切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 164 -172. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2016.02.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

儿童急性B前体淋巴细胞白血病铁转出蛋白表达水平与其临床特征和预后相关性研究
霍婉莹1, 袁粒星2, 吴剑蓉1, 杨雪1, 艾媛1, 郭霞1, 蒋鸣燕1, 万智1, 高举1,*,*()   
  1. 1. 610041 成都,四川大学华西第二医院儿科/儿童血液肿瘤科
    2. 西部妇幼医学研究院公共实验室
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-03 修回日期:2016-03-01 出版日期:2016-04-01
  • 通信作者: 高举

Ferroportin expression of correlation with clinical features and prognosis in childhood precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Wanying Huo1, Lixing Yuan2, Jianrong Wu1, Xue Yang1, Yuan Ai1, Xia Guo1, Mingyan Jiang1, Zhi Wan1, Ju Gao1()   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology
    2. The Open Laboratory, West China Institutes for Women and Children's Health, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2016-01-03 Revised:2016-03-01 Published:2016-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Ju Gao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Gao Ju, Email:
引用本文:

霍婉莹, 袁粒星, 吴剑蓉, 杨雪, 艾媛, 郭霞, 蒋鸣燕, 万智, 高举. 儿童急性B前体淋巴细胞白血病铁转出蛋白表达水平与其临床特征和预后相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 12(02): 164-172.

Wanying Huo, Lixing Yuan, Jianrong Wu, Xue Yang, Yuan Ai, Xia Guo, Mingyan Jiang, Zhi Wan, Ju Gao. Ferroportin expression of correlation with clinical features and prognosis in childhood precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2016, 12(02): 164-172.

目的

探讨儿童急性B前体淋巴细胞白血病(BCP-ALL)铁转出蛋白(Fpn)表达水平与其临床特征和预后的关系。

方法

选择2011年2月至2014年6月四川大学华西第二医院收治的64例BCP-ALL患儿为研究对象,纳入研究组。对其统一按照中国儿童白血病协作组(CCLG)-急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL) 2008方案进行分型诊断和治疗。采用随机数字表法随机选择同期于本院健康体检的21例健康儿童,纳入对照组。采用荧光定量逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)技术分别检测研究组BCP-ALL患儿初诊时及对照组受试者体检时骨髓和外周血单个核细胞的Fpn表达水平。以Fpn相对表达量(0.18)为界值进行划分,研究组Fpn相对表达量>0.18为Fpn高表达患儿,纳入Fpn高表达亚组(n=32),Fpn相对表达量≤0.18为Fpn低表达患儿,纳入Fpn低表达亚组(n=32)。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算研究组患儿无复发生存(RFS)率、无事件生存(EFS)率和总生存(OS)率。统计学分析Fpn表达水平与研究组BCP-ALL患儿的临床特征、免疫表型、ALL相关融合基因、早期治疗反应、临床危险度及其预后的关系。本研究遵循的程序符合四川大学华西第二医院人体试验委员会制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准。

结果

①研究组与对照组受试者,以及Fpn高、低表达亚组患儿的性别构成比和年龄分布分别比较,差异均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。②研究组Fpn中位相对表达量(0.18)显著低于对照组(2.19),差异有统计学意义(U=1 415.0,P<0.001)。③研究组患儿初诊时白细胞计数<50×109/L(47例)和白细胞计数≥50×109/L(17例)患儿的Fpn中位相对表达量分别为0.23和0.04,二者比较,差异亦有统计学意义(U=399.0,P=0.02)。分别按照初诊时中位白细胞计数(21.1×109/L)和中位初诊幼稚细胞绝对计数(14.1×109/L)进行划分,研究组初诊时高、低中位白细胞计数和高、低中位幼稚细胞绝对计数患儿的Fpn中位相对表达量均分别为0.09和0.28,差异均有统计学意义(U=870.0、878.0,P=0.02、0.03)。研究组患儿中,Fpn高、低表达亚组患儿初诊时中位白细胞计数及中位幼稚细胞绝对计数分别为15.4×109/L和29.3×109/L,8.2×109/L和21.3×109/L,差异亦均有统计学意义(U=863.5、866.0,P=0.018、0.019)。Fpn相对表达量与初诊时白细胞计数及幼稚细胞绝对计数均呈显著负相关关系(rs=-0.357、-0.366,P=0.004、0.003)。④Fpn相对表达量与BCP-ALL患儿初诊年龄、性别,以及ALL免疫表型、融合基因类型、糖皮质激素耐药、危险度分组和早期治疗反应均无明确相关关系(P>0.05)。Fpn高、低表达亚组患儿不同临床特征的构成比比较,差异亦无统计学意义(P>0.05)。⑤研究组患儿的中位随访时间为13个月(2~50个月)。Kaplan-Meier生存分析结果显示,Fpn高、低表达亚组患儿的3年RFS率、EFS率、OS率分别为74.4%与61.7%、68.0%与62.4%、85.0%与74.4%,组间比较,差异均无统计学意义(χ2=0.975、0.102、0.576,P=0.323、0.749、0.448)。

