切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03) : 299 -308. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2020.03.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

肺表面活性物质不同给药方案治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的临床研究
王伏东1, 符明凤1, 陈敏华1, 吴明赴1,(), 宋祥芳1, 张丽1, 刘凤1, 蒋丽军1   
  1. 1. 扬州大学附属医院新生儿科,江苏 225001
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-04 修回日期:2020-05-10 出版日期:2020-06-01
  • 通信作者: 吴明赴

Clinical research of different pulmonary surfactant administration techniques on premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome

Fudong Wang1, Mingfeng Fu1, Minhua Chen1, Mingfu Wu1,(), Xiangfang Song1, Li Zhang1, Feng Liu1, Lijun Jiang1   

  1. 1. Department of Neonatology, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225001, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2019-12-04 Revised:2020-05-10 Published:2020-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Mingfu Wu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wu Mingfu, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Maternal and Child Health Research Project of Jiangsu Province(F201858); Key Medical Discipline of Yangzhou City " 13th Five-Year Plan Ke Jiao Qiang Wei" Project(ZDXK201807)
引用本文:

王伏东, 符明凤, 陈敏华, 吴明赴, 宋祥芳, 张丽, 刘凤, 蒋丽军. 肺表面活性物质不同给药方案治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的临床研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(03): 299-308.

Fudong Wang, Mingfeng Fu, Minhua Chen, Mingfu Wu, Xiangfang Song, Li Zhang, Feng Liu, Lijun Jiang. Clinical research of different pulmonary surfactant administration techniques on premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2020, 16(03): 299-308.

目的

探讨侵入性较小的肺表面活性物质给药(LISA)和气管插管-使用肺表面活性物质-拔管(INSURE)方案,治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)的疗效、安全性及其对预后的影响。

方法

选择2018年1月1日至2019年4月30日,在扬州大学附属医院接受LISA方案治疗的26例RDS早产儿为研究对象,纳入LISA组。同时,选择2016年7月1日至2017年12月31日,在同一家医院接受INSURE方案治疗的36例RDS早产儿,纳入INSURE组。采用成组t检验,对2组患儿胎龄、出生体重、生后Apgar评分等进行统计学比较。对2组患儿入院年龄、经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)时间、机械通气(MV)时间、总用氧时间、住院时间、住院费用及不同时间点吸入氧气分数(FiO2)等组间比较,采用Mann-Whitney U检验。对2组患儿动脉血pH值、动脉血氧分压(PaO2)、动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)比较,采用重复测量资料的方差分析;组内总体比较,采用单因素方差分析,进一步组内两两比较,则采用最小显著差异(LSD)法。采用Friedman秩和检验对不同时间点FiO2进行组内比较。对2组患儿性别构成比、剖宫产术分娩率、外院转入率及相关不良反应发生率与母亲产前激素使用率等比较,采用χ2检验、连续性校正χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法。本研究经病例收集医院医学伦理委员会审核批准(审批文号:2020-YKL05-003),与所有患儿监护人签署知情同意书。

