切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 159 -163. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2016.02.006

所属专题: 文献

论著

中孕期唐氏综合征血清学筛查在高龄孕妇中的应用价值探讨
刘春燕1, 何斌1, 韩代文1, 刘之英1, 赖怡1, 秦利1, 袁粒星1, 刘珊玲1, 王和1,*,*()   
  1. 1. 610041 成都,四川大学华西第二医院妇产科产前诊断中心
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-04 修回日期:2016-02-25 出版日期:2016-04-01
  • 通信作者: 王和

Value of second trimester serological screening of Down syndrome in pregnant women with advanced age

Chunyan Liu1, Bin He1, Daiwen Han1, Zhiying Liu1, Yi Lai1, Li Qin1, Lixing Yuan1, Shanling Liu1, He Wang1()   

  1. 1. Department of Prenatal Diagnosis of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2016-01-04 Revised:2016-02-25 Published:2016-04-01
  • Corresponding author: He Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang He, Email:
引用本文:

刘春燕, 何斌, 韩代文, 刘之英, 赖怡, 秦利, 袁粒星, 刘珊玲, 王和. 中孕期唐氏综合征血清学筛查在高龄孕妇中的应用价值探讨[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 12(02): 159-163.

Chunyan Liu, Bin He, Daiwen Han, Zhiying Liu, Yi Lai, Li Qin, Lixing Yuan, Shanling Liu, He Wang. Value of second trimester serological screening of Down syndrome in pregnant women with advanced age[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2016, 12(02): 159-163.

目的

探讨中孕期唐氏综合征(DS)血清学筛查在高龄孕妇中的应用价值。

方法

选取2009年1月至2014年12月于四川大学华西第二医院妇产科产前诊断中心接受中孕期DS血清学筛查的1 571例高龄孕妇(预产年龄≥35岁),以及2012年1~12月于本院妇产科产前诊断中心接受中孕期DS血清学筛查的10 881例低龄孕妇(预产年龄<35岁)为研究对象,分别纳入高龄组(n=1 571)和低龄组(n=10 881)。本研究纳入标准:妊娠期妇女,孕龄为14~20+6孕周,单胎妊娠,自愿接受中孕期DS血清学筛查。排除标准:有染色体异常和先天性畸形家族史者,妊娠期内合并内外科疾病者,双胎或多胎妊娠者,以及糖尿病患者。采用血清游离β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)、甲胎蛋白(AFP)和游离雌三醇(uE3)DS三联筛查法对两组孕妇进行DS筛查,设定DS血清学高风险临界值为l/270。对DS血清学筛查风险值≥l/270的DS血清学筛查高风险孕妇,均建议行羊膜腔穿刺染色体检查,以确诊胎儿是否为DS;对未接受羊膜腔穿刺染色体检查的孕妇,采用电话随访方式随访其妊娠结局。分别计算两组孕妇DS血清学筛查的假阳性率和筛查效率,并进行统计学比较。两组受试对象的孕龄和体重等比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。本研究遵循的程序符合四川大学华西第二医院人体试验委员会制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,DS血清学产前筛查前均征得受试对象的知情同意。

结果

①高龄组1 571例孕妇中,DS血清学筛查高风险孕妇为121例,4例胎儿最终被确诊为DS;DS血清学筛查低风险孕妇为1 450例,未发现DS胎儿。低龄组10 881例孕妇中,DS血清学筛查高风险孕妇为759例,6例胎儿最终被确诊为DS;DS血清学筛查低风险孕妇为10 122例,1例胎儿最终被确诊为DS,为DS血清学筛查假阴性病例。②高龄组孕妇DS血清学筛查假阳性率为7.4%(117/1 571),低龄组为6.9%(753/10 881),二者筛查假阳性率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.587,P=0.444)。③高龄组孕妇DS血清学筛查效率为3.3%(4/121),显著高于低龄组的0.8%(6/759),并且差异有统计学意义(χ2=3.870,P=0.049)。

结论

对高龄孕妇进行中孕期DS血清学三联筛查,其筛查效率高于低龄孕妇,可在高龄孕妇中较有效地检出胎儿DS,降低产前有创的羊膜腔穿刺诊断率。

Objective

To evaluate the value of second trimester serological screening of Down syndrome (DS) in pregnant women with advanced age.

