切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03) : 305 -311. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2016.03.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

妊娠期糖尿病患者血糖波动与新生儿出生体重、母体及新生儿不良妊娠结局的相关性研究
余凡1, 廖海明2, 殷文静1, 彭秀红1, 李智敏1, 王意1, 牛建民1,()   
  1. 1. 510010 广州,广东省妇幼保健院妇产科
    2. 510630 广州,南方医科大学第三附属医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-04 修回日期:2016-04-28 出版日期:2016-06-01
  • 通信作者: 牛建民

Research of glycemic variability of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus and its relationship with infant birth weight and adverse pregnancy outcomes

Fan Yu1, Haiming Liao2, Wenjing Yin1, Xiuhong Peng1, Zhimin Li1, Yi Wang1, Jianmin Niu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou 510010, Guangdong Province, China
    2. Department of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2016-01-04 Revised:2016-04-28 Published:2016-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Jianmin Niu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Niu Jianmin, Email:
引用本文:

余凡, 廖海明, 殷文静, 彭秀红, 李智敏, 王意, 牛建民. 妊娠期糖尿病患者血糖波动与新生儿出生体重、母体及新生儿不良妊娠结局的相关性研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 12(03): 305-311.

Fan Yu, Haiming Liao, Wenjing Yin, Xiuhong Peng, Zhimin Li, Yi Wang, Jianmin Niu. Research of glycemic variability of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus and its relationship with infant birth weight and adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2016, 12(03): 305-311.

目的

应用持续性动态血糖监测系统(CGMS)监测妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)患者血糖水平,并探讨GDM患者血糖波动与新生儿出生体重、母体及新生儿不良妊娠结局的相关性。

方法

选取2011年4月至2012年8月于广东省妇幼保健院门诊定期产前检查的189例GDM患者为研究对象。本组GDM患者的诊断符合2011年美国糖尿病协会(ADA)推荐的GDM诊断标准。对本组患者于入组第1周,进行第1次CGMS 72 h血糖监测。对其采取个体化血糖控制4周后,即入组第5周时,进行第2次CGMS72 h血糖监测。收集189例GDM患者的年龄、身高、孕产史、孕前体重、空腹血糖水平、口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT) 1 h血糖(OGTT-GLU1h)、OGTT 2 h血糖(OGTT-GLU2h)、OGTT日糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平、入组第1及第5周平均血糖水平(MBG)、血糖水平标准差(SDBG)、平均血糖波动幅度(MAGE)及日间血糖平均绝对差(MODD),以及新生儿体重、母体与新生儿不良妊娠结局等指标。采用多重线性回归分析方法对GDM患者上述指标与新生儿出生体重,进行相关性分析。采用非条件多因素logistic回归分析方法,对GDM患者上述指标与母体及新生儿不良妊娠结局的关系进行分析。本研究遵循的程序符合广东省妇幼保健院人体试验委员会制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准。

结果

①本组189例GDM患者入组第5周时,MBG、SDBG、MAGE、MODD、高血糖水平(≥7.8 mmol/L)时间及低血糖水平(≤3.3mmol/L)时间分别为(5.7±0.7)mmol/L、(1.1±0.4)mmol/L、(2.4±0.9)mmol/L、(1.2±0.3)mmol/L、60 min/d(0~380 min/d)及0 min/d(0~270 min/d),均分别显著低于入组第1周时的(6.1±0.9)mmol/L、(1.3±0.4)mmol/L、(3.1±0.9)mmol/L、(1.5±0.4)mmol/L、100 min/d(0~760 min/d)及0 min/d(0~470 min/d),并且差异均有统计学意义(χ2=4.197,P<0.001; χ2=7.028,P<0.001; χ2=7.691,P<0.001; χ2=12.986,P<0.001;Z=-4.992,P<0.001;Z=-2.601,P=0.009)。②本组189例GDM患者中,因自然流产(1例)及胎死宫内(2例),共计186例新生儿出生,出生体重为(3 345±508)kg。其中,母体不良妊娠结局包括:1例(0.5%)自然流产,2例(1.1%)胎死宫内,19例(10.1%)合并子痫前期,88例(46.6%)初次剖宫产,36例再次剖宫产(19.0%)。新生儿不良妊娠结局包括:1例(0.5%)产伤,20例(10.8%)巨大儿,48例(25.8%)大于胎龄儿,5例(2.7%)小于胎龄儿,26例(14.0%)合并低血糖,18例(9.7%)合并高胆红素血症,11例(5.9%)合并呼吸窘迫综合征,共计92例(49.5%)新生儿发生不良妊娠结局。③GDM患者入组第1周的MBG及入组第5周的MAGE,均与新生儿出生体重呈正相关关系(b=104.709,P=0.013;b=87.804,P=0.035)。④GDM患者入组第1周的MBG与初产妇,均为初次剖宫产的独立危险因素(OR=1.728,95% CI:1.160~2.573,P=0.007;OR=5.208,95% CI:2.677~10.133,P=0.000)。GDM患者入组第1周的MAGE与MBG,为大于或小于胎龄儿的独立危险因素(OR=1.632,95% CI:1.137~2.343,P=0.008;OR=1.992,95% CI:1.269~3.128,P=0.003)。GDM患者入组第1周的MAGE、MBG及入组第5周的MAGE,均为巨大儿的独立危险因素(OR=1.800,95% CI:1.107~2.925,P=0.018;OR=1.987,95% CI:1.038~3.803,P=0.038;OR=1.885,95% CI:1.063~3.341,P=0.030)。GDM患者入组第1周的MAGE为新生儿不良妊娠结局的独立危险因素(OR=1.452,95% CI:1.050~2.008,P=0.024)。

结论

GDM患者血糖波动异常,可能导致母体及新生儿的不良妊娠结局,因此除了对GDM患者每天监测7次瞬时血糖水平外,还应同时监测其血糖波动情况。

Objective

To analyze the glycemic variability in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) by using continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) and to explore the relationship between GDM glycemic variability and infant birth weight and maternal and neonatal adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

From April 2011 to August 2012, 189 cases of patients with GDM who were ready to regularly receive prenatal examination in the Department of Obstetrics of Guangdong Women and Children Hospital were enrolled in this study. All the GDM patients in this research met the GDM diagnostic criteria recommended by American Diabetes Association. They were instructed to wear the CGMS for 72 consecutive hours in the first week of this study. After four weeks of individual glucose control following strictly with doctors' advice, all the patients wear the CGMS for 72 consecutive hours for the second time in the fifth week of this study The parameters of glycemic variability which included mean blood glucose (MBG), the standard deviation of blood glucose (SDBG), mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), and the mean of daily differences (MODD) were measured in the first and fifth weeks of this study. The maternal and neonatal adverse pregnancy outcomes and infant birth weight were collected. The relationship between infant birth weight and GDM patients' age, height, pregnancy history, body weight before pregnancy, fasting blood glucose level, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) 1 h glucose (OGTT-GLU1h), OGTT 2 h glucose (OGTT-GLU2h) and level of glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) on OGTT day, and MBG, SDBG, MAGE, MODD in the first and fifth weeks of this study were analyzed by multiple linear regression analysis. The relationship between maternal and neonatal adverse pregnancy outcomes and those above indexes of GDM patients in the first and fifth weeks of this study were analyzed by multiple logistic regression analysis. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of Guangdong Women and Children Hospital.

Results

①The MBG, SDBG, MAGE, MODD, duration of hyperglycemia level (≥7.8 mmol/L) and duration of hypoglycemia level (≤3.3mmol/L) of GDM patients in the fifth week of this study were (5.7±0.7) mmol/L, (1.1±0.4) mmol/L, (2.4±0.9) mmol/L, (1.2±0.3) mmol/L, 60 min/d (0-380 min/d) and 0 min/d (0~270 min/d) respectively, which all were significantly lower than those (6.1±0.9) mmol/L, (1.3±0.4) mmol/L, (3.1±0.9) mmol/L, (1.5±0. 4) mmol/L, 100 min/d (0~760 min/d) and 0 min/d (0~470 min/d) in the first week of this study respectively, and all the differences were statistically significant (χ2=4.197, P<0.001; χ2=7.028, P<0.001; χ2=7.691, P<0.001; χ2=12.986, P<0.001; Z=-4.992, P<0.001; Z=-2.601, P=0.009). ②189 women with GDM delivered 186 living infants, as 1 woman miscarried and 2 women experienced intrauterine fetal death. The average birth weight of infants was (3 345±508) kg. The maternal adverse pregnancy outcomes included: 1(0.5%) miscarriage, 2 (1.1%) intrauterine fetal deaths, 19(10.1%) combined with preeclampsia, 88(46.6%) primary cesarean delivery, 36(19.0%) repeat cesarean delivery. The neonatal adverse pregnancy outcomes included: 1(0.5%) obstetric trauma, 20(10.8%) macrosomia, 48(25.8%) large for gestational age, 5(2.7%) small for gestational age, 26(14.0%) combined with hypoglycemia, 18(9.7%) combined with hyperbilirubinemia, 11(5.9%) combined with respiratory distress syndrome. In total, 92(49.5%) infants suffered adverse pregnancy outcomes. ③MBG in the first week and MAGE in the fifth week were strongly associated with infant birth weight (b=104.709, P=0.013; b=87.804, P=0.035). ④MBG in the first week of GDM patients and primipara were independent risk factors for primary cesarean delivery (OR=1.728, 95% CI: 1.160-2.573, P=0.007; OR=5.208, 95% CI: 2.677-10.133, P=0.000). MAGE and MBG in the first week of GDM patients were independent risk factors for large or small for gestational age (OR=1.632, 95% CI: 1.137-2.343, P=0.008; OR=1.992, 95% CI: 1.269-3.128, P=0.003). MAGE, MBG in the first week and MAGE in the fifth week of GDM patients were independent risk factors for macrosomia (OR=1.800, 95% CI: 1.107-2.925, P=0.018; OR=1.987, 95% CI: 1.038-3.803, P=0.038; OR=1.885, 95% CI: 1.063-3.341, P=0.030). MAGE in the first week of GDM patients was independent risk factor for neonatal adverse pregnancy outcome (OR=1.452, 95% CI: 1.050-2.008, P=0.024).

Conclusions

Abnormal glycemic variability in patients with GDM may lead to maternal and neonatal adverse pregnancy outcomes. Therefore, seven times of measurements for glucose levels per day may be not enough for GDM. Monitoring for glycemic variability is also recommended.

表1 GDM患者血糖波动情况
表2 入组第1、第5周时GDM患者血糖波动与新生儿出生体重的相关性分析
表3 入组第1、第5周时GDM患者血糖波动与母体及新生儿不良妊娠结局的非条件多因素logistic回归分析
1
HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group, Metzger BE, Lowe LP, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. N Engl J Med, 2008, 358(19):1991-2002.
2
王蕴慧,吴惠华,刘玉昆,等.加强妊娠期糖尿病管理对妊娠期糖代谢异常患者的影响分析[J/CD].中华临床医师杂志:电子版,2011,5(4):1042-1046.
3
徐洁,杨菁.强化血糖控制对妊娠期糖尿病产妇以及新生儿健康的影响[J/CD].中华妇幼临床医学杂志:电子版,2015,11(2):229-231.
4
魏华莉,刘亚静.妊娠期糖尿病妊娠结局及对新生儿影响的临床分析[J/CD].中华临床医师杂志:电子版,2011,5(18):5479-5480.
5
郑迅风,董巨浪,杜继红,等.妊娠期糖尿病的干预治疗与妊娠结局的临床分析[J/CD].中华妇幼临床医学杂志:电子版,2012,8(4):447-409.
6
Klonoff DC. Continuous glucose monitoring: roadmap for 21st century diabetes therapy[J]. Diabetes Care, 2005, 28(5):1231-1239.
7
McLachlan K, Jenkins A, O'Neal D. The role of continuous glucose monitoring in clinical decision-making in diabetes in pregnancy[J]. Aust NZJ Obstet Gynaecol, 2007, 47(3):186-190.
8
Kestilä KK, Ekblad UU, Rönnemaa T. Continuous glucose monitoring versus self-monitoring of blood glucose in the treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2007, 77(2):174-179.
9
Su JB, Wang XQ, Chen JF, et al. Glycemic variability in gestational diabetes mellitus and its association with β cell function[J]. Endocrine, 2013, 43(2):370-375.
10
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2011[J]. Diabetes Care, 2011, 34(Suppl 1):S11-S61.
11
Service FJ, O'Brien PC, Rizza RA. Measurements of glucose control[J]. Diabetes Care 1987, 10(10):225-237.
12
Service FJ, Nelson RL. Characteristics of glycemic stability[J]. Diabetes Care, 1980, 3(1):58-62.
13
Dalfrà MG, Sartore G, Di Cianni G, et al. Glucose variability in diabetic pregnancy[J]. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2011, 13(8):853-859.
14
刘帅,沈洁,罗祥蓉,等.应用持续动态血糖监测系统分析妊娠期糖尿病血糖波动特征[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2009,25(11):853-855.
15
周健,贾伟平."首届动态血糖监测国际论坛"纪要[J].中华内分泌代谢杂志,2010,26(2):175-176.
16
Yu F, Lv L, liang Z, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring effects on maternal glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2014, 99(12):4674-4682.
[1] 杨皓媛, 龚杰, 邹青伟, 阮航. 哮喘孕妇的母婴不良妊娠结局研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[2] 陈甜甜, 王晓东, 余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[3] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[4] 顾娟, 孙擎擎, 胡方方, 曹义娟, 祁玉娟. 子宫内膜容受性检测改善胚胎反复种植失败患者妊娠结局的临床应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[5] 陈絮, 詹玉茹, 王纯华. 孕妇ABO血型联合甲状腺功能检测对预测妊娠期糖尿病的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[6] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[7] 陈莉, 雷雪芹, 段炼, 曾悦, 何国琳. 影响2次剖宫产术后阴道试产产妇试产成功因素及妊娠结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 287-294.
[8] 陈樱, 陈艳莉. 高龄孕妇心率变异性原因及围产结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 295-301.
[9] 冯丹艳, 曹晓辉, 史玉霞. 血清脂联素与胎盘亮氨酸氨肽酶对妊娠期糖尿病患者妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 302-308.
[10] 邬龙海, 黄淼, 龚云辉, 喻云倩. 血清趋化因子在妊娠期糖尿病孕妇中的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 357-362.
[11] 任国华, 杜晓晓, 洪善玲, 邵帅. 妊娠期高血压并发急性肾损伤患者血清白细胞介素-22、硫化氢及护骨素水平的变化与意义[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 150-155.
[12] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[13] 王欣, 刘琳, 闻哲嘉, 刘春玲, 张弘, 吕芳. 妊娠前应激暴露对小鼠后续妊娠的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 431-437.
[14] 吴晓翔, 杨波, 李景漩, 张凤玲, 郭桂辉, 郑少培. 脐动脉超声检查联合NLR、sFlt-1/PLGF对妊娠高血压综合征患者不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 266-271.
[15] 张丽姿, 陈敦金. 胎盘植入性疾病的不良结局及远期影响[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 155-158.
阅读次数
全文


摘要