Clinical analysis of high-purity human postmenopausal gonadotropin pretreatment before ovarian stimulation in long-acting protocol

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2021.02.005

Objective

To explore impacts of pretreatment with high-purity human postmenopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG) before ovarian stimulation in long-acting protocol on clinical pregnancy outcome of sterile females who took in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ISCI)-embryo transfer (ET).

Methods

A total of 171 sterile females with normal ovarian reserve to whom long-acting IVF/ICSI-ET program for assisted reproduction in Department of Reproductive Medicine of the 980th Hospital of PLA Joint Logistics Support Force from January 2018 to August 2019, were selected as research subjects.Their clinical case data were retrospectively analyzed. According to whether pretreated with HP-hMG before officially launching gonadotropin (Gn) or not, they were divided into study group (n=102, pretreated with HP-hMG ) and control group (n=69, without pretreatment). The general clinical data, relevant clinical indicators during IVF/ICSI-ET for assisted reproduction, related indicators of ET, pregnancy outcome and the incidence of adverse reactions related to assisted reproduction of two groups were statistically compared by independent-samples t test and chi-square test.This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our hospital (Approval No. 2020-KY-129), and all subjects signed the informed consents.

Results

①There were no significant differences in age, body mass index (BMI), proportion of primary infertility, duration of infertility, basal antral follicle count (AFC) and basal serum hormone levels, including follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol and progesterone between two groups (P>0.05). ②There were no significant differences in serum FSH, LH, estradiol and progesterone levels after down-regulation, serum FSH and estradiol levels on Gn start-up day, the usage days and dose of Gn, serum LH, estradiol and progesterone levels on human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) day, and endometrial thickness on transplantation day between two groups (P>0.05). The serum LH level on Gn start-up day of study group was (1.27± 0.81) IU/L, which was significantly higher than that of (0.46±0.21) IU/L in control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=-8.115, P<0.001). ③There were no significant differences in number of retrieved oocytes, rate of retrieved oocytes, rate of M Ⅱ oocytes, rate of normal fertilization, rate of high-quality embryos, rate of fresh embryo transfer, number of transferred embryos, ratio of IVF to ICSI (IVF/ICSI), rate of clinical pregnancy and spontaneous abortion between two groups (P>0.05). The incidences of moderate and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and poor ovarian response in study group were both 0, which were significantly lower than those of 4.4% and 5.8% in control group, and the differences were statistically significant (χ²=4.514, P=0.034; χ²=6.055, P=0.014).

Conclusions

On the premise of not increasing Gn using days and its dosage, the pretreatment with HP-hMG before ovulation induction in long-acting protocol of sterile females who took IVF/ICSI-ET for assisted reproduction can lower the occurrence of OHSS and poor ovarian response.

Key words: Menotropins, Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, Fertilization in vitro, Sperm injections, intracytoplasmic, Pregnancy outcome, Female

表1 接受IVF/ICSI-ET助孕的2组受试者一般临床资料比较

组别	例数	年龄(岁，±s)	BMI(kg/m²，±s)	原发不孕者[例数(%)]	不孕年限(年，±s)	基础AFC(个，±s)	基础血清激素水平(±s)
组别	例数	年龄(岁，±s)	BMI(kg/m²，±s)	原发不孕者[例数(%)]	不孕年限(年，±s)	基础AFC(个，±s)	FSH(IU/L)	LH(IU/L)	雌二醇(pmol/L)	孕酮(mg/L)
研究组	102	28.3±3.2	23.3±3.1	50(49.0)	3.3±2.1	15.3±2.3	6.1±1.3	4.8±1.3	166.2±16.5	0.74±0.23
对照组	69	29.0±2.7	22.3±3.2	39(56.5)	3.1±2.0	15.5±2.3	6.3±1.2	4.9±1.3	163.7±17.8	0.76±0.26
检验值		t＝-1.332	t＝0.236	χ²＝7.363	t＝0.716	t＝-0.684	t＝-1.096	t＝-0.523	t＝0.154	t＝-0.522
P值		0.724	0.744	0.061	0.099	0.831	0.275	0.601	0.293	0.622