Methods

From January 2009 to December 2014, a total of 1 571 cases of pregnant women with advanced age (expected age of delivery≥35 years old) who received second trimester serological screening for DS in Department of Prenatal Diagnosis of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital were enrolled as advanced age group (n=1 571). From January to December 2012, a total of 10 881 cases of young pregnant women (expected age of delivery<35 years old) who received second trimester serological screening of DS in the same hospital were chose as young group (n=10 881). The inclusion criteria for subjects in this research were as follows: pregnant women, gestational age of 14 to 20+ 6 weeks, singleton pregnancy, voluntary to do second trimester DS serological screening. The exclusion criteria for subjects: bearing a family history of congenital malformations or chromosomal abnormalities, associated with other internal or surgical diseases, bigeminal or multiple pregnancy and patients with diabetes. Three second trimester maternal serum screening markers, free β-human chorionic gonadotrophin (β-hCG), alpha fetoprotein (AFP) and unconjugated estriol (uE3) were used for DS serological screening. Patients with an increased risk of DS (≥l/270) were offered genetic amniocentesis to ensure whether the fetus was DS or not, and the pregnancy outcomes of other pregnant women who didn't received genetic amniocentesis were obtained by telephone follow-up. The false positive rate and screening efficiency of DS serological screening were evaluated in both two groups and were compared by statistical methods. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in West China Second University Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from each patient before receiving second trimester DS screening. There were no statistical differences of gestational age and weight between groups (P>0.05).

Results

①Among 1 571 cases of pregnant women in advanced age group, 121 cases were in high-risk of DS serological screening, and 4 cases were diagnosed as DS; 1 450 cases were in low-risk of DS serological screening, and no fetal DS was found. Among 10 881 cases of pregnant women in young group, 759 cases were in high-risk of DS serological screening, and 6 cases were diagnosed as DS; 10 122 cases were in low-risk of DS serological screening, and 1 case were diagnosed as DS postnatally. ②In advanced age group, the false positive rate of DS serological screening was 7.4% (117/1 571), the young group was 6.9% (753/10 881), and the difference was not statistically significant (χ2=0.587, P=0.444). ③In advanced age group, DS serological screening efficiency was 3.3% (4/121), which was significantly higher than that of young group (0.8%, 6/759), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=3.870, P=0.049).

Conclusions

The three-marker (β-hCG, AFP and uE3) test is an effective screen strategy for second trimester serological screening of DS in pregnant women with advanced age. It can reduce the rate of genetic amniocentesis.

