切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (06) : 711 -717. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2018.06.014

所属专题: 指南与规范 文献 指南共识

论著

妊娠期糖尿病孕妇的早期规范化管理对分娩新生儿及其随访的影响
蒋新液1, 郭冰冰1, 裴晶晶1, 许吟1, 王丽珍1, 朱云龙1,()   
  1. 1. 214002 江苏,南京医科大学附属无锡妇幼保健院(无锡市妇幼保健院)儿童保健科
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-10 修回日期:2018-11-01 出版日期:2018-12-01
  • 通信作者: 朱云龙

Effect of early standardized management of pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus on newborns and their follow-up

Xinye Jiang1, Bingbing Guo1, Jingjing Pei1, Yin Xu1, Lizhen Wang1, Yunlong Zhu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Children Health Care, The Affiliated Wuxi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi 214002, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2018-08-10 Revised:2018-11-01 Published:2018-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Yunlong Zhu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhu Yunlong, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Maternal and Child Health Appropriate Technology Promotion Program of Wuxi Municipal Health and Family Planning Commission(FYTG201803)
引用本文:

蒋新液, 郭冰冰, 裴晶晶, 许吟, 王丽珍, 朱云龙. 妊娠期糖尿病孕妇的早期规范化管理对分娩新生儿及其随访的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(06): 711-717.

Xinye Jiang, Bingbing Guo, Jingjing Pei, Yin Xu, Lizhen Wang, Yunlong Zhu. Effect of early standardized management of pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus on newborns and their follow-up[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2018, 14(06): 711-717.

目的

探讨早期规范化管理在妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)孕妇分娩新生儿中的应用价值及其随访。

方法

选择2015年1月1日至12月31日,在南京医科大学附属妇幼保健院孕期接受产前检查时确诊为GDM孕妇所分娩的140例新生儿为研究对象,并纳入GDM组(接受早期规范化管理)。选取同期于本院接受产前检查的非GDM孕妇所分娩的130例新生儿纳入对照组(接受常规管理)。采集2组受试儿的一般临床资料、生后3个月龄内的喂养方式及其随访至1岁及2岁时体格发育、神经心理指标,以及母亲孕前人体质量指数(BMI)。采用成组t检验,对2组受试儿的出生体重、随访至1岁及2岁时体格发育、神经心理指标进行统计学比较。采用χ2检验,对受试儿性别构成比、早产儿所占比例等指标进行比较。本研究遵循的程序符合南京医科大学附属无锡妇幼保健院人体试验委员会制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准(审批文号:2016-01-0729-12),并与受试儿监护人签署临床研究知情同意书。

结果

①2组受试儿的性别构成比、出生体重及早产儿所占比例等一般临床资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。②GDM组受试儿母亲孕前BMI为(22.1±3.1)kg/m2,高于对照组的(20.6±2.4)kg/m2,2组比较,差异有统计学意义(t=4.275,P<0.001)。2组受试儿母亲不同孕前BMI所占比例比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=10.560,P=0.005)。③2组受试儿生后3个月龄内不同喂养方式所占比例比较,差异亦无统计学意义(P>0.05)。④对GDM组受试儿随访至1岁及2岁时,其身高、体重、头围和BMI等体格发育相关指标分别与对照组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。⑤对2组受试儿随访至2岁时,其体重正常、超重及肥胖所占比例比较,差异亦无统计学意义(P>0.05)。⑥对2组受试儿分别随访至1岁及2岁时,其发育商得分比较,差异亦均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对GDM组受试儿随访至1岁及2岁时,其适应能力、语言能力、社交行为的实际月龄,均低于对照组,2组比较,差异均有统计学意义(随访至1岁时:t=-2.022、-2.880、-3.981,P<0.05;随访至2岁时:t=-5.420、-4.857、-2.298,P<0.05),而2组受试儿在大运动及精细运动的实际月龄比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。⑦GDM组140例新生中,其母亲孕期血糖控制良好者为98例(70.0%)。母亲孕期血糖控制不良者所分娩新生儿的出生体重、低出生体重儿和巨大儿所占比例,均高于孕期血糖控制良好者,但是差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);对孕期血糖控制不良母亲分娩新生儿随访至2岁时,均较控制良好母亲分娩新生儿随访至2岁时的身高、体重稍高与稍重,但是二者比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);体重正常、超重和肥胖儿童在孕期血糖控制不良和控制良好者中所占比例比较,差异亦无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

对GDM孕妇分娩新生儿自围生期起施行早期规范化管理,具有重要意义。临床除了在关注GDM孕妇分娩新生儿营养及喂养方式避免体格发育出现偏离的同时,亦应重视后续神经心理发育指导,促进其身心全面发展。

Objective

To explore clinical values of early standardized management in children delivered by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) pregnant women and their follow-up.

Methods

From January 1 to December 31, 2015, a total of 140 neonates who delivered by GDM pregnant women at The Affiliated Wuxi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were selected into GDM group (received early standardized management). Meanwhile, another 130 neonates who delivered by mothers had not been diagnosed with GDM during pregnancy were included into control group (received routine management). The general clinical data, maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), feeding patterns within 3 months after birth, and follow-up information of physical development and neuropsychology development of 2 groups were analyzed. The birth weight, maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, physical development and neuropsychology development at 1-year and 2-year old were analyzed by independent-samples t test. The gender composition ratio and the proportion of preterm infants were compared by chi-square test. This study protocol was in line with the Institutional Review Board of The Affiliated Wuxi Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Approval Number: 2016-01-0729-12), and informed contents were obtained from the guardians of all subjects.

Results

①There were no significant differences in the gender composition ratio, the proportion of preterm infants, birth weight and other general clinical data between two groups (P>0.05). ②The maternal pre-pregnancy BMI in GDM group was (22.1±3.1) kg/m2, which was higher than that of control group (20.6±2.4) kg/m2, and there was a statistically significant difference between two groups (t=4.275, P<0.001). There was also a statistically significant difference in the proportion of mothers with different pre-pregnancy BMI between two groups (χ2=10.560, P=0.005). ③There was no significant difference between two groups in the proportion of different feeding methods within 3 months after birth (P>0.05). ④There were no significant differences in the height, weight, head circumference and BMI between two groups at 1-year and 2-year old during follow-up (P>0.05). ⑤There were no significant difference in the proportion of normal weight, overweight and obesity between two groups at the time point of two-year follow-up (P>0.05). ⑥There were no significant differences in the scores of developmental quotient between two groups at 1-year and 2-year old during follow-up (P>0.05). In GDM group, the actual age of adaptive ability, language ability, and social behavior were lower than those of control group at 1-year and 2-year old during follow-up. There were statistically significant differences between two groups (one-year old: t=-2.022, -2.880, -3.981; P<0.05; two-year old: t=-5.420, -4.857, -2.298; P<0.05). But there were no significant differences between two groups in the actual age of gross motor and fine motor (P>0.05). ⑦Among 140 newborns in GDM group, 98 (70.0%) had good blood glucose control during pregnancy. The birth weight, proportion of low birth weight and macrosomia in newborns born to mothers with poor blood glucose control during pregnancy were higher than those born to mothers with good blood glucose control, but the difference were not statistically significant (P>0.05). At the time of follow-up to the age of 2-year old, the height and weight of newborns born to those with poor blood glucose control during pregnancy were higher than those born to those with good blood glucose control during pregnancy, but there were no statistical differences between two groups (P>0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference in the proportion of normal weight, overweight and obesity between those with poor blood glucose control and those with good control during pregnancy (P>0.05).

Conclusions

It is of great significance for GDM pregnant women to carry out early standardized management from perinatal period. In addition to paying attention to nutrition and feeding methods of children delivered by GDM pregnant women to avoid physical development deviation, clinical attention should also be paid to the guidance of children′s neuropsychological development so as to promote their physical and mental development in an all-round way.

