切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (03) : 345 -349. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2023.03.015

论著

北京市胎儿先天性脑积水的产前MRI诊断及围产期转归
张雯, 张彦春, 刘凯波, 徐宏燕()   
  1. 首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院/北京妇幼保健院围产保健科,北京 100026
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-28 修回日期:2023-04-20 出版日期:2023-06-01
  • 通信作者: 徐宏燕

Prenatal MRI diagnosis and perinatal outcome of fetal congenital hydrocephalus in Beijing

Wen Zhang, Yanchun Zhang, Kaibo Liu, Hongyan Xu()   

  1. Department of Perinatal Health Care, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University · Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing 100026, China
  • Received:2022-10-28 Revised:2023-04-20 Published:2023-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Hongyan Xu
  • Supported by:
    Project of Beijing Scientific and Technology Commission(Z141100006014025)
引用本文:

张雯, 张彦春, 刘凯波, 徐宏燕. 北京市胎儿先天性脑积水的产前MRI诊断及围产期转归[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 345-349.

Wen Zhang, Yanchun Zhang, Kaibo Liu, Hongyan Xu. Prenatal MRI diagnosis and perinatal outcome of fetal congenital hydrocephalus in Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 345-349.

目的

探讨北京市最近6年胎儿先天性脑积水(CH)的产前MRI诊断情况及围产期转归。

方法

选择2015年1月至2020年12月北京市出生缺陷监测系统内收集的被诊断为CH的468例胎儿及新生儿为研究对象,对CH诊断及围产期(宫内及出生0~6 d)死亡情况,进行回顾性分析。采用χ2检验,对产前诊断与生后诊断的孤立性脑积水患儿围产期死亡率等,进行统计学比较。本研究遵循的程序符合2013年修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》。

结果

①北京市出生缺陷监测系统最近6年的胎儿及生后7 d内新生儿CH发生率为3.57×10-4(468/1 310 025)。本组468例CH患儿的产前诊断率为97.44%(456/468),产前检出的平均胎龄为24周,检出时胎龄≥28周者占26.53%(121/456)。②产前诊断的456例CH儿中,56例接受产前超声联合MRI检查者,占比为12.28%(56/456),其中40例CH患儿的MRI与超声诊断结果一致,其余16例的MRI检查结果对其颅内畸形具体类型进行补充诊断。③本组105例胎龄≥28周的孤立性脑积水患儿中,除外治疗性引产49例胎儿,其余56例患儿的围产期死亡率为14.29%(8/56)。产前诊断与生后诊断的孤立性脑积水患儿围产期死亡率分别为12.24%(6/49)、28.57%(2/7),二者比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.33,P=0.564);产前超声与产前超声联合MRI诊断的孤立性脑积水患儿围产期死亡率分别为11.63%(5/43)、16.67%(1/6),二者比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.564)。

结论

MRI对产前超声诊断CH患儿的颅内畸形,具有补充诊断价值。

Objective

To explore prenatal MRI diagnosis and perinatal outcome of fetal congenital hydrocephalus (CH) in Beijing in recent 6 years.

Methods

From January 2015 to December 2020, a total of 468 fetuses and newborns with CH included into Beijing Birth Defects Monitoring Network were selected as the study subjects. The diagnosis of CH and perinatal death data of intrauterine and within 0-6 d after birth were analyzed retrospectively. The perinatal mortality of children with isolated CH were compared between prenatal diagnosis and postnatal diagnosis by chi-square test. The procedure followed in this study was in line with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013.

Results

①The prevalence of CH fetuses and newborns within 0-6 d after birth from 2015 to 2020 in Beijing Birth Defects Monitoring Network was 3.57×10-4 (468/1 310 025). The prenatal diagnosis rate of 468 children with CH was 97.44% (456/468). The median gestational age when CH was detected in pregnancy was 24 weeks, and the gestational age ≥28 weeks at the time of diagnosis of CH accounted for 26.53%(121/456). ② Among 456 prenatal diagnosed cases, 56 cases were examined by prenatal ultrasound combined with MRI, accounted for 12.28%(56/456). Among those 56 cases, results of MRI were consistent with ultrasound diagnosis in 40 cases, and 16 cases were supplementary diagnosed specific types of intracranial malformations. ③ Among 105 children with isolated hydrocephalus of gestational age ≥28 weeks, except 49 cases were taken therapeutic induction labortion measures, the perinatal mortality rate of another 56 cases was 14.29%(8/56). The perinatal mortality rate of prenatal diagnosis and postpartum diagnosis of isolated hydrocephalus were 12.24%(6/49) and 28.57%(2/7), respectively, and there was no significant difference between them (χ2=0.33, P=0.564). The perinatal mortality rate of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and prenatal ultrasound combined MRI diagnosis of isolated hydrocephalus were 11.63%(5/43) and 16.67%(1/6), respectively, and there was no significant difference between them (P=0.564).

Conclusion

Prenatal MRI has supplementary diagnostic value for intracranial malformation than prenatal ultrasound in children with CH.

表1 2015—2020年北京市出生缺陷监测系统内收集的56例胎龄≥28周被诊断为孤立性脑积水患儿的围产期转归及死亡率
[1]
Fernández-Méndez R, Richards HK, Seeley HM, et al. Current epidemiology of cerebrospinal fluid shunt surgery in the UK and Ireland (2004-2013)[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2019, 90(7): 747-754. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-319927.
[2]
吴青青,杨文娟. 解读胎儿孕中期常规超声筛查应用指南[国际妇产科超声学会(ISUOG)][J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2011, 8(1): 17-21. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2011.01.004.
[3]
中华人民共和国卫生部令(第33号)——产前诊断技术管理办法[EB/OL]. (2002-12-13)[2022-07-23].

URL    
[4]
中国出生缺陷监测中心,全国妇幼卫生监测办公室. 中国出生缺陷监测系统疑难和微小畸形报告指南(试用版2012)[EB/OL]. (2012-11-01)[2022-07-23].

URL    
[5]
World Health Organization. ICD-11: International Statistical Classification of Diseases. The global standard for diagnostic health information[EB/OL]. (2021-05-05)[2022-07-23].

URL    
[6]
Yi L, Wan C, Deng C, et al. Changes in prevalence and perinatal outcomes of congenital hydrocephalus among Chinese newborns: a retrospective analysis based on the hospital-based birth defects surveillancesystem[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2017, 17(1): 406. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017-1603-2.
[7]
Garne E, Loane M, Addor MC, et al. Congenital hydrocephalus - prevalence, prenatal diagnosis and outcome of pregnancy in four European regions[J]. Eur J Paediatr Neurol, 2010, 14(2): 150-155. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2009.03.005.
[8]
Andersson J, Rosell M, Kockum K, et al. Prevalence of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a prospective, population-based study[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(5): e0217705. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217705.
[9]
Manganaro L, Bernardo S, De Vito C, et al. Role of fetal MRI in the evaluation of isolated and non-isolated corpus callosum dysgenesis: results of a cross-sectional study[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2017, 37(3): 244-252. DOI: 10.1002/pd.4990.
[10]
Nagaraj UD, Calvo-Garcia MA, Kline-Fath BM. Abnormalities associated with the cavum septi pellucidi on fetal MRI: what radiologists need to know[J]. Am J Roentgenol, 2018, 210(5): 989-997. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.17.19219.
[11]
Prayer D, Malinger GBrugger PC, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: performance of fetal magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Ultrasound Obstet & Gyne, 2017, 49(5): 671-680. DOI: 10.1002/uog.17412.
[12]
夏秋玲,漆洪波. "2018年美国母胎医学会胎儿轻度侧脑室增宽诊断、评估、管理指南"解读[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志2018, 34(11):1238-1242. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2018110113.
[13]
Van denVeyver IB. Prenatally diagnosed developmental abnormalities of the central nervous system and genetic syndromes: a practical review[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2019, 39(9): 666-678. DOI: 10.1002/pd.5520.
[14]
朱颖. 胎儿疾病的MRI诊断[J]. 中华围产医学杂志2020, 23(11):737-741. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113903-20201113-01102.
[1] 武玺宁, 欧阳云淑, 张一休, 孟华, 徐钟慧, 张培培, 吕珂. 胎儿心脏超声检查在抗SSA/Ro-SSB/La抗体阳性妊娠管理中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1056-1060.
[2] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[3] 丁建民, 秦正义, 张翔, 周燕, 周洪雨, 王彦冬, 经翔. 超声造影与普美显磁共振成像对具有高危因素的≤3 cm肝结节进行LI-RADS分类诊断的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 930-938.
[4] 赵红娟, 赵博文, 潘美, 纪园园, 彭晓慧, 陈冉. 应用多普勒超声定量分析正常中晚孕期胎儿左心室收缩舒张时间指数[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 951-958.
[5] 张莲莲, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳. 颈部血管超声在粥样硬化斑块易损性评估中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 816-821.
[6] 张璟璟, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 毛彦恺, 潘陈可, 朱玲艳, 朱琳琳, 蓝秋晔. 胎儿超声心动图测量McGoon指数在评价胎儿肺血管发育中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 860-865.
[7] 旺久, 陈军, 朱霞, 米玛央金, 赵胜, 陈欣林, 李建华, 王双. 山南市妇幼保健院开展胎儿系统超声筛查的效果分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 728-733.
[8] 徐鹏, 李军, 高巍伦, 王峥, 庞珅, 李春妮, 朱霆. 快速旋转扫查法在胎儿超声心动图检查中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 761-766.
[9] 谭芳, 杨娇娇, 沈玉琴, 李炎菲海, 王海蕊, 范思涵, 纪学芹. 胎儿心脏定量分析技术对正常胎儿心脏形态及收缩功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 598-604.
[10] 罗刚, 泮思林, 陈涛涛, 许茜, 纪志娴, 王思宝, 孙玲玉. 超声心动图在胎儿心脏介入治疗室间隔完整的肺动脉闭锁中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 605-609.
[11] 黄佳, 石华, 张玉国, 胡佳琪, 陈茜. 胎儿左头臂静脉正常与异常超声图像特征及其临床意义[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 610-617.
[12] 袁泽, 庄丽. 超声检测胎儿脐动脉和大脑中动脉血流对胎儿宫内窘迫的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 618-621.
[13] 刘冰茹, 刘皓希, 陈莹, 赖世伟, 陈蓉. 疑似乳腺癌的韧带样纤维瘤病一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 314-317.
[14] 韩宇, 张武, 李安琪, 陈文颖, 谢斯栋. MRI肝脏影像报告和数据系统对非肝硬化乙肝患者肝细胞癌的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 669-673.
[15] 钟广俊, 刘春华, 朱万森, 徐晓雷, 王兆军. MRI联合不同扫描序列在胃癌术前分期诊断及化疗效果和预后的评估[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 378-382.
阅读次数
全文


摘要