表1 两组孕妇DS血清学筛查假阳性率比较[例数(%)]
表2 两组孕妇DS血清学筛查效率比较[例数(%)]
1
左启华.智力发育迟缓的遗传学//严仁英.实用优生学.2版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1998:529.
2
Hook EB. Rates of chromosome abnormalities at diferent maternal ages[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1981, 58(3): 282-285.
3
边旭明,刘俊涛,戚庆伟,等.对孕中期妇女行血清学二联指标筛查胎儿唐氏综合征的多中心前瞻性研究[J].中华妇产科志,2008,43(11):805-809.
4
Dommergues M, Audibert F, Benatar C, et al. Is routine amniocentes is for advanced maternal age still indicated?[J]. Fetal Diagn Ther, 2001, 16(6): 372-377.
5
Benn PA, Egan JF, Fang M, et al. Changes in the utilization of prenatal diagnosis[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 103(6): 1255-1260.
6
Benn PA, Fang M, Egan JF. Trends in the use of second trimester materal serum screening from 1991 to 2003[J]. Genet Med, 2005, 7(5): 328-331.
7
Hodges RJ, Wallace EM. Testing for Down syndrome in the older women: a risky business? [J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gyneol, 2005, 45(6): 486-488.
8
中华人民共和国卫生计生委.胎儿常见染色体异常与开放性神经管缺陷的产前筛查与诊断技术标准[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2010.
9
戚庆伟,蒋宇林,刘俊涛,等.对高龄孕妇于孕中期行血清学二联指标筛查胎儿唐氏综合征的多中心前瞻性研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,2008,43(10):737-741.
10
吴清明,周瑾.出生缺陷产前筛查及产前诊断研究进展[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2011,19(1):129-131.
11
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 27: Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecolostists. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosomal abnormalities[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2001, 97(5 Pt 1): suppl 1-12.
12
牛洁,刘珊玲,王和.2T-Risks和Lifecycle风险计算软件在中孕期唐氏综合征产前筛查中的回顾性研究[J/CD].中华妇幼临床医学杂志:电子版,2014,10(3):305-309.
13
ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 77: screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 109(1): 217-227.
14
Rosen DJ, Kedar I, Amiel A, et al. A negative second trimester triple test and absence of specific ultraonographic markers may decrease the need for genetic amniocentesis in advanced maternal age by 60%[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2002, 22(1): 59-63.
15
Devore GR, Romero R. Genetic sonography: an option for women of advanced maternal age with negative triple-marker maternal serum screening results[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2003, 22(11): 1191-1199.
16
Yaegashi N, Senoo M, Uehara S, et al. Age-specific incidences of chromosome abnormalities at the second trimesteramniocentesis for Japanese mothers aged 35 and older: collaborative study of 5 484 cases[J]. J Hum Genet, 1998, 43(2): 85-90.
17
Ball RH, Cauhey AB, Malone FD, et al. First- and second-trimester evaluation of risk for Down syndrome[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 110(1): 10-17.
18
Wald NJ, Rodeck C, Hackshaw AK, et al. SURUSS in perspective[J]. Semin Perinatol, 2005,29(4):225-235.
19
Malone FD, Canick JA, Ball RH, et al. First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down syndrome[J]. N Engl J Med, 2005, 353(19): 2001-2011.
20
Benn PA, Ying J, Beazoglou T, et al. Estimates for the sensitivity and fasle-positive rates for second trimester serum screening for Down Syndrome and trisomy 18 with adjustment for cross-identification and double-positive[J]. Prenst Diagn, 2001, 21(1): 46-51.
21
Snijders RJ, Noble P, Sebire N, et al. UK multicentre project on assessment of risk of trisomy 21 by maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness at 10-14 weeks of gastation. Fetal Medicine Foundation First Trimester Screening Group[J]. Lancet, 1998, 352(9125): 343-346.
22
Bianchi DW, Parker RL, Wentworth J, et al. DNA sequencing versus standard prenatal aneuploidy screening[J]. N Engl J Med, 2014, 370(9): 799-808.
23
Liao C, Yin AH, Peng CF, et al. Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of common aneuploidies by semiconductor sequencing[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2014, 111(20): 7415-7420.
[1] 陈谊, 文华轩, 陈琮瑛, 姚远, 李胜利. 胎儿半侧巨脑畸形的产前超声诊断及研究分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(01): 28-34.
[2] 马雪松, 吴青青, 王莉, 杨丽曼, 高凤云, 李晓菲, 玄英华, 李巧. 超声在诊断孕中期完全性子宫破裂中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(06): 509-513.
[3] 张禾璇, 宋咏刚, 杨雪. 孕妇无创产前检测结果的大样本分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(06): 685-691.
[4] 陈金卫, 戴常平, 申屠伟慧, 张伟娟, 张蕊, 王红英. 胎儿超声筛查不同胎龄胎儿先天性唇腭裂的检查时间及检出率比较[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(04): 442-448.
[5] 魏瑗, 罗红. 子宫动脉血流参数及血清学指标分别对早期先兆流产孕妇的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(01): 111-119.
[6] 谢良玉, 王和, 赵小文, 张迅, 张雪梅, 刘洪倩, 祝茜, 王婧, 胡婷, 张竹, 赖怡, 秦利, 刘珊玲. 中孕期胎儿染色体异常高危孕妇羊水细胞胎儿染色体核型及介入性产前诊断指征的大样本分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(01): 73-79.
[7] 姚利民, 章锦曼, 朱姝, 黎冬梅, 余蕊, 陆丽花, 赵庆芬, 丁云川. 18-三体综合征胎儿中孕期超声检查与染色体核型结果分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(05): 590-597.
[8] 张彦春, 刘凯波, 张雯, 徐宏燕. 中孕期血清学筛查联合无创产前检测在唐氏综合征产前筛查与诊断中的应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(06): 709-713.
[9] 赵旭亮, 田瑞霞, 王伦善, 魏玉业, 张曼, 俞敏. 早孕期胎儿颈项透明层超声检测联合胎儿DNA无创产前检测对高龄孕妇胎儿性别发育异常的诊断价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(04): 478-482.
[10] 王宏, 段纯, 袁晖, 吴晓霞, 谢建生, 赵光临. 早孕期筛查唐氏综合征或18-三体综合征不同风险值与胎儿染色体异常及妊娠结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(06): 646-654.
[11] 蒙春华, 赖春慧, 李荣. 早孕期唐氏综合征一站式临床风险评估的临床应用价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(05): 590-595.
[12] 徐婷婷, 周芷伊, 刘娜, 邓春燕, 黄桂琼, 王晓东, 余海燕. 中孕期使用子宫颈托对双胎妊娠孕妇早产预防的系统评价[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(03): 253-261.
[13] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[14] 刘养奇, 林伟研, 欧伟麟, 林志丰, 柯莉, 林琳, 陈艳红. 依沙吖啶及其联合方案在中期妊娠引产中的应用[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2021, 10(04): 242-246.
[15] 储倩倩, 张羽. 再谈子痫前期的预测[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2021, 10(04): 201-205.
阅读次数
全文


摘要