表1 接受IVF/ICSI-ET助孕的2组受试者一般临床资料比较

组别	例数	年龄(岁，±s)	BMI(kg/m²，±s)	原发不孕者[例数(%)]	不孕年限(年，±s)	基础AFC(个，±s)	基础血清激素水平(±s)
组别	例数	年龄(岁，±s)	BMI(kg/m²，±s)	原发不孕者[例数(%)]	不孕年限(年，±s)	基础AFC(个，±s)	FSH(IU/L)	LH(IU/L)	雌二醇(pmol/L)	孕酮(mg/L)
研究组	102	28.3±3.2	23.3±3.1	50(49.0)	3.3±2.1	15.3±2.3	6.1±1.3	4.8±1.3	166.2±16.5	0.74±0.23
对照组	69	29.0±2.7	22.3±3.2	39(56.5)	3.1±2.0	15.5±2.3	6.3±1.2	4.9±1.3	163.7±17.8	0.76±0.26
检验值		t＝-1.332	t＝0.236	χ²＝7.363	t＝0.716	t＝-0.684	t＝-1.096	t＝-0.523	t＝0.154	t＝-0.522
P值		0.724	0.744	0.061	0.099	0.831	0.275	0.601	0.293	0.622

表2 2组受试者接受IVF/ICSI-ET助孕中相关临床指标比较(±s)

组别	例数	垂体降调节后血清激素水平				Gn启动日血清激素水平
组别	例数	FSH(IU/L)	LH(IU/L)	雌二醇(pmol/L)	孕酮(mg/L)	FSH(IU/L)	LH(IU/L)	雌二醇(pmol/L)
研究组	102	2.7±0.4	0.43±0.20	85.1±11.7	0.63±0.25	2.9±0.6	1.27±0.81	88.8±12.8
对照组	69	2.8±0.6	0.46±0.21	85.1±12.5	0.61±0.23	2.8±0.6	0.46±0.21	85.1±12.5
t值		1.263	0.843	-0.016	-0.492	-1.238	-8.115	-1.793
P值		0.208	0.400	0.987	0.623	0.217	<0.001	0.075
组别	例数	Gn使用时间(d)	Gn使用剂量(IU)	hCG日血清激素水平			移植日子宫内膜厚度(mm)
组别	例数	Gn使用时间(d)	Gn使用剂量(IU)	LH(IU/L)	雌二醇(pmol/L)	孕酮(mg/L)	移植日子宫内膜厚度(mm)
研究组	102	12.7±1.6	2 639±573	1.4±0.8	13 573±3 941	0.81±0.24	11.4±1.3
对照组	69	12.5±1.8	2 753±706	1.2±0.8	13 544±2 316	0.85±0.25	11.3±1.4
t值		-1.028	0.290	-1.126	-0.095	-1.124	-0.496
P值		0.305	0.772	0.262	0.924	0.262	0.620

表2 2组受试者接受IVF/ICSI-ET助孕中相关临床指标比较(±s)

组别	例数	垂体降调节后血清激素水平				Gn启动日血清激素水平
组别	例数	FSH(IU/L)	LH(IU/L)	雌二醇(pmol/L)	孕酮(mg/L)	FSH(IU/L)	LH(IU/L)	雌二醇(pmol/L)
研究组	102	2.7±0.4	0.43±0.20	85.1±11.7	0.63±0.25	2.9±0.6	1.27±0.81	88.8±12.8
对照组	69	2.8±0.6	0.46±0.21	85.1±12.5	0.61±0.23	2.8±0.6	0.46±0.21	85.1±12.5
t值		1.263	0.843	-0.016	-0.492	-1.238	-8.115	-1.793
P值		0.208	0.400	0.987	0.623	0.217	<0.001	0.075
组别	例数	Gn使用时间(d)	Gn使用剂量(IU)	hCG日血清激素水平			移植日子宫内膜厚度(mm)
组别	例数	Gn使用时间(d)	Gn使用剂量(IU)	LH(IU/L)	雌二醇(pmol/L)	孕酮(mg/L)	移植日子宫内膜厚度(mm)
研究组	102	12.7±1.6	2 639±573	1.4±0.8	13 573±3 941	0.81±0.24	11.4±1.3
对照组	69	12.5±1.8	2 753±706	1.2±0.8	13 544±2 316	0.85±0.25	11.3±1.4
t值		-1.028	0.290	-1.126	-0.095	-1.124	-0.496
P值		0.305	0.772	0.262	0.924	0.262	0.620

