Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (04): 334 -343. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2026.04.008

Original Article

Pregnant woman with thyroid hormone resistance syndrome: a case report and literature review

Dandan Huang(), Peixiao Liu, Jixing Liao, Shuting Xu   

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Longgang District Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City (Longgang Maternity & Child Institute of Shantou University Medical College), Shenzhen 518104, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2026-01-09 Revised:2026-07-10 Published:2026-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Dandan Huang
  • Supported by:
    Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation(2026A1515012009)
Objective

To investigate the clinical characteristics, diagnosis and treatment strategies of pregnant women with thyroid hormone resistance syndrome (SRTH).

Methods

One pregnant woman with SRTH (patient 1) who visited the Department of Internal Medicine of Longgang District Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital of Shenzhen City in November 2023 was selected. A retrospective analysis was conducted to collect the clinical data of pregnant woman 1, and to summarize and analyze her clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment process. Chinese and English keywords including " resistance to thyroid hormone" " pregnant woman" and " resistance to thyroid hormone in pregnancy" were used to retrieve relevant literature about pregnancy complicated with SRTH from CNKI, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, PubMed and Web of Science (WoS). The retrieval period covered September 1, 2004 to July 1, 2026. The retrieved literature was systematically analyzed to summarize the clinical characteristics and key diagnosis-treatment points of pregnant women with SRTH. The protocol of this study complied with the requirements of the Helsinki Declaration of the World Medical Association revised in 2013.

Results

①Patient 1 was a 29-year-old primipara with last menstrual period on September 17, 2023. She presented to the internal medicine outpatient department of our hospital on November 22, 2023 with a chief complaint of abnormal thyroid function for more than 10 years. Her thyroid dysfunction was first detected on physical examination more than 10 years ago, without obvious clinical manifestations, and she did not receive standardized management at that time. Six years prior to presentation, she developed goiter and prominent hypermetabolic symptoms accompanied by elevated serum free thyroxine (FT4), and was misdiagnosed with hyperthyroidism at an outside hospital. After radioactive iodine-131 therapy, her hypermetabolic symptoms resolved completely, without subsequent generalized edema or cold intolerance. During pre-pregnancy preparation in May 2021, a physical examination at another hospital revealed elevated levels of serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free triiodothyronine (FT3), and FT4, while plain and contrast-enhanced pituitary MRI showed no remarkable abnormalities. Starting from March 2023, the outside hospital initiated levothyroxine (LT4) replacement therapy at a dose of 50 μg/d under the tentative diagnosis of hypothyroidism post radioactive iodine-131 ablation, with regular thyroid function monitoring. Her serum TSH remained persistently elevated despite treatment. The LT4 dosage was gradually titrated up to 175 μg/d in November 2023; dose escalation only induced a mild reduction in serum TSH while further raising serum FT4. Therefore, LT4 was discontinued in December 2023, and serum FT4 levels returned to normal after discontinuation of the drug. In March 2024, the gene test results of pregnant woman 1 showed that there was a c. 1036C>T(p.Leu346Phe) mutation (NM_001128177.1) in the thyroid hormone receptor β (THRβ) gene (chr3: 24169098), and she was diagnosed as SRTH patient. In June 2024, she delivered a male neonate vaginally at 39 weeks of gestation. Neonatal thyroid function test results were unremarkable, with only mild elevation of thyroid autoantibodies. Genetic screening of the newborn showed no pathogenic variants in the THRβ gene. The infant was followed up to 1 year of age, presenting with normal physical growth and consistently normal thyroid function. ② Literature review: Three relevant studies involving 17 pregnant women with SRTH (patients 2 to 18) were retrieved per the predefined search strategy. Together with patient 1, a total of 18 pregnant women with SRTH were included for comprehensive analysis. These 18 pregnant women had a total of 23 singleton pregnancies. Thyroid function characteristics during pregnancy: 1 case (patient 1) had synchronously elevated serum FT4 and TSH levels; 1 case (patient 2) had typical hyperthyroidism; 1 case (patient 3) had normal thyroid function; 1 case (patient 5) had mildly elevated serum FT4 in early pregnancy; and the remaining 14 patients had normal serum TSH levels and elevated serum FT4 levels. SRTH management during pregnancy: Two cases (patients 10 and 12) used LT4 to improve hypothyroidism symptoms during pregnancy; three cases (patients 2, 15, and 18) used propylthiouracil to treat hyperthyroidism; two cases (the first pregnancy of patient 7 and patient 17) used methimazole to suppress high FT4 levels; three cases (patients 6, 8, and 9) did not report SRTH management during pregnancy; and the remaining pregnancies did not receive any SRTH-targeting drug treatment. Pregnancy outcomes: Except for stillbirth in the first pregnancy of patient 7, preterm birth in patient 2 and the second pregnancy of patient 14, and no reported pregnancy outcomes in four cases (patients 6, 9-11), all other pregnancies had good outcomes. Neonatal thyroid function: Except for elevated serum TSH levels in newborns delivered by patient 7 in the second pregnancy, patient 14 in their first and second pregnancies and patients 16 and 17, and no reported thyroid function in newborns delivered by patients 6, 9-11, and the first pregnancy of patient 7, all other newborns had normal thyroid function.

Conclusions

Pregnant woman with SRTH is relatively rare, and its pathogenesis is not yet clear, but often accompanied by THRβ gene abnormalities. For pregnant women with suspected SRTH, thorough medical history collection combined with auxiliary examinations is required to guide individualized targeted treatment. Regular prenatal surveillance is essential for dynamic disease assessment throughout gestation of SRTH pregnant woman. Postpartum comprehensive thyroid function screening should be completed for all neonates born to mothers with SRTH.

图1 孕妇1及其分娩新生儿THRβ基因Sanger法测序图[图1A:孕妇1的THRβ基因发生c.1036C>T(p.Leu346Phe)杂合突变(红色箭头所示);图1B:孕妇1分娩新生儿THRβ基因该位点未发现突变(红色箭头所示)]注:孕妇1为妊娠合并甲状腺激素抵抗综合征孕妇
表1 本研究孕妇1与文献检索纳入的17例SRTH孕妇(孕妇2~18)的临床资料比较
孕妇编号 文献(第1作者,发表年) 孕妇年龄(岁)/孕次(次) THRβ基因缺陷序列/孕妇甲状腺功能情况 孕期SRTH处理措施 出生结局 胎儿基因突变情况
1 本研究 29/1 L346F/血清FT4、TSH均升高 停用LT4,定期监测甲状腺功能 足月儿(出生胎龄为39周,出生体重为3 kg),甲状腺功能正常 WT
2 Dhingra[7],2008 19/1 R383H/甲状腺功能亢进 采取丙硫氧嘧啶100 mg/次×2次/d治疗 早产儿(出生胎龄为34周,出生体重为2.14 kg),甲状腺功能正常 未查
3 Dhingra[7],2008 33/1 R438C/甲状腺功能正常 未服药 足月儿(出生胎龄为38周,出生体重为3.44 kg),甲状腺功能正常 未查
4 Dhingra[7],2008 34/1 I431M/39孕周时,FT3与FT4升高,血清TSH正常 未服药 足月儿(35周时宫内生长发育受限,39周时因羊水减少而催产分娩。出生体重为3.06 kg),甲状腺功能正常 未查
5 Wu[8],2018 25/1 Y321C/早孕期FT4轻度升高 未服药 足月儿(出生胎龄为37周,出生体重为3.21 kg),甲状腺功能正常 WT
6 Pappa[9],2017 不详/1 L450H/血清TSH正常,FT4为ULN的162% 不详 不详 WT
7a Pappa[9],2017 不详/1 M334R/血清TSH正常,FT4为ULN的163% 甲巯咪唑 死胎(胎龄37周时胎死宫内,体重为2.31 kg),携带THRβ基因M334R突变 THRβ基因突变
7a Pappa[9],2017 不详/2 M334R/血清TSH正常,FT4为ULN的163% 未用药 足月儿(出生胎龄、出生体重均不详),血清TSH为6.0 μIU/mL(升高) THRβ基因突变
7a Pappa[9],2017 不详/3 M334R/血清TSH正常,FT4为ULN的163% 未用药 足月儿(出生胎龄为38周,出生体重为2.48 kg),血清TSH为1.6 μIU/mL(正常) WT
8 Pappa[9],2017 不详/1 A317T/血清TSH正常,FT4为ULN的183% 不详 足月儿(出生胎龄为38周,出生体重为2.8 kg),血清TSH为4.3 μIU/mL(正常) WT
9 Pappa[9],2017 不详/1 E460K/血清TSH正常,FT4为ULN的165% 不详 不详 WT
10 Pappa[9],2017 不详/1 R320C/血清TSH正常,FT4为ULN的158% LT4 不详 WT
11 Pappa[9],2017 不详/1 V349M/血清TSH正常,FT4为ULN的232% 未服药 不详 THRβ基因突变
12b Pappa[9],2017 不详/1 R320C/血清TSH正常,FT4为ULN的129% LT4 足月儿(出生胎龄为39周,出生体重为3.53 kg),血清TSH为3.3 μIU/mL(正常) WT
12b Pappa[9],2017 不详/2 R320C/血清TSH正常,FT4为ULN的129% LT4 足月儿(出生胎龄为40周,出生体重为4.05 kg),血清TSH为3.3 μIU/mL(正常) WT
12b Pappa[9],2017 不详/3 R320C/血清TSH正常,FT4为ULN的129% LT4 足月儿(出生胎龄为39周,出生体重为3.48 kg),血清TSH为2.91 μIU/mL(正常) THRβ基因突变
13 Pappa[9],2017 不详/1 A317T/血清TSH正常,FT4为ULN的180% 未服药 足月儿(出生胎龄为40周,出生体重为3.33 kg),血清TSH为4.4 μIU/mL(正常) THRβ基因突变
14c Pappa[9],2017 不详/1 A317T/血清TSH正常,FT4为ULN的219% 未服药 足月儿(出生胎龄为39周,出生体重为3.06 kg),血清TSH为29.5 μIU/mL(升高) WT
14c Pappa[9],2017 不详/2 A317T/血清TSH正常,FT4为ULN的219% 未服药 早产儿(出生胎龄为35周,出生体重为2.33 kg),血清TSH为6.7 μIU/mL(升高) THRβ基因突变
15 Pappa[9],2017 不详/1 P453T/血清TSH正常,FT4为ULN的236% 丙硫氧嘧啶 足月儿(出生胎龄为38周,出生体重为2.93 kg),血清TSH为4.6 μIU/mL(正常) WT
16 Pappa[9],2017 不详/1 R429Q/血清TSH正常,FT4为ULN的126% 未服药 足月儿(出生胎龄为37周,出生体重为2.3 kg),血清TSH为8 μIU/mL(升高) WT
17 Pappa[9],2017 不详/1 M310L/不详 甲巯咪唑 足月儿(出生胎龄为38周,出生体重为2.92 kg),血清TSH为15 μIU/mL(升高) WT
18 Pappa[9],2017 不详/1 R243Q/血清TSH正常,FT4为ULN的156% 丙硫氧嘧啶 足月儿(出生胎龄为39周,出生体重为3.23 kg),血清TSH为4.3 μIU/mL(正常) WT
图2 甲状腺功能异常患者的诊断流程图注:TSH为促甲状腺激素,FT4为游离甲状腺素,TPOAb为甲状腺过氧化物酶抗体,TgAb为甲状腺球蛋白抗体,TRH为促甲状腺激素释放激素
[1]
Refetoff S, DeWind LT, DeGroot LJ. Familial syndrome combining deaf-mutism, stuppled epiphyses, goiter and abnormally high PBI: possible target organ refractoriness to thyroid hormone[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 1967, 27(2): 279-294. DOI: 10.1210/jcem-27-2-279.