结果

① 2组患儿性别构成比、分娩胎龄、出生体重、剖宫产术分娩率、双胎妊娠率、入院时年龄、生后Apgar评分、外院转入率、母亲产前激素使用率等临床资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。②2组患儿无一例死亡。LISA组患儿的中位MV时间及总用氧时间分别为0和84 h(45~180 h),均短于INSURE组的0(0~80 h)和137 h(107~235 h),并且差异均有统计学意义(Z=2.877、1.991,P=0.004、0.047)。2组患儿NCPAP时间、生后72 h内MV率、住院时间、住院费用、不同并发症发生率等比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。③2组患儿治疗前、后动脉血pH值、PaO2PaCO2水平比较结果显示,处理措施与测定时间因素间均不存在交互作用(F处理×时间=1.751、P=0.152,F处理×时间=0.338、P=0.852,F处理×时间=0.396,P=0.810)。LISA组与INSURE组患儿接受PS治疗前及治疗后1、8、24、48 h动脉血pH值、PaO2PaCO2水平分别组内整体比较,差异均有统计学意义(LISA组的动脉血pH值:F=47.318、P<0.001,PaO2F=30.370、P<0.001,PaCO2F=27.140、P<0.001;INSURE组的动脉血pH值:F=20.773、P<0.001,PaO2F=16.976、P<0.001,PaCO2F=23.016、P<0.001)。2组患儿动脉血pH值、PaO2PaCO2水平在接受PS治疗前及治疗后1、8、24、48 h这5个时间点分别组间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。④ LISA组和INSURE组患儿接受PS治疗前及治疗后0.5、1、6、12、24、48 h的FiO2分别组内整体比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=131.108、P<0.001,χ2=81.589、P<0.001);而2组患儿治疗后上述各时间点FiO2分别与治疗前比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组患儿接受PS治疗前及治疗后0.5、1、6 h的FiO2组间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);但是LISA组患儿FiO2在接受PS治疗后12、24、48 h均低于INSURE组,并且差异有统计学意义(Z=3.315、4.312、4.280,P=0.001、<0.001、<0.001)。⑤LISA组患儿接受PS治疗后无不良反应者为18例(69.2%), INSURE组为27例(75.0%),2组比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.252、P=0.615)。此外,2组患儿在PS给药过程中经皮血氧饱和度(TcSO2)<85%、心动过缓等不良反应发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

对RDS早产儿采取LISA方案治疗,可缩短MV及总用氧时间,而且不增加不良预后。

Objective

To investigate the efficacy, safety and prognosis of less invasive pulmonary surfactant administration (LISA) and intubation-surfactant-extubation (INSURE) techniques in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in premature infants.

Methods

Twenty-six premature infants with RDS who underwent LISA technique at the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University from January 1, 2018 to April 30, 2019 were included in LISA group, and 36 premature infants with RDS who underwent INSURE technique at same hospital from July 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017 were included into INSURE group. The gestational age, birth weight, and postnatal Apgar score of 2 groups were statistically compared by using independent-samples t test. The age at admission, nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) duration, mechanical ventilation (MV) duration, total oxygen consumption time, hospital stay, hospitalization costs and fraction of inspiration oxygen (FiO2) at different time points between 2 groups were statistically compared by Mann-Whitney U test. The pH value, partial pressure of oxygen in artery (PaO2), and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) between 2 groups were compared by the variance analysis of repeated measurement data; furthermore, overall comparison within groups were compared by one-way ANOVA, and least significant difference (LSD) method was used for further pairwise comparison within groups. The Friedman rank sum test was used for within-group comparisons of FiO2 at different time points. The gender composition ratio, cesarean section rate, transfe rate from other hospitals, maternal prenatal hormone use rate and incidence of related adverse reactions between 2 groups were compared by chi-square test, continuity correction of chi-square test or Fisher′s exact test. The procedures followed in this study was in accordance with the ethical standards established by the Human Beings Test Committee of Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, and was approved by the committee (Approval No. 2020-YKL05-003). Informed consent was obtained from each participate′s parents.

Results

①There were no statistically significant differences in the gender composition ratio, gestational age, birth weight, modes of delivery, pregnancy rate of twins, age at admission, Apgar score after birth, transfer rate from other hospitals and maternal prenatal hormone use rate between 2 groups (P>0.05). ②No death occurred in 2 groups of RDS preterm infants. The median duration of MV (0) and total oxygen consumption time [84 h (45-180 h)] were significantly shorter than those of INSURE group [0 h (0-80 h), 137 h (107-235 h)], there were significantly statistical differences (Z=2.877, 1.991; P=0.004, 0.047). There were no differences between 2 groups in the aspects of NCPAP duration, MV rate within 72 h after birth, hospital stay, costs and incidence of different complications (P>0.05). ③The comparison results of pH value, PaO2 and PaCO2 levels before and after the treatment between 2 groups showed that there were no interactions between treatment measures and determination time factors (Ftreatment × time = 1.751, P=0.152, Ftreatment × time =0.338, P=0.852, Ftreatment × time=0.396, P=0.810). The pH value, PaO2 and PaCO2 levels of children in LISA group before and at 1, 8, 24, 48 h after treatment were compared with each other in the group as a whole, and the differences were statistically significant (pH value: F=47.318, P<0.001, PaO2: F=30.37, P<0.001, PaCO2: F=27.140, P<0.001). The pH value, PaO2 and PaCO2 levels of children in INSURE group before and at 1, 8, 24, 48 h after treatment were compared with each other in the group as a whole, and the differences were statistically significant (pH value: F=20.773, P<0.001, PaO2: F=16.976, P<0.001, PaCO2: F=23.016, P<0.001). The pH value, PaO2 and PaCO2 levels of 2 groups were compared before PS treatment and at 1, 8, 24, 48 h after PS treatment respectively, and there were no statistically significant differences (P>0.05). ④ There were significant differences in FiO2 at 0.5, 1, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after PS treatment in 2 groups (LISA group: χ2 = 131.108, P<0.001; INSURE group: χ2=81.589, P<0.001). The FiO2 at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after treatment were significantly different from those before treatment (P<0.05). Compared with pre-treatment, there were significant differences in FiO2 at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after treatment in 2 groups, respectively (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between 2 groups of FiO2 before PS treatment and 0.5, 1 and 6 h after PS treatment (P>0.05). The FiO2 of LISA group was lower than that in INSURE group at 12, 24 and 48 h after PS treatment, and the difference were statistically significant (Z=3.315, 4.312, 4.280, P=0.001, <0.001, <0.001). ⑤ There were 18 cases (69.2%) without adverse reactions after treatment in LISA group, and 27 cases (75.0%) in INSURE group. There was no statistically significant difference between 2 groups (χ2=0.252, P=0.615). In addition, there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions such as transcutaneous oxygen saturation(TcSO2)<85% and bradycardia between 2 groups during PS administration (P>0.05).

Conclusions

LISA technique can shorten MV duration and total oxygen consumption time in premature infants with RDS, and does not increase the adverse prognosis.