表3 接受IVF/ICSI-ET助孕的2组受试者ET相关指标、妊娠结局及不良反应比较

组别	例数	获卵数(个，±s)	获卵率[%(n/n′)]	MⅡ卵率[%(n/n′)]	正常受精率[%(n/n′)]	优质胚胎率[%(n/n′)]	鲜胚移植率[%(n/n′)]
研究组	102	14.5±4.3	90.5(1 473/1 627)	89.5(1 318/1 473)	71.3(940/1 318)	45.3(426/940)	75.5(77/102)
对照组	69	15.1±4.5	88.4(1 044/1 181)	89.4(933/1 044)	70.5(558/792)	40.9(228/558)	73.9(51/69)
检验值		t＝0.893	χ²＝3.358	χ²＝0.008	χ²＝0.180	χ²＝2.830	χ²＝0.054
P值		0.373	0.067	0.930	0.671	0.093	0.816
组别	例数	移植胚胎数(个，±s)	IVF/ICSI[%(n/n′)]	临床妊娠率[%(n/n′)]	自然流产率[%(n/n′)]	中、重度OHSS发生率[%(n/n′)]	卵巢低反应发生率[%(n/n′)]
研究组	102	1.5±0.9	17.2(15/87)	71.4(55/77)	10.9(6/55)	0(0/102)	0(0/102)
对照组	69	1.5±0.9	25.5(14/55)	54.9(28/51)	10.7(3/28)	4.4(3/69)	5.8(4/69)
检验值		t＝-0.019	χ²＝1.399	χ²＝3.676	χ²＝0.001	χ²＝4.514^a	χ²＝6.055^a
P值		0.985	0.237	0.055	0.978	0.034	0.014

表3 接受IVF/ICSI-ET助孕的2组受试者ET相关指标、妊娠结局及不良反应比较

组别	例数	获卵数(个，±s)	获卵率[%(n/n′)]	MⅡ卵率[%(n/n′)]	正常受精率[%(n/n′)]	优质胚胎率[%(n/n′)]	鲜胚移植率[%(n/n′)]
研究组	102	14.5±4.3	90.5(1 473/1 627)	89.5(1 318/1 473)	71.3(940/1 318)	45.3(426/940)	75.5(77/102)
对照组	69	15.1±4.5	88.4(1 044/1 181)	89.4(933/1 044)	70.5(558/792)	40.9(228/558)	73.9(51/69)
检验值		t＝0.893	χ²＝3.358	χ²＝0.008	χ²＝0.180	χ²＝2.830	χ²＝0.054
P值		0.373	0.067	0.930	0.671	0.093	0.816
组别	例数	移植胚胎数(个，±s)	IVF/ICSI[%(n/n′)]	临床妊娠率[%(n/n′)]	自然流产率[%(n/n′)]	中、重度OHSS发生率[%(n/n′)]	卵巢低反应发生率[%(n/n′)]
研究组	102	1.5±0.9	17.2(15/87)	71.4(55/77)	10.9(6/55)	0(0/102)	0(0/102)
对照组	69	1.5±0.9	25.5(14/55)	54.9(28/51)	10.7(3/28)	4.4(3/69)	5.8(4/69)
检验值		t＝-0.019	χ²＝1.399	χ²＝3.676	χ²＝0.001	χ²＝4.514^a	χ²＝6.055^a
P值		0.985	0.237	0.055	0.978	0.034	0.014

