切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2014, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (04) : 521 -524. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2014.04.026

所属专题: 文献

论著

重度先兆子痫孕妇发病孕龄与母婴预后的关系
钟琳琳1,*,*(), 唐卉1, 陈悦1   
  1. 1. 530021 南宁,广西医科大学第一附属医院
  • 收稿日期:2014-04-11 修回日期:2014-07-02 出版日期:2014-08-01
  • 通信作者: 钟琳琳

Relationship Between Onset Gestational Age and Materal and Perinatal Prognosis in Severe Preeclampsia

Linlin Zhong1(), Hui Tang1, Yue Chen1   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Province, China
  • Received:2014-04-11 Revised:2014-07-02 Published:2014-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Linlin Zhong
  • About author:
    (Corresponding author: Zhong Linlin, Email: )
引用本文:

钟琳琳, 唐卉, 陈悦. 重度先兆子痫孕妇发病孕龄与母婴预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2014, 10(04): 521-524.

Linlin Zhong, Hui Tang, Yue Chen. Relationship Between Onset Gestational Age and Materal and Perinatal Prognosis in Severe Preeclampsia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2014, 10(04): 521-524.

目的

分析重度先兆子痫孕妇不同发病孕龄对母婴预后的影响。

方法

选择2007年1月至2013年10月于广西医科大学第一附属医院住院治疗的468例重度先兆子痫孕妇为研究对象,并按照发病孕龄将其分为A组(n = 75,孕龄<28孕周,平均为26.01孕周),B组(n = 99,孕龄为28~31+6孕周,平均为30.62孕周),C组(n = 84,孕龄为32~33+6孕周,平均为33.05孕周),D组(n = 210,孕龄≥34孕周,平均为37.70孕周)。本研究遵循的程序符合广西医科大学第一附属医院人体试验委员会所制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,分组征得受试对象本人的知情同意,并与之签署临床研究知情同意书。比较4组孕妇的临床特点、并发症发生情况和围生儿结局。

结果

4组不同发病孕龄的重度先兆子痫孕妇发病时年龄、收缩压、舒张压比较,差异均无统计学意义(F=0.936 4,0.129 7,0.722 8;P = 0.422 9,0.942 4,0.538 8),而发病孕龄、分娩孕龄及保守治疗时间比较,差异均有统计学意义(F= 396.356 6,238.161 1,207.104 6;P=0.000)。4组各并发症发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(χ2 = 7.312 0,1.347 3,0.465 5,2.486 3,2.576 6,2.077 1,4.387 4,2.261 0,20.657 0;P>0.05)。A组和B组围生儿死亡率、新生儿窒息和新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征(NRDS)发生率显著高于C组和D组,前二者分别和后二者比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),但C组和D组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。

结论

重度先兆子痫孕妇发病孕龄与其保守治疗时间及并发症发生率无明显关系,而与围生儿结局有较密切关系,可以选择孕龄为32孕周作为判断早发型重度先兆子痫(EOSP)的临界值标准。

Objective

To analyze the effects of severe preeclampsia at different gestational ages on the maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Methods

From January 2007 to October 2013, the clinical data of 468 severe preeclampsia patients were analyzed retrospectively in the study. According to their gestational weeks, they were divided into group A (n=75, gestational week<28 weeks), group B (n= 99, 28 weeks≤gestational week<31+6 weeks), group C (n = 84, 32 weeks≤gestational week<34 weeks) and group D (n=210, gestational week≥34 weeks). The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University. Informed consent was obtained from each participants. The maternal and perinatal outcomes among four groups were compared.

Results

There were no significant differences in age, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure among four groups (F=0.936 4,0.129 7,0.722 8; P = 0.422 9,0.942 4,0.538 8) and no significant differences were found in incidence rates of complications among four groups (χ2 = 7.312 0, 1.347 3,0.465 5,2.486 3,2.576 6,2.077 1,4.387 4,2.261 0,20.657 0;P>0.05). The differences of gestational age at onset, gestational age at delivery and expectant treatment duration among four groups had statistically significant (F=396.356 6,238.161 1,207.104 6;P = 0.000). Perinatal mortality, the incidence rates of neonatal asphyxia and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (NRDS) in group A and group B were significantly higher than those of group C and group D (P<0.05), but the differences were not found between group C and group D (P>0.05).

Conclusions

The gestational age of the onset of severe preeclampsia and expectant treatment duration were unrelated to the maternal outcomes. Gestational week at 32 weeks may be the best critical value of diagnosis of early onset severe preeclampsia(EOSP).

表1 4组患者一般情况比较(±s)
Table 1 Comparison of general condition of pregnant women among four groups(±s)
表2 4组孕产妇并发症发生情况比较[n(%)]
Table 2 Comparison of the complications of pregnant women among different groups[n(%)]
表3 4组围生儿结局比较[n(%)]
Table 3 Comparison of the status on the perinatal infant among four groups[n(%)]
1
吴大庆.子痫昏迷患者剖宫产术麻醉体会[J].临床误诊误治.2008,21(6):35.
2
陈小燕,郭靖.早发型重度先兆子痫28例临床分析[J].临床医药实践,2010,19(9A):651-653.
3
乐杰.妇产科学.7版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:137-139.
4
Duley L. The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia [J]. Semin Perinatol, 2009, 33(3):130.
5
黄雪文,黄金智.105例先兆子痫的临床特点与围生结局的临床观察[J].广东医学院学报,2010,28(3):268-269.
6
Vigil De Gracia P, Montufar Rueda C, Ruiz J. Expectant management of severe preeclampsia and preeclampsia superimposed on chronic hypertension between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2003, 107(1):24-27.
7
Begum MR, Akhter S, Begum A, et al. Conservative management of eclampsia and severe preeclampsia. A Bangladesh experience[J]. Medscape Womens Health, 2002, 7(1):11.
8
李敏,陈玲,曲皖君,等.早发型重度先兆子痫期待疗法的影响因素探讨[J].中国生育健康杂志,2010,21(5):259.
9
杨雪芳,陈皆锋,阮秀兰,等.早发型重度先兆子痫发病及母婴结局的临床分析[J].实用妇产科杂志.2010,26(2):146-148.
10
宛扬,张二红,张宁芝.早发型重度先兆子痫期待治疗的临床观察[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2011,36(6):589-591.
11
张颜.重度先兆子痫终止妊娠的时机方式与结局[J].中国医药指南,2009,7(12):181-182.
12
杨孜,王伽略,黄萍,等.重度子线前期临床发病类型及特点与围生结局的关系[J].中华妇产科杂志,2006,41(5):302-306.
13
赵文秋,刘朝晖,赵扬玉,等.早发型先兆子痫的临床特征及其预后意义分析[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2008,16(5):56-58.
14
杨孜,李蓉,石凌懿,等.早发型重度先兆子痫的临床界定及保守治疗探讨[J].中华妇产科杂志,2005,40(5):302-305.
15
杨雪芳,陈皆锋,阮秀兰,等.早发型重度先兆子痫发病及母婴结局的临床分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2010,26(2):146-148.
[1] 谭芳, 杨娇娇, 范思涵, 叶彩玲, 纪学芹. 产前超声心动图在先天性血管环诊断中的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(01): 37-41.
[2] 何雪威, 谷美玉, 吴亭亭. 超声子宫动脉及子宫内膜血流参数对不明原因复发性流产患者妊娠结局的影响[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(11): 1158-1163.
[3] 杜佳丽, 鲍睿, 乔春红, 韩伟. 中孕期宫颈功能不全孕妇经阴道紧急宫颈环扎术后不良妊娠结局预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 403-409.
[4] 李欣, 魏艺, 张娟, 张娟娟, 凌秀凤, 赵纯, 张媔秋. 高龄女性冻胚移植周期临床妊娠结局的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 276-283.
[5] 薛静, 孙雅楠, 朱丽丽, 李淑红. 妊娠期急性脂肪肝孕产妇诊疗及其妊娠结局[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 312-321.
[6] 陈义思, 梁敏, 李红雨, 夏雪, 刘燕茜, 李晨曲, 王丹. 妊娠合并慢性肾病围产期多学科团队管理价值研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 133-139.
[7] 贾赛君, 张英, 万佳义. 妊娠合并亚临床甲状腺功能减退孕妇的妊娠结局[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 140-147.
[8] 鲁珊, 姚蕴珊, 廖色坭, 陈子恩, 张一剑, 蓝健皓, 魏薇, 刘艳杨, 陈艳红, 陈敦金. 妊娠合并急性阑尾炎100例临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 214-219.
[9] 汪文雁, 郑剑兰, 朱丽慈. 体外受精-胚胎移植术后妊娠患者孕产期风险的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 220-226.
[10] 俞慧慧, 尹宗智. 妊娠期胃穿孔[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 209-213.
[11] 胡淼, 杜丽丽, 张丽姿, 林琳, 张瑜亮, 古士锋, 古仲嘉, 赖思莹, 梁景英, 刘雨, 黄敏珊, 黄媛媛, 黄晴晴, 罗世君, 陈敦金. 体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射受孕患者胎盘植入分级及围产结局的研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 183-189.
[12] 庄旭, 丁立, 许丽, 张宁, 张羽, 林建华. 慢性肾病孕妇肾脏超声异常与不良妊娠结局的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 100-105.
[13] 徐琦, 彭小芳, 杜涛, 王霞妹, 张蜀宁, 陈曼绮, 郭勤敏, 黄泽薇, 付帅. COL1A2基因变异致胎儿期及成年后成骨不全家系的相关研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 106-111.
[14] 王晓艳, 朱利平, 侯顺玉, 岳永飞. 椎管内分娩镇痛对B族溶血性链球菌阳性孕妇阴道分娩结局的影响[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 112-116.
[15] 刘文易, 高晓彤, 汤景, 麦卓瑶, 祝丽琼, 陈慧. 体外受精-胚胎移植妊娠合并绒毛膜下血肿患者妊娠结局的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 93-99.
阅读次数
全文


摘要