切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版)

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (02) : 209 -215. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2024.02.012

论著

早产小于胎龄儿发生支气管肺发育不良的危险因素及预后分析
郭立珍1, 范天群2, 张欣凯1, 蒋韵红1, 金蓉3, 刘冬云3,†()   
  1. 1. 青岛大学，青岛　266000；青岛大学附属医院儿童医学中心，青岛　266000
    2. 临沂市人民医院儿科，临沂　276000
    3. 青岛大学附属医院儿童医学中心，青岛　266000
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-01 修回日期:2024-03-05 出版日期:2024-04-01
  • 通信作者: 刘冬云

Risk factors and prognosis analysis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm small for gestational age infants

Lizhen Guo1, Tianqun Fan2, Xinkai Zhang1, Yunhong Jiang1, Rong Jin3, Dongyun Liu3,†()   

  1. 1. Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province, China; Children′s Medical Center of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province, China
    2. Department of Pediatrics, Linyi People′s Hospital, Linyi 276000, Shandong Province, China
    3. Children′s Medical Center of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province, China
  • Received:2024-02-01 Revised:2024-03-05 Published:2024-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Dongyun Liu
  • Supported by:
    Medical and Health Technology Development Plan of Shandong Province(2017WSB26008)
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

郭立珍, 范天群, 张欣凯, 蒋韵红, 金蓉, 刘冬云. 早产小于胎龄儿发生支气管肺发育不良的危险因素及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 209-215.

Lizhen Guo, Tianqun Fan, Xinkai Zhang, Yunhong Jiang, Rong Jin, Dongyun Liu. Risk factors and prognosis analysis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm small for gestational age infants[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(02): 209-215.

目的

探讨早产小于胎龄(SGA)儿发生支气管肺发育不良(BPD)的影响因素及预后。

方法

选择2019年1月至2021年12月于青岛大学附属医院新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)住院治疗的92例早产(出生胎龄为24～32周)SGA儿为研究对象。采用回顾性队列研究方法，根据矫正胎龄36周时是否诊断为BPD，将其分为BPD组(n＝38)和无BPD组(n＝54)。对2组早产SGA儿临床资料、住院期内治疗情况及BPD相关并发症发生率等，采用χ2检验、独立样本t检验及Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计学比较；并采用多因素非条件logistic回归分析法，对影响早产SGA儿发生BPD的独立影响因素进行分析。本研究经本院医学伦理委员会批准(审批文号：QYFY WZLL 28257)，所有受试儿监护人对诊疗知情同意并签署临床研究知情同意书。

结果

①BPD组早产SGA儿生后1个月体重、出生身长及头围、生后1 min及5 min Apgar评分均低于、短于、小于无BPD组；有创机械通气、无创机械通气、吸氧及住院时间，以及肺表面活性剂(PS)使用率均长于、高于无BPD组，并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。②多因素非条件logistic回归分析结果显示，早产SGA儿无创机械通气时间长(OR＝1.180，95%CI: 1.064～1.308，P＝0.002)，生后吸氧时间长(OR＝1.295，95%CI: 1.126～1.488，P<0.001)，均为导致早产SGA儿发生BPD的独立危险因素。③BPD组早产SGA儿感染性肺炎、晚发败血症、有血流动力学意义的动脉导管未闭(hsPDA)及早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)发生率，均高于无BPD组，并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

对于早产SGA儿，临床应适宜掌握无创机械通气及吸氧时间，可降低其BPD及相关并发症发生率。

关键词: 支气管肺发育不良, 婴儿，小于胎龄, 危险因素, 早产儿视网膜病, 动脉导管未闭, 婴儿，早产
Objective

To investigate influencing factors and prognosis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in preterm small for gestational age (SGA) infants.

Methods

A total of 92 preterm (gestational age of 24-32 weeks) SGA infants who were hospitalized in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from January 2019 to December 2021 were selected as study subjects. Using a retrospective cohort study method, they were divided into BPD group (n=38) and BPD-free group (n=54) according to whether BPD was diagnosed at 36 weeks′ corrected gestational age or not. The clinical data, treatment and BPD related complications of preterm SGA infants between two groups were statistically compared by chi-square test, independent samples t test and Mann-Whitney U test. Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the independent influencing factors of BPD in preterm SGA infants. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of our hospital (Approval No. QYFY WZLL 28257), and the guardians of all subjects gave informed consent to diagnosis and treatment and signed an informed consent form for this clinical study.