[1]	包莉莉，杨波，王冬雪，等. 高纯度人绝经期促性腺激素的应用对IVF/ICSI促排卵中鲜胚移植率的影响[J]. 生殖医学杂志，2019, 28(10): 1179-1183. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2019.10.015.
[2]	张少娣，耿嘉瑄，路锦，等. 促性腺激素释放激素激动剂降调节方案对子宫内膜容受性的研究进展[J]．中华生殖与避孕杂志，2017，37(8)：675-678. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2096-2916.2017.08.015.
[3]	刘思邈，邓成艳. 垂体降调节后促性腺激素启动时机的选择[J]．生殖医学杂志，2017, 26(11): 1092-1094. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2017.11.008.
[4]	van Wely M, Kwan I, Burt AL, et al. Recombinant versus urinary gonadotrophin for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology cycles. a cochrane review[J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2012, 18(2)：111. DOI：10.1093/humupd/dmr048.
[5]	张婉玉，张冬雅，杨新红，等. 卵巢过度刺激综合征合并卵巢出血的诊治体会-附2例病案报道与文献复习[J]. 中华生殖与避孕杂志，2021, 41(3): 247-251. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101441-20200331-00175.
[6]	乔杰，马彩虹，刘嘉茵，等．辅助生殖促排卵药物治疗专家共识[J]．生殖与避孕，2015，35(4)：211-223.DOI: 10.7669/j.issn.0253-357X.2015.04.0211.
[7]	刘琨，张学红，马晓玲，等. 卵巢高反应性不孕患者拮抗剂超促排卵应用探讨[J]. 中国妇幼保健，2019，34(8)：1815-1817. DOI: 10.7620/zgfybj.j.issn.1001-4411.2019.08.41.
[8]	骆丽华，刘雨生，季静娟，等．长方案卵巢刺激启动日血黄体生成激素水平作为黄体生成激素添加指标的价值[J]．中国实用妇科与产科杂志，2012，28(8)：619-623.
[9]	田冬梅，李亨利，朱明辉，等．卵巢储备正常者COH不同阶段添加高纯度人绝经期促性腺激素对IVF-ET结局的影响[J]. 生殖与避孕，2016，36(9): 769-773.DOI: 10.7669/j.issn.0253-357X.2016.09.0769.
[10]	王凤，邓伟芬，廖海珍，等．改良超长方案中促排卵时不同时期添加高纯度尿促性素对助孕结局的影响[J]．中华生殖与避孕杂志，2017，37(1)：16-21. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2096-2916.2017.01.005.
[11]	刘茜桐，田莉，马淳，等．长方案添加HMG时机对供精体外受精-胚胎移植结局的影响[J]．生殖医学杂志，2017，26(7)：661-665. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2017.07.008.
[12]	Balasch J, Fábregues F, Casamitjana R, et al. A pharmacokinetic and endocrine comparison of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and human menopausal gonadotrophin in polycystic ovary syndrome[J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2003, 6(3)：296-301. DOI：10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61848-2.
[13]	马亚兰，张欣，李丹丹，等．卵巢功能储备正常者拮抗剂方案COH使用过程中添加高纯度人绝经促性腺激素对IVF-ET妊娠结局的影响[J]．吉林大学学报(医学版)，2018，44(5)：1036-1040.DOI: 10.13481/j.1671-587x.20180527.
[14]	李巍巍，许晓燕，高瑞峰，等．长方案促排卵过程中血清LH低于正常值时补充LH对助孕结局的影响[J]．华中科技大学学报(医学版)，2015，44(3)：334-338. DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1672-0741.2015.03.021.
[15]	Figen TA, Seckin B, Onalan G, et al. Human menopausal gonadotropin versus recombinant FSH in polycystic ovary syndrome patients undergoing in vitro fertilization[J]. Int J Fertil Steril, 2013, 6(4)：238-243.
[16]	Arce JC, Smitz J．Live-birth rates after HP-hMG stimulation in the long GnRH agonist protocol: association with mid-follicular hCG and progesterone concentrations, but not with LH concentrations[J]. Gynecol Endocrinol, 2013, 29(1)：46-50. DOI：10.3109/09513590.2012.705379.
[17]	Thuesen LL, Loft A, Egeberg AN，et al. A randomized controlled dose-response pilot study of addition of hCG to recombinant FSH during controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization[J]. Hum Reprod, 2012, 27(10)：3074-3084. DOI：10.1093/humrep/des256.
[18]	McGee EA, Hsueh AJ. Initial and cyclic recruitment of ovarian follicles[J]. Endocr Rev, 2000, 21(2)：200-214. DOI: 10.1210/edrv.21.2.0394.
[19]	魏丽娜，张俊博，赵考考，等．不同治疗方案在体外受精-胚胎移植患者中的临床疗效比较[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018，14(3): 317-323. DOI：10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2018.03.011.

[1]	Minrong Ma, Cong Li, Qin Zhou. Current research status of treatment of cervical cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 497-504.
[2]	Changsheng Lin, Jun Zhan, Xue Xiao. Genetic testing and precision molecular targeted therapy in diagnosis and treatment of epithelial ovarian caner[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 505-510.
[3]	Haoyuan Yang, Jie Gong, Qingwei Zou, Hang Ruan. Current research status on adverse pregnancy outcomes of maternal and infant in pregnant women with asthma[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[4]	Tiantian Chen, Xiaodong Wang, Haiyan Yu. Pregnancy outcome of twin pregnancy with Gitelman syndrome: a case report and literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[5]	Xiaoqing Ju, Yunjie Jin, Xiaoyan Wang. Influencing factors of uterine rupture during vaginal delivery in patients with scarred uterus after cesarean section[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[6]	Juan Gu, Qingqing Sun, Fangfang Hu, Yijuan Cao, Yujuan Qi. Clinical application of endometrial receptivity array to improve pregnancy outcomes in women with repeated embryo implantation failure[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[7]	Mengling Zhou, Zhiwei Xue, Shu Zhou. Changes in size of uterine myoma during pregnancy and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[8]	Wenrong Dai, Lijuan Zhao, Zhihui Li. Research progress of influence of extracellular vesicles on embryo implantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 616-620.
[9]	Dongjie Zhou, Min Jiang, Hairui Fan, Lingling Gao, Xiang Kong, Dan Lu, Liping Wang. Current research progress on non-coding RNA in follicular development and maturation[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 387-393.
[10]	Huizhu Chen, Yingkun Guo, Xinrong Wang, Gang Ning, Xijian Chen. Current research status on the " dualistic model" of epithelial ovarian cancer and its molecular biology[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 394-402.
[11]	Chunying Han, Tingting Wang, Yanyan Li, Jinxia Piao. Current research status on predictors of lymphatic vascular invasion in patients with endometrial carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 403-409.
[12]	Li Chen, Xueqin Lei, Lian Duan, Yue Zeng, Guolin He. Analysis of influencing factors of success of trial of labor after twice cesarean sections and its pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 287-294.
[13]	Ying Chen, Yanli Chen. Causes of heart rate variability and perinatal outcomes in elderly pregnant women[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 295-301.
[14]	Yuyan Zhang, Bin Hu, Weihong Zhang, Mei Xu, Hui Zhu, Xinyue Yang, Hailing Liu. Relationship between echocardiography parameters and liver function during the second trimester of pregnancy and their predictive value for adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[15]	Xin Wang, Lin Liu, Zhejia Wen, Chunling Liu, Hong Zhang, Fang Lyu. Effect of stress exposure before pregnancy on subsequent pregnancy outcomes in mice[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 431-437.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export