表1 2组受试儿一般临床资料比较
表2 2组受试儿母亲孕前人体质量指数比较[例数(%)]
表3 2组受试儿生后3个月龄内不同喂养方式比较结果[例数(%)]
表4 2组受试儿分别随访至1岁及2岁时体格发育指标比较(±s)
表5 2组受试儿随访至2岁时体重比较[例数(%)]
表6 2组受试儿神经心理发育指标比较(±s)
表7 孕期血糖不同控制状态妊娠期糖尿病孕妇分娩新生儿出生体重比较
表8 孕期血糖不同控制状态妊娠期糖尿病孕妇分娩新生儿对其随访至2岁时体格发育比较
[1]
Buchanan TA, Xiang AH. Gestational diabetes mellitus [J]. J Clin Invest, 2005, 115(3): 485-491.
[2]
Sacks DA, Hadden DR, Maresh M, et al. Frequency of gestational diabetes mellitus at collaborating centers based on IADPSG consensus panel-recommended criteria: the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study [J]. Diabetes Care, 2012, 35(3): 526-528.
[3]
王笑笑,刘情,张英奎,等. 2016年河北省妊娠期糖尿病患病率和流行病学特点分析[J]. 中国全科医学,2018,31(21):1-6.
[4]
苏日娜,朱微微,魏玉梅,等. 北京地区妊娠期糖尿病发病情况及妊娠结局的回顾性调查[J]. 中华围产医学杂志,2016,19(5):330-335.
[5]
中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组,中华医学会围产医学分会妊娠合并糖尿病协作组.妊娠合并糖尿病诊治指南(2014)[J].中华围产医学杂志,2014,17(8):537-545.
[6]
Battin MR, Obolonkin V, Rush E, et al. Blood pressure measurement at two years in offspring of women randomized to a trial of metformin for GDM: follow up data from the MiG trial [J]. BMC Pediatr, 2015, 15: 54.
[7]
国家卫生计生委. 《0~6岁儿童健康管理技术规范》解读[J]. 中国乡村医药,2015,22(14):52.
[8]
卫生部妇社司儿童处. 全国儿童保健工作规范(试行) [J]. 中国儿童保健杂志,2010,18(4):351-352.
[9]
李辉,宗心南,季成叶,等. 中国2~18岁儿童青少年超重和肥胖筛查体重指数界值点的研究[J]. 中华流行病学杂志,2010,31(6):616-620.
[10]
九市儿童体格发育调查协作组. 2005年中国九市七岁以下儿童体格发育调查[J]. 中华儿科杂志,2007,45(8):609-614.
[11]
中国学生体质与健康研究组. 2005年中国学生体质与健康调研报告[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2007.
[12]
王文鹏,陈芳芳,米杰,等.孕妇孕期适宜体质量增加范围的探讨及其与新生儿出生体质量的关系[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2013,48(5):321-325.
[13]
杨玉凤. 儿童发育行为心理评定量表[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2016:58-67 .
[14]
Kania M, Herbut K, Dybala A, et al. The association of maternal gestational diabetes mellitus with autism spectrum disorders in the offspring [J]. Clin Diabetol, 2017, 5(5): 147-151.
[15]
Sudasinghe BH, Wijeyaratne CN, Ginige PS. Long and short-term outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) among South Asian women: a community-based study [J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2018, 145: 93-101.
[16]
郭冰冰,卫雅蓉,许吟,等. 妊娠期糖尿病对不同性别新生儿体脂含量差异的影响[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志,2016,24(5):452-454.
[17]
Franz MJ, Monk A, Barry B, et al. Effectiveness of medical nutrition therapy provided by dietitians in the management of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized, controlled clinical trial [J]. J Am Diet Assoc, 1995, 95(9): 1009-1017.
[18]
Yamamoto JM, Kellett JE, Balsells M, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus and diet: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials examining the impact of modified dietary interventions on maternal glucose control and neonatal birth weight [J]. Diabetes Care, 2018, 41(7): 1346-1361.
[19]
赵亚玲,马润玫,黄永坤,等. 母乳喂养对妊娠期糖尿病母亲子代儿童期超重的影响[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志,2013,15(1):56-61.
[20]
O′Tierney-Ginn P, Presley L, Minium J, et al. Sex-specific effects of maternal anthropometrics on body composition at birth [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 211(3): 292.e1-e9.
[21]
Zhao P, Liu E, Qiao Y, et al. Maternal gestational diabetes and childhood obesity at age 9-11: results of a multinational study [J]. Diabetologia, 2016, 59(11): 2339-2348.
[22]
蒋新液,郭冰冰,卫雅蓉,等. 妊娠期糖尿病对子代体格发育的影响分析[J]. 中国儿童保健杂志,2016,24(7):709-711.
[1] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[2] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[3] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[4] 刘婷婷, 林妍冰, 汪珊, 陈幕荣, 唐子鉴, 代东伶, 夏焙. 超声衰减参数成像评价儿童代谢相关脂肪性肝病的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[5] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[6] 米洁, 陈晨, 李佳玲, 裴海娜, 张恒博, 李飞, 李东杰. 儿童头面部外伤特点分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 511-515.
[7] 李维, 莫俊俏. 儿童呼吸道耐药流感嗜血杆菌基因型鉴定及耐药分析对抗菌药物治疗选择的意义[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 315-323.
[8] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[9] 李芳, 许瑞, 李洋洋, 石秀全. 循证医学理念在儿童腹股沟疝患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 782-786.
[10] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[11] 冷昭富, 汪永新. 儿童去骨瓣减压术后颅骨成形术的研究进展[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 313-317.
[12] 卓少宏, 林秀玲, 周翠梅, 熊卫莲, 马兴灶. CD64指数、SAA/CRP、PCT联合检测在小儿消化道感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[13] 刘笑笑, 张小杉, 刘群, 马岚, 段莎莎, 施依璐, 张敏洁, 王雅晳. 中国学龄前儿童先天性心脏病流行病学研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1021-1024.
[14] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
[15] 余林阳, 王美英, 李建斌, 楼骁斌, 谢思远, 马志忠, 齐海英, 李稼. 高原地区肺炎合并右心功能衰竭体征患儿的肺动脉压力和心脏形态与功能的特征[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 535-544.
阅读次数
全文


摘要