Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (06): 697 -706. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2025.06.013

Original Article

Efficacy of surgical treatment for patients with refractory postpartum hemorrhage after cesarean section: a Meta analysis

Wenyan He, Youjiong Wang()   

  1. Department of Obstetrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Tongji University·Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Shanghai 201204, China
  • Received:2024-12-24 Revised:2025-11-01 Published:2025-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Youjiong Wang
Objective

To explore the therapeutic effects of surgical treatment for patients with refractory postpartum hemorrhage (IPPH) after cesarean sections.

Methods

Clinical research literature on the efficacy of surgical treatment for patients with IPPH after cesarean section was selected from databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, VIP Chinese Journal Service Platform, China Biomedical Literature Database, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science using computer-based retrieval. Key words in both Chinese and English, such as "cesarean section" "refractory postpartum hemorrhage" etc., were employed to screen clinical studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this research and had acceptable literature quality. The retrieval time frame was from January 1, 2000, to June 1, 2024. RevMan 5.3 software was used to analyze the obtained data. First, the Cochrane-Q test was applied to detect the heterogeneity among the included literature, and a random effects model or a fixed effects model was used for Meta-analysis based on the results. For the efficacy evaluation index postpartum hemorrhage(PPH) volume adopted in this study, the standardized mean difference (SMD) was used as the effect size, and its 95%CI was calculated. A funnel plot was used to evaluate the publication bias of the included literature.

Results

According to the literature retrieval strategy set in this study, a total of 17 pieces of literature on the efficacy of surgical treatment for patients with IPPH after cesarean section were included, all of which were of grade B quality. There was significant heterogeneity among the literature. The studies involved 775 patients with IPPH after cesarean section treated surgically, and a total of eight surgical treatment methods were adopted. The SMD with PPH volume as the efficacy index for 8 methods were as follows, respectively. The SMD for the efficacy of modified B-Lynch suture combined with bilateral ascending uterine artery ligation was -2.07 (95%CI: -3.14--1.00, P<0.001); the SMD for the efficacy of modified B-Lynch suture was -0.59 (95%CI: -0.84--0.34, P<0.001); the SMD for the efficacy of bilateral ascending uterine artery ligation was -2.77 (95%CI: -4.91--0.64, P<0.001); the SMD for the efficacy of uterine artery ligation combined with intrauterine water balloon compression was -1.27 (95%CI: -1.76--0.77, P<0.001); the SMD for the efficacy of uterine artery ligation combined with Hayman suture was -5.24 (95%CI: -6.01--4.48, P<0.001); the SMD for the efficacy of Bakri balloon intrauterine packing was -3.71 (95%CI: -4.77--2.65, P<0.001); the SMD for the efficacy of pelvic vascular interventional embolization was -1.63 (95%CI: -1.92--1.34, P<0.001); and the SMD for the efficacy of uterine cross-ligature was -4.52 (95%CI: -11.26--2.22, P=0.190). The pooled effect size for the efficacy of the eight surgical treatment methods, that is, the overall SMD for efficacy was -2.46 (95%CI: -3.09--1.82, P<0.001). The efficacy of the study group (use one of the eight methods) was superior to that of the control group, and the differences were all statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusions

The existing eight surgical treatment methods, such as modified B-Lynch suture etc., have definite clinical efficacy in treating patients with IPPH after cesarean section and can be selected for individual or combined application according to the actual conditions of patients.

图1 本研究关于采用手术治疗剖宫产术后IPPH患者疗效的研究文献筛选流程图及结果注:IPPH为难治性产后出血,RCT为随机对照试验
表1 本研究纳入关于采用手术治疗剖宫产术后IPPH患者疗效的研究文献基本特征
文献(第1作者,发表年) 样本量(例) 研究组采用的手术治疗方法 对照组采用的治疗方法 疗效评价指标
研究组 对照组
孙婉颖[5],2022 37 37 改良B-Lynch缝合术+双侧子宫动脉上行支结扎术 双侧子宫动脉上行支结扎术 ①②③④
黄琦[6],2019 36 36 改良B-Lynch缝合术+双侧子宫动脉上行支结扎术 双侧子宫动脉上行支结扎术 ②③④⑤⑥
罗虹[7],2020 46 44 改良B-Lynch缝合术+双侧子宫动脉上行支结扎术 双侧子宫动脉上行支结扎术 ①②③⑤⑦
王金梅[8],2022 48 48 改良B-Lynch缝合术+双侧子宫动脉上行支结扎术 双侧子宫动脉上行支结扎术 ②③④⑧
王洋[9],2010 40 40 改良B-Lynch缝合术 宫腔纱条填塞术 ①②③
曾萌[10],2021 54 54 改良B-Lynch缝合术 宫腔纱条填塞术 ②③⑨
李淑华[11],2018 45 45 改良B-Lynch缝合术 宫腔纱条填塞术 ①②③
苟兰英[12],2024 40 40 双侧子宫动脉上行支结扎术+马来酸麦角新碱 马来酸麦角新碱 ①②⑨⑩⑪
范晓红[13],2017 35 35 双侧子宫动脉上行支结扎术 宫腔纱条填塞术 ②⑪⑫
马延巾[14],2020 38 38 子宫动脉结扎+宫腔水囊压迫 宫腔纱条填塞术 ②⑦
程虹[15],2023 60 60 子宫动脉结扎+Hayman缝合 双侧子宫动脉上行支结扎术 ②④⑤⑥
陈丽萍[16],2024 32 30 Bakri球囊宫腔填塞术 宫腔纱条填塞术 ②⑤⑪⑫
路宗林[17],2024 39 39 Bakri球囊宫腔填塞术 宫腔纱条填塞术 ②③⑦⑪
黄鸿燕[18],2022 50 50 宫腔水囊压迫+宫颈环扎术 宫颈环扎术 ①②⑫
郭上玮[19],2023 120 120 盆腔血管介入栓塞 宫腔纱条填塞术 ②⑦
刘洪莉[20],2016 35 22 子宫交叉捆绑术 B-Lynch缝合术 ①②③⑫
杭悦霞[21],2022 20 20 子宫交叉捆绑术 宫腔纱条填塞术 ②③⑤⑥
图2 本研究纳入关于采用手术治疗剖宫产术后IPPH患者疗效的研究文献偏倚风险评估图(图2A:概要图;图2B:详图)注:绿色表示低偏倚风险,黄色表示偏倚风险不明确。IPPH为难治性产后出血。random sequence generation (selection bias)为随机序列产生(选择偏倚),allocation concealment (selection bias)为分配隐藏(选择偏倚),blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)为受试者与研究人员设盲(实施偏倚),blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)为结局评价者设盲(检测偏倚),incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)为结局数据不完整(失访偏倚/损耗偏倚),selective reporting (reporting bias)为选择性报告(报告偏倚),other bias为其他偏倚
图3 纳入本研究17篇文献中,研究组与对照组治疗剖宫产术后IPPH患者的PPH量比较的森林图注:IPPH为难治性产后出血,PPH为产后出血
表2 本研究8种手术方法治疗剖宫产术后IPPH患者的治疗效果评价
图4 本研究纳入采用PPH量指标评估8种手术方法治疗剖宫产术后IPPH患者疗效17篇文献的发表偏倚分析漏斗图注:SE为标准误,SMD为标准化均数差,IPPH为难治性产后出血,PPH为产后出血
[1]
Win SS, Lasimbang HB, Lynn AUng SN, et al. How B-Lynch suture and bilateral internal iliac artery ligation saved the uterus of a young patient with severe postpartum haemorrhage[J]. BMJ Case Rep, 2021, 14(8):e244226. DOI:10.1136/bcr-2021-244226.
[2]
Shi X, Wu H, Liu C, et al. Circular suture of the uterine serosa and myometrium layer around placental attachment site for refractory postpartum hemorrhage[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2021, 47(5):1735-1742. DOI:10.1111/jog.14695.
[3]
王树华. 宫缩乏力性产后出血的临床治疗及护理研究进展[J]. 中文科技期刊数据库(文摘版)医药卫生2023(2): 51-54.
[4]
周玮. 产后出血预防与处理指南(2023年)解读[J]. 实用妇产科杂志2024, 40(3): 195-198.
[5]
孙婉颖.改良B-Lynch缝合术+双侧子宫动脉上行支结扎在剖宫产难治性产后出血患者中的应用[J].黑龙江医药科学202245(2):139-140.
[6]
黄琦,黄秀敏. 改良B-Lynch缝合术+双侧子宫动脉上行支结扎在剖宫产术中难治性产后出血患者中的应用效果观察[J]. 临床合理用药杂志2019, 12(35): 18-19. DOI: 10.15887/j.cnki.13-1389/r.2019.35.008.
[7]
罗虹,程楚云,徐小凤. 双侧子宫动脉上行支结扎联合改良子宫背带式缝合术治疗剖宫产难治性产后出血的效果观察[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志2020, 19(13): 1424-1428. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2020.13.024.
[8]
王金梅. 不同术式联合在产后宫缩乏力难治性出血中的应用[J]. 实用中西医结合临床2022, 22(4): 105-107. DOI: 10.13638/j.issn.1671-4040.2022.04.032.
[9]
王洋,贾雪梅. 改良B-Lynch缝合术在剖宫产中难治性产后出血的临床应用[J]. 中国妇幼保健2015, 30(34): 6143-6145. DOI: 10.7620/zgfybj.j.issn.1001-4411.2015.34.76.
[10]
曾萌,秦竞霞,王婷. 改良式B-Lynch缝合术治疗剖宫产术中难治性产后出血临床效果及对止血时间、术中出血、术后24 h出血和输血量的影响探究[J]. 黑龙江医学2021, 45(9): 942-944. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5775.2021.09.017.
[11]
李淑华. 改良B-Lynch缝合术在治疗剖宫产术中难治性产后出血的临床效果观察[J].山西职工医学院学报2018, 28(4): 38-40.
[12]
苟兰英,王雪利. 双侧子宫动脉上行支结扎联合马来酸麦角新碱治疗剖宫产难治性产后出血的效果及对凝血因子水平的影响[J]. 临床医学研究与实践2024, 9(29): 95-98. DOI: 10.19347/j.cnki.2096-1413.202429024.
[13]
范晓红. 双侧子宫动脉上行支结扎术在中央性前置胎盘剖宫产术中大出血止血的效果[J]. 中国妇幼保健2017, 32(11): 2498-2499. DOI: 10.7620/zgfybj.j.issn.1001-4411.2017.11.80.
[14]
马延巾. 子宫动脉结扎联合宫腔水囊压迫治疗剖宫产难治性产后出血的临床分析[J]. 中国医药指南2020, 18(5): 64.
[15]
程虹,符爱贞,邢少宁,等. 子宫动脉上行支结扎联合海曼式缝合治疗剖宫产术中难治性产后出血的临床研究[J]. 中国性科学2023, 32(6): 92-95. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1993.2023.06.022.
[16]
陈丽萍,梁地英,曾红英. 卡前列素氨丁三醇联合子宫填塞球囊对剖宫产难治性产后出血的止血效果[J]. 实用中西医结合临床2024, 24(7): 75-78. DOI: 10.13638/j.issn.1671-4040.2024.07.021.
[17]
路宗林,张琴. Bakri球囊联合纱条宫腔填塞治疗难治性产后出血的效果分析[J]. 当代医药论丛2024, 22(12): 31-34. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-7629.2024.12.009.
[18]
黄鸿燕,刘秀珍,单丝洁. 宫颈环扎术加球囊压迫宫腔对难治性产后出血的治疗效果[J]. 中国卫生标准管理2022, 13(11): 45-47. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2022.11.013.
[19]
郭上玮,刘敬,胡国敏,等. 盆腔血管介入栓塞治疗难治性剖宫产后出血患者的效果研究[J]. 河北医药2023, 45(17): 2644-2647. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7386.2023.17.019.
[20]
刘洪莉,漆洪波,罗欣,等. 子宫交叉捆绑术治疗剖宫产术中难治性产后出血疗效研究[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志2016, 32(6): 554-557. DOI: 10.7504/fk2016050117.
[21]
杭悦霞,高向明,马鸿云,等. 全子宫捆绑缝合术与宫内球囊压迫用于难治性产后出血的临床疗效比较[J]. 宁夏医学杂志2022, 44(9): 820-822. DOI: 10.13621/j.1001-5949.2022.09.0820.
[22]
中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组. 产后出血预防与处理指南(2014)[J]. 中国实用乡村医生杂志2015(10): 8-11. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7185.2015.10.05.
[23]
朱盛兰,张慧婷,冯玲. 产后出血发生机制研究新进展[J]. 实用妇产科杂志2024, 40(3): 161-163.
[24]
高雯. B-Lynch缝合术+BUAL在剖宫产术后宫缩乏力IPPH中的应用[J]. 内蒙古医学杂志2021, 53(10): 1189-1191. DOI: 10.16096/J.cnki.nmgyxzz.2021.53.10.012.
[25]
陈静. 子宫背带缝合术联合子宫动脉上行支结扎术治疗难治性产后出血的临床效果[J]. 实用妇科内分泌电子杂志2024, 11(7): 16-18. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-8803.2024.07.006.
[26]
李秀桃. 宫腔放置水囊联合药物治疗在剖宫产产后出血患者中的应用效果分析[J]. 中国社区医师2025, 41(1): 48-50. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-614x.2025.01.016.
[27]
余红琴. 子宫压迫缝合术治疗剖宫产产后出血的临床价值研究[J]. 中国实用医药2022, 17(3): 49-52. DOI: 10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2022.03.017.
[28]
宋雁秋,杨丽娟,李卫峰. Bakri球囊在剖宫产产后出血应用的研究进展[J]. 现代妇产科进展2024, 33(3): 228-231, 236. DOI: 10.13283/j.cnki.xdfckjz.2024.03.016.
[29]
张玲芳. 子宫动脉栓塞术治疗难治性产后大出血疗效的影响因素分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健2021, 36(11):2603-2605. DOI: 10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2021.11.050.
[30]
任敏. 子宫下段环形捆绑术联合卡前列素氨丁三醇对剖宫产术中及术后出血控制中的应用价值[J]. 当代医药论丛2025, 23(4): 71-73. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-7629.2025.04.021.
[31]
刘洪庆. 难治性产后出血介入治疗的应用进展[J]. 当代医学2010, 16(5): 117-118. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393.2010.05.045.
[1] Rong Li, Zhengquan Xiao, Long Wang, Huan Zhang. Incidence of radiation dermatitis and influencing factors in breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy: a meta-analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(01): 34-43.
[2] Xiaoya Liu, Jiayi Guo, Yan Cheng, Feng Li, Yanxia Yang, Qi Gao, Yuxia Yang, Chen Yue. Meta-analysis on effects of virtual reality exercise in patients with knee osteoarthritis[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(01): 50-59.