结论

BCP-ALL细胞Fpn表达水平显著低于正常外周血单个核细胞,并与初诊时白细胞计数和幼稚细胞绝对计数呈显著负相关关系。这高度提示Fpn表达下调有助于细胞内铁的阻滞,满足淋巴白血病细胞旺盛代谢对铁的需求。与乳腺癌等恶性实体肿瘤一样,这可能也是淋巴白血病细胞增殖异常的重要铁代谢调控机制。

Objective

To study the expression levels of ferroportin (Fpn) in lymphoblastic leukemia cells in children with precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL), and to explore the possible correlations with various clinical features and treatment outcomes.

Methods

Sixty-four children with newly diagnosed BCP-ALL in West China Second Hospital from February 2011 to June 2014 were enrolled into this study as study group, and were risk-stratified and treated according to the Chinese Children Leukemia Group ALL 2008 (CCLG-ALL 2008) protocol. Twenty-one healthy children for health check-up in our hospital during the same period were chosen by random number table as control group. Levels of Fpn relative media expression levels in bone marrow and peripheral mononuclear cells isolated from leukemic and control group children were determined respectively by fluorescence real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Level of Fpn relative media expression 0.18 was set as the threshold of Fpn relative media expression levels, patients with level of Fpn relative expression >0.18 in study group were enrolled into Fpn high expression levels subgroup (n=32), while patients with level of Fpn relative expression ≤0.18 in study group were enrolled into Fpn low expression levels subgroup (n=32). Prognosis in terms of relapse-free survival (RFS) rate, event-free survival (EFS) rate and overall survival (OS) rate were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. Correlations between relative median Fpn expression levels and various clinical features, immunophenotype, ALL related fused gene, early treatment response, clinical risk degree and prognosis were analyzed by statistical methods. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University.

Results

①There were no statistical differences among the gender ratio and age distribution between study group and control group, Fpn high expression levels subgroup and Fpn low expression levels subgroup in study group, respectively (P>0.05). ②The relative median Fpn expression level in study group (0.18) was significantly lower than that in control group (2.19) (U=1 415.0, P<0.001). ③ The relative median Fpn expression levels in patients with initial white blood cell count <50×109/L (47 cases) and those with white blood cell count ≥50×109/L (17 cases) were 0.23 and 0.04 respectively, relative relative and there was statistical difference between them (U=399.0, P=0.02). With the median initial white blood cell count (21.1×109/L) and median absolute blast count (14.1×109/L) as the cutoff points respectively, relative median Fpn expression levels in patient with high and low cell counts were 0.09 and 0.28, respectively (U=870.0, P=0.02), 0.09 and 0.28 (U=878.0, P=0.03), respectively. Similarly, with relative median Fpn expression as the cutoff point, the median white blood cell count and median absolute blast count in Fpn high expression levels subgroup and Fpn low expression levels subgroup were 15.4×109/L and 29.3×109/L (U=863.5, P=0.018), 8.2×109/L and 21.3×109/L (U=866.0, P=0.019) respectively. In addition, Spearman rank correlation analysis showed that Fpn expression level was negatively correlated to both initial white blood cell count and absolute blast counts (rs=-0.357, -0.366; P=0.004, 0.003). ④No correlations were documented between Fpn expression levels and age at diagnosis, gender, leukemia immunophenotyping, fusion genes, glucocorticoid resistance, risk assignment and early chemotherapy response (P>0.05). No significant differences were disclosed between Fpn high and low expression levels subgroups , in terms of patient proportions with different clinical features (P>0.05). ⑤The median follow-up time was 13 months (2-50 months) in study group. Up to the follow-up endpoint, the rates of 3-year RFS, EFS and OS were 74.4% and 61.7% (χ2=0.975, P=0.323), 68.0% and 62.4% (χ2=0.102, P=0.749), 85.0% and 74.4% (χ2=0.576, P=0.448) in Fpn high and low expression levels subgroups respectively.