表1 2组RDS早产儿一般临床资料比较
表2 2组RDS早产儿治疗时间、并发症发生情况及出院转归等比较
表3 2组RDS早产儿PS治疗前、后不同时间点血气分析指标组间及组内比较(±s)
表4 2组RDS早产儿PS治疗前、后不同时间点FiO2组内及组间比较[M(P25P75)]
表5 2组RDS早产儿接受PS治疗后不良反应发生率比较[例数(%)]
[1]
王华,母得志. 新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的通气策略 [J/CD] . 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2017,13(1): 10-13. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2017.01.002.
[2]
邱其周,程贵辉,陈虹余,等.不同通气模式对新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征患儿临床康复的影响 [J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2016,12(2): 206-210. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2016.02.014.
[3]
中国城市多中心早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征调查协作组. 住院分娩早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征:中国13家医院的回顾性调查 [J]. 中华围产医学杂志,2016,19(10): 743-754. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-9408.2016.10.006.
[4]
Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, et al. European consensus guidelines on the management of respiratory distress syndrome - 2016 update [J]. Neonatology, 2017, 111(2): 107-125. DOI: 10.1159/000448985.
[5]
Göpel W, Kribs A, Ziegler A, et al. Avoidance of mechanical ventilation by surfactant treatment of spontaneously breathing preterm infants (AMV): an open-label, randomised, controlled trial [J]. Lancet, 2011, 378(9803): 1627-1634. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60986-0.
[6]
Kribs A, Roll C, Göpel W, et al. Nonintubated surfactant application vs conventional therapy in extremely preterm infants: a randomized clinical trial [J]. JAMA Pediatr, 2015, 169(8): 723-730. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0504.
[7]
Klotz D, Porcaro U, Fleck T, et al. European perspective on less invasive surfactant administration-a survey [J]. Eur J Pediatr, 2017, 176(2): 147-154. DOI: 10.1007/s00431-016-2812-9.
[8]
Kurepa D, Perveen S, Lipener Y, et al. The use of less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) in the United States with review of the literature [J]. J Perinatol, 2019, 39(3): 426-432. DOI: 10.1038/s41372-018-0302-9.
[9]
Bao Y, Zhang G, Wu M, et al. A pilot study of less invasive surfactant administration in very preterm infants in a Chinese tertiary center [J]. BMC Pediatr, 2015, 15: 21. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-015-0342-7.
[10]
卢维城,魏海波,陈有平. 经胃管微创注入肺表面活性物质在新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征中的应用 [J]. 广东医学,2016,37(21): 3233-3235. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9448.2016.21.025.
[11]
刘艳红,赵先锋,梁桂娟,等. LISA技术治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征临床观察 [J]. 儿科药学杂志,2018,24(5): 21-24. DOI: 10.13407/j.cnki.jpp.1672-108X.2018.05.007.
[12]
荣箫,周伟,赵小朋,等. 微创肺表面活性物质治疗在新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征中的疗效与安全性 [J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志,2018,33(14): 1071-1074. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-428X.2018.14.007.
[13]
邵肖梅,叶鸿瑁,丘小汕.实用新生儿学[M]. 5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2019.
[14]
中国医师协会新生儿科医师分会,孔祥永,封志纯,等. 早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征早期防治专家共识 [J].发育医学电子杂志,2017,5(3): 129-131. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5340.2017.03.002.
[15]
孔令凯,孔祥永,李丽华,等. 双水平正压通气和经鼻持续气道正压通气在早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征INSURE治疗方式中应用的比较 [J/CD] . 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2013,9(5): 579-585. DOI: 10.3969/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2013.05.002.
[16]
Dani C, Bertini G, Pezzati M, et al. Early extubation and nasal continuous positive airway pressure after surfactant treatment for respiratory distress syndrome among preterm infants <30 weeks′ gestation [J]. Pediatrics, 2004, 113(6): e560-563. DOI: 10.1542/peds.113.6.e560.
[17]
徐芬,罗俊,黎红平,等. LISA技术治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征有效性的系统评价 [J]. 临床儿科杂志,2017,35(3): 223-228. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3606.2017.03.017.
[18]
O′Donnell CP, Kamlin CO, Davis PG, et al. Endotracheal intubation attempts during neonatal resuscitation: success rates, duration, and adverse effects [J]. Pediatrics, 2006, 117(1): e16-21. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-0901.
[19]
Kribs A, Roll C, Göpel W, et al. Nonintubated surfactant application vs conventional therapy in extremely preterm infants: a randomized clinical trial [J]. JAMA Pediatr, 2015, 169(8): 723-730. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.050.
[20]
Vento M, Bohlin K, Herting E, et al. Surfactant administration via thin catheter: a practical guide [J]. Neonatology, 2019, 116(3): 211-226. DOI: 10.1159/000502610.
[21]
Lista G, La Verde A, Castoldi F. LISA: surfactant administration in spontaneous breathing. Which evidence from the literature? [J]. Acta Biomed, 2015, 86 (Suppl 1): 24-26.
[22]
朱佳骏. LISA/MIST技术与早产儿呼吸系统疾病的预后 [J]. 中国实用儿科杂志,2018,33(5): 338-341. DOI: 10.19538/j.ek2018050605.
[23]
Lista G, Bresesti I, Fabbri L. Is less invasive surfactant administration necessary or " only" helpful or just a fashion? [J]. Am J Perinatol, 2018, 35(6): 530-533. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1637759.
[24]
Jeffreys E, Hunt K, Dassios T, et al. UK survey of less invasive surfactant administration [J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2019, 104(5): F567. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316466.
[25]
Bohlin K, Bouhafs RK, Jarstrand C, et al. Spontaneous breathing or mechanical ventilation alters lung compliance and tissue association of exogenous surfactant in preterm newborn rabbits [J]. Pediatr Res, 2005, 57(5 Pt 1): 624-630. DOI: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000156502.84909.BC.
[26]
Buyuktiryaki M, Alarcon-Martinez T, Simsek GK, et al. Five-year single center experience on surfactant treatment in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: LISA vs INSURE [J]. Early Hum Dev, 2019, 135: 32-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2019.06.004.
[27]
Halim A, Shirazi H, Riaz S,et al. Less invasive surfactant administration in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome [J]. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 2019, 29(3): 226-330. DOI: 10.29271/jcpsp.2019.03.226.
[28]
Christine SM, Chamberlain RS, Sun S. Less invasive surfactant administration reduces the need for mechanical ventilation in preterm infants: a Meta-analysis [J]. Glob Pediatr Health, 2017, 4: 2333794X17696683. DOI: 10.1177/2333794X17696683.
[29]
Aldana-Aguirre JC, Pinto M, Featherstone RM, et al. Less invasive surfactant administration versus intubation for surfactant delivery in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and Meta-analysis [J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2017, 102(1): F17-F23. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-310299.
[30]
游芳,任雪云,牛峰海,等.LISA技术与INSURE技术在早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征应用疗效的比较 [J].中华新生儿科杂志,2019,34(4): 254-258.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2096-2932.2019.04.003.
[31]
Klebermass-Schrehof K, Wald M, Schwindt J, et al. Less invasive surfactant administration in extremely preterm infants: impact on mortality and morbidity [J]. Neonatology, 2013, 103(4): 252-258. DOI: 10.1159/000346521.
[32]
Baraldi E, Filippone M. Chronic lung disease after premature birth [J]. N Engl J Med, 2007, 357(19): 1946-1955. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra067279.
[33]
Jobe AH. The new bronchopulmonary dysplasia [J]. Curr Opin Pediatr, 2011, 23(2): 167-172. DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e3283423e6b.
[34]
de Kort EH, Hanff LM, Roofthooft D, et al. Insufficient sedation and severe side effects after fast administration of remifentanil during INSURE in preterm newborns [J]. Neonatology, 2017, 111(2): 172-176. DOI: 10.1159/000450536.
[1] 戴瑞芝, 霍美池, 李峥. 无创高频振荡通气对早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的临床疗效[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(05): 372-378.
[2] 李文琳, 羊玲, 邢凯慧, 陈彩华, 钟丽花, 张娅琴, 张薇. 脐动脉血血气分析联合振幅整合脑电图对新生儿窒息脑损伤的早期诊断价值分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 550-558.
[3] 胡诤贇, 史建伟, 申建伟, 王冰, 蒋春苗, 刘冲. 基于机器学习鉴定早产儿支气管肺发育不良的关键基因[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 446-454.
[4] 李敏, 熊菲. 母乳成分及其影响因素的研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 267-272.
[5] 周美岑, 王华, 母得志. 早产儿疫苗预防接种及时性[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 261-266.
[6] 杨萍, 许世敏, 李亮亮, 尹向云, 锡洪敏, 马丽丽, 李向红. 早产儿支气管肺发育不良合并代谢性骨病的影响因素[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 202-211.
[7] 苏永维, 陈果. 早产儿非心脏手术的麻醉管理[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 139-144.
[8] 张霭润, 招嘉樑, 李管明, 李嘉鸿, 陈静蓉, 王兰, 庄思齐, 房晓祎. 早产儿RhE合并Rhc溶血病1例并文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 93-99.
[9] 张璐, 杨惠娟, 刘凯波. 2015—2021年北京市辅助生殖技术助孕活产及高龄孕母占比与不良妊娠结局变化趋势[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 46-53.
[10] 吕莉, 乔莉娜. 经鼻高流量氧疗治疗重症肺炎患儿的疗效[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 38-45.
[11] 袁冰, 颜凯. 人羊膜上皮干细胞治疗早产儿支气管肺发育不良的研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(06): 640-644.
[12] 伏洪玲, 刘瀚旻. 支气管肺发育不良及肺动脉高压有关信号通路研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(05): 497-505.
[13] 张璐, 杨惠娟, 刘凯波. 影响双胎消失综合征存活儿围生期结局危险因素研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(04): 400-409.
[14] 宣瑞萍, 刘笑琴, 王平, 查日田. 无创正压通气与经鼻高流量氧疗治疗AECOPD合并Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭的临床分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 346-348.
[15] 李瑞琦, 吴子健, 吴杰斌, 任佳佳, 翟敬芳. 动脉血气分析判读Excel电子表格在实习生酸碱平衡紊乱教学中的应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 737-743.
阅读次数
全文


摘要