组的(6.3±1.4)d、(5.4±1.3)d、(4.3±1.1)d、(8.4±1.8)d、(12.8±2.5)d,2组分别比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=3.648、2.192、2.397、2.173、3.294,P=0.001、0.035、0.022、0.037、0.002)。

结论

SS患儿接受EGDT方案后,对其中乳酸清除率<10%者早期进行CBP治疗,可快速降低患儿炎症反应强度,控制病情,缩短病程。由于本研究纳入样本量相对较小,SS患儿接受EGDT方案后,乳酸清除率对SS患儿进一步采取CBP治疗的时机选择指导作用,仍需多中心、大样本、随机对照试验进一步证实。

Objective

To explore guiding effect of lactic acid clearance rate detection of children with septic shock (SS) after receiving early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) on timing selection of further receiving continuous blood purification (CBP).

Methods

From January 2017 to December 2019, a total of 36 children with SS admitted to pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region were selected as research subjects, with lactic acid clearance rate<10% after receiving EGDT and meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study. The children with SS were randomly divided into study group (n=21) and control group (n=15) by envelope method. They were treated with early CBP, or first treated with cluster therapy, and then treated with CBP if their organ functions showed progressive deterioration, respectively. General clinical data, plasma levels of interleukin (IL)-6, 10 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α on admission (d0), 3 days after admission (d3), and 5 days after admission (d5), and duration of plasma lactic acid concentration up to standard level, duration of urine volume up to standard level, CBP treatment time, mechanical ventilation time, and hospital stay in PICU of two groups were collected. ANOVA of repeated measurement data and independent-samples t test were used for statistical comparisons. There were no statistical differences between two groups in general clinical data, such as composition ratios of gender, age and primary infection locations, plasma lactic acid concentration before treatment, and pediatric critical illness score (PCIS) (P>0.05). The procedure followed in this study conformed to the standards of medical ethics in Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and has been approved by this ethics committee [approval No. (2017-1)4-16]. All guardians of children have signed informed consent of clinical research.

Results

①ANOVA of repeated measurement data results of plasma IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α levels on d0, d3 and d3 showed that as for plasma levels of IL-6 and IL-10, the interaction between different treatment measures and time factors was statistically significant (Ftreatment×time=14.937, P<0.001; Ftreatment×time=5.314, P<0.001), while as for plasma level of TNF-α, the interaction between different treatment measures and time factors was not statistically significant (Ftreatment×time=2.918, P=0.092). Results of further analysis by fixing time factor showed that plasma levels of IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α on d3 in study group were significantly lower than those in control group, and all differences were statistically significant (t=-4.957, P<0.001; t=-6.545, P<0.001; t=-2.638, P=0.012). Results of further analysis by fixing factor of treatment measures showed that plasma levels of IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α in study group and control group showed a progressive decrease trend, and there were statistical differences in further comparisons between different times within each group (P<0.05) except for the comparison of d3 and d5 plasma levels of TNF-α in study group. ②Duration of plasma lactic acid concentration up to standard level, duration of urine volume up to standard level, CBP treatment time, mechanical ventilation time, and hospital stay in PICU of children in study group were (4.7±1.2) d, (4.3±1.5) d, (3.4±1.2) d, (7.1±1.7) d, (10.1±2.4) d, respectively, which were significantly shorter than those in control group (6.3±1.4) d, (5.4±1.3) d, (4.3±1.1) d, (8.4±1.8) d, (12.8±2.5) d, and all differences were statistically significant (t=3.648, 2.192, 2.397, 2.173, 3.294, P=0.001, 0.035, 0.022, 0.037, 0.002).

Conclusions

Early CBP treatment for SS children with lactic acid clearance rate<10% after receiving EGDT can rapidly reduce intensity of inflammatory response, control the disease, and shorten course of disease. Due to relatively small sample size included in this study, guiding effect of lactic acid clearance rate after receiving EGDT on timing selection of CBP for children with SS still needs to be further confirmed by multi-center, large-sample, randomized controlled trials.

表1 2组脓毒性休克患儿临床资料比较
表2 2组脓毒性休克患儿不同时间炎症指标比较(pg/mL,±s)
表3 2组脓毒性休克患儿预后相关指标比较(d,±s)
[1]
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3)[J]. JAMA, 2016, 315(8): 801-810. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
[2]
Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008[J]. Crit Care Med, 2008, 36(1): 296-327. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-007-0934-2.
[3]
李雷雷,龚海蓉,王莹,等. 严重脓毒症患儿连续血液净化治疗多中心前瞻性研究[J]. 中华儿科杂志,2014, 52(6): 438-443. DOI: 10.3760/cmaj.issn.0578-1310.2014.06.009.
[4]
Zarbock A, Kellum JA, Schmidt C, et al. Effect of early vs delayed initiation of renal replacement therapy on mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: the ELAIN randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2016, 315(20): 2190-2199. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.5828.
[5]
Gaudry S, Hajage D, Schortgen F, et al. Initiation strategies for renal replacement therapy in the intensive care unit[J]. N Engl J Med, 2016, 375(2): 122-133. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603017.
[6]
Gutierrez G, Wulf ME. Lactic acidosis in sepsis: another commentary[J]. Crit Care Med, 2005, 33(10): 2420-2422. DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000183003.65144.c7.
[7]
Martin J, Blobner M, Busch R, et al. Point-of-care testing on admission to the intensive care unit: lactate and glucose independently predict mortality[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2013, 51(2): 405-412. DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0258.
[8]
江乐,应利君,吕铁. 乳酸清除率对感染性创面导致脓毒性休克患者疗效与生存状况的评估价值[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志,2017, 27(9): 1959-1962. DOI: 10.11816/cn.ni.2017-163248.
[9]
袁文浩,曾凌空,蔡保欢,等. 动脉血乳酸对于新生儿休克严重程度和预后判断的价值[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志,2018, 20(1): 17-20. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2018.01.004.
[10]
中华医学会儿科学分会急救学组,中华医学会急诊医学分会儿科学组,中国医师协会儿童重症医师分会. 儿童脓毒性休克(感染性休克)诊治专家共识(2015版)[J]. 中华儿科杂志,2015, 53(8): 576-580. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4912.2015.11.001.
[11]
Levy MM, Evans LE, Rhodes A. The surviving sepsis campaign bundle: 2018 update[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2018, 44(6): 925-928. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5085-0.
[12]
Weiss SL, Peters MJ, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines for the management of sepsis shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction in children[J]. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2020, 21(2): e52-e106. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002198.
[13]
van der Poll T, van de Veerdonk FL, Scicluna BP, et al. The immunopathology of sepsis and potential therapeutic targets[J]. Nat Rev Immunol, 2017, 17(7): 407-420. DOI: 10.1038/nri.2017.36.
[14]
Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2017, 43(3): 304-377. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6.
[15]
Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, et al. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for sepcic shock[J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(14): 1301-1311. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500896.
[16]
PRISM Investgators, Rowan KM, Angus DC, et al. Early, goal-directed therapy for septic shock: a patient-level Meta-analysis[J]. N Engl J Med, 2017, 376(23): 2223-2234. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1701380.
[17]
尚秀玲,刘大为,王小亭,等. 感染性休克患者早期目标导向治疗后动脉血乳酸清除率与预后及心肌损伤的关系[J]. 中华内科杂志,2018, 57(5): 345-350. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2018.05.008.
[18]
Englert JA, Rogers AJ. Metabolism, metabolomics, and nutritional support of patients with sepsis[J]. Clin Chest Med, 2016, 37(2): 321-331. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccm.2016.01.011.
[19]
Jiwaji Z, Brady S, McIntyre LA, et al. Emergency department management of early sepsis: a national survey of emergency medicine and intensive care consultants[J]. Emerg Mad J, 2014, 31(12): 1000-1005. DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202883.
