Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2023, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (01): 85 -92. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2023.01.012

Original Article

Predictive value of detection of fetal ultrasound soft indexes in fetal chromosomal abnormalities

Yuxiang Bian, Lichun Wang, Rong Cai()   

  1. Functional Department, Wuxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi 214000, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2022-07-04 Revised:2023-01-04 Published:2023-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Rong Cai
  • Supported by:
    Medical Scientific Research Project of Jiangsu Provincial Health Commission(H201991)
Objective

To explore the predictive value of detection of fetal ultrasound soft indexes in fetal chromosomal abnormalities.

Methods

A total of 123 fetuses who underwent fetal chromosome detection at Wuxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University from January 2017 to December 2021 were selected in study. According to the results of fetal chromosome detection, they were divided into abnormal chromosome group (n=23) and normal chromosome group (n=100) by retrospective analysis method. All fetuses in two groups received color Doppler ultrasound to detect thickness of nuchal translucency (NT) at 11 to 13 weeks of gestation, and the other fetal ultrasound soft indexes such as umbilical venous catheter a-wave reverse, left ventricular focal hyperecho, intestinal echo enhancement, choroidal cyst, short humerus/femur, lateral ventricle widening, and separation of renal pelvis were detected at 18 to 27 weeks of gestation by color Doppler ultrasound. At 18-20 weeks of gestation, amniotic cavity puncture under the guidance of ultrasonic puncture probe was conducted for fetal chromosome detection. The incidence of fetal ultrasound soft indexes abnormalities between two groups was compared by chi-square test or continuity correction chi-square test or Fisher′s exact probability test. Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis was conducted to analyze influencing factors of fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the value of fetal ultrasound soft indexes for predicting fetal chromosomal abnormalities. The procedure followed in this study conformed to the regulations of the Ethics Committee of Wuxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, and was approved by this committee (Approval No. 2022-06-0714-28). All mothers of fetuses signed informed consents for clinical study. There were no statistical differences between two groups in general clinical data, such as gestational age at ultrasound detection in the first and second trimester of pregnancy and mother′s age, and so on (P>0.05).

Results

①There were 17 cases (73.9%) of fetal ultrasound soft indexes abnormalities in abnormal chromosome group and 12 cases (12.0%) in normal chromosome group. The incidence of fetal intestinal echo enhancement and NT thickening in abnormal chromosome group both was 26.1% (6/23), which was significantly higher than 1.0% (1/100) and 4.0% (4/100) in normal chromosome group, and both the differences were statistically significant (χ2=7.78, 9.43; P=0.005, 0.002). ②Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis results showed that fetal ultrasound found intestinal echo enhancement and NT thickening both were independent risk factors of chromosomal abnormalities in fetus (OR=5.392, 5.557; 95%CI: 1.843-15.776, 1.899-16.257; P=0.005, 0.009). ③Area under the curve (AUC) of fetal intestinal echo enhancement combined with NT thickening in fetal ultrasound for predicting fetal chromosomal anomalies was 0.776 (95%CI: 0.654-0.898, P<0.001).

Conclusions

Fetal ultrasound soft indexes including fetal intestinal echo enhancement and NT thickening both are closely related to fetal chromosomal abnormalities. The combination detection of these two fetal ultrasound soft indexes in predicting fetal chromosomal abnormalities is of medium value.

