切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2013, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (02) : 178 -184. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2013.02.011

所属专题: 文献

论著

口服布洛芬治疗新生儿动脉导管未闭的对照研究
杨波1, 高翔羽1,*,*(), 王秀利1, 崔湘君1   
  1. 1. 221009 江苏徐州,江苏省徐州市东南大学附属徐州医院儿科
  • 收稿日期:2013-01-05 修回日期:2013-03-07 出版日期:2013-04-01
  • 通信作者: 高翔羽

Clinical Comparison Study of Oral Ibuprofen on Neonatal Patent Ductus Arteriosus

Bo YANG1, Xiang-yu GAO1(), Xiu-li WANG1, Xiang-jun CUI1   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Xuzhou Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Xuzhou 221009, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2013-01-05 Revised:2013-03-07 Published:2013-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiang-yu GAO
  • About author:
    (Corresponding author: GAO Xiang-yu, Email: )
引用本文:

杨波, 高翔羽, 王秀利, 崔湘君. 口服布洛芬治疗新生儿动脉导管未闭的对照研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2013, 09(02): 178-184.

Bo YANG, Xiang-yu GAO, Xiu-li WANG, Xiang-jun CUI. Clinical Comparison Study of Oral Ibuprofen on Neonatal Patent Ductus Arteriosus[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2013, 09(02): 178-184.

目的

探讨新生儿动脉导管未闭(patent ductus arteriosus,PDA)的自然关闭率及口服布洛芬干预的利弊。

方法

选择2008年10月至2011年9月因"早产儿/新生儿肺炎、发绀"入院,生后15 h~24 d经心脏彩超确诊为PDA的患儿96例为研究对象。将其按照治疗方式的不同分为治疗组[n=61,确诊后立即给予布洛芬混悬液口服治疗,首剂为10 mg/kg,24 h,48 h后再分别给予5 mg/kg;治疗(72~96)h后复查心脏彩超],安慰剂组[n=35,确诊后立即给予生理盐水口服,首剂为1 mL/kg,24 h,48 h后再分别给予0.5 mL/kg;(72~96)h后复查心脏彩超。对仍存在PDA的患儿,则按照治疗组方案治疗,(72~96)h后再复查心脏彩超](本研究遵循的程序符合本院人体试验委员会制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,分组征得受试对象监护人的知情同意,并与其签署临床研究知情同意书)。两组患儿一般临床资料及治疗前彩超检查结果比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对两组治疗后复查心脏彩超结果及不良反应发生率进行统计学分析。

结果

①治疗组全部患儿,治疗组足月儿、非症状性PDA儿、不合并其他心脏病患儿、出生72 h内确诊为PDA患儿的动脉导管关闭率(分别为88.5%,91.3%,92.9%,89.6%及93.0%)均显著高于安慰剂组的同类患儿(62.9%,50.0%,68.0%,60.7%及66.7%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗组早产儿、症状性PDA儿、合并其他心脏病患儿、出生72 h后确诊为PDA患儿的动脉导管关闭率(分别为86.8%,78.9%,84.6%及77.8%)分别与安慰剂组的同类患儿(71.4%,50.0%,71.4%及50.0%)比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。②两组早产儿与足月儿、症状性与非症状性PDA患儿、合并其他心脏病与不合并其他心脏病患儿、出生72 h内确诊与出生72 h后确诊的PDA患儿的动脉导管关闭率组内比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。③安慰剂组第1次复查心脏彩超的结果显示,动脉导管关闭率为62.9%(22/35,均自发性关闭),第2次则为61.5%(8/13,在治疗后关闭)。④4例早产儿出生10 d后接受布洛芬治疗,2例动脉导管关闭,2例导管内径缩小。⑤治疗过程中出现少尿,治疗组为6例(9.8%),安慰剂组为2例(5.7%)。⑥未完成治疗/临床病历资料不完整的接受布洛芬治疗患儿中,出现血小板(PLT)严重下降、上消化道出血及便血各1例。

结论

口服布洛芬不但可有效促进出生10 d内的PDA早产儿动脉导管闭合,对于足月儿肺炎/发绀伴PDA及出生10 d后PDA早产儿的动脉导管闭合亦有效,而且临床应用相对安全。

Objective

To investigate rate of spontaneous closure, efficacy and safety of oral ibuprofen on neonatal patent ductus arteriosus (PDA).

Methods

From October 2008 to September 2011, a total of 96 neonates admitted to department of pediatrics with premature infants, neonate pneumonia or cyanosis associated with PDA confirmed by echocardiography from 15 h to 24 d after delivery. They were divided into two groups based on different treatment strategies: Treatment group (n=61, treatment by oral ibuprofen suspension 10 mg/kg, 5 mg/kg at 24 h and 48 h, respectively, and echocardiography examination after treatment 72 h to 96 h); placebo group (n=35, treatment by oral physiological saline 1 mL/kg, 0.5 mL/kg at 24 h and 48 h, respectively, echocardiography examination after treatment 72 h to 96 h. They were treatment by oral ibuprofen suspension as strategies of treatment group if PDA persistence, and echocardiography examination again after treatment by ibuprofen 72 h to 96 h. There had no significance difference between two groups among general clinical data and results of echocardiography of heart before treatment etc.(P>0.05). Data of reexamine results of echocardiography of heart and incidence of adverse reactions were analysis between two groups by statistics. Informed consent was obtained from the parents of each participating neonate.

Results

①The PDA closing rates of overall, full term infants, asymptomatic infants, without others cardiopathy infants, PDA confirmed born within 72 h in treatment group (88.5%, 91.3%, 92.9%, 89.6%, 93.0%) were significant higher than those in placebo group (62.9%, 50.0%, 68.0%, 60.7%, 66.7%)(P<0.05). There were no significant difference in PDA closing rates of preterm infants, symptomatic infants, with other cardiopathy infants, PDA confirmed born after 72 h between treatment group (86.8%, 78.9%, 84.6%, 77.8%) and placebo group (71.4%, 50.0%, 71.4%, 50.0%)(P>0.05). ②There were no significant difference between two groups in closing rates of PDA of preterm infants and full term infants, symptomatic and asymptomatic, with and without others cardiopathy, PDA confirmed born within and after 72 h (P>0.05). ③ In placebo group, PDA disappear spontaneously in 22/35 (62.9%) cases after treatment by placebo, and PDA were closed in 8/13 (61.5%) cases after treatmen by strategies as that of treatment group.④There were 4 cases premature infants born after 10 d treatment by ibuprofen, closed in 2/4 cases, and diameter reduced in the other 2/4 cases.⑤Oliguria occurred in 6 cases (9.8%) in treatment group, and 2 cases (5.7%) in placebo group. ⑥Another 3 cases treatment by ibuprofen who had been excluded by this study, occurred serious decrease of platelet (PLT), upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and hematochezia one case, respectively.

Conclusions

Oral ibuprofen is effective in closing PDA in preterm infants within 10 days of life. It is effective in closing PDA in full term infants with neonate pneumonia or cyanosis and preterm infants after 10 days of life, too. It is safe to clinical use.

表1 96例PDA新生儿一般临床资料比较(±s)
Table 1 Comparison of general clinical data among 96 cases PDA neonates (±s)
表2 96例PDA新生儿治疗前心脏彩超检查结果比较(±s)
Table 2 Comparison of results of echocardiography before treatment among 96 cases PDA neonates (±s)
表3 两组治疗(72~96)h后复查心脏彩超的动脉导管关闭率比较
Table 3 Comparison of results of the closing rates of ductus arteriosus during 72 h to 96 h after oral ibuprofen suspension therapy or placebo
表4 治疗组4例PDA早产儿生后10 d予布洛芬治疗的一般临床资料比较
Table 4 Comparison of general clinical data among 4 cases PDA preterm infants born after 10 d treatment by ibuprofen
[1]
Kliegman RM, Behrman RE, Jenson HB, et al. Nelson textbook of pediatrics. 18th ed[M]. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier, 2007, 1891-1893, 731-741.
[2]
Hamrick SEG, Hansmann G. Patent ductus arteriosus of the preterm infant[J]. Pediatrics, 2010, 125:1020-1030.
[3]
Noori S, McCoy M, Friedlich P, et al. Failure of ductus arteriosus closure is associated with increased mortality in preterm infants[J]. Pediatrics, 2009, 123:e138-e144.
[4]
Chorne N, Leonard C, Piecuch R, et al. Patent ductus arteriosus and its treatment as risk factors for neonatal and neurodevelopmental morbidity[J]. Pediatrics, 2007, 119:1165-1174.
[5]
Van Overmeire B, Allegaert K, Casaer A, et al. Prophylactic ibuprofen in premature infants: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2004, 364:1945-1949.
[6]
Lemmers PMA, Toet MC, Bel F. Impact of patent ductus arteriosus and subsequent therapy with indomethacin on cerebral oxygenation in preterm infants[J]. Pediatrics, 2008, 121:142-147.
[7]
Tacy TA. Abnormalities of the ductus arteriosus and pulmonary arteries//Lai WL, Mertens LL, Cohen MS, et al. Echocardiography in pediatric and congenital heart disease[M]. West Sussex, United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009, 283-296.
[8]
MalviyaMN, Ohlsson A, Shah SS. Surgical versus medical treatment with cyclooxygenase inhibitors for symp tomatic patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants[J]. Cochrane Database Systemat Rev, 2008, CD003951.
[9]
Bhandari V, Zhou G, Bizzarro MJ, et al. Genetic contribution to patent ductus arteriosus in the premature newborn[J]. Pediatrics, 2009, 123:669-673.
[10]
Van Overmeire B, Smets K, Lecoutere D, et al. A comparison of ibuprofen and indomethacin for closure of patent ductus arteriosus[J]. N Engl J Med, 2000, 343:674-681.
[11]
Ohlsson A, Walia R, Shah SS. Ibuprofen for the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm and/or low birth weight infants[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2010, 14:CD003481.
[12]
Van Overmeire B, Smets K, Lecoutere D, et al. A comparison of ibuprofen and indomethacin for closure of patent ductus arteriosus[J]. N Engl J Med, 2000, 343:674-681.
[13]
Gournay V, Savagner C, Thiriez G, et al. Pulmonary hypertension after ibuprofen prophylaxis in very preterm infants[J]. Lancet, 2002, 359:1486-1488.
[14]
Gournay V, Roze JC, Kuster A, et al. Prophylactic ibuprofen versus placebo in very premature infants:A randomised, doubleblind, placebo-controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2004, 364:1939-1944.
[15]
Mosca F, Bray M, Stucchi I, et al. Pulmonary hypertension after ibuprofen prophylaxis in very preterm infants[J]. Lancet, 2002, 360:1023-1024.
[16]
Cherif A, Khrouf N, Jabnoun S, et al. Randomized pilot study comparing oral ibuprofen with intravenous ibuprofen in very low birth weight infants with patent ductus arteriosus[J]. Pediatrics, 2008, 122:e1256-e1261.
[17]
Erdeve O, Yurttutan S, Altug N, et al. Oral versus intravenous ibuprofen for patent ductus arteriosus closure: A randomised controlled trial in extremely low birthweight infants[J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2012, 97(4):F279-283.
[18]
Jiang Y, Gao XY, Gu CS, et al. Indomethacin therapy for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in newborn infants: A clinical observation[J]. J Neonatol, 2003, 18:12-14.
[19]
Feng Q, Li Y, Wang Y, et al. Clinical investigation on patent ductus arteriosus of premature Infants[J]. J Appl Clin Pediatr, 2005, 20:129-131.
[20]
Koch J, Hensley G, Roy L, et al. Prevalence of spontaneous closure of the ductus arteriosus in neonates at a birth weight of 1000 grams or less[J]. Pediatrics, 2006, 117:1113-1121.
[21]
Dagle JM, Lepp NT, Cooper ME, et al. Determination of genetic predisposition to patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants[J]. Pediatrics, 2009, 123:1116-1123.
[22]
Kajino H, Chen YQ, Seidner SR, et al. Factors that increase the contractile tone of the ductus arteriosus also regulate its anatomic remodeling[J]. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol, 2001, 281:R291-301.
[23]
McCurnin D, Clyman RI. Effects of a patent ductus arteriosus on postprandial mesenteric perfusion in premature baboons[J]. Pediatrics, 2008, 122:e1262-e1267.
[24]
Noori S, McCoy M, Friedlich P, et al. Failure of ductus arteriosus closure is associated with increased mortality in preterm infants[J]. Pediatrics, 2009, 123:e138-e144.
[25]
Van Overmeire B, Van de Broek H, Van Laer P, et al. Early versus late indomethacin treatment for patent ductus arteriosus in premature infants with resp iratory distress syndrome[J]. J Pediatr, 2001, 138:205-211.
[1] 徐婷婷, 詹泳池, 王晓东, 刘兴会. 电子胎心监测结果出现正弦波形的胎母输血综合征围生期结局分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 382-389.
[2] 梅娟, 陶旭炜. 弥散性血管内凝血为首发表现先天性肝内门体静脉分流新生儿2例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 322-330.
[3] 张禾璇, 杨雪, 王侣金, 李林洁, 刘兴宇. 新生儿葡萄糖-6-磷酸脱氢酶缺乏症筛查及基因突变特征分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 200-208.
[4] 郭立珍, 范天群, 张欣凯, 蒋韵红, 金蓉, 刘冬云. 早产小于胎龄儿发生支气管肺发育不良的危险因素及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 209-215.
[5] 梁靓, 谭征, 黄婷, 高跃, 章坚, 夏杰. 新生儿先天性膈疝术后呼吸支持相关危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(01): 9-17.
[6] 花少栋, 李永超, 姜晨阳, 张盼, 池婧涵, 白芸, 高铭. 新生儿红斑狼疮临床特点及远期预后[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(01): 74-80.
[7] 马海月, 南晓琴. 网织红细胞百分比/未成熟网织红细胞指数联合胆红素与白蛋白比值对新生儿溶血病的病情评估意义[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(01): 89-96.
[8] 徐珍娥, 杨娅丽, 徐晨霞, 向巴曲西, 王家蓉. 无创脑水肿监测技术在高原地区重度窒息新生儿脑水肿中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(01): 114-119.
[9] 姜舟, 唐立, 杨柳, 邹凌. 先天性甲状腺功能减退症患儿确诊时间的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(06): 649-656.
[10] 田权秀, 韩爱民, 徐艳. 动脉导管未闭与极低出生体重早产儿支气管肺发育不良的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(06): 675-682.
[11] 朱颖军, 张敏, 王加玉. 小剂量去甲肾上腺素对蛛网膜下腔-硬膜外联合麻醉剖宫产术分娩新生儿影响[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(06): 728-733.
[12] 董晓燕, 赵琪, 唐军, 张莉, 杨晓燕, 李姣. 奥密克戎变异株感染所致新型冠状病毒感染疾病新生儿的临床特征分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 595-603.
[13] 杨莹, 刘艳, 王央丹. 新生儿结节性硬化症相关性癫痫1例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 464-472.
[14] 郑伟军, 郑超, 方一凡, 吴典明, 王翔, 陈飞, 刘明坤. 新生儿急性阑尾炎17例诊治分析并文献回顾[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 291-293.
[15] 李茂军, 唐彬秩, 吴青, 阳倩, 梁小明, 邹福兰, 黄蓉, 陈昌辉. 新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的管理:多国指南/共识及RDS-NExT workshop 共识陈述简介和评价[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 607-617.
阅读次数
全文


摘要