[20]
Arnold RC, Shapiro NI, Jones AE, et al. Muhicenter study of early lactate clearance as a determinant of survival in patients with presumed sepsis[J]. Shock, 2009, 32(1): 35-39. DOI: 10.1097/shk.0b013e3181971d47
[21]
Vanni S, Viviani G, Baioni M,et al. Prognostic value of plasma lactate levels among patients with acute pulmonary embolism: the thromboembolism lactate outcome study[J]. Ann Emerg Med, 2013, 61(3): 330-338. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.10.022
[22]
刘晓原,裴源源,朱继红. 脓毒性休克致急性肾损伤患者的危险因素分析[J/CD]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 11(6): 366-371. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2018.06.002.
[23]
谢友军,莫武桂,韦跃,等. 早期连续血液净化治疗对儿童脓毒性休克预后的影响:前瞻性随机对照研究[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志,2020, 22(6): 573-577. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2002128.
[24]
Kogelmann K, Jarczak D, Scheller M, et al. Hemoadsorption by CytoSorb in septic patients: a case series[J]. Crit Care, 2017, 21(1): 74. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-017-1662-9.
[25]
孟婷,周巧玲. 感染性休克的血液净化治疗[J]. 临床内科杂志,2015, 32(6): 374-376. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9057.2015.06.004.
[26]
Alobaidi R, Basu RK, Goldstein SL, et al. Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury[J]. Semin Nephrol, 2015, 35(1): 2-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2015.01.002.
[27]
Barbar SD, Clere-Jehl R, Bourredjem A, et al. Timing of renal-replacement therapy in patients with acute kidney injury and sepsis[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 379(15): 1431-1442. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803213.
[28]
Pool R, Gomez H, Kellum JA. Mechanisms of organ dysfunction in sepsis[J]. Crit Care Clin, 2018, 34(1): 63-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccc.2017.08.003.
[29]
Russell JA, Rush B, Boyd J. Pathophysiology of septic shock[J]. Crit Care Clin, 2018, 34(1): 43-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccc.2017.08.005.
[30]
Gotts JE, Matthay MA. Sepsis: pathophysiology and clinical management[J]. BMJ, 2016, 353: i1585. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i1585.
[1] 陶宏宇, 叶菁菁, 俞劲, 杨秀珍, 钱晶晶, 徐彬, 徐玮泽, 舒强. 右心声学造影在儿童右向左分流相关疾病中的评估价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 959-965.
[2] 张霞, 张瑞, 郑志波, 张勤. 紫草素调控乳酸化修饰和线粒体功能改善脓毒症心肌病小鼠的预后[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 275-284.
[3] 刘琴, 刘瀚旻, 谢亮. 基质金属蛋白酶在儿童哮喘发生机制中作用的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 564-568.
[4] 向韵, 卢游, 杨凡. 全氟及多氟烷基化合物暴露与儿童肥胖症相关性研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 569-574.
[5] 张梦思, 麻艺群, 蒙礼娟, 朱辉, 付晋凤. 压力手套与指蹼加压带及泡沫型硅凝胶贴膜联合应用于儿童瘢痕性并指术后的效果观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(04): 329-334.
[6] 刘冉佳, 崔向丽, 周效竹, 曲伟, 朱志军. 儿童肝移植受者健康相关生存质量评价的荟萃分析[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 302-309.
[7] 丁荷蓓, 王珣, 陈为国. 七氟烷吸入麻醉与异丙酚静脉麻醉在儿童腹股沟斜疝手术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-574.
[8] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中华医学会外科学分会外科手术学学组, 中华医学会外科学分会移植学组, 华南劈离式肝移植联盟. 劈离式供肝儿童肝移植中国临床操作指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 593-601.
[9] 刘军, 丘文静, 孙方昊, 李松盈, 易述红, 傅斌生, 杨扬, 罗慧. 在体与离体劈离式肝移植在儿童肝移植中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 688-693.
[10] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
[11] 杨卫东, 周威, 向洪涛. 慢性萎缩性胃炎患者幽门螺杆菌感染与炎性细胞因子及病理特征的关系[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 459-464.
[12] 董晟, 郎胜坤, 葛新, 孙少君, 薛明宇. 反向休克指数乘以格拉斯哥昏迷评分对老年严重创伤患者发生急性创伤性凝血功能障碍的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 541-547.
[13] 詹维强, 李梦蝶, 涂玉玲, 郭艳, 芦乙滨, 史新格, 许明. 早期CRRT联合VA-ECMO治疗难治性心源性休克的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 260-268.
[14] 陈晓胜, 何佳, 刘方, 吴蕊, 杨海涛, 樊晓寒. 直立倾斜试验诱发31 秒心脏停搏的植入心脏起搏器儿童一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 488-494.
[15] 曹亚丽, 高雨萌, 张英谦, 李博, 杜军保, 金红芳. 儿童坐位不耐受的临床进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 510-515.
阅读次数
全文


摘要