[2]
Persani L, Rodien P, Moran C, et al. 2024 European Thyroid Association Guidelines on diagnosis and management of genetic disorders of thyroid hormone transport, metabolism and action[J]. Eur Thyroid J, 2024, 13(4): e240125. DOI: 10.1530/ETJ-24-0125.
[3]
Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology [J]. Genet Med, 2015, 17(5): 405-424. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2015.30.
[4]
王秋菊,沈亦平,陈少科,等. 遗传变异分类标准与指南[J]. 中国科学:生命科学2017, 47(6): 668-688. DOI: 10.1360/N052017-00099.
[5]
Walker LC, Hoya M, Wiggins GAR, et al. Using the ACMG/AMP framework to capture evidence related to predicted and observed impact on splicing: recommendations from the ClinGen SVI Splicing Subgroup[J]. Am J Hum Genet, 2023, 110(7): 1046-1067. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.06.002.
[6]
Abou Tayoun AN, Pesaran T, DiStefano MT, et al. Recommendations for interpreting the loss of function PVS1 ACMG/AMP variant criterion[J]. Hum Mutat, 2018, 39(11): 1517-1524. DOI: 10.1002/humu.23626.
[7]
Dhingra S, Owen PJ, Lazarus JH, et al. Resistance to thyroid hormone in pregnancy[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 112(2 Pt 2): 501-503. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181809e3a.
[8]
Wu D, Guo R, Guo H, et al. Resistance to thyroid hormone β in autoimmune thyroid disease: a case report and review of literature[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2018, 18(1): 468. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-2110-9.
[9]
Pappa T, Anselmo J, Mamanasiri S, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of resistance to thyroid hormone and its clinical implications[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2017, 102(10): 3775-3782. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2017-01251.
[10]
《妊娠和产后甲状腺疾病诊治指南》(第2版)编纂委员会,中华医学会内分泌学分会,中华医学会围产医学分会. 妊娠和产后甲状腺疾病诊治指南(第2版)[J]. 中华内分泌代谢杂志2019, 35(8): 636-665. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6699.2019.08.003.
[11]
中华医学会,中华医学会杂志社,中华医学会全科医学分会,等. 甲状腺功能减退症基层诊疗指南(2019年)[J]. 中华全科医师杂志2019, 18 (11): 1022-1028. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7368.2019.11.004.
[12]
Sidana S, Singh R, Gupta S, et al. Resistance to thyroid hormone: clinical and biochemical paradox[J].BMJ Case Rep, 2025, 18(11): e267068. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2025-267068.
[13]
Moran C, Chatterjee K. Maternal resistance to thyroid hormone β and pregnancy outcomes[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2023, 109(1): e420-e421. DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgad350.
[14]
王黄曼,单忠艳,滕晓春. β型甲状腺激素抵抗综合征[J]. 罕见病研究2023, 2(3): 331-336. DOI: 10.12376/j.issn.2097-0501.2023.03.003.
[15]
Santos Mata MA, Ariza Jimenez AB, Macias Lopez F, et al. Thyroid hormone resistance: multicentrical case series study[J].Horm Metab Res, 2022, 54(2): 67-75. DOI: 10.1055/a-1725-8533.
[16]
Pappa T, Refetoff S. Resistance to thyroid hormone beta: a focused review[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2021, 12: 656551. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.656551.
[1] Min Jiang, Aihua Chen. Interaction of thyrotropin levels on gonadotrophin initiation day and body mass index on ovulation promoting high quality embryo formation in infertile patients with polycystic ovary syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2025, 21(02): 171-179.
[2] Yaqin Wang, He Zhao, Jun Zhang. Pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with cervical polypectomy during pregnancy and analysis of influencing factors of pregnancy outcome in pregnant women with cervical polyps[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2025, 21(02): 165-170.
[3] Ziyang Liu, Jianjian Cui, Yin Zhao. Current research status on obstetric disseminated intravascular coagulation and its scoring system[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(05): 511-518.
[4] Jing Xue, Yanan Sun, Lili Zhu, Shuhong Li. Diagnosis and treatment of acute fatty liver during pregnancy and its pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(03): 312-321.
[5] Yisi Chen, Min Liang, Hongyu Li, Xue Xia, Yanxi Liu, Chenqu Li, Dan Wang. Value of multidisciplinary team management in perinatal period for pregnant women with chronic kidney disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(02): 133-139.
[6] Saijun Jia, Ying Zhang, Jiayi Wan. Pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with subclinical hypothyroidism[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(02): 140-147.
[7] Zhou Jiang, Li Tang, Liu Yang, Lin Zou. Analysis of influencing factors of diagnosis time in infants with congenital hypothyroidism[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(06): 649-656.
[8] Xu Chen, Yuru Zhan, Chunhua Wang. Clinical value of ABO blood group combined with thyroid function in prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[9] Haoyuan Yang, Jie Gong, Qingwei Zou, Hang Ruan. Current research status on adverse pregnancy outcomes of maternal and infant in pregnant women with asthma[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[10] Jiaxu Dong, Meizi Song, Xun Bi. Effect and survival prognosis of radiofrequency ablation combined with TSH suppression in the treatment of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(02): 200-203.
[11] Jing Han, Shaolong Hao, Hua Kang. Retrospective analysis of clinical features of single-center thyroid carcinoma patients in Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 490-493.
[12] Benquan Wang, Fan Cui, Jun Qiu, Benhong Xiang. The effect of different thyroid surgery methods on improving insulin resistance[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(02): 208-211.
[13] Yilin Fu, Wencheng Ding. Pregnancy outcomes in women with adenomyosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2026, 15(01): 28-32.
[14] Zhaolei Li, Minjin Zhan, Haitian Chen. Clinical research on hyper-triglyceridemic acute pancreatitis in pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2025, 14(02): 86-94.
[15] Chang Sun, Shigang Zhao, Wenting Bai. The relationship between the cognitive impairment after stroke and the hormone levels[J]. Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(05): 471-476.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract