切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 283 -290. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2018.03.006

所属专题: 文献

论著

血清鳞状细胞癌抗原及其变化对宫颈鳞状细胞癌新辅助化疗敏感性的预测价值
侯勇丽1, 平毅1,()   
  1. 1. 030001 太原,山西医科大学第二医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-19 修回日期:2018-05-11 出版日期:2018-06-01
  • 通信作者: 平毅

Predictive values of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen and its changes in neoadjuvant chemotherapy sensitivity of cervical squamous cell carcinoma

Yongli Hou1, Yi Ping1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, Shanxi Province, China
  • Received:2018-03-19 Revised:2018-05-11 Published:2018-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Yi Ping
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ping Yi, Email:
引用本文:

侯勇丽, 平毅. 血清鳞状细胞癌抗原及其变化对宫颈鳞状细胞癌新辅助化疗敏感性的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(03): 283-290.

Yongli Hou, Yi Ping. Predictive values of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen and its changes in neoadjuvant chemotherapy sensitivity of cervical squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2018, 14(03): 283-290.

目的

探讨血清鳞状细胞癌抗原(SCC-Ag)在宫颈鳞状细胞癌(SCC)新辅助化疗(NACT)前、后的变化,以及对宫颈SCC患者进行NACT敏感性的预测价值。

方法

选择2009年1月至2017年1月,在山西医科大学第二医院妇产科进行手术治疗前接受NACT,并且术中切除组织病理学检查结果证实为宫颈SCC的68例患者为研究对象。对宫颈SCC患者的NACT疗效进行分析。采用配对t检验和配对χ2检验,分别对NACT前、后血清SCC-Ag值及其阳性率进行比较。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)对NACT前血清SCC-Ag值及NACT前、后血清SCC-Ag值变化,对宫颈SCC的NACT疗效的预测价值进行分析。采用多因素非条件logistic回归分析,对宫颈SCC的NACT疗效影响因素进行分析。采用χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法,对宫颈SCC患者NACT前、后血清SCC-Ag阳性率及其临床病理特征的关系进行分析。采用成组t检验,对复发与未复发宫颈SCC患者接受NACT前血清SCC-Ag值进行比较。本研究符合2013年修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》的要求,征得所有受试者知情同意,并签订临床研究知情同意书。

结果

①宫颈SCC患者的NACT有效率为75.0%(51/68)。②本组68例宫颈SCC患者接受NACT后,血清SCC-Ag值及其阳性率分别为(2.9±1.6)ng/mL和45.6%(31/68),均分别显著低于接受NACT前的(5.1±1.7)ng/mL和91.2%(62/68),并且差异均有统计学意义(t=7.991,P<0.001;χ2=32.682,P<0.001)。③NACT前血清SCC-Ag值及NACT前、后血清SCC-Ag值变化值对于预测宫颈SCC患者NACT疗效的ROC-AUC分别为0.839(95%CI:0.717~0.965,P<0.001)与1.000(95%CI:1.000~1.000,P<0.001),最佳临界值分别为3.0、0.6 ng/mL。④对宫颈SCC患者NACT疗效影响因素进行多因素非条件logistic回归分析的结果显示,NACT前血清SCC-Ag值及NACT前、后血清SCC-Ag值变化值均为预测宫颈SCC患者NACT敏感性的独立影响因素(OR=0.365,95%CI:0.224~0.608,P<0.001;OR=0.984,95%CI:0.899~0.998,P<0.001)。⑤本研究68例宫颈SCC患者中,合并脉管转移者,其接受NACT前的血清SCC-Ag阳性率高于未合并脉管转移者,合并淋巴结转移者、脉管转移者及国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)临床分期为ⅡA2期患者接受NACT后的血清SCC-Ag阳性率,均分别高于未合并淋巴结转移者、脉管转移者及ⅠB2期患者,并且差异均有统计学意义(P=0.007,P<0.001,P=0.035,P<0.001)。⑥本组68例宫颈SCC患者中,13例发生复发,复发率为19.1%(13/68)。复发者接受NACT前的血清SCC-Ag值为(7.1±1.1)ng/mL,高于未复发者的(4.7±1.5)ng/mL,并且差异有统计学意义(t=5.253,P<0.001)。

结论

血清SCC-Ag值及其变化是否可作为预测宫颈SCC患者NACT敏感性的指标,以及预测宫颈SCC复发的指标,因本研究纳入样本量较小,尚待大样本、多中心、随机对照试验进一步研究、证实。

Objective

To explore the changes of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and to assess its predictive values of NACT sensitivity in cervical SCC.

