切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (04) : 401 -405. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2016.04.006

所属专题: 文献

论著

唐氏综合征中孕期产前诊断指征的临床研究
欧阳鲁平1, 刘天盛1, 费冬梅1, 黄红倩1, 陈少科1, 郑陈光1,()   
  1. 1. 530003 南宁,广西壮族自治区妇幼保健院/儿童医院/妇产医院遗传代谢中心实验室
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-31 修回日期:2016-06-12 出版日期:2016-08-01
  • 通信作者: 郑陈光

Clinical research of prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome during the second trimester of pregnancy

Luping Ou-Yang1, Tiansheng Liu1, Dongmei Fei1, Hongqian Huang1, Shaoke Chen1, Chenguang Zheng1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Genetic Metabolism, Maternal and Child Hospital/Children′s Hospital/Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning 530003, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
  • Received:2016-05-31 Revised:2016-06-12 Published:2016-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Chenguang Zheng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zheng Chenguang, Email:
引用本文:

欧阳鲁平, 刘天盛, 费冬梅, 黄红倩, 陈少科, 郑陈光. 唐氏综合征中孕期产前诊断指征的临床研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 12(04): 401-405.

Luping Ou-Yang, Tiansheng Liu, Dongmei Fei, Hongqian Huang, Shaoke Chen, Chenguang Zheng. Clinical research of prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome during the second trimester of pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2016, 12(04): 401-405.

目的

探讨胎儿唐氏综合征(DS)的不同产前诊断指征,在中孕期产前诊断中的应用价值。

方法

选择2011年1月1日至2014年12月31日于广西壮族自治区妇幼保健院/儿童医院/妇产医院接受中孕期羊膜腔穿刺术的18 693例孕妇的临床病历资料为研究对象。本组接受中孕期羊膜腔穿刺术孕妇的DS产前诊断指征包括:高龄(≥35岁,11 664例),血清学筛查高风险(酶联免疫法检测21-三体综合征风险值≥1/270、18-三体综合征风险值≥1/350,4 226例),胎儿超声检查结果异常(620例),夫妇一方染色体异常(651例),夫妇双方或一方为地中海贫血患者(782例),以及不良孕产史(748例)与无创产前检测(NIPT)结果呈阳性(2例)。上述进行中孕期羊膜腔穿刺术的胎儿DS产前诊断指征均为单一指征,无交叉。羊膜腔穿刺取羊水细胞进行遗传学检查,对胎儿DS进行确诊。对具有胎儿DS不同产前诊断指征的中孕期孕妇的胎儿DS检出例数及检出率进行比较,并对检出率进行统计学分析。本研究遵循的程序符合广西壮族自治区妇幼保健院/儿童医院/妇产医院人体试验委员会制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,羊膜腔穿刺术前均与受试者签署知情同意书。

结果

本组18 693例孕妇于中孕期进行羊膜腔穿刺,共计检出151例DS胎儿,检出率为0.8%(151/18 693)。对中孕期DS胎儿的不同产前诊断指征与胎儿DS检出例数及检出率的研究结果显示,分别于11 664例高龄、4 226例血清学筛查高风险、620例胎儿超声检查结果异常、651例夫妇一方染色体异常、782例夫妇双方或一方为地中海贫血患者、748例不良孕产史及2例NIPT结果呈阳性的孕妇中,检出DS胎儿45、79、15、2、5、3及2例,胎儿DS检出率分别为0.4%、1.9%、2.4%、0.3%、0.6%、0.4%及100.0%。对上述中孕期具有胎儿DS不同产前诊断指征孕妇的胎儿DS检出率比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=111.83,P<0.001)。

结论

血清学筛查高风险、高龄(≥35岁)妊娠及胎儿超声检查结果异常,是中孕期产前筛查胎儿DS的重要产前诊断指征。同时,应重视夫妇一方染色体异常和地中海贫血等产前诊断指征,减少出生缺陷儿的出生率。

Objective

To analyze the application value of different prenatal diagnosis indications of fetal Down syndrome (DS) in the prenatal diagnosis during the second trimester.

Methods

From 1st January 2011 to 31st December 2014, clinical data of 18 693 cases of pregnant women who received amniocentesis in Maternal and Child Hospital/Children′s Hospital/Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region were selected as research subjects. The prenatal diagnosis indications of DS among 18 693 cases of pregnant women who received amniocentesis during the second trimester included: advanced maternal age (≥35 years old, 11 664 cases), high risk of serum screening (the risk value of trisomy-21 syndrome ≥ 1/270, trisomy-18 syndrome ≥ 1/350, 4 226 cases), abnormal fetal ultrasound examination results (620 cases), one of the couple with chromosomal abnormalities (651 cases), and one of the couple or two with mediterranean anemia (782 cases), abnormal pregnancy history (748 cases) and noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT) positive (2 cases). All the prenatal diagnosis indications of DS were uncrossed. Amniotic fluid cells were collected by amniocentesis to take the genetics examination, in order to final diagnose the fetal DS. The number and detection rate of fetal DS among pregnant women during the second trimester with the above-mentioned prenatal diagnosis indications of DS were compared, and the detection rate of fetal DS was analyzed by statistical method. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Maternal and Child Hospital/Children′s Hospital/Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. Informed consent was obtained from each participate before receiving amniocentesis.

Results

A total of 18 693 cases of amniotic fluid were detected, and 151 cases were detected as fetal DS, the detection rate was 0.8% (151/18 693). The results of amniocentesis showed that, among 11 664 cases of pregnant women with advanced maternal age, 4 226 cases with high risk of serum screening, 620 cases with abnormal fetal ultrasound examination results, 651 cases with one of the couple with chromosomal abnormalities, 782 cases with one of the couple or two with mediterranean anemia, 748 cases with abnormal pregnancy history and 2 cases with NIPT positive, 45, 79, 15, 2, 5, 3 and 2 cases were detected as fetal DS, respectively. And the detection rate of fetal DS was 0.4%, 1.9%, 2.4%, 0.3%, 0.6%, 0.4% and 100.0%, respectively. There was statistical difference among the fetal DS detection rate of different prenatal diagnosis indications of fetal DS (χ2=111.83, P<0.001).

Conclusions

High-risk of serum screening, advanced maternal age (≥35 years old), and abnormal ultrasonic testing results are important prenatal diagnosis indications of fetal DS. At the same time, we should pay attention to the prenatal diagnosis indications of one of the couple with chromosomal abnormalities or mediterranean anemia, in order to reduce the rate of birth defects.

表1 具有胎儿DS不同产前诊断指征中孕期孕妇的胎儿DS检出例数与检出率比较
[1]
王立芳,李东明,韦媛, 等. 广西地区2009-2012年31 944例孕中期孕妇产前筛查、诊断及随访情况分析[J]. 实用医学杂志,2013, 29(24): 4064-4066.
[2]
宋亦军,刘丛丛,刘俊涛, 等. 羊膜腔穿刺用于胎儿染色体异常产前诊断的评价[J]. 生殖医学杂志,2012, 21(4): 358-362.
[3]
许遵鹏,廖灿,李蓓, 等. 广州地区妊娠中期血清学三联指标产前筛查胎儿染色体异常的结果分析[J]. 中华围产医学杂志,2014, 17(1): 36-38.
[4]
Tseng JJ, Chou MM, Lo FC, et al. Detection of chromosome aberration in the second trimester using genetic amniocentesis: experience during 1995-2004[J]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 45(1): 39-41.
[5]
吴小青,李英,谢晓蕊, 等. 3 240名高龄孕妇胎儿染色体核型分析[J]. 中华医学遗传学杂志,2014, 31(2): 255-257.
[6]
Benn PA, Fang M, Egan JF. Trends in the use of second trimester maternal serum screening from 1991 to 2003[J]. Genel Med, 2005, 7(5): 328-331.
[7]
戚庆炜,蒋宇林,周希亚, 等. 6 584例高龄孕妇妊娠中期羊水染色体核型分析结果[J]. 中华围产医学杂志,2013, 16(2): 76-81.
[8]
邹波,张莉超,施丹华. 孕妇年龄风险与胎儿染色体异常的相关性分析[J]. 中华医学遗传学杂志,2015, 32(1): 125-127.
[9]
严英榴, 杨秀雄, 沈理. 产前超声诊断学[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2005: 440-468.
[10]
Senat MV, Bussieres L, Couderc S, et al. Long-term outcome of children born after a first-trimester measurement of nuchal translucency at the 99th percentile or greater with normal karyotype: a prospective study[J]. Am J Obstet Gyncol, 2007, 196(1): 53. e1-e6.
[11]
Nicolaides KH, Azar G, Byrne D, et a1. Fetal nuchal translucency: ultrasound screening for chromosomal defects in the first trimester of pregnancy[J]. BMJ, 1992, 304(6831): 867-889.
[12]
Chitayat D, Langlois S, Wilson RD, et al. Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2011, 33(7): 736-750.
[13]
邹波,鲁丽萍,毛倩倩. 不同羊膜腔穿刺指征的产前细胞遗传学结果分析[J]. 中华医学遗传学杂志,2014, 31(6): 805-806.
[14]
林晓娟,孙庆梅,何晓春, 等. 胎儿染色体核型异常的临床分析[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志:电子版,2016, 12(2): 173-178.
[15]
刘春燕,何斌,韩代文, 等. 中孕期唐氏综合征血清学筛查在高龄孕妇中的应用价值探讨[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志:电子版,2016, 12(2): 159-163.
[16]
Position statement from the Italian College of Fetal Maternal Medicine: non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) by maternal plasma DNA sequencing[J]. J Prenat Med, 2013, 7(2): 19-20.
[17]
Dan S, Wang W, Ren J, et al. Clinical application of massively parallel sequencing-based prenatal non invasive fetal trisomy test for trisomies 21 and 18 in 11 105 pregnancies with mixed risk factors[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2012, 32(13): 1225-1232.
[1] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[2] 陈谊, 文华轩, 陈琮瑛, 姚远, 李胜利. 胎儿半侧巨脑畸形的产前超声诊断及研究分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(01): 28-34.
[3] 戢秀勤, 杨小红, 赵胜, 路小军, 张晓燕, 张涛, 黄晓宇. 早孕期双胎反向动脉灌注序列征的产前超声诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(12): 1355-1360.
[4] 曾晴, 文华轩, 袁鹰, 丁妍, 罗丹丹, 廖伊梅, 梁美玲, 秦越, 彭桂艳, 林毅, 邹于, 李胜利. 二维横切面新方法对胎儿胼胝体结构异常的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(09): 899-907.
[5] 任芸芸. 无创产前诊断时代早孕期超声检查的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(09): 873-876.
[6] 薛超, 张烨, 赵映, 韩建成, 谷孝艳, 孙琳, 刘晓伟, 宋伟, 何怡华. 胎儿先天性肺动脉瓣缺如综合征的超声特征及预后分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 410-418.
[7] 张雯, 张彦春, 刘凯波, 徐宏燕. 北京市胎儿先天性脑积水的产前MRI诊断及围产期转归[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 345-349.
[8] 曾照敏, 余海燕. 超雌综合征的临床认知[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 145-150.
[9] 卞玉香, 王丽春, 蔡蓉. 胎儿超声软指标对胎儿染色体异常的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 85-92.
[10] 胡青, 余海燕. 胎儿宫内治疗及风险评估[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 23-30.
[11] 张禾璇, 宋咏刚, 杨雪. 孕妇无创产前检测结果的大样本分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(06): 685-691.
[12] 陈金卫, 戴常平, 申屠伟慧, 张伟娟, 张蕊, 王红英. 胎儿超声筛查不同胎龄胎儿先天性唇腭裂的检查时间及检出率比较[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(04): 442-448.
[13] 贺江梅, 刘红梅, 郑梅玲, 张志莉. 无创产前检测筛查胎儿染色体拷贝数变异临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(03): 300-306.
[14] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[15] 谭剑平, 胡搏文, 汤景, 刘颖娜, 杜涛, 祝丽琼, 刘颖琳, 曹春伟, 陈慧. 复发性流产产前诊断指征与妊娠结局60例临床分析[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2022, 11(04): 234-240.
阅读次数
全文


摘要