Results

① The body weight at 1 month after birth, birth length and head circumference, Apgar score at 1 min and 5 min after birth of preterm SGA infants in BPD group were lower, shorter and smaller than those in BPD-free group, while invasive mechanical ventilation, noninvasive mechanical ventilation, oxygen inhalation and hospitalization time, and the utilization rate of pulmonary surfactant (PS) were longer, higher than those in BPD-free group, and all the differences were statistically significant (P<0.01). ② The results of multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis showed that the long duration of non-invasive mechanical ventilation (OR=1.180, 95%CI: 1.064-1.308, P=0.002) and the long duration of oxygen inhalation after birth (OR=1.295, 95%CI: 1.126-1.488, P<0.001) were independent risk factors for BPD in preterm SGA infants. ③ The incidences of pneumonia, late-onset sepsis, hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA) and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in the BPD group were higher than those in the BPD-free group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

For preterm SGA infants, the timing of non-invasive mechanical ventilation and oxygen inhalation should be appropriately controlled to reduce the incidence of BPD and related complications.

Key words: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia, Infant, small for gestational age, Risk factors, Retinopathy of prematurity, Ductus arteriosus, patent, Infant, premature
表1 2组早产SGA儿临床资料比较
组别 例数 母亲
自然受孕[例数(%)] 顺产[例数(%)] 产前感染[例数(%)] 年龄(岁，±s) 妊娠期高血压疾病[例数(%)] 妊娠期糖尿病[例数(%)] 产前使用激素[例数(%)]
BPD组 38 37(97.4) 4(10.5) 13(34.2) 32.8±4.1 24(63.2) 6(15.8) 37(97.4)
无BPD组 54 53(98.1) 0(0) 18(33.3) 32.8±4.8 35(64.8) 11(20.4) 47(87.0)
统计量   －a －a χ2＝0.01 t＝0.03 χ2＝0.03 χ2＝0.31 －a
P值   >0.999 0.026 0.930 0.979 0.870 0.577 0.134
组别 例数 生后1个月体重(g，±s) 男性[例数(%)] 单胎[例数(%)] 出生身长(cm，±s) 出生头围(cm，±s) 生后1 min Apgar评分[分，M(Q1，Q3)] 生后5 min Apgar评分[分，M(Q1，Q3)]
BPD组 38 1 332±279 24(63.2) 26(68.4) 34.5±2.8 25.4±2.2 6.5(5.0，8.0) 8.0(7.0，9.0)
无BPD组 54 1 549±255 29(53.7) 47(87.0) 36.5±3.0 26.9±2.0 8.0(7.0，9.0) 9.0(8.0，10.0)
统计量   t＝3.87 χ2＝0.82 χ2＝4.72 t＝3.34 t＝3.28 Z＝4.32 Z＝3.61
P值   <0.001 0.366 0.030 0.001 0.001 <0.001 <0.001
组别 例数 出生时血小板计数[×109/L，M(Q1，Q3)] 出生时Hb水平[g/L，M(Q1，Q3)] 有创机械通气时间[d，M(Q1，Q3)] 无创机械通气时间[d，M(Q1，Q3)] 面罩/鼻导管/箱内吸氧时间[d，M(Q1，Q3)] 开奶时间[d，M(Q1，Q3)] 静脉营养时间[d，M(Q1，Q3)]
BPD组 38 180(154，196) 171(160，182) 0(0，4) 35.5(18.0，52.0) 24(8，35) 1(1，2) 28.5(22.0，41.0)
无BPD组 54 189(156，218) 178(163，191) 0(0，0) 10.0(6.0，20.0) 0(0，4) 1(1，2) 25.0(18.0，32.0)
统计量   Z＝0.96 Z＝1.69 Z＝3.94 Z＝5.32 Z＝6.36 Z＝0.71 Z＝2.03
P值   0.339 0.092 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.478 0.021
组别 例数 全胃肠营养时间[d，M(Q1，Q3)] 输血[例数(%)] 使用PS[例数(%)] PS剂量[mg，M(Q1，Q3)] 住院时间[d，M(Q1，Q3)] 父亲年龄[岁，M(Q1，Q3)]
BPD组 38 29.5(23.0，42.0) 32(84.2) 18(47.4) 0(0，220) 75.5(61.0，97.0) 33(30，39)
无BPD组 54 26.0(19.0，33.0) 34(63.0) 11(20.4) 0(0，0) 54.0(47.0，65.0) 33(30，37)
统计量   Z＝2.19 χ2＝4.97 χ2＝7.53 Z＝2.53 Z＝4.93 Z＝0.24
P值   0.029 0.026 0.006 0.011 <0.001 0.814
表2 早产SGA儿发生BPD的多因素非条件logistic回归分析结果
影响因素 B SE Wald值 P值 OR值 OR值95%CI
生后1个月体重(连续变量) 0.003 0.004 0.477 0.490 1.003 0.995～1.011
1 min Apgar评分(连续变量) 0.099 0.518 0.037 0.848 1.104 0.400～3.049
5 min Apgar评分(连续变量) －0.089 0.619 0.020 0.886 0.915 0.272～3.081
出生身长(连续变量) 0.119 0.222 0.287 0.592 1.126 0.729～1.740
出生头围(连续变量) 0.367 0.348 1.112 0.292 1.443 0.730～2.853
有创机械通气(连续变量) 0.825 0.545 2.288 0.130 2.281 0.784～6.642
无创机械通气(连续变量) 0.165 0.053 9.850 0.002 1.180 1.064～1.308
面罩/鼻导管/箱内吸氧(连续变量) 0.258 0.071 13.175 <0.001 1.295 1.126～1.488
住院时间(连续变量) 0.005 0.067 0.005 0.946 1.005 0.881～1.145
使用PS(vs未使用) －1.760 1.515 1.348 0.246 0.172 0.009～3.355
常数项 －25.596 16.523 2.400 0.121 <0.001 －
表3 2组早产SGA儿并发症发生率比较[例数(%)]
组别 例数 感染性肺炎 贫血 新生儿低血糖 肠外营养相关性胆汁淤积症 晚发败血症 NRDS
BPD组 38 30(78.9) 38(100.0) 2(5.3) 7(18.4) 13(34.2) 38(100.0)
无BPD组 54 14(25.9) 54(100.0) 4(7.4) 12(22.2) 6(11.1) 53(98.1)
χ2值   25.13 －a －a 0.20 7.26 －a
P值   <0.001 >0.999 >0.999 0.657 0.007 >0.999
组别 例数 hsPDA 肺动脉高压 ROP NEC 喂养不耐受
BPD组 38 23(60.5) 8(21.1) 14(36.8) 2(5.3) 5(13.2)
无BPD组 54 17(31.5) 4(7.4) 7(13.0) 3(5.6) 12(22.2)
χ2值   7.66 2.56 7.22 －a 1.22
P值   0.006 0.110 0.007 >0.999 0.270
[1]
Cao Y, Jiang SY, Sun JH, et al. Assessment of neonatal intensive care unit practices, morbidity, and mortality among very preterm infants in China[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2021, 4(8): e2118904. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.18904.
[2]
Costa LR P, Costa GAM, Valete COS, et al. In-hospital outcomes in preterm and small-for-gestational-age newborns: a cohort study[J]. Einstein (Sao Paulo), 2022, 20: eAO6781. DOI: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2022AO6781.
[3]
中华医学会儿科学分会新生儿学组，中华儿科杂志编辑委员会. 早产儿支气管肺发育不良临床管理专家共识[J]. 中华儿科杂志，2020, 58(5): 358-365. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20200317-00254.
[4]
中华医学会儿科学分会新生儿学组，中国医师协会新生儿科医师分会感染专业委员会. 新生儿败血症诊断及治疗专家共识(2019年版)[J]. 中华儿科杂志，2019, 57(4): 252-257. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2019.04.005.
[5]
王珊珊，吴彬，刘江勤，等. 不同口服药物治疗出生胎龄<28周有血流动力学意义动脉导管未闭超早产儿的疗效与安全性 [J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(4): 392-397. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2020.04.004.
[6]
Chiang MF, Quinn GE, Fielder AR, et al. International classification of retinopathy of prematurity, third edition[J]. Ophthalmology, 2021, 128(10): e51-e68. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.05.031.
[7]
中国医师协会新生儿科医师分会循证专业委员会. 新生儿坏死性小肠结肠炎临床诊疗指南(2020)[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志，2021, 23(1): 1-11. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2011145.
[8]
Rhoads E, Montgomery GS, Ren CL. Wheezing in preterm infants and children[J]. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2021, 56(11): 3472-3477. DOI: 10.1002/ppul.25314.
[9]
Wozniak P, Botros M, Diaz P. Pulmonary function testing and imaging studies among adult survivors of bronchopulmonary dysplasia[J]. Chest, 2022, 161(6): A459. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.12.489.
[10]
Karatza AA, Gkentzi D, Varvarigou A. Nutrition of infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia before and after discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit[J]. Nutrients, 2022, 14(16): 3311. DOI: 10.3390/nu14163311.
[11]
Sucasas Alonso A, Pértega Diaz S, Sáez Soto R, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants born at or less than 32 weeks of gestation[J]. An Pediatr, 2022, 96(3): 242-251. DOI: 10.1016/j.anpede.2021.03.006.
[12]
张雅茹，邓欢，由凯. 高氧致细胞衰老在支气管肺发育不良中的作用[J]. 国际儿科学杂志，2023, 50(3): 169-172. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4408.2023.03.006.
[13]
翁博雯，蔡成. 肠-肺轴与支气管肺发育不良关系的研究进展[J]. 国际儿科学杂志，2023, 50(3): 150-153. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4408.2023.03.002.
[14]
Yang K, He SS, Dong WB. Gut microbiota and bronchopulmonary dysplasia[J]. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2021, 56(8): 2460-2470. DOI: 10.1002/ppul.25508.
[15]
Sweet DG, Carnielli VP, Greisen G, et al. European consensus guidelines on the management of respiratory distress syndrome: 2022 update[J]. Neonatology, 2023, 120(1): 3-23. DOI: 10.1159/000528914.
[16]
刘燕，赵铭，姜红，等. 极早产儿支气管肺发育不良影响因素的多中心临床研究 [J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(4): 419-426. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2022.04.007.
[17]
Tang L, Zhu TT, Zhao J. Association between red blood cell transfusion and bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Front Pediatr, 2023, 11: 1095889. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1095889.
[18]
Bahr TM, Snow GL, Christensen TR, et al. Can red blood cell and platelet transfusions have a pathogenic role in bronchopulmonary dysplasia？[J]. J Pediatr, 2024, 265: 113836. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113836
[19]
Lapcharoensap W, Kan P, Powers RJ, et al. The relationship of nosocomial infection reduction to changes in neonatal intensive care unit rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia[J]. J Pediatr, 2017, 180: 105-109.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.09.030.
[20]
Shah J, Jefferies AL, Yoon EW, et al. Risk factors and outcomes of late-onset bacterial sepsis in preterm neonates born at<32 weeks′ gestation[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2015, 32(7): 675-682. DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1393936.
[21]
Clyman RI, Kaempf J, Liebowitz M, et al. Prolonged tracheal intubation and the association between patent ductus arteriosus and bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a secondary analysis of the PDA-TOLERATE trial[J]. J Pediatr, 2021, 229: 283-288.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.09.047.
[22]
Vayalthrikkovil S, Vorhies E, Stritzke A, et al. Prospective study of pulmonary hypertension in preterm infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia[J]. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2019, 54(2): 171-178. DOI: 10.1002/ppul.24211.
[23]
Al-Ghanem G, Shah P, Thomas S, et al. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia and pulmonary hypertension: a Meta-analysis[J]. J Perinatol, 2017, 37(4): 414-419. DOI: 10.1038/jp.2016.250.
[1] 明昊, 肖迎聪, 巨艳, 宋宏萍. 乳腺癌风险预测模型的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 287-291.
[2] 庄燕, 戴林峰, 张海东, 陈秋华, 聂清芳. 脓毒症患者早期生存影响因素及Cox 风险预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 372-378.
[3] 黄鸿初, 黄美容, 温丽红. 血液系统恶性肿瘤患者化疗后粒细胞缺乏感染的危险因素和风险预测模型[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 285-292.
[4] 罗文斌, 韩玮. 胰腺癌患者首次化疗后中重度骨髓抑制的相关危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 357-362.
[5] 李国煜, 丛赟, 祖丽胡马尔·麦麦提艾力, 何铁英. 急性胰腺炎并发门静脉系统血栓形成的危险因素及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 266-270.
[6] 贺斌, 马晋峰. 胃癌脾门淋巴结转移危险因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 694-699.
[7] 林凯, 潘勇, 赵高平, 杨春. 造口还纳术后切口疝的危险因素分析与预防策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-638.
[8] 杨闯, 马雪. 腹壁疝术后感染的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 693-696.
[9] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[10] 张伟伟, 陈启, 翁和语, 黄亮. 随机森林模型预测T1 期结直肠癌淋巴结转移的初步研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 389-393.
[11] 司楠, 孙洪涛. 创伤性脑损伤后肾功能障碍危险因素的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 300-305.
[12] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
[13] 李文哲, 王毅, 崔建, 郑启航, 王靖彦, 于湘友. 新疆维吾尔自治区重症患者急性肾功能异常的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 269-276.
[14] 刘志超, 胡风云, 温春丽. 山西省脑卒中危险因素与地域的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 424-433.
[15] 曹亚丽, 高雨萌, 张英谦, 李博, 杜军保, 金红芳. 儿童坐位不耐受的临床进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 510-515.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号