切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (04) : 444 -450. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2020.04.011

所属专题: 文献

论著

输卵管通液术联合溴隐亭治疗高催乳素血症所致不孕症合并输卵管阻塞疗效及其对患者血清促黄体激素、抗顶体蛋白酶抗体的影响
高迎春1,(), 潘长清1, 张耀1   
  1. 1. 绵阳市中心医院妇产科,四川 621000
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-18 修回日期:2020-07-15 出版日期:2020-08-01
  • 通信作者: 高迎春

Therapeutic effect of hydrotubation combined with bromocriptine in treatment of infertility patients caused by hyperprolactinemia complicated with tubal obstruction and its effect on serum luteinizing hormone and anti-acrosin antibody

Yingchun Gao1,(), Changqing Pan1, Yao Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang 621000, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2019-11-18 Revised:2020-07-15 Published:2020-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Yingchun Gao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Gao Yingchun, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Science and Technology Project of Health and Family Planning Commission of Sichuan Province(18PJ072)
引用本文:

高迎春, 潘长清, 张耀. 输卵管通液术联合溴隐亭治疗高催乳素血症所致不孕症合并输卵管阻塞疗效及其对患者血清促黄体激素、抗顶体蛋白酶抗体的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(04): 444-450.

Yingchun Gao, Changqing Pan, Yao Zhang. Therapeutic effect of hydrotubation combined with bromocriptine in treatment of infertility patients caused by hyperprolactinemia complicated with tubal obstruction and its effect on serum luteinizing hormone and anti-acrosin antibody[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2020, 16(04): 444-450.

目的

探讨输卵管通液术联合溴隐亭对高催乳素血症(HPRL)所致不孕症合并输卵管阻塞患者的临床治疗效果,以及对患者血清促黄体激素(LH)、抗顶体蛋白酶抗体(AcrAb)水平的影响。

方法

选择2017年6月至2018年6月,绵阳市中心医院收治的HPRL所致不孕症合并输卵管阻塞患者102例为研究对象。采用随机数字表法,将其分为观察组(n=51)和对照组(n=51)。对观察组患者采取输卵管通液术联合溴隐亭治疗,而对照组患者仅采取输卵管通液术治疗。分别采用化学发光法、酶联免疫吸附试验,检测患者血清LH、AcrAb水平。治疗结束后,对2组患者随访1年,观察其妊娠情况。2组患者采取输卵管通液术治疗的持续时间、术中出血量和术后下床活动时间,血清LH、AcrAb水平,以及治疗结束至妊娠的时间比较,采用成组t检验。2组患者输卵管阻塞治疗的总有效率、不良反应率、术后妊娠率比较,采用χ2检验。本研究经过绵阳市中心医院伦理委员会批准(审批文号:S-2018-022),与所有患者签署临床研究知情同意书。2组患者年龄、不孕年限等一般临床资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结果

①2组患者采取输卵管通液术治疗的持续时间、术中出血量和术后下床活动时间分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。②观察组输卵管阻塞治疗的总有效率为82.3%(42/51),显著高于对照组的64.7%(33/51),并且差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.080、P=0.043)。③组间比较:治疗后,观察组患者血清LH水平为(5.59±0.58) IU/L,显著高于对照组的(5.36±0.57) IU/L,血清AcrAb水平为(12.2±2.5) U/L,显著低于对照组的(14.2±2.9) U/L,并且差异均有统计学意义(t=2.002、P=0.048,t=3.743、P<0.001)。组内比较:治疗后,2组患者血清LH水平,均显著高于治疗前,而血清AcrAb水平,则均显著低于治疗前,并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。④治疗结束后的1年随访期内,观察组妊娠率为70.6%(36/51),显著高于对照组的51.0%(26/51),治疗结束至妊娠的时间为(4.0±1.0)个月,显著短于对照组的(5.3±1.1)个月,2组分别比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=4.110、P=0.043,t=6.053、P<0.001)。⑤2组治疗相关不良反应率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

输卵管通液术联合溴隐亭治疗HPRL所致不孕症合并输卵管阻塞患者的疗效较好,患者妊娠率增高,可有效改善患者血清LH、AcrAb水平,不增加不良反应率。由于本研究纳入样本量相对较小,该方案治疗疗效仍有待大样本、多中心、随机对照试验进一步研究、证实。

Objective

To explore the clinical effect of hydrotubation combined with bromocriptine in treatment of infertility patients caused by hyperprolactinemia (HPRL) and complicated with tubal obstruction, and its effect on serum luteinizing hormone (LH) and anti-acrosin antibody (AcrAb).

Methods

A total of 102 patients with infertility caused by HPRL and complicated with tubal obstruction in Mianyang Central Hospital from June 2017 to June 2018 were selected as research subjects. They were randomly divided into observation group (n=51) and control group (n=51) by random digits table method. Patients in observation group were treated with hydrotubation combined with bromocriptine. And patients in control group were treated with hydrotubation. The levels of serum LH and AcrAb were detected by chemiluminescence method and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. After treatment, the two groups were followed up for 1 year to observe their pregnancy situation. Duration of hydrotubation, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative ambulation time, levels of serum LH and AcrAb, and the time from the end of treatment to pregnancy between two groups were compared by independent-samples t test. Total effective rates of tubal obstruction, adverse reaction and pregnancy between two groups were compared by chi-square test. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Mianyang Central Hospital (Approval No. S-2018-022), and clinical research informed consent was signed with each patient. There were no significant differences in age, duration of infertility and other general clinical data between two groups (P>0.05).

Results

①There were no significant differences in duration of hydrotubation, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative ambulation time between two groups (P>0.05). ②The total effective rate of tubal obstruction in observation group was 82.3% (42/51), which was significantly higher than that of control group 64.7% (33/51), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.080, P=0.043). ③Comparisons between two groups: after treatment, the serum LH level of observation group was (5.59±0.58) IU/L, which was significantly higher than those of control group (5.36±0.57) IU/L, and the serum AcrAb levels were (12.2±2.5) U/L, which was significantly lower than those of control group (14.2±2.9) U/L, and both the differences were statistically significant (t=2.002, P=0.048; t=3.743, P<0.001). Intra-group comparisons: after treatment, serum LH levels in two groups were significantly higher than those before treatment within group, while serum AcrAb levels were significantly lower than those before treatment within group, and all the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). ④During 1-year follow-up after treatment, the pregnancy rate in observation group was 70.6% (36/51), which was significantly higher than that in control group 51.0% (26/51), the time from the end of treatment to pregnancy was (4.0±1.0) months, which was significantly shorter than that of control group (5.3±1.1) months, and both the differences were statistically significant (χ2=4.110, P=0.043; t=6.053, P<0.001). ⑤There was no significant difference in rate of adverse reaction related with treatment between two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

Hydrotubation combined with bromocriptine in treatment of patients with infertility caused by HPRL complicated with tubal obstruction has a good effect, and the pregnancy rate is increased. It can effectively improve serum levels of LH and AcrAb, but does not increase the rate of adverse reactions. Due to the relatively small sample size included in this study, the therapeutic effect of this regimen remains to be further confirmed by large-sample size, multi-center and randomized controlled trials.

表1 2组HPRL所致不孕症合并输卵管阻塞患者输卵管通液术治疗的相关指标比较(±s)
表2 2组HPRL所致不孕症合并输卵管阻塞患者输卵管阻塞治疗的总有效率比较[例数(%)]
表3 2组HPRL所致不孕症合并输卵管阻塞患者治疗前、后血清LH与AcrAb水平的组内及组间比较(±s)
表4 治疗结束后,2组HPRL所致不孕症合并输卵管阻塞患者的妊娠率与治疗结束至妊娠的时间比较
[1]
朱海燕,张海荣,沈祖楠,等. 900例不孕不育患者染色体核型分析[J]. 中华医学遗传学杂志,2015, 32(4): 583-584. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1003-9406.2015.04.031.
[2]
Chua SJ, Danhof NA, Mochtar MH, et al. Age-related natural fertility outcomes in women over 35 years: a systematic review and individual participant data Meta-analysis [J]. Hum Reprod, 2020: deaa129 [2020-07-23]. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa129. [published online ahead of print July 22, 2020].

URL    
[3]
Zauner G, Girardi G. Potential causes of male and female infertility in Qatar [J]. J Reprod Immunol, 2020, 141: 103137 [2020-06-30]. DOI: 10.1016/j.jri.2020.103173. [published online ahead of print June 28, 2020].