Conclusions

Our research findings that Fpn expression level is remarkably down-regulated as compared to normal children, and is negatively correlated to both initial white blood cell count and absolute blast cell count in peripheral blood, which strongly suggest that decreased Fpn expression level in highly proliferating lymphoblastic leukemia cells plays key role in sequestering iron within cells, in order to meet iron demand for enhanced cellular metabolism and proliferation. The dysregulated Hepcidin (Hepc)-Fpn axis might turn out to be an important underlying mechanism of cellular iron modulation in lymphoblastic leukemia cells, as revealed by recent studies in breast cancer cell lines and patients.

表1 Fpn荧光定量RT-PCR引物序列及扩增反应条件
表2 研究组患儿Fpn高、低表达亚组临床特征、早期化疗反应和预后比较[例数(%)]
图1 研究组患儿Fpn高、低表达亚组生存曲线比较(图1A: 无复发生存率比较;图1B: 无事件生存率比较;图1C: 总生存率比较)
1
Drakesmith H, Nemeth E, Ganz T. Ironing out ferroportin[J]. Cell Metab, 2015, 22(5): 777-787.
2
Hentze MW, Muckenthaler MU, Galy B, et al. Two to tango: regulation of mammalian iron metabolism[J]. Cell, 2010, 142(1): 24-38.
3
Gozzelino R, Arosio P. Iron homeostasis in health and disease[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2016, 17(1). pii:E130.
4
Ganz T, Nemeth E. Hepcidin and disorders of iron metabolism[J]. Annu Rev Med, 2011, 62: 347-360.
5
Sun CC, Vaja V, Babitt JL, et al. Targeting the hepcidin-feroportin axis to develop new treatment strategies for anemia of chronic disease and anemia of inflammation[J]. Am J Hematol, 2012, 87(4): 392-400.
6
Wu XN, Su D, Wang L, et al. Roles of the hepcidin-ferroportin axis and iron in cancer[J]. Eur J Cancer Pre, 2014, 23(2): 122-123.
7
Nicolae CD, Coman OA, Ene C, et al. Hepcidin in neoplastic disease[J]. J Med Life, 2013, 6(3): 355-359.
8
Guo W, Zhang S, Chen Y, et al. An important role of the hepcidin-ferroportin signaling in affecting tumor growth and metastasis[J]. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai), 2015, 47(9): 703-715.
9
Fischer-Fodor E, Miklasova N, Berindan-Neagoe I, et al. Iron, inflammation, and invasion of cancer cells[J]. Clujul Med, 2015, 88(3): 272-277.
10
Zhang S, Chen Y, Guo W, et al. Disordered hepcidin-ferroportin signaling promotes breast cancer growth[J]. Cell Signal, 2014, 26(11): 2539-2550.
11
Miller LD, Coffman LG, Chou JW, et al. An iron regulatory gene signature predicts outcome in breast cancer[J]. Cancer Res, 2011, 71(21): 6728-6737.
12
Pinnix ZK, Miller LD, Wang W, et al. Ferroportin and iron regulation in breast cancer progression and prognosis[J]. Sci Trans Med, 2010, 2(43): 43-56.
13
Sakuraoka Y, Sawada T, Shiraki T, et al. Analysis of hepcidin expression: in situ hybridization and quantitative polymerase chain reaction from paraffin sections[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2012, 18(28): 3727-3731.
14
Ward DG, Roberts K, Brook JM, et al. Increased hepcidin expression in colorectal carcinogenesis[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2008, 14(9): 1339-1345.
15
Kamai T, Tomosugi N, Abe H, et al. Increased serum hepcidin-25 level and increased tumor expression of hepcidin mRNA are associated with metastasis of renal cell carcinoma[J]. BMC cancer, 2009, 9(1): 270-278.
16
中华医学会儿科学分会血液学组,《中华儿科杂志》编辑委员会.儿童急性淋巴白血病诊疗建议(第四次修订)[J].中华儿科杂志,2014,52(9):641-644.
17
张雪,李蓓,陈振萍,等.儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病骨髓细胞形态学检查多中心综合比较及评价[J].检验医学,2014,29(8):843-845.
18
张坤龙,王宁玲,徐修才,等.多重RT-PCR检测儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病融合基因的临床研究[J].中国小儿血液与肿瘤杂志,2014,19(5):233-237.
19
Bene MC, Castoldi G, Knapp W, et al. Proposals for the Immunological classification of acute leukemias. European Group for the immunological Characterization of Leukemias (EGIL) [J]. Leukemia, 1995, 9(10): 1783-1786.
20
Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, et al. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes[J]. Blood, 2009, 109(7): 937-951.
21
陈婷婷,袁粒星,潘玲丽,等.增生性贫血患儿骨髓单个核细胞转铁蛋白受体2表达情况及其意义探讨[J].中国实验血液学杂志,2011,19(2):439-443.
22
Prutki M, Poljak-Blazi M, Jakopovic M, et al. Altered iron metabolism, transferrin receptor 1 and ferritin in patients with colon cancer[J]. Cancer Lett, 2006, 238(2): 188-196.
23
Habashy HO, Powe DG, Staka CG, et al. Transferrin receptor (CD71) is a marker of poor prognosis in breast cancer and can predict response to tamoxifen[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2010, 119(3): 283-293.
24
Liu Q, Wang M, Hu Y, et al. Significance of CD71 expression by flow cytometry in diagnosis of acute leukemia[J]. Leuk Lymphoma, 2014, 55(4): 892-898.
25
Ploszynska A, Ruckemann-Dziurdzinska K, Jozwik A, et al. Cytometric evaluation of transferrin receptor 1 (CD71) in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia[J]. Folia Histochem Cytobiol, 2012, 50(2): 304-311.
26
Daniels TR, Bernabeu E, Rodirquez JA, et al. The transferrin receptor and the targeted delivery of therapeutic agents against cancer[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2012, 1820(3): 291-317.
27
Eisfeld AK, Westerman M, Krahl R, et al. Highly elevated serum hepcidin in patients with acute myeloid leukemia prior to and after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: does this protect from excessive parenchymal iron loading?[J]. Adv Hematol, 2011: 491058.
28
Ciccarelli BT, Patterson CJ, Hunter ZR, et al. Hepcidin is produced by lymphoplasmacytic cells and is associated with anemia in Waldenström's macroglobulinemia[J]. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk, 2011, 11(1): 160-163.
29
Wu JR, Yuan LX, Ma ZG, et al. GDF15-mediated upregulation of ferroportin plays a key role in the development of hyperferritinemia in children with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis[J]. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2013, 60(6): 940-950.
30
Bhojwani D, Yang JJ, Pui CH. Biology of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia[J]. Pediatr Clin North Am, 2015, 62(1): 47-60.
31
Conter V, Bartram CR, Valsecchi MG, et al. Molecular response to treatment redefines all prognostic factors in children and adolescents with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results in 3 184 patients of the AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000 study[J]. Blood, 2010, 115(16): 3206-3214.
32
Zuckermann T, Rowe JM. Pathogenesis and prognostication in acute lymphoblastic leukemia[J]. F1000 Prime Rep, 2014, 6(1): 6-59.
33
Campana D. Molecular determinants of treatment response in acute lymphoblastic leukemia[J]. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Edu Progam, 2008, 128(8): 366-373.
34
Izraeli S. Application of genomics for risk stratification of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: from bench to bedside?[J]. Br J Hematol, 2010, 151(2): 119-131.
35
Pui CH. Genomic and pharmacogenitic studies of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia[J]. Front Med, 2015, 9(1): 1-9.
[1] 陶宏宇, 叶菁菁, 俞劲, 杨秀珍, 钱晶晶, 徐彬, 徐玮泽, 舒强. 右心声学造影在儿童右向左分流相关疾病中的评估价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 959-965.
[2] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[3] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[4] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[5] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[6] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[7] 贺斌, 马晋峰. 胃癌脾门淋巴结转移危险因素[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 694-699.
[8] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[9] 刘郁, 段绍斌, 丁志翔, 史志涛. miR-34a-5p 在结肠癌患者的表达及其与临床特征及预后的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 485-490.
[10] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[11] 曾明芬, 王艳. 急性胰腺炎合并脂肪肝患者CT 与彩色多普勒超声诊断参数与其病情和预后的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 531-535.
[12] 沈炎, 张俊峰, 唐春芳. 预后营养指数结合血清降钙素原、胱抑素C及视黄醇结合蛋白对急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 536-540.
[13] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[14] 颜世锐, 熊辉. 感染性心内膜炎合并急性肾损伤患者的危险因素探索及死亡风险预测[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 618-624.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要