Methods

A total of 68 patients who underwent NACT before surgery and were diagnosed as cervical SCC by postoperative biopsy from January 2009 to January 2017 in the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University were selected as research subjects. The efficacy of NACT in treatment of patients with cervical SCC were analyzed. Serum SCC-Ag values and its positive rates before and after NACT were compared by paired-samples t test and paired-chi-square test, respectively. The area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was used to analyze the predictive values of serum SCC-Ag value before NACT and changes of serum SCC-Ag values before and after NACT in NACT sensitivity of cervical SCC. Multiple unconditional logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors of NACT efficacy in cervical SCC. Chi-square test or Fisher′s exact test was used to analyze the relationship between the positive rate of serum SCC-Ag before and after NACT in cervical SCC patients and their clinicopathological characteristics. Independent-samples t test was used to compare serum SCC-Ag values in cervical SCC patients with recurrent and non-recurrent before receiving NACT. This study met the requirements of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013. And every subject signed an informed consent form.

Results

①The efficacy of NACT in treatment of patients with cervical SCC was 75.0% (51/68). ②The value and positive rate of serum SCC-Ag after NACT in 68 patients with cervical SCC were (2.9±1.6) ng/mL and 45.6% (31/68), respectively, which were significantly lower than those before NACT (5.1±1.7) ng/mL and 91.2% (62/68), and both the differences were statistically significant (t=7.991, P<0.001; χ2=32.682, P<0.001). ③The ROC-AUC of serum SCC-Ag value before NACT and changes of serum SCC-Ag values before and after NACT in predicting the efficacy of NACT for cervical SCC were 0.839 (95%CI: 0.717-0.965, P<0.001) and 1.000 (95%CI: 1.000-1.000, P<0.001), respectively, with the optimal cut-off values of 3.0 ng/mL and 0.6 ng/mL, respectively. ④The results of multiple unconditional logistic regression analysis of influencing factors of NACT efficacy in cervical SCC showed that the serum SCC-Ag value before NACT and changes of serum SCC-Ag values before and after NACT both were independent predictors of NACT sensitivity of cervical SCC (OR=0.365, 95%CI: 0.224-0.608, P<0.001; OR=0.984, 95%CI: 0.899-0.998, P<0.001). ⑤Among 68 patients with cervical SCC in this study, the positive rate of serum SCC-Ag before NACT in patients with vascular metastasis was higher than those without vessel metastasis, and the positive rates of serum SCC-Ag after NACT in patients with lymph node metastasis, vascular metastasis, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage ⅡA2 were significantly higher than those without lymph node metastasis, vascular metastasis, and stage ⅠB2, respectively, and all the differences were statistically significant (P=0.007, P<0.001, P =0.035, P<0.001). ⑥Among 68 patients with cervical SCC in this study, 13 cases relapsed, with a recurrence rate of 19.1% (13/68). The serum SCC-Ag value before NACT in patients with recurrence was (7.1±1.1) ng/mL, which was higher than that of those without recurrence (4.7±1.5) ng/mL, and the difference was statistically significant (t=5.253, P<0.001).

Conclusions

Whether serum SCC-Ag value and its changes can be used as effective predictors of NACT sensitivity of cervical SCC, and whether they can be used as detection indexes of cervical SCC recurrence or not, it still remains to be further confirmed by large-sample, multi-center, and randomized controlled studies as the sample size included in this study is relatively small.

表1 68例宫颈鳞状细胞癌患者新辅助化疗有效率[例数(%)]
表2 68例宫颈SCC患者NACT前、后血清SCC-Ag值及其阳性率比较
图1 NACT前血清SCC-Ag值预测宫颈SCC患者NACT疗效的ROC曲线
表3 宫颈SCC患者NACT疗效影响因素的单因素分析结果[例数(%)]
表4 宫颈SCC患者NACT疗效影响因素的多因素非条件logistic回归分析变量含义及其赋值情况
表5 宫颈SCC患者NACT疗效影响因素的多因素非条件logistic回归分析结果
表6 68例宫颈SCC患者NACT前、后血清SCC-Ag与其临床病理特征的关系[例数(%)]
表7 68例宫颈SCC患者中,复发与未复发者接受NACT前的血清SCC-Ag值比较(ng/mL,±s)
[1]
Osman M. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of locally advanced cervix cancer: a systematic review[J]. Oncol Rev, 2014, 8(2): 60-66.
[2]
Hu T, Li S, Chen Y, et al. Matched-case comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with FIGO stageⅠBl-ⅡB cervical cancer toestablish selection criteria[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2012, 48(15): 2353-2360.
[3]
Yin M, Hou Y, Zhang T, et al. Evaluation of chemotherapy response with serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen level in cervical cancer patients: a prospective cohort study[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(1): e54969.
[4]
Kotowicz B, Fuksiewicz M, Jonska-Gmyrek J, et al. The assessment of the prognostic value of tumor markers and cytokines as SCCAg, CYFRA 21.1, IL-6, VEGF and sTNF receptors in patients with squamous cell cervical cancer, particularly with early stage of the disease[J]. Tumour Biol, 2015, 37(1): 1271-1278.
[5]
Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2009, 105(2): 103-104.
[6]
沈铿,马丁. 妇产科学[M]. 3版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2015.
[7]
程金龙,徐冶,谢宏宇,等. 宫颈癌新辅助化疗前后SCC-Ag水平与化疗敏感性的关系[J]. 现代肿瘤医学,2016, 24 (23): 3791-3793.
[8]
马绍康,吴令英,孙阳春,等. 子宫颈鳞状细胞癌复发患者血清鳞状细胞癌抗原监测的意义[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2008, 43(1): 13-17.
[9]
Chen IH, Liao CT, Wang HM, et al. Using SCC antigen and CRP levels as prognostic biomarkers in recurrent oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(7): e103265.
[10]
赵晓南,张虹. 宫颈癌新辅助化疗敏感性的影响因素研究[J]. 现代妇产科进展,2015, 24(7): 498-500.
[11]
HE L, WU L, SU G, et al. The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in different histological types of cervical cancer[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2014, 134(2): 419-425.
[12]
McCormack M, Kadalayil L, Hackshaw A, et al. A phase Ⅱ study of weekly neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer[J]. Br J Cancer, 2013, 108(12): 2464-2469.
[13]
Gong L, Lou JY, Wang P, et al. Clinical evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery in the management of stageⅠB2-ⅡB cervical cancer[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2012, 117(1): 23-26.
[14]
de Azevedo CR, Thuler LC, de Mello MJ,et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation in cervical carcinoma: a review[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2016, 26(4): 729-736.
[15]
王若琪,韩菲菲. CA125、CA153、CA199和SCC联合检测对宫颈癌的诊断价值[J]. 实用癌症杂志,2016, 31(11): 1744-1746.
[16]
Li X, Zhou J, Huang K, et al. The predictive value of serum squamous cellcarcinoma antigen in patients with cervical cancer who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery: a single-institute study[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(4): e0122361.
[17]
王红霞,丁晓萍,侯庆香,等. SCC-Ag在宫颈癌新辅助化疗前后的改变及临床意义[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志,2015, 16(3): 229-232.
[18]
Wang Y, Cui T, Du L, et al. The correlation between the serum squamous carcinoma antigen and the prognosis of recurrent cervical squamous carcinoma[J]. J Clin Lab Anal, 2017, 31(1): e22020.
[19]
Chen H, Liang C, Zhang L, et al. Clinical efficacy of modified preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced (stageⅠB2 toⅡB) cervical cancer: a randomized study[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2008, 110(3): 308-315.
[1] 马敏榕, 李聪, 周勤. 宫颈癌治疗研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 497-504.
[2] 罗丹, 孔为民, 陈姝宁, 赵小玲, 谢云凯. 子宫内膜异位症患者在位及异位内膜上皮细胞-间充质转化相关生物标志物的变化[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 530-539.
[3] 刘星辰, 刘娟, 魏宝宝, 刘洁, 刘辉. XIAP与XAF1异常表达与卵巢癌的相关性分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 419-427.
[4] 杨一君, 董雯, 刘晓平, 石灿, 张磊, 谷琎, 龚咪, 华馥. 腹腔镜折叠对接缝合联合宫腔镜憩室开渠法治疗剖宫产瘢痕憩室的疗效[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 330-337.
[5] 邹佳桐, 王颂扬, 徐薇, 余婷婷, 叶红霞, 谯小勇. 自然流产女性精神健康问题的相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 77-84.
[6] 董双, 李晓莹, 孙立涛, 田家玮. 影像学技术在宫颈癌术前临床分期中的应用进展[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 113-119.
[7] 戴佑任, 张悦, 李扬, 王聪, 陈婷, 程文俊, 罗成燕. 未分化/去分化子宫内膜癌的临床病理学特征及治疗研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(06): 660-668.
[8] 陈晶晶, 钱芳. 新疆地区不同民族育龄妇女胚胎停育与叶酸代谢酶基因多态性及染色体异常的相关性[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(05): 599-605.
[9] 卫怡妙, 李亚芹, 赵卫红. 环状RNA与宫颈癌发病机制的研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(05): 512-516.
[10] 张文涵, 王成. 瘢痕鳞状细胞癌的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(01): 59-64.
[11] 李晨曦, 谭小容, 魏巍, 李慕秋, 龚忠诚. 三级淋巴结构在口腔癌中的特征及意义[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 315-321.
[12] 胡伟涛, 李星瀚, 刘琦, 孟贺, 马琳, 邓永强. 微小核糖核酸-21在口腔鳞状细胞癌中作为生物学标志物的研究进展[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 328-332.
[13] 刘迎, 尹嫚, 杨林青, 王云飞. 子宫颈浸润性复层产黏液的癌的诊断学特征并文献复习[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 173-177.
[14] 尹嫚, 杨林青, 王云飞. 女性生殖道同期发生的黏液上皮化生和肿瘤的诊断学特征并文献复习[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 193-196.
[15] 阿孜古丽·阿力木江, 买买提·依斯热依力, 王婧, 阿巴伯克力·乌斯曼, 陈美华, 陆萍, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 探讨围绝经期妇女胃食管反流病症状和胃酸反流的特征[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2022, 09(03): 151-155.
阅读次数
全文


摘要