URL    
[4]
林姬,林立恒. 输卵管堵塞导致的不孕症患者行输卵管通液术的疗效观察[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2016, 31(21): 4521-4522. DOI: 10.7620/zgfybj.j.issn.1001-4411.2016.21.74.
[5]
杨智红,陈光元. 溴隐亭治疗高催乳素血症致不孕不育的疗效及对性激素水平的影响[J]. 海南医学,2018, 29(4): 554-555. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2018.04.035.
[6]
Choi J, Smitz J. Luteinizing hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin: origins of difference [J]. Mol Cell Endocrinol, 2014, 383(1-2): 203-213. DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2013.12.009.
[7]
靳镭,徐蓓. 黄体生成素在卵泡发育中的作用及早卵泡期黄体生成素预处理[J]. 生殖医学杂志,2014, 23(12): 940-943. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2014.12.003.
[8]
吴晓红. 血清顶体蛋白酶抗体与精子蛋白17抗体在不孕不育症患者中的诊断价值[J]. 检验医学与临床,2016, 13(22): 3213-3214. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2016.22.032.
[9]
谢幸,苟文丽. 妇产科学[M]. 8版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2013: 369.
[10]
罗福东,潘婉仪,周强. 化学发光免疫分析法检测黄体生成素、维生素B12和癌胚抗原的性能评价[J]. 实验与检验医学,2006, 24(5): 431-432. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1129.2006.05.023.
[11]
Howe SE, Grider SL, Lynch DM, et al. Antisperm antibody binding to human acrosin: a study of patients with unexplained infertility [J]. Fertil Steril, 1991, 55(6): 1176-1182. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod44.6.1189.
[12]
Bhat A, Byatt N. Infertility and perinatal loss: when the bough breaks [J]. Curr Psychiat Rep, 2016, 18(3): 31. DOI: 10.1007/s11920-016-0663-8.
[13]
Luk BH, Loke AY. The impact of infertility on the psychological well-being, marital relationships, sexual relationships, and quality of life of couples: a systematic review [J]. J Sex Marital Ther, 2015, 41(6) : 610-625. DOI: 10.1080/0092623X.2014.958789.
[14]
钱莹. 156对不孕不育症患者临床观察[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2016, 31(14): 2917-2918. DOI: 10.7620/zgfybj.j.issn.1001-4411.2016.14.54.
[15]
Langley FA. The fallopian tube: structure, function, pathology and management [J]. J Clin Pathol, 1970, 23(4): 376-376. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.23.4.376-a.
[16]
包成,柯荔宁. 输卵管结构病变引发不孕的诊疗研究进展[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志,2014, 32(1): 115-116. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2014.01.029.
[17]
Goldman MB, Thornton KL, Ryley D, et al. A randomized clinical trial to determine optimal infertility treatment in older couples: the Forty and Over Treatment Trial (FORT-T) [J]. Fertil Steril, 2014, 101(6): 1574-1581.e1-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.012.
[18]
陶雪峰,侯俊霞,崔世红. 宫腔镜下输卵管插管通液术在输卵管阻塞性不孕患者治疗中的优势[J]. 中国临床研究,2016, 29(1): 92-94. DOI: 10.13429/j.cnki.cjcr.2016.01.028.
[19]
李文香,安新涛,焦守凤,等. 宫腔镜下输卵管插管通液治疗不孕不育的临床疗效[J]. 中国性科学,2016, 25(9): 110-112. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1993.2016.09.037.
[20]
Krysiak R, Okrzesik J, Okopien B. The effect of short-term metformin treatment on plasma prolactin levels in bromocriptine-treated patients with hyperprolactinaemia and impaired glucose tolerance: a pilot study [J]. Endocrine, 2015, 49(1): 242-249. DOI: 10.1007/s12020-014-0428-2.
[21]
Mabrouk SK, Abdellatif N. Clinical determination of bromocriptine 2.5 mg (parlodel®) induced ovulation in atlas shepherd Bitch [J]. J Vet Sci Technol, 2018, 9(2): 517. DOI: 10.4172/2157-7579.1000517.
[22]
王慧玉,陈丽红. 溴隐亭不同给药时机对高泌乳素血症妇女促性腺激素诱导排卵的影响[J]. 中国临床药理学杂志,2015, 31(1): 3-4. DOI: 10.13699/j.cnki.1001-6821.2015.01.001.
[23]
Beltrame AL, Serafini P, Motta EL, et al. The effects of bromocriptine on VEGF, kidney function and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in in vitro fertilization patients: a pilot study [J]. Gynecol Endocrinol, 2013, 29(3): 201-204. DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2012.736554.
[24]
Liu X, Xie F, Zamah AM, et al. Multiple pathways mediate luteinizing hormone regulation of cGMP signaling in the mouse ovarian follicle [J]. Biol Reprod, 2014, 91(1): 9. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.113.116814.
[25]
李曼,温冬梅,王伟佳,等. AMH、FSH、LH、E2联合检测在不孕症患者卵巢储备功能中的预测价值[J]. 检验医学与临床,2017, 14(12): 1729-1731. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2017.12.017.
[26]
Veaute C, Liu DY, Furlong LI, et al. Anti-human proacrosin antibody inhibits the zona pellucida (ZP)-induced acrosome reaction of ZP-bound spermatozoa [J]. Fertil Steril, 2010, 93(7): 2456-2459. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.08.040.
[27]
Feng S, Xu L, Xu C, et al. Role of acrAB in antibiotic resistance of Haemophilus parasuis serovar 4 [J]. Vet J, 2014, 202(1): 191-194. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.05.045.
[28]
张婧楠. 腹腔镜下分粘加输卵管通液术治疗输卵管阻塞性不孕的临床价值[J]. 中国卫生标准管理,2015, 5(23): 29-30. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2015.23.019
[29]
杨晋蓉,谢珊莉,张英. 腹腔镜联合输卵管术中通液治疗输卵管性不孕患者的临床观察[J]. 西部医学,2011, 23(9): 1759-1760. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3511.2011.09.056.
[30]
田普宁. 输卵管通液术对输卵管堵塞致不孕症患者妊娠率的影响[J]. 临床医学研究与实践,2016, 1(4): 61.
[31]
朱素芹,郑备红,陈晓菁,等. 经溴隐亭治疗的垂体泌乳素瘤患者行体外受精-胚胎移植的临床研究[J]. 海峡药学,2016, 28(7): 113-114. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3765.2016.07.049.
[1] 邵小丽, 林燕, 张玲玲, 韩亚琴. 超声引导下子宫肌瘤注射聚桂醇硬化术联合术后米非司酮治疗临床疗效分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 353-360.
[2] 李欣, 魏艺, 张娟, 张娟娟, 凌秀凤, 赵纯, 张媔秋. 高龄女性冻胚移植周期临床妊娠结局的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 276-283.
[3] 魏艺, 周羽西, 杨烨, 凌秀凤, 赵纯. 微小RNA对子宫内膜容受性影响的研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 266-270.
[4] 蒋冉, 邹彩艳, 桑谊荃. 宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅲ患者血清性激素水平及其与高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(06): 683-688.
[5] 魏权, 张燊, 陈慧佳, 邹姮, 胡丽娜. 女性生殖道微生物群与辅助生殖技术相关性研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 151-155.
[6] 韩雪盈, 马春燕, 程燕, 杨帆, 闵玲, 黄子星. 《美国放射学院适宜性标准:女性不孕》2020年版要点解读[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(05): 527-534.
[7] 李林双, 章汉旺. 子宫内膜异位症患者的不孕机制和助孕策略研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(03): 272-277.
[8] 游小林, 谢聪. 抗精神病药与高催乳素血症及月经紊乱[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(04): 472-475.
[9] 于鲁华, 刘琳, 潘宇, 吕晓芹, 何笑, 王力, 张晓梅. 女方年龄及血清基础卵泡刺激素水平对夫精人工授精妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(02): 186-191.
[10] 孙擎擎, 曹义娟, 顾娟, 祁玉娟, 尹倩倩. 输卵管积水所致不孕症临床治疗分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(01): 81-85.
[11] 马玲, 陈雅, 洪志丹, 周春. 卵泡输出率对不孕患者卵巢反应性及妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(06): 704-710.
[12] 胡小良, 徐宏里, 徐丽梅, 蔡月英. 生育镜应用于不孕症的耐受性研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2006, 02(04): 192-194.
[13] 周杨, 吕淑兰. 围孕期高催乳素血症的诊治与管理[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(01): 24-28.
阅读次数
全文


摘要