切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (02) : 238 -244. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2024.02.016

论著

腹腔镜下子宫动脉阻断术联合子宫肌瘤切除术治疗子宫肌瘤临床疗效
李玉萍1,(), 马会2, 禹航1   
  1. 1. 张家口市妇幼保健院妇科,张家口 075000
    2. 河北北方学院附属第一医院,张家口 075000
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-30 修回日期:2024-03-01 出版日期:2024-04-01
  • 通信作者: 李玉萍

Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic uterine artery ligation combined with myomectomy for the treatment of uterine fibroids

Yuping Li1,(), Hui Ma2, Hang Yu1   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhangjiakou Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Zhangjiakou 075000, Hebei Province, China
    2. The First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou 075000, Hebei Province, China
  • Received:2023-09-30 Revised:2024-03-01 Published:2024-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Yuping Li
引用本文:

李玉萍, 马会, 禹航. 腹腔镜下子宫动脉阻断术联合子宫肌瘤切除术治疗子宫肌瘤临床疗效[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 238-244.

Yuping Li, Hui Ma, Hang Yu. Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic uterine artery ligation combined with myomectomy for the treatment of uterine fibroids[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(02): 238-244.

目的

探讨腹腔镜下子宫动脉阻断术联合子宫肌瘤切除术(LUAO-M)治疗子宫肌瘤的临床疗效。

方法

选择2018年7月至2021年12月张家口市妇幼保健院收治的120例子宫肌瘤患者为研究对象。根据患者接受手术方式不同,将其分为LUAO-M组(n=60)和腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤切除术(LM)组(n=60)。回顾性分析2组患者术前、术后7 d及21 d时的血清促卵泡生成素(FSH),黄体生成素(LH)及雌二醇水平;以及术后24 h与72 h时的血清肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α、白细胞介素(IL)-1和IL-6水平。对2组患者术后随访1年,随访内容包括月经过多缓解率、闭经率、肌瘤复发率、子宫体积及1年无进展生存(PFS)率。本研究遵循的程序符合张家口市妇幼保健院医学伦理委员会要求,并获得医院伦理委员会批准(批号:第2023-012号)。所有患者对诊疗过程知情并签署临床研究知情同意书。

结果

① 2组患者年龄,肌瘤直径、数目及类别构成比比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。② LUAO-M组患者的术中出血量、手术时间、术后肛门排气时间、术后住院时间,均少于或短于LM组,并且差异均有统计学意义(t=6.02、3.10、5.86、2.76,P均<0.05)。③对2组患者术后7 d及21 d时的FSH、LH和雌二醇水平进行重复测量资料方差分析显示,不同治疗措施与时间因素的交互效应,差异均有统计学意义(F治疗×时间=9.33、50.63、47.32,P治疗×时间均<0.001)。④对2组患者术前、术后24 h及72 h时的TNF-α、IL-1和IL-6水平进行重复测量资料方差分析显示,不同治疗措施与时间因素的交互效应,差异均有统计学意义(F治疗×时间=3.35、10.62、16.53,P治疗×时间均<0.001)。⑤ LUAO-M组患者术后并发症总发生率低于LM组,并且差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.07,P=0.024)。

结论

LUAO-M治疗子宫肌瘤,有助于提高患者生存率、降低并发症总发生率,保护患者卵巢功能。

Objective

To explore clinical efficacy of laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion combined with myomectomy (LUAO-M) for the treatment of uterine fibroids.

Methods

A total of 120 patients with uterine fibroids admitted to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Zhangjiakou Maternal and Child Health Hospital from July 2018 to December 2021 were selected into this study. According to different surgical methods, they were randomly divided into LUAO-M group (n=60) and laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) group (n=60). Retrospective analysis was performed on the serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and estradiol levels of the two groups of patients before and after surgery at 7 days and 21 days; as well as the serum levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1, and IL-6 before and after surgery at 24 and 72 hours. The two groups of patients were followed up for one year after surgery, and the follow-up content included the alleviation rate of menorrhagia, amenorrhea, fibroid recurrence, uterine volume, and 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. The procedures followed in this study were in accordance with the requirements of the Medical Ethics Committee of Zhangjiakou Maternal and Child Health Hospital and were approved by the hospital′s ethics committee (Approval No. 2023-012). Informed consents were obtained from all participants.

Results

① There was no statistically significant difference in age, fibroid size, number of fibroids, and the composition ratio of fibroid categories between the two groups (P>0.05). ② The intraoperative blood loss, operation time, time to postoperative anal passage gas, and postoperative hospital stay of the LUAO-M group were all less than or shorter than those of the LM group, and the differences were statistically significant (t=6.02, 3.10, 5.86, 2.76; all P<0.05). ③ Repeated measures analysis of variance of FSH, LH, and estradiol levels before and after surgery at 7 days and 21 days for the two groups of patients showed that the interactive effect of different treatment measures and time factors was statistically significant (Ftreatment×time=9.33, 50.63, 47.32; all Ptreatment×time<0.001). ④ Repeated measures analysis of variance of TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-6 levels before and after surgery at 24 hours and 72 hours for the two groups of patients showed that the interactive effect of different treatment measures and time factors was statistically significant (Ftreatment×time=3.35, 10.62, 16.53; all Ptreatment×time<0.001). ⑤ The overall incidence rate of postoperative complications in the LUAO-M group was lower than that in the LM group, and the difference between the groups was statistically significant (χ2=5.07, P=0.024).

Conclusions

LUAO-M treatment for uterine fibroids helps to improve patient survival rates, reduce the incidence of complications, and protect ovarian function.

表1 2组子宫肌瘤患者的一般临床资料比较(±s)
表2 2组子宫肌瘤患者围手术期相关指标比较(±s)
表3 2组子宫肌瘤患者术前、术后不同时点的激素水平比较(±s)
表4 2组子宫肌瘤患者术前、术后不同时点血清炎症因子水平比较(±s)
表5 2组子宫肌瘤患者术后并发症发生率比较[例数(%)]
表6 2组子宫肌瘤患者随访结果比较
[1]
刘欣,汪伟,唐杰,等. 子宫肌瘤聚焦超声消融手术与子宫肌瘤剔除术的远期临床疗效比较[J].中华妇产科杂志2022, 57(4): 244-252. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210830-00476.
[2]
周兰,梁国伟,闫佼佼,等. 腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤切除术联合改良子宫动脉阻断术对患者术后恢复、性激素水平及预后影响[J].中国计划生育学杂志2021, 29(11): 2297-2300. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8189.2021.11.010.
[3]
沈燕,沈冰燕. 腹腔镜下子宫动脉阻断术联合子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗子宫肌瘤的临床疗效[J].检验医学与临床202118(19):2830-2833. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9455.2021.19.012.
[4]
周梦玲,薛志伟,周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(5): 611-615. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2023.05.016.
[5]
计雪玲,郭豪,黄嘉敏,等. 腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术联合子宫动脉上行支阻断术治疗子宫肌瘤的效果及对患者卵巢功能的影响[J].广西医学202143(9):1078-1081. DOI: 10.11675/j.issn.0253-4304.2021.09.10.
[6]
刘星辰,刘娟,魏宝宝,等. XIAP与XAF1异常表达与卵巢癌的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(4): 419-427. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2023.04.007.
[7]
程必盛,黄海. 盆腔肿瘤手术后的"隐藏危机":泌尿功能障碍的防范与处理[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版)202418(1):1-5. DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2024.01.001. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2024.01.001.
[8]
刘建会,张林东,宋莉. 腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗子宫肌瘤的效果分析 [J]. 中国实用医刊2023, 50(7) : 45-48. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115689-20221123-05588.
[9]
刘娜,王硕. 妊娠合并巨大子宫肌瘤的临床特点及围产结局[J]. 发育医学电子杂志2020, 8(1): 42-46. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5340.2020.01.008.
[10]
中国医师协会妇产科医师分会妇科肿瘤专业委员会(学组). 实施腹腔镜下子宫(肌瘤)分碎术的中国专家共识[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志2020, 36(7): 626-632. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2020070113.
[11]
查莹娟,田蓉蓉. 单孔腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤切除术后感染影响因素分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志202030(12):1885-1888. DOI: 10.11816/cn.ni.2020-191218.
[12]
张颖.宫腔镜下子宫肌瘤切除术的临床实践[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志2019, 26(S1): 116-118.
[13]
游小林,干晓琴,黄利琼,等. 子宫肌瘤原位旋切法在腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术的应用[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(5): 566-570. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2019.05.014.
[14]
周洋,浦科学. 基于Markov模型的子宫肌瘤手术方法成本效用分析[J].现代预防医学2019, 46(19): 3501-3504.
[15]
孟宁,何林生,尹春华.腹腔镜子宫动脉暂时阻断术与子宫动脉栓塞术预处理治疗Ⅲ型剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的效果分析[J].实用妇产科杂志201935(6):475-477.
[16]
梁茵,史玉林,刘岩松,等. 腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤切除术中标本不同取出方式临床分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志201935(6):689-692. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2019060120.
[17]
Go EB, Kim HE, Kim JS, et al. Efficacy of hand assisted laparoscopic adenomyomectomy with manipulation of uterine artery comparing with classical laparoscopic and laparotomic adenomyomectomy [J]. J Minimally Invasive Gynecol, 2019, 26(7): S121-S122. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.09.147.
[18]
Jin L, Ji L, Shao M, et al. Laparoscopic myomectomy with temporary bilateral uterine artery and utero-ovarian vessels occlusion compared with traditional surgery for uterine fibroids: blood loss and recurrence [J]. Gynecol Obstet Invest, 2019, 84(6): 548-554. DOI: 10.1159/000499494.
[19]
Chen D, Ai G, Yang W, et al. Laparoscopic uterine artery occlusion combined with uterine-sparing pelvic plexus block and partial adenomyomectomy for adenomyosis: a video case report [J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2021, 28(10): 1681-1684. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.05.015.
[20]
Markarov AE, Apresyan SV, Dimitrova VI, et al. The choice of the X-ray endovascular method for the treatment of uterine fibroids and the possibility of prolonging the remission of the disease [J]. Meditsinskiy Sovet, 2021, 2021(13): 123-125.
[1] 汪凯林, 李舜颖, 刘强. 第5版《年轻女性乳腺癌国际共识指南》更新要点解读[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 65-71.
[2] 魏丽坤, 张旭红, 罗营, 薛凤霞, 王颖梅, 宋学茹, 田丽娜, 张艳芳, 王艳霞, 田文艳. 卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿发生恶变并发盆腔脓肿1例并文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(06): 696-702.
[3] 蒋冉, 邹彩艳, 桑谊荃. 宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅲ患者血清性激素水平及其与高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(06): 683-688.
[4] 代雯荣, 赵丽娟, 李智慧. 细胞外囊泡对胚胎着床影响的研究进展[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 616-620.
[5] 王璐, 樊杨. 子宫内膜癌相关生物标志物研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 511-516.
[6] 陈永胜, 朱健, 王军, 张永辉, 徐源佑, 丁璐璐, 陈建国, 樊健, 姚海蓉. 江苏省启东市育龄女性恶性肿瘤患者生存率变化趋势分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 363-372.
[7] 李晓阳, 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 大数据及人工智能对女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的诊断及风险预测[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 549-552.
[8] 封意兰, 赵仁峰. 经脐单孔腹腔镜剔除特殊部位子宫肌瘤[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(01): 26-29.
[9] 缪妙, 王一娜, 陈继明, 汤慧敏, 陈尧, 单武林, 贾秋成, 魏炜炜, 唐斌, 郑虹. 经腹壁瘢痕入路单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剥除术临床分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(06): 348-352.
[10] 王靖, 高建建, 刘平, 陆美荣, 袁永兴, 胡茜, 孙亮亮, 李君亮, 王海琳. 达芬奇机器人辅助单孔腹腔镜在子宫良性疾病的临床应用分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(06): 342-347.
[11] 顾成磊, 徐佳, 张妮娜, 赵路阳, 范文生. 机器人手术在困难子宫切除术中的应用[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 283-287.
[12] 罗曼文, 黄桔园, 刘艳燕, 易跃雄, 陈雨柔, 熊家强, 王景涛, 张蔚. 单孔腹腔镜子宫肌瘤旋切隔离保护技术的应用[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 220-226.
[13] 张茜, 刘叶青, 康雪莹, 孙兵兵, 刘岩, 胡丽叶, 周亚茹. 血清铁蛋白与绝经后骨质疏松症的相关性分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 166-171.
[14] 高红琴, 陈晨, 陆瑞科, 王小雨, 张敏, 李少华, 郝梨岚, 黄新程, 关凌耀, 张韵红. 外阴阴道假丝酵母菌病对女性阴道-宫颈菌群的影响研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-725.
[15] 刘育昕, 王子晗, 张艺馨, 栾永婕, 孟凯. 肾母细胞瘤基因1在卵巢疾病发病机制中的研究进展[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 178-183.
阅读次数
全文


摘要