[3] Hao Yang, Pei Yang, Hao Liu, Xiaochao Zeng, Wenjie Xu, Xu Zhang, Zhizheng Xiong. Comparative study of cementless prosthesis versus cemented prosthesis in treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(06): 697-707.
[4] Shuheng Dong, Qing Sun, Yiming Qu. Vertebroplasty combined with anti osteoporosis drugs for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(05): 586-596.
[5] Qi Liu, Ning Gu, Ling Yang, Yan Zhou, Yanjing Rui, Yimin Dai. Clinical characteristics and maternal-fetal outcomes of pregnancy complicated by malignancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2025, 21(06): 634-642.
[6] Ying Hu, Xueqin Zheng, Ting Su. Effects of double-lumen water balloon combined with oxytocin on cervical ripening and impact on pregnancy outcomes in term pregnant women with borderline oligohydramnios[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2025, 21(06): 674-680.
[7] Wenqing Zhu, Renfeng Liu, Weiming Li, Erkuan Wang. Efficacy and safety analysis of octreotide combined with sirolimus in children with congenital hyperinsulinemia who did not respond to diazine treatment[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2025, 21(05): 561-567.
[8] Kaihua Dong, Yanqing Yao, Min Miao. Impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection on maternal and infant clinical outcomes of late-pregnant women during the Omicron variant epidemic[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(05): 298-306.
[9] Yuhan Zhang, Tianqing Wu, Wenqing Gao, Zhikai Zheng, Minrui He, Zhongguo Zhou. Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of different treatments for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 14(06): 939-947.
[10] Zhejing Wu, Jingdong Li. Meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of ICG fluorescence imaging-guided laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 14(06): 852-859.
[11] Xiaojia Tie, Lianpeng Wang, Lingxiao Jiang, Yajun Han. Prevalence of rotator cuff tears in proximal humerus fractures:a Meta-analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2026, 14(01): 45-52.
[12] Hongli Chen, Feihong Ren, Pengyuan Liang, Yuyang Wang, Yongli Zhan. Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of coated aldehyde oxystarch in the treatment of chronic renal failure[J]. Chinese Journal of Kidney Disease Investigation(Electronic Edition), 2025, 14(06): 309-316.
[13] Jiangtao Liao, Zhenyu Song, Hao Xu, Yi Li, Dongdong Xu, Wei Yu, Zhipeng Dai, Hongtao Tian, Wei Tong. Cross-sectional study on serum total testosterone levels and the risk of osteoarthritis in Middle-aged and Elderly Women[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2025, 11(05): 271-279.
[14] Sheng Jiang. SGLT2 inhibitors and risk of kidney stones: A meta-analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(06): 446-453.
[15] Bo Ning, Sikun Zhang, Fei Gao, Enqiang Linghu, Ruihua Shi. Meta-analysis of the impact of robotic-assisted digestive endoscopic systems on ESD in animal experimental models[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(Electronic Edition), 2026, 13(01): 34-44.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract