切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 470 -473. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2017.04.018

所属专题: 文献

论著

沙盘游戏治疗对初产妇孕期抑郁状态干预效果的研究
张爱华1, 彭飞1,(), 唐艳1, 杜忠仁2, 韩爽1   
  1. 1. 100067 北京市丰台区妇幼保健院心理科
    2. 100071 北京市丰台区疾病预防控制中心
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-16 修回日期:2017-07-20 出版日期:2017-08-01
  • 通信作者: 彭飞

Study on the intervention effects of sandplay therapy on depressive state of primipara during pregnancy

Aihua Zhang1, Fei Peng1,(), Yan Tang1, Zhongren Du2, Shuang Han1   

  1. 1. Department of Psychology, Fengtai Maternal & Child Health Hospital of Beijing, Beijing 100067, China
    2. Fengtai Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Beijing, Beijing 100071, China
  • Received:2017-06-16 Revised:2017-07-20 Published:2017-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Fei Peng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Peng Fei, Email:
引用本文:

张爱华, 彭飞, 唐艳, 杜忠仁, 韩爽. 沙盘游戏治疗对初产妇孕期抑郁状态干预效果的研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 13(04): 470-473.

Aihua Zhang, Fei Peng, Yan Tang, Zhongren Du, Shuang Han. Study on the intervention effects of sandplay therapy on depressive state of primipara during pregnancy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2017, 13(04): 470-473.

目的

探讨沙盘游戏治疗对初产妇孕期抑郁状态的干预效果。

方法

选取2016年10月至2017年5月,于北京市丰台区妇幼保健院参加产前检查,应用《抑郁自评量表(SDS)》进行心理测评,而被临床诊断为孕期抑郁状态的86例初产妇为研究对象。采用随机数字表法,将这86例受试者随机分为研究组(n=43)和对照组(n=43)。2组受试者均接受常规产前检查和心理健康知识教育。研究组受试者在此基础上,再采用沙盘游戏治疗对其孕期抑郁状态进行干预。研究组受试者完成3次沙盘游戏治疗1周后,以及对照组受试者纳入本研究1个月后,均再次采用SDS对其进行心理测评。统计学比较2组受试者孕期抑郁状态干预前、后SDS标准分。2组受试者年龄、孕龄及文化程度构成比等一般临床资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。本研究通过北京市丰台区妇幼保健院伦理委员会批准,并与所有受试者均签署了临床研究知情同意书。

结果

①2组受试者孕期抑郁状态干预前的SDS标准分比较,差异无统计学意义(t=0.56,P=0.577)。孕期抑郁状态干预后,研究组SDS标准分显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=18.12,P<0.001)。研究组、对照组孕期抑郁状态干预前、后SDS标准分组内分别比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=31.77、15.04,P<0.001)。②研究组受试者孕期抑郁状态干预前、后SDS标准分降低值为(27.9±5.8)分,显著高于对照组的(8.8±3.8)分,二者比较,差异有统计学意义(t=18.06,P<0.001)。

结论

沙盘游戏治疗可有效改善初产妇孕期抑郁状态,干预效果较好。因本研究纳入样本量较小,沙盘游戏治疗应用于初产妇孕期抑郁状态干预,是否值得临床推广,仍需大样本、多中心、随机对照研究进一步证实。

Objective

To explore the intervention effects of sandplay therapy on the depressive state of primipara during pregnancy.

Methods

A total of 86 cases of primiparas who attended prenatal examinations in Fengtai Maternal & Child Health Hospital of Beijing and were diagnosed as depressive state during pregnancy by Self-Rating Depression Scale(SDS) from October 2016 to May 2017 were selected as research subjects. They were divided into study group (n=43) and control group (n=43) by random number table. Every primipara in both two groups received prenatal examination and mental health education. Besides, for primiparas in study group, they received additional sandplay therapy to intervene their depressive states during pregnancy. One week after 3 times of sandplay therapy in study group, and one month after the enrollment of control group, all primiparas received the second time of SDS test. The standard scores of SDS in two groups before and after intervention were compared by statistical methods. There were no significant differences between two groups in ages, gestational ages and constitute ratio of education levels and so on (P>0.05). This study was approved by the Ethics Committee in Fengtai Maternal & Child Health Hospital of Beijing and every primipara signed informed consent of clinical research.

Results

①There was no significant difference between two groups in standard scores of SDS before intervention (t=0.56, P=0.577). While the standard score of SDS in study group after intervention was obviously lower than that in control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=18.12, P<0.001). After intervention, intra-group comparison, the standard scores of SDS in study group and control group both were statistically lower than those before intervention, and both the differences were statistically significant (t=31.77, 15.04; P<0.001). ②The standard score of SDS in study group decreased by (27.9±5.8) scores before and after intervention, which was significantly higher than (8.8±3.8) scores in control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=18.06, P<0.001).

Conclusions

Sandplay therapy can effectively improve the depressive state of primipara during pregnancy. For this study, since the sample size is small, it still needs larger-sample, multi-center and randomized controlled study to confirm whether sandplay therapy used in the intervention of depressive state of primipara during pregnancy is worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 2组初产妇孕期抑郁状态干预前、后SDS标准分比较(分,±s)
表2 2组初产妇孕期抑郁状态干预前、后SDS标准分降低值比较(分,±s)
[1]
吴文源,魏镜,陶明. 综合医院焦虑抑郁诊断和治疗的专家共识[J]. 中华医学杂志,2012, 92(31): 2174-2181.
[2]
张红梅,徐英,吴爱勤. 产后抑郁相关危险因素多元回归分析[J]. 上海预防医学,2007, 19(10): 492-495.
[3]
李国胜. 抑郁症人际心理治疗临床研究[J]. 中国民康医学,2009, 21(11): 1296-1298.
[4]
Weissman MM. Cognitive therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy: 30 years later[J]. Am J Psychiatry, 2007, 164(5): 693-696..
[5]
Boik BL, Goodwin EA. 沙游治疗:心理治疗师实践手册. 田宝伟,译[M]. 北京:中国轻工业出版社,2014: 6-10.
[6]
申荷永,陈侃,高岚. 沙盘游戏治疗的历史与理论[J]. 心理发展与教育,2005, 21(2): 124-128.
[7]
Zung WW. A self-rating depression scale[J]. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 1965, 12: 63-70.
[8]
彭慧,张一英,季莹,等. 农村地区女性自评抑郁量表中文版的信度效度分析[J]. 上海医药,2013, 34(14): 20-22, 23.
[9]
成承,张丽萍. 焦虑抑郁状态与代谢综合征关系的研究[J]. 中华保健医学杂志,2016, 18(2): 131-133.
[10]
张利滨,黄钢,章小雷. 沙盘游戏疗法的研究进展[J]. 医学综述,2008, 14(4): 565-567.
[11]
范国平,高岚,李江雪. "沙盘游戏"的理论分析及其在幼儿教育中的应用研究[J]. 心理学探新,2003, 23(2): 51-54.
[12]
Seligman MEP. 持续的幸福. 赵昱鲲,译[M]. 杭州:浙江人民出版社,2012: 10-12.
[13]
何琴. 沙盘游戏作为儿童心理教育技术的探索[D]. 广州:华南师范大学,2004.
[14]
徐洁,张日昇. 箱庭疗法应用于家庭治疗的理论背景与临床实践[J]. 心理科学,2007, 30(1): 151-154.
[15]
周风举,赵云,李竞,等. 沙盘游戏治疗在围化疗期肺癌患者中的应用研究[J]. 中国临床研究,2015, 28(10): 1312-1315.
[16]
陶慧慧,邵婷,倪玲玲,等. 母亲孕期情绪症状与学龄前儿童情绪和行为问题关系的出生队列研究[J]. 中华预防医学杂志,2016, 50(2): 129-135.
[17]
龙丽. 心理咨询对怀孕早期情绪抑郁的干预分析[J]. 大家健康,2016,10(30): 178.
[1] 李钱梅, 何冠南, 赵婧, 陈曦, 唐玉英, 马丽琼, 梁蓉, 袁桃, 李明星. 早孕期低危妊娠和高危妊娠胎盘微血流成像特征及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 726-732.
[2] 张舒沁, 陈练. 产后宫腔内妊娠物残留的诊断和临床处理[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 493-497.
[3] 刘子洋, 崔俭俭, 赵茵. 产科弥散性血管内凝血及其评分系统的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 511-518.
[4] 谢江燕, 王亚菲, 贺芳. 妊娠合并血栓性血小板减少性紫癜2例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 556-563.
[5] 韩肖燕, 杨桦. 中孕期孕妇血清胎盘生长因子水平低与胎儿不良预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 398-402.
[6] 杜佳丽, 鲍睿, 乔春红, 韩伟. 中孕期宫颈功能不全孕妇经阴道紧急宫颈环扎术后不良妊娠结局预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 403-409.
[7] 张静, 刘畅, 华成舸. 妊娠期患者口腔诊疗进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 340-344.
[8] 徐敬云, 丁波, 蒋宇慧, 沈杨. 妊娠期单孔腹腔镜手术实施行与思[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 262-266.
[9] 马云霞, 于金勇, 魏淑凤, 韩臣子. 耳穴疗法对肝气郁结型甲状腺结节合并焦虑抑郁的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 348-354.
[10] 胡小靖, 张华. 妊娠期卵巢囊肿蒂扭转的诊断与治疗[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 197-201.
[11] 黎璞, 生秀杰. 妊娠合并子宫颈癌的管理[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 202-208.
[12] 俞慧慧, 尹宗智. 妊娠期胃穿孔[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 209-213.
[13] 鲁珊, 姚蕴珊, 廖色坭, 陈子恩, 张一剑, 蓝健皓, 魏薇, 刘艳杨, 陈艳红, 陈敦金. 妊娠合并急性阑尾炎100例临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 214-219.
[14] 汪文雁, 郑剑兰, 朱丽慈. 体外受精-胚胎移植术后妊娠患者孕产期风险的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 220-226.
[15] 傅新露, 李之岳, 卢丹. 妊娠合并结肠癌穿孔致脓毒症休克一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 227-231.
阅读次数
全文


摘要