切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 40 -46. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2016.01.008

所属专题: 文献

论著

子宫内膜癌术中冷冻切片病理检查的诊断准确性及其影响因素
王利丽1, 王心1, 吴楠1, 尚丽新1,*,*(), 顾玉婵2, 赵谦谦2   
  1. 1. 100010 北京军区总医院妇产科
    2. 116044 辽宁,大连医科大学
  • 收稿日期:2015-10-09 修回日期:2016-01-05 出版日期:2016-02-01
  • 通信作者: 尚丽新

Diagnostic accuracy and influencing factors of intraoperative frozen section pathological examination in endometrial carcinoma

Lili Wang1, Xin Wang1, Nan Wu1, Lixin Shang1(), Yuchan Gu2, Qianqian Zhao2   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Military General Hospital of Beijing, Beijing 100010, China
    2. Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, Liaoning Province, China
  • Received:2015-10-09 Revised:2016-01-05 Published:2016-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Lixin Shang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Shang Lixin, Email:
引用本文:

王利丽, 王心, 吴楠, 尚丽新, 顾玉婵, 赵谦谦. 子宫内膜癌术中冷冻切片病理检查的诊断准确性及其影响因素[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 12(01): 40-46.

Lili Wang, Xin Wang, Nan Wu, Lixin Shang, Yuchan Gu, Qianqian Zhao. Diagnostic accuracy and influencing factors of intraoperative frozen section pathological examination in endometrial carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2016, 12(01): 40-46.

目的

探讨子宫内膜癌(EC)术中冷冻切片病理检查的诊断准确性及其影响因素。

方法

选择2006年1月至2014年12月,北京军区总医院妇产科诊治的170例EC患者为研究对象。以术后石蜡包埋切片病理检查结果为诊断金标准,比较所有EC患者术中冷冻切片病理检查在诊断肿瘤细胞级别、组织学类型、肌层浸润深度及宫颈累及方面的敏感度和特异度差异,及影响术中冷冻切片病理检查粗符合率的临床因素。本研究遵循的程序符合北京军区总医院人体试验委员会制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,并与患者签署临床研究知情同意书。

结果

①在肿瘤细胞级别的诊断上,术中冷冻切片病理检查诊断低分化的敏感度(87.5%)分别较诊断高分化、中分化的敏感度(74.7%、56.1%)高,且差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.28、23.97,P=0.028、0.000);诊断低分化的特异度(98.4%)较诊断高分化的特异度(75.4%)高,且差异有统计学意义(χ2=22.65,P=0.000)。②在肿瘤组织学类型的诊断上,术中冷冻切片病理检查诊断为Ⅰ型的敏感度(88.5%)较诊断为Ⅱ型的敏感度(33.3%)高,诊断为Ⅰ型的特异度(45.5%)较诊断为Ⅱ型的特异度(88.8%)低,且差异均有统计学意义(χ2=63.99、43.03,P=0.000、0.000)。③在诊断肿瘤肌层浸润深度上,术中冷冻切片病理检查诊断深肌层浸润的敏感度(95.0%)较诊断浅肌层浸润的敏感度(86.5%)高,且差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.61,P=0.032);诊断深肌层浸润的特异度(99.2%)与浅肌层浸润的特异度(95.5%)比较,差异则无统计学意义(χ2=1.52,P=0.218)。④在诊断宫颈累及方面,术中冷冻切片病理检查诊断宫颈累及的敏感度(20.0%)较诊断无宫颈累及的敏感度(100.0%)低,诊断宫颈累及的特异度(100.0%)较无宫颈累及的特异度(20.0%)高,且差异均有统计学意义(χ2=133.33、133.33,P=0.000、0.000)。⑤研究的10项临床因素中,肥胖、组织学类型为Ⅰ型及低分化EC患者术中冷冻切片病理检查在诊断肿瘤细胞级别方面的粗符合率(81.9%、72.4%、91.7%)较无肥胖、组织学类型为Ⅱ型及高/中分化EC患者(63.8%、0、65.6%)高,且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);有阴道异常出血或排液、肥胖、有高血压和(或)糖尿病及宫腔深度≥8 mm的EC患者术中冷冻切片病理检查在诊断肌层浸润深度上准确性较高,但在诊断肌层浸润深度方面的粗符合率(91.4%、94.5%、93.4%、95.2%)较无阴道异常出血或排液、无肥胖、无高血压和(或)糖尿病及宫腔深度<8 mm的EC患者(28.6%、78.3%、84.3%、86.0%)高,且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

术中冷冻切片病理检查在诊断肌层浸润深度上准确性较高,但在EC肿瘤细胞级别、组织学类型、宫颈累及的诊断上有一定局限性。EC患者在术中的手术范围不能完全依据冷冻切片病理检查结果进行判断。

Objective

To investigate the diagnostic accuracy and influencing factors of intraoperative frozen section pathological examination in endometrial carcinoma(EC).

Methods

From January 2006 to December 2014, 170 patients with EC who were hospitalized in the department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Military General Hospital of Beijing, were chosen as study objects. The diagnostic gold standard was postoperative paraffin embedded biopsy results. The sensitivity and specificity differences of intraoperative frozen biopsy in the diagnosis of tumor cell level, tumor histological type, depth of myometrial infiltration and cervical involvement of all EC patients, and clinical influencing factors of rough coincidence rate of intraoperative frozen section pathological examination were analyzed. The procedures of this study accord with the ethical standards established by the Human Testing Committee of Military General Hospital of Beijing, and get the approval of the committee, and the patients signed the informed consent.

Results

①For intraoperative frozen section pathological examination in the diagnosis of tumor cell level, the sensitivity of poorly differentiated(87.5%) was higher than that of well or moderately differentiated (74.7%, 56.1%) , respectively, and the differences were statistically significant(χ2=4.28, 23.97; P=0.028, 0.000). The specificity of poorly differentiated(98.4%) was higher than that of well-differentiated (75.4%), and the difference was statistically significant(χ2=22.65, P=0.000). ②For intraoperative frozen section pathological examination in the diagnosis of tumor histological type, the sensitivity of type Ⅰ(88.5%) was higher than that of type Ⅱ(33.3%), the specificity of typeⅠ(45.5%) was lower than that of type Ⅱ(88.8%), and the differences were statistically significant(χ2=63.99, 43.03; P=0.000, 0.000). ③For intraoperative frozen section pathological examination in the diagnosis of depth of myometrial infiltration, the sensitivity of deep myometrial infiltration(95.0%) was higher than that of no invasion or superficial myometrial infiltration(86.5%), and the difference was statistically significant(χ2=4.61, P=0.032). There was no significant difference between specificity of deep myometrial infiltration and no invasion or superficial myometrial infiltration(99.2%vs 95.5%, χ2=1.52, P=0.218). ④For intraoperative frozen section pathological examination in the diagnosis of cervical involvement, the sensitivity of cervical involvement(20.0%) was lower than that of without cervical involvement(100.0%), the specificity of cervical involvement(100.0%) was higher than that of without cervical involvement(20.0%), and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=133.33, 133.33; P=0.000, 0.000). ⑤Among 10 clinical factors of this study, the rough coincidence rate of obesity, type Ⅰ tumor histology and poorly differentiated(81.9%, 72.4%, 91.7%) of EC patients with intraoperative frozen section pathological examination in the diagnosis of tumor cell level, were higher than those of no obesity, type Ⅱ tumor histology and well and moderately differentiated(63.8%, 0, 65.6%), and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). The rough coincidence rate of abnormal vaginal bleeding or discharge, obesity, hypertension and (or) diabetes mellitus and uterine cavity depth more than or equal 8 mm(91.4%, 94.5%, 93.4%, 95.2%) of EC patients with intraoperative frozen section pathological examination in the diagnosis of myometrial infiltration depth, were higher than those of without abnormal vaginal bleeding or discharge, no obesity, no hypertension and(or) diabetes mellitus and uterine cavity depth less than 8 mm (28.6%, 78.3%, 84.3%, 86.0%), and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).

Conclusions

Intraoperative frozen section pathological examination has a higher accuracy in the diagnosis of depth of muscular layer invasion, but has some limitations in the diagnosis of tumor cell level, tumor histological type and cervical involvement. Surgery intraoperative scope of EC cannot be completely based on the results of frozen section pathological examination.

表1 152例子宫内膜样腺癌患者术中冷冻与术后石蜡包埋切片病理检查诊断肿瘤细胞级别结果(例数)
表2 170例EC患者术中冷冻与术后石蜡包埋切片病理检查诊断肿瘤组织学类型结果(例数)
表3 170例EC患者术中冷冻与术后石蜡包埋切片病理检查诊断肿瘤肌层浸润深度结果(例数)
表4 170例EC患者术中冷冻与术后石蜡包埋切片病理检查诊断宫颈累及结果(例数)
表5 影响EC患者术中冷冻切片病理检查准确性的单因素分析[例数(%)]
临床因素 肿瘤细胞级别 χ2 P 肌层浸润深度 χ2 P
例数 粗符合率 例数 粗符合率
年龄(岁)     3.057a 0.080     1.070b 0.301
  <60 124 86(69.4)     136 123(90.4)    
  ≥60 28 24(85.7)     34 28(82.4)    
阴道异常出血或排液     0.240b 0.624     0.000c
  145 106(73.1)     163 149(91.4)    
  7 4(57.1)     7 2(28.6)    
未生育     0.502b 0.479     1.019b 0.313
  13 11(84.6)     15 15(100.0)    
  139 99(71.2)     155 136(87.7)    
肥胖     6.282a 0.012     10.279a 0.001
  94 77(81.9)     110 104(94.5)    
  58 37(63.8)     60 47(78.3)    
高血压和(或)糖尿病     0.295a 0.587     3.902a 0.048
  67 47(70.1)     81 76(93.4)    
  85 63(74.1)     89 75(84.3)    
肿瘤组织学类型     36.908a 0.000     0.149b 0.699
  Ⅰ型 152 110(72.4)     152 136(89.5)    
  Ⅱ型 18 0     18 15(83.3)    
宫颈累及     0.000b 1.000     0.408b 0.523
  10 7(70.0)     10 10(100.0)    
  142 103(72.5)     160 141(88.1)    
宫腔深度(mm)     0.441a 0.507     6.882a 0.009
  <8 79 59(74.7)     86 71(86.0)    
  ≥8 73 51(69.9)     84 80(95.2)    
石蜡包埋切片病理检查细胞分级     6.494a 0.011     1.751b 0.186
  高/中分化 128 84(65.6)     128 106(82.8)    
  低分化 24 22(91.7)     24 23(95.8)    
石蜡包埋切片病理检查肌层浸润深度     2.548a 0.110     2.906b 0.088
  浅肌层浸润 115 87(75.7)     130 112(86.2)    
  深肌层浸润 37 23(62.2)     40 39(97.5)    
1
王志启,王建六.年轻未生育妇女子宫内膜癌保留生育功能的治疗[J].实用妇产科杂志,2012,28(7):521-523.
2
魏丽惠.关于子宫内膜癌筛查的思考[J].中国计划生育和妇产科,2015,7(1):26-28.
3
Sweet MG, Schmidt-Dalton TA, Weiss PM, et al.Evaluation and management of abnormal uterine bleeding in premenopausal women[J].Am Fam Physician, 2012, 85(1):35-43.
4
Kleebkaow P, Maneetab S, Somboonporn W, et al.Preoperative and postoperative agreement of histopathological findings in cases of endometrial hyperplasia[J].Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2008, 9(1):89-91.
5
Kilgore LC, Partridge EE, Alvarez RD, et al.Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: survival comparisons of patients with and without pelvic node sampling[J].Gynecol Oncol, 1995, 56(1):29-33.
6
Kabat GC, Xue X, Kamensky V, et al.Risk of breast, endometrial, colorectal, and renal cancers in postmenopausal women in association with a body shape index and other anthropometric measures[J].Cancer Causes Control, 2015, 26(2):219-229.
7
Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS.WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs[M].Lyon:IARC Press, 2014:125-126.
8
Archer DF, Carr BR, Pinkerton JV, et al.Effects of ospemifene on the female reproductive and urinary tracts:translation from preclinical models into clinical evidence[J].Menopause, 2015, 22(7):786-796.
9
Pecorelli S.Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium[J].Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2009, 105(2):103-104.
10
贾英华,李淑敏.子宫内膜癌术前诊刮病理的临床价值分析[J/CD].中华临床医师杂志:电子版,2013,7(4):45-48.
11
张惠,汪希鹏,李卫平.影响子宫内膜癌术中冰冻诊断准确性的临床因素分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2009,25(6):449-452.
12
Mungenast F, Thalhammer T.Estrogen biosynthesis and action in ovarian cancer[J].Front Endocrinol(Lausanne), 2014, 5:192.
13
郝烁月.快速冰冻切片诊断宫腔刮出组织的准确率与前瞻性研究[J].中国医学创新,2013,10(5):91-92.
14
李玲,杨兴升,孙清,等.子宫内膜不典型增生患者的内膜癌漏诊因素分析[J].现代妇产科进展,2014,23(7):553-555,559.
15
Chan JK, Cheung MK, Huh WK, et al.Therapeutic role of lymph node resection in endometrioid corpus cancer:a study of 12 333 patients[J]. Cancer, 2006, 107(8):1823-1830.
16
Case AS, Rocconi RP, Straughn JM Jr, et al.A prospective blinded evaluation of the accuracy of frozen section for the surgical management of endometrial cancer[J].Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 108(6):1375-1379.
17
May K, Bryant A, Dickinson HO, et al.Lymphadenectomy for the management of endometrial cancer[J].Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2010, 9(1):CD007585.
[1] 陈欣, 胡莎, 罗红. 梗阻性子宫颈发育异常的超声特征及其诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(10): 1052-1057.
[2] 刘士源, 林浩, 李谦, 乔哲, 李少民. 超声引导下经皮肺穿刺组织学活检对周围型肺病变的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(06): 573-577.
[3] 汪凯林, 李舜颖, 刘强. 第5版《年轻女性乳腺癌国际共识指南》更新要点解读[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 65-71.
[4] 王璐, 樊杨. 子宫内膜癌相关生物标志物研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 511-516.
[5] 代雯荣, 赵丽娟, 李智慧. 细胞外囊泡对胚胎着床影响的研究进展[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 616-620.
[6] 韩春颖, 王婷婷, 李艳艳, 朴金霞. 子宫内膜癌患者淋巴管间隙浸润预测因素研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 403-409.
[7] 陈永胜, 朱健, 王军, 张永辉, 徐源佑, 丁璐璐, 陈建国, 樊健, 姚海蓉. 江苏省启东市育龄女性恶性肿瘤患者生存率变化趋势分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 363-372.
[8] 魏权, 张燊, 陈慧佳, 邹姮, 胡丽娜. 女性生殖道微生物群与辅助生殖技术相关性研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 151-155.
[9] 齐新宇, 孔菲, 赵捷, 王海燕, 乔杰. 生殖医学中的免疫学临床研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 1-9.
[10] 庞兴华, 苑著. 针吸细胞块技术在术前乳腺癌分子分型中的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 276-279.
[11] 李晓阳, 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 大数据及人工智能对女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的诊断及风险预测[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 549-552.
[12] 李殷南, 王乾, 孙宾. 膀胱壁、逼尿肌壁厚度与老年女性膀胱过度活动症相关性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 178-182.
[13] 田利飞, 姚建锋, 张乐, 屈亚琦, 张晓龙, 权攀, 阎立昆. 子宫圆韧带去腹膜化在女性腹股沟疝患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 56-59.
[14] 张茜, 刘叶青, 康雪莹, 孙兵兵, 刘岩, 胡丽叶, 周亚茹. 血清铁蛋白与绝经后骨质疏松症的相关性分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 166-171.
[15] 高红琴, 陈晨, 陆瑞科, 王小雨, 张敏, 李少华, 郝梨岚, 黄新程, 关凌耀, 张韵红. 外阴阴道假丝酵母菌病对女性阴道-宫颈菌群的影响研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-725.
阅读次数
全文


摘要