表1 2组胎儿一般临床资料及孕母年龄比较(±s)
图1 胎儿超声软指标异常的超声声像图[图1A:1例胎儿(胎龄为22周)的胎儿超声图,提示脐静脉导管a波反向;图1B:1例胎儿(胎龄为22周)的胎儿超声图,提示左心室灶状强回声;图1C:1例胎儿(胎龄为21周)的胎儿超声图,提示肠道回声增强;图1D:1例胎儿(胎龄为19周)的胎儿超声图,提示脉络膜囊肿;图1E:1例胎儿(胎龄为27周)的胎儿超声图,提示肱/股骨偏短;图1F:1例胎儿(胎龄为20周)的胎儿超声图,提示侧脑室增宽;图1G:1例胎儿(胎龄为23周)的胎儿超声图,提示肾盂分离;图1H:1例胎儿(胎龄为12周)的胎儿超声图,提示NT增厚]注:NT为颈项透明层
表2 2组胎儿超声软指标比较[例数(%)]
表3 胎儿染色体异常影响因素的多因素非条件logistic回归分析变量含义及赋值情况
表4 胎儿染色体异常影响因素的多因素非条件logistic回归分析结果
表5 胎儿超声软指标预测胎儿染色体异常的ROC曲线分析结果
图2 胎儿超声软指标对胎儿染色体异常的ROC曲线分析注:a为肠道强回声联合NT增厚。ROC曲线为受试者工作特征曲线,NT为颈项透明层
[1]
李燕青,刘夏莹,谢俊杰,等. 超声异常胎儿的染色体核型分析及单核苷酸多态性芯片检测应用分析[J]. 国际妇产科学杂志2020, 47(3): 286-290. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1870.2020.03.010.
[2]
Harris S, Reed D, Vora NL. Screening for fetal chromosomal and subchromosomal disorders[J]. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med, 2018, 23(2): 85-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2017.10.006.
[3]
杜云芳,周红梅,郑笑,等. 胎盘主体不同附着位置的凶险性前置胎盘孕妇彩色多普勒超声和临床特征分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健2021, 36(15): 3643-3645. DOI: 10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2021.15.071.
[4]
戴群云,陈健康,王春茶,等. 彩色多普勒超声评估胎儿窘迫的效果研究[J]. 中国妇幼保健2020, 35(8): 1532-1534. DOI: 10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2020.08.053.
[5]
陈梅,张帅,查斌斌,等. 胎儿超声指标异常的遗传病因学分析[J]. 中国医药2021, 16(12): 1864-1868. DOI: 10.3760/j.issn.1673-4777.2021.12.024.
[6]
谢幸,苟文丽. 妇产科学[M]. 8版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2013: 64-66.
[7]
周月云,张庆娥,董晶晶,等. 880例不同产前诊断指征孕妇羊水穿刺胎儿染色体核型的对比分析[J]. 中国现代医学杂志2020, 30(10): 33-37. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8982.2020.10.007.
[8]
李胜利,罗国阳. 胎儿畸形产前超声诊断学[M]. 2版. 北京:科学出版社,2017.
[9]
韩瑾,张蒙,甄理,等. 18-三体综合征胎儿的产前诊断结果分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 12(2): 190-195. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2016.02.011.
[10]
Volpe N, Dall′Asta A, Di Pasquo E, et al. First-trimester fetal neurosonography: technique and diagnostic potential[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2021, 57(2): 204-214. DOI: 10.1002/uog.23149.
[11]
薛永铭,陈怡博. 无创基因检测联合单项超声软指标异常在胎儿染色体筛查中的应用及围生结局[J]. 中华全科医学2019, 17(8): 1372-1374. DOI: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000947.
[12]
马明霞,廖高庆. 胎儿超声软指标在产前诊断染色体异常中的临床意义[J]. 山西医药杂志2020, 49(19): 2577-2579. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9926.2020.19.008.
[13]
刘莹,翟敬芳. 胎儿心脏超声软指标及结构异常与染色体异常的相关性研究[J]. 现代医学2019, 47(9): 1095-1098. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7562.2019.09.009.
[14]
王文,白雪,熊静. 超声软指标NT与NF检测对胎儿21-三体综合征产前诊断的价值[J]. 海南医学2019, 30(14): 1833-1836. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2019.14.020.
[15]
孔德明,韦卫中,纪伟英,等. 超声软指标联合母体血清甲胎蛋白和人绒毛膜促性腺激素筛查胎儿染色体异常[J]. 中国医学影像技术2020, 36(12): 1872-1876. DOI: 10.13929/j.issn.1003-3289.2020.12.024.
[16]
姚妍怡,张成成,宋婕萍. 中孕期超声软指标与染色体异常相关分析[J]. 现代妇产科进展2021, 30(12): 933-936. DOI: 10.13283/j.cnki.xdfckjz.2021.12.005.
[17]
郭芬芬,徐盈,张建芳,等. 单一超声软指标阳性与胎儿染色体异常的关系[J]. 山西医科大学学报2019, 50(3): 357-360. DOI: 10.13753/j.issn.1007-6611.2019.03.021.
[18]
涂艳萍,尚宁,张婕,等. 超声诊断胎儿单脐动脉合并畸形及其与染色体异常的关系[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志2019, 27(4): 309-312, 319. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2019.04.017.
[19]
姚利民,章锦曼,朱姝,等. 18-三体综合征胎儿中孕期超声检查与染色体核型结果分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(5): 590-597. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2021.05.013.
[20]
赵萍,宋勇,崔丽清,等. 超声软指标在胎儿染色体异常筛查中的应用价值[J]. 临床超声医学杂志2021, 23(1): 18-22. DOI: 10.16245/j.cnki.issn1008-6978.2021.01.005.
[21]
许彬,寇燕妮. 孕早期超声检测颈部透明层增厚与静脉导管频谱异常在筛查胎儿复杂先天性心脏畸形中的价值[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志2020, 28(12): 1507-1510. DOI: 10.13404/j.cnki.cjbhh.2020.12.026.
[22]
马丽爽,霍平,王方娜,等. 799例肠管回声增强胎儿的细胞遗传学分析[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志2019, 27(12): 1437-1440. DOI: 10.13404/j.cnki.cjbhh.2019.12.011.
[1] Fei Dai, Bowen Zhao, Mei Pan, Xiaohui Peng, Ran Chen, Yuanshi Tian, Ming Di. Value of multiple fetal echocardiographic quantitative parameters in assessing heart structure and function in fetuses with coarctation of the aorta[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(10): 950-958.
[2] Zusheng Du, Bowen Zhao, Zhen Zhang, Mei Pan, Xiaohui Peng, Ran Chen, Yankai Mao. Impact of gestational age and apex orientation on left atrial strain assessed by two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging in normal fetuses during the second and third trimesters[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(09): 843-851.
[3] Shangdi Zhang, Bowen Zhao, Mei Pan, Xiaohui Peng, Ran Chen, Yankai Mao, Yang Chen, Hua Yuan, Yan Chen. Value of quantitative fetal atrial size parameters in assessing cardiac malformations in fetuses with atrial disproportion in middle and late trimesters[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(08): 785-793.
[4] Lili Gu, Fan Jiang. Survey and analysis of quality of screening prenatal ultrasound images in Anhui Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(07): 671-674.
[5] Qiulian Wang, Ying Zhang, Chunmin Li, Shuming Xu, Yuqi Zhang. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of fetal aortic arch obstruction with complex intracardiac structural malformations: causes of missed diangosis and misdiagnosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(07): 718-725.
[6] Qing Zeng, Huaxuan Wen, Ying Yuan, Yimei Liao, Yue Qin, Dandan Luo, Meiling Liang, Shengli Li. Sylvian fissure plateau angle: a new parameter to evaluate fetal sylvian fissure by transabdominal two-dimensional ultrasound[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(05): 454-459.
[7] Gang Luo, Silin Pan, Lingyu Sun, Zhixin Li, Taotao Chen, Sibo Qiao, Shanchen Pang. Classification of right ventricular hypoplasia in fetuses diagnosed with pulmonary atresia with an intact ventricular septum or critical pulmonary stenosis via a new semantic parsing network model[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(04): 377-383.
[8] Zhen Zhang, Bowen Zhao, Mei Pan, Xiaohui Peng, Ran Chen, Yuanshi Tian, Yang Chen. Evaluation of normal fetal right atrial function in the second and third trimester of pregancy by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: a preliminary study[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(04): 384-390.
[9] Qing Zeng, Huaxuan Wen, Ying Yuan, Yimei Liao, Yue Qin, Dandan Luo, Meiling Liang, Guiyan Peng, Yi Lin, Ying Tan, Xin Wen, Wenlan Huang, Shengli Li. Clinical application of five axial planes of the fetal brain[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(03): 243-250.
[10] Feng Xie, Yuhan Wu, Sheng Zhao, Xiaohong Yang, Yubo Wang, Zhen Shi, Jianhua Fan, Min Zhang. Combined use of prenatal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of fetal dural sinus malformation[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(03): 275-280.
[11] Bo Li, Fanghua Peng, Dexuan Kong, Huanhuan Zhang, Donghui Qu, Kun Wang, Changli Kan, Minghui Nie, Tianxin Liu, Wenying Wu. Value of echocardiography in diagnosis of isolated fetal pulmonary valvular stenosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(02): 158-162.
[12] Lijuan Chen, Xiaoqin Li, Yanyun Shi, Tongtong Duan. Ultrasonic characteristics of fetal left brachiocephalic vein anomalies[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2023, 20(12): 1260-1265.
[13] Jingyu Qian, Mingming Zheng. Interpretation of the Italian guidelines on non-invasive and invasive prenatal diagnosis:executive summary of recommendations for practice the Italian Society for Obstetrics and Gynecology(SIGO)[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(05): 486-492.
[14] Shaomin Wu, Shihao Zhang, Bingguang Liu, Chan Li, Jiamin Yin, Changye Zheng, Suran Huang. Fetal giant arachnoid cysts:a case report and literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(04): 390-397.
[15] Guizhi Chu, Shujuan Wang, Wenjie Luan, Guimin Guo, Chunxia Guan, Xiaofeng Wu, Songyang Li, Haoling Wang, Zedong Luan. Analysis of prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of amniotic band syndrome in early pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 12(01): 57-60.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract