切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (01) : 114 -119. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2024.01.015

论著

无创脑水肿监测技术在高原地区重度窒息新生儿脑水肿中的临床应用
徐珍娥1, 杨娅丽2, 徐晨霞2, 向巴曲西2, 王家蓉1,()   
  1. 1. 重庆医科大学附属儿童医院新生儿科、国家儿童健康与疾病临床医学研究中心、儿童发育疾病研究教育部重点实验室、儿科学重庆市重点实验室,重庆 400014;西藏自治区昌都市人民医院儿科,昌都 854000
    2. 西藏自治区昌都市人民医院儿科,昌都 854000
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-04 修回日期:2024-01-11 出版日期:2024-02-01
  • 通信作者: 王家蓉

Clinical application of noninvasive brain edema monitoring technology in brain edema of neonates with severe asphyxia in plateau area

Zhene Xu1, Yali Yang2, Chenxia Xu2, Baquxi Xiang2, Jiarong Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Neonatology, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Children′s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400014, China; Department of Pediatrics, Changdu People′s Hospital, Changdu 854000, Tibet Autonomous Region, China
    2. Department of Pediatrics, Changdu People′s Hospital, Changdu 854000, Tibet Autonomous Region, China
  • Received:2023-12-04 Revised:2024-01-11 Published:2024-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Jiarong Wang
  • Supported by:
    Natural Science Foundation of Tibet Autonomous Region Group Medical Aid Project(XZ2020ZR-ZY71 (Z))
引用本文:

徐珍娥, 杨娅丽, 徐晨霞, 向巴曲西, 王家蓉. 无创脑水肿监测技术在高原地区重度窒息新生儿脑水肿中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(01): 114-119.

Zhene Xu, Yali Yang, Chenxia Xu, Baquxi Xiang, Jiarong Wang. Clinical application of noninvasive brain edema monitoring technology in brain edema of neonates with severe asphyxia in plateau area[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(01): 114-119.

目的

探讨采用无创脑水肿动态监护仪主要输出参数:扰动系数(DC),在高原地区重度窒息新生儿脑水肿中的临床应用价值。

方法

选择2019年12月至2023年6月于西藏自治区昌都市人民医院新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)治疗的22例高原地区重度窒息新生儿为研究对象,纳入重度窒息组。将同期在同一家医院新生儿病房治疗的22例高原地区非重症新生儿作为对照,纳入对照组。采用前瞻性研究方法,对2组新生儿采用无创脑水肿动态监护仪进行脑水肿监测。采用多因素非条件logistic回归分析法,确定DC值是否为高原地区重度窒息新生儿发生脑水肿的独立影响因素;采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线的曲线下面积(AUC),评估DC值对重度窒息新生儿发生脑水肿的评估价值。本研究经昌都市人民医院医学伦理委员会批准(审批文号:2021006)。所有患儿监护人对诊疗过程知情同意,并签署临床研究知情同意书。

结果

①重度窒息组新生儿DC值为32±11,低于对照组的56±13,并且差异有统计学意义(t=-6.82、P<0.001)。②多因素非条件logistic回归分析显示,DC值升高(OR=0.801,95%CI:0.790~0.895,P=0.049)为重度窒息新生儿发生脑水肿的独立保护因素。③无创脑水肿动态监护仪的DC值,评估重度窒息新生儿发生脑水肿的AUC为0.926,敏感度为81.8%,特异度为90.9%,DC最佳临界值为45.5。

结论

在高原地区,无创脑水肿监测参数DC值,可以辅助评估新生儿脑水肿,从而及时采取治疗措施。

Objective

To explore the clinical application value of the main output parameter of non-invasive dynamic brain edema monitor: disturbance coefficient (DC) in the brain edema of neonates with severe asphyxia in plateau area.

Methods

From December 2019 to June 2023, 22 neonates with severe asphyxia in plateau area treated in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of Changdu People′s Hospital in Tibet Autonomous Region were selected as the research objects and included in the severe asphyxia group. Twenty-two cases of non-severe newborns in plateau area who were treated in the neonatal ward of the same hospital in the same period were taken as control group. With prospective research method, non-invasive brain edema dynamic monitoring instrument was used to two groups of neonates for brain edema monitoring. Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis was used to determine whether DC value was an independent influencing factor of brain edema in neonates with severe asphyxia in plateau area. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the evaluation value of DC value for brain edema in neonates with severe asphyxia. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Changdu People′s Hospital (Approval No. 2021006). The guardians of all children had informed consents to the diagnosis and treatment process and signed the informed consent forms of clinical research.

Results

① The DC value of neonates in severe asphyxia group was 32±11, which was lower than that of 56±13 in control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=-6.82, P<0.001). ② Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis showed that DC value increase (OR=0.801, 95%CI: 0.790-0.895, P=0.049) was an independent protective factor for brain edema in neonates with severe asphyxia. ③ The AUC of the DC value of the non-invasive brain edema dynamic monitor for evaluating brain edema in neonates with severe asphyxia was 0.926, the sensitivity was 81.8%, the specificity was 90.9%, and the optimal cut-off value of DC was 45.5.

Conclusions

In plateau areas, DC value of non-invasive brain edema monitoring parameter can help evaluate brain edema in neonates, so as to take timely treatment.

表1 2组新生儿临床资料比较
表2 影响重度窒息新生儿发生脑水肿的多因素非条件logistic回归分析结果
图1 无创脑水肿动态监护仪DC值评估重度窒息新生儿发生脑水肿的ROC曲线分析注:DC为扰动系数,ROC曲线为受试者工作特征曲线
[1]
汪泉,吴春,李勇刚,等. 电阻抗成像技术和水通道蛋白4在3岁以下主动脉缩窄手术患儿脑水肿监测中的应用[J]. 重庆医科大学学报2019, 44(1): 89-93. DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.001793.
[2]
Lymperopoulos G, Lymperopoulos P, Alikari V, et al. Applications for electrical impedance tomography (EIT) and electrical properties of the human body[J]. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2017, 989: 109-117. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-57348-9_9.
[3]
Li N, Xu H, Zhou Z, et al. Reconfigurable bioimpedance emulation system for electrical impedance tomography system validation[J]. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst, 2013, 7(4): 460-468. DOI: 10.1109/TBCAS.2012.2224110.
[4]
赖寒. 无创脑水肿动态监护仪在儿童颅脑监测中的临床应用[D]. 重庆:重庆医科大学,2020.
[5]
高文文. 无创颅内压监测在神经外科疾病中的应用前景[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志2020, 25(1): 54-56. DOI: 10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2020.01.020.
[6]
赖寒,方芳,刘文俊,等. 不同年龄组无颅脑损伤患儿扰动系数的变化特点[J]. 中华儿科杂志2020, 58(4): 290-294. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20191126-00750.
[7]
幸奠伟,周硕彦,王宸浩,等. 应用GAMLSS方法构建1~16岁儿童青少年扰动系数参考值的横断面调查[J]. 中国循证儿科杂志2023, 18(4): 267-271. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5501.2023.04.004.
[8]
Mrelashvili A, Russ JB, Ferriero DM, et al. The Sarnat score for neonatal encephalopathy: looking back and moving forward[J]. Pediatr Res, 2020, 88(6): 824-825. DOI: 10.1038/s41390-020-01143-5.
[9]
Enhesari A, Biglari N, Shafieei M, et al. Evaluating the correlation between brain ultra sonographic, brain mri, and electroencephalography findings and the severity of asphyxia and neurodevelopment in infants with hypoxic-ischemic injury[J]. Iran J Child Neurol, 2022, 16(3): 109-119. DOI: 10.22037/ijcn.v15i4.28345.
[10]
刘炳学,张丽,张亦鹏,等. 扰动系数预测不同年龄重型颅脑损伤患儿预后的临床价值[J]. 中国现代医学杂志2022, 32(12): 66-71. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8982.2022.12.012.
[11]
He LY, Wang J, Luo Y, et al. Application of non-invasive cerebral electrical impedance measurement on brain edema in patients with cerebral infarction[J]. Neurol Res, 2010, 32(7): 770-774. DOI: 10.1179/016164109X12478302362572.
[12]
Zhang X, Medow JE, Iskandar BJ, et al. Invasive and noninvasive means of measuring intracranial pressure: a review[J]. Physiol Meas, 2017, 38(8): R143-R182. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/aa7256.
[13]
Kristiansson H, Nissborg E, Bartek J Jr, et al. Measuring elevated intracranial pressure through noninvasive methods: a review of the literature[J]. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol, 2013, 25(4): 372-385. DOI: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e31829795ce.
[14]
Ong T, Bharatha A, Alsufayan R, et al. MRI predictors for brain invasion in meningiomas[J]. Neuroradiol J, 2021, 34(1): 3-7. DOI: 10.1177/1971400920953417.
[15]
Xu J, Li G, Zhao S, et al. Experimental study on healthy volunteers based on magnetic induction brain edema monitoring system[J]. Technol Health Care, 2019, 27(S1): 273-285. DOI: 10.3233/THC-199026.
[16]
Li G, Zhang B, Zhang M, et al. A non-invasive real-time monitoring system for cytotoxic brain edema in post ischemic stroke based on near-field coupling[J]. Technol Health Care, 2021, 29(5): 963-978. DOI: 10.3233/THC-202685.
[17]
陆美琪,王兴蕾,巩会平,等. 无创脑水肿动态监测技术在颅脑损伤急危重症救治中的应用[J]. 中华危重病急救医学2023, 35(3): 334-336. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20221018-00927.
[18]
高文文,蒋小兵,陈鹏,等. 脑水肿无创动态监测仪在自发性脑出血中的应用[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志2022, 27(10): 822-824. DOI: 10.13798/j.issn.1009-153X.2022.10.007.
[19]
秦兴虎,陈义天,徐宏,等. 无创脑水肿动态监测在创伤性脑损伤术后的临床应用价值[J]. 中华创伤杂志2017, 33(8): 719-723. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2017.08.011.
[20]
杜玉民,谭冬,袁宇. 无创脑水肿动态监护仪在动脉瘤自发性蛛网膜下腔出血患者术后脑水肿监测中的应用[J]. 国际神经病学神经外科学杂志2022, 49(1): 66-67. DOI: 10.16636/j.cnki.jinn.1673-2642.2022.01.014.
[21]
赵杰. 脑出血患者治疗中微创颅内血肿清除术的应用及无创脑水肿动态监护仪的指导作用分析[J]. 中国医疗器械信息2021, 27(19): 88-89. DOI: 10.15971/j.cnki.cmdi.2021.19.039.
[1] 徐婷婷, 詹泳池, 王晓东, 刘兴会. 电子胎心监测结果出现正弦波形的胎母输血综合征围生期结局分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 382-389.
[2] 李欣, 魏艺, 张娟, 张娟娟, 凌秀凤, 赵纯, 张媔秋. 高龄女性冻胚移植周期临床妊娠结局的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 276-283.
[3] 夏婷君, 段耀祥, 段霞, 刘金凤. 助产士共情疲劳现状及影响因素研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 302-311.
[4] 梅娟, 陶旭炜. 弥散性血管内凝血为首发表现先天性肝内门体静脉分流新生儿2例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 322-330.
[5] 张禾璇, 杨雪, 王侣金, 李林洁, 刘兴宇. 新生儿葡萄糖-6-磷酸脱氢酶缺乏症筛查及基因突变特征分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 200-208.
[6] 郑伟军, 郑超, 方一凡, 吴典明, 王翔, 陈飞, 刘明坤. 新生儿急性阑尾炎17例诊治分析并文献回顾[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 291-293.
[7] 韩婧, 郝少龙, 康骅. 北京市单中心甲状腺癌患者临床特征的回顾分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 490-493.
[8] 陈文进, 张月君, 王传泰. 腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术后肠梗阻发生的影响因素研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 389-392.
[9] 陈静, 王晓玲, 安康. 老年进展期胃癌术后腹膜转移的相关因素及治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 225-228.
[10] 张艺萱, 罗金丹, 葛小丽, 钟红琴. 先天性心脏病伴PH血清H-FABP、NT-proBNP与肺动脉内径、血流速度及PASP的关系[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 252-255.
[11] 彭祺, 马丽娜, 李倩倩, 陈旭. 重症病毒性肺炎机械通气脱机的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(02): 260-263.
[12] 赵月, 田坤, 张宗明, 郭震天, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓. 降钙素原对老年急性重度胆囊炎发生的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 801-806.
[13] 冯铭, 孙洪涛. 动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的颅内压监测与管理[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 248-253.
[14] 司楠, 孙洪涛. 创伤性脑损伤后肾功能障碍危险因素的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 300-305.
[15] 李茂军, 唐彬秩, 吴青, 阳倩, 梁小明, 邹福兰, 黄蓉, 陈昌辉. 新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的管理:多国指南/共识及RDS-NExT workshop 共识陈述简介和评价[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 607-617.
阅读次数
全文


摘要