切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (01) : 61 -64. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2017.01.011

所属专题: 文献

论著

开腹与腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术的对比研究
李艺平1,(), 颜友良2, 王秀中1, 钟亮尹3, 钟洁4   
  1. 1. 528412 广东省中山市东升医院妇产科
    2. 528400 广东省中山市博爱医院妇产科
    3. 510080 广州,广东药学院附属第一医院检验科
    4. 200430 上海市杨浦区市东医院妇科
  • 收稿日期:2016-08-31 修回日期:2016-12-19 出版日期:2017-02-01
  • 通信作者: 李艺平

Comparative study of transabdominal and laparoscopic myomectomy

Yiping Li1,(), Youliang Yan2, Xiuzhong Wang1, Liangyin Zhong3, Jie Zhong4   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongshan Dongsheng Hospital of Guangdong Province, Zhongshan 528412, Guangdong Province, China
    3. Department of Clinical Laboratory, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
    4. Department of Gynecology, East City Hospital of Shanghai Yangpu District, Shanghai 200430, China
  • Received:2016-08-31 Revised:2016-12-19 Published:2017-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Yiping Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Yiping, Email:
引用本文:

李艺平, 颜友良, 王秀中, 钟亮尹, 钟洁. 开腹与腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 13(01): 61-64.

Yiping Li, Youliang Yan, Xiuzhong Wang, Liangyin Zhong, Jie Zhong. Comparative study of transabdominal and laparoscopic myomectomy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2017, 13(01): 61-64.

目的

探讨开腹与腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤(UM)剔除术后患者肌瘤残留、复发及妊娠结局。

方法

选取2009年1月至2015年12月,于广东省中山市东升医院妇产科收治的116例UM患者为研究对象。根据随机数字表法,将其分为观察组(n=58)与对照组(n=58)。对观察组患者进行腹腔镜下UM剔除术,对照组患者进行常规开腹UM剔除术。统计学比较2组UM患者的术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间,剔除的UM个数、重量,术后并发症发生情况,以及术后患者妊娠结局、UM残留及复发情况。2组患者年龄、UM直径、个数及单发与多发性UM构成比等一般临床资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。本研究与所有同意接受研究的UM患者签署知情同意书。

结果

①与对照组相比,观察组UM患者术中出血量、剔除的UM个数均显著减少,手术时间、住院时间均显著缩短,剔除的UM重量显著降低,并且差异均有统计学意义(t=7.136,P=0.029;t=4.913,P=0.041;t=9.259,P=0.017;t=5.715,P=0.035;t=8.149,P=0.023)。②观察组UM患者术后并发症发生率为15.5%(9/58),显著低于对照组的27.7%(16/58),二者比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.132,P=0.045)。③2组UM患者术后UM残留率、复发率及妊娠率分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(χ2=0.892,P=0.345;χ2=1.335,P=0.248;χ2=0.637,P=0.425)。

结论

开腹与腹腔镜下UM剔除术后,UM残留、复发及妊娠结局相近,但腹腔镜下UM剔除术手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量等方面,优于开腹UM剔除术,并且术后并发症少,安全性高。

Objective

To explore the residual, recurrence and pregnancy outcomes of uterus myoma (UM) patients with transabdominal and laparoscopic myomectomy.

Methods

From January 2009 to December 2015, a total of 116 cases of UM patients in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongshan Dongsheng Hospital of Guangdong Province were selected as research objects. According to the random number table method, they were divided into the observation group (n=58) and control group (n=58). The patients in observation group were treated with laparoscopic myomectomy, and the patients in control group underwent routine laparotomy myomectomy. The transoperative bleeding volume, operation duration, length of hospitalization, removal number of UM, removal weight of UM, postoperative complications, and postoperative pregnancy outcomes, UM recurrence and residual between two groups were analyzed by statistical methods. There were no significant differences between two groups in the age, diameter and number of UM and constituent ratio of solitary and multiple UM (P>0.05). All the UM patients who agreed to accept this study signed the informed consent.

Results

①Compared with control group, both the transoperative bleeding volume and removal number of UM in the observation group were significantly reduced, and both the operation duration and length of hospitalization were significantly shortened, and removal weight of UM decreased significantly, and all the differences were statistically significant (t=7.136, P=0.029; t=4.913, P=0.041; t=9.259, P=0.017; t=5.715, P=0.035; t=8.149, P=0.023). ②The incidence of postoperative complication in observation group was 15.5% (9/58), which was significantly lower than 27.7% (16/58) in control group, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.132, P=0.045). ③There were no significant differences between two groups in the rates of UM residual, UM recurrence and pregnancy (χ2=0.892, P=0.345; χ2=1.335, P=0.248; χ2=0.637, P=0.425).

Conclusions

Postoperative UM residual, recurrence and pregnancy outcomes of transabdominal and laparoscopic myomectomy are similar. But the operation duration, length of hospitalization and transoperative bleeding volume of laparoscopic myomectomy are superior to transabdominal myomectomy, and leads to less postoperative complications with high safety.

表1 2组子宫肌瘤患者手术情况比较(±s)
表2 2组子宫肌瘤患者术后并发症发生情况比较[例数(%)]
表3 2组子宫肌瘤患者术后肌瘤残留、复发及妊娠结局比较[例数(%)]
[1]
王海波. 263例腹腔镜与开腹手术子宫肌瘤剔除术后效果比较[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2013, 28(11): 1853-1855.
[2]
田玉翠,代荫梅. 子宫肌瘤剔除术后残留和复发的临床危险因素分析[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2014, 49(8): 594-598.
[3]
张建红,杨宝珍,胡玉玲,等. 腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术与开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术的对比研究[J]. 医学综述,2013, 19(16): 3066-3068.
[4]
龚敏. 腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗子宫肌瘤临床疗效观察[J]. 河北医学,2013, 19(5): 690-692.
[5]
裴桂华. 腹腔镜与开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术的比较[J]. 贵阳医学院学报,2015, 40(2): 186-188.
[6]
林建国,何恒君. 腹腔镜与开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术近期临床疗效及组织损伤程度观察[J]. 河北医学,2014, 20(8): 1256-1258.
[7]
蒋春梅. 腹腔镜与开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术后肌瘤残留、复发及妊娠结局的对比分析[J]. 现代诊断与治疗,2015, 26(12): 2788-2789.
[8]
陈咏梅. 腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与开腹手术治疗后肌瘤残留、复发及妊娠结局的对比研究[J]. 中国现代药物应用,2015, 9(2): 50-51.
[9]
梁炳宏. 腹腔镜与开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术后的对比分析[J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科,2014, 6(9): 69-71.
[10]
徐芳. 腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗子宫肌瘤近期疗效比较[J]. 中华全科医学,2013, 11(7): 1063-1064.
[11]
孙瑞. 腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与开腹手术治疗后肌瘤残留、复发及妊娠结局的对比研究[J]. 临床医学,2014, 34(4): 81-82.
[12]
杨美芳. 腹腔镜与开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术后肌瘤残留、复发及妊娠结局的对比分析[J]. 中外医疗,2016, 35(7): 68-69, 72.
[13]
支翠芳. 腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤手术的疗效研究[J]. 安徽医药,2014, 18(8): 1538-1540.
[14]
唐靖,蒋蕾. 腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗子宫肌瘤的临床疗效比较[J]. 实用临床医药杂志,2013, 17(19): 82-83, 86.
[15]
王建华. 腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗子宫肌瘤临床对比研究[J]. 中国医药导刊,2013, 15(11): 1808, 1810.
[16]
王金娟,成九梅,金婧,等. 宫颈肌瘤经阴道剔除术与经腹腔镜剔除术的疗效观察[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2014, 10(6): 779-782.
[17]
崔颖,孟庆伟,申桂华,等. 阴式与腹腔镜下复杂子宫肌瘤剔除术的对比分析[J/CD]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2011, 5(12): 3608-3610.
[1] 杜佳丽, 鲍睿, 乔春红, 韩伟. 中孕期宫颈功能不全孕妇经阴道紧急宫颈环扎术后不良妊娠结局预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 403-409.
[2] 李欣, 魏艺, 张娟, 张娟娟, 凌秀凤, 赵纯, 张媔秋. 高龄女性冻胚移植周期临床妊娠结局的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 276-283.
[3] 薛静, 孙雅楠, 朱丽丽, 李淑红. 妊娠期急性脂肪肝孕产妇诊疗及其妊娠结局[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 312-321.
[4] 邵小丽, 林燕, 张玲玲, 韩亚琴. 超声引导下子宫肌瘤注射聚桂醇硬化术联合术后米非司酮治疗临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 353-360.
[5] 陈义思, 梁敏, 李红雨, 夏雪, 刘燕茜, 李晨曲, 王丹. 妊娠合并慢性肾病围产期多学科团队管理价值研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 133-139.
[6] 贾赛君, 张英, 万佳义. 妊娠合并亚临床甲状腺功能减退孕妇的妊娠结局[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 140-147.
[7] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[8] 高建新, 王啸飞, 于淼, 路夷平. 局部进展期直肠癌新辅助治疗后行ISR术远切缘距离的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 539-543.
[9] 鲁珊, 姚蕴珊, 廖色坭, 陈子恩, 张一剑, 蓝健皓, 魏薇, 刘艳杨, 陈艳红, 陈敦金. 妊娠合并急性阑尾炎100例临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 214-219.
[10] 汪文雁, 郑剑兰, 朱丽慈. 体外受精-胚胎移植术后妊娠患者孕产期风险的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 220-226.
[11] 俞慧慧, 尹宗智. 妊娠期胃穿孔[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 209-213.
[12] 胡淼, 杜丽丽, 张丽姿, 林琳, 张瑜亮, 古士锋, 古仲嘉, 赖思莹, 梁景英, 刘雨, 黄敏珊, 黄媛媛, 黄晴晴, 罗世君, 陈敦金. 体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射受孕患者胎盘植入分级及围产结局的研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 183-189.
[13] 刘文易, 高晓彤, 汤景, 麦卓瑶, 祝丽琼, 陈慧. 体外受精-胚胎移植妊娠合并绒毛膜下血肿患者妊娠结局的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 93-99.
[14] 彭小蓉, 莫伟, 李琴, 吴雅琴, 李兰. 妊娠期妇女静脉血栓栓塞症预防的知信行现状及其影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 274-280.
[15] 李鸿睿, 胡海清. 上消化道平滑肌瘤内镜下治疗的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 259-262.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?