Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03): 329 -334. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2020.03.011

Special Issue:

Original Article

Influence of different doses of sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles and mechanical indexes setting on imaging quality of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in placenta of pregnant rats

Changrui Sheng1, Saijun Chen1,(), Liming Yan1, Jingjing Hu1, Fangfang Hong1, Zhifei Ben1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Hwa Mei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315010, Zhejiang Province, China
  • Received:2019-09-12 Revised:2020-05-20 Published:2020-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Saijun Chen
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Chen Saijun, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Project of Zhejiang Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission(2019RC077)
Objective

To investigate influence of different contrast agent injection doses of sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles (SHM) through fetal rats′ umbilical veins and different mechanical indexes (MI) setting on imaging quality of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in placental fetal surface of SD rats in late pregnancy.

Methods

Forty SD rats in late pregnancy were selected as study subjects. According to random number table method, they were divided into A, B, C and D groups each group with 10 rats, and doses of SHM were 0.03, 0.06, 0.09 and 0.12 mL/kg, respectively during CEUS. Meanwhile, contrast pulse sequence (CPS) imaging technology was used and MI were set as 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, 0.25 and 0.30 in each group. The quantitative analysis was conducted by time-intensity curve (TIC) method for CEUS imaging quality, and 3 indexes measured by TIC for this study included arrival time (AT), time to peak (TTP) and peak intensity (PI) after SHM was injected. One-way ANOVA and least significant difference (LSD)-t test were used for overall comparison and further comparison between each two groups of above 3 indexes when adjusted different SHM doses and set different MI.

Results

① Results of CEUS in placental fetal surface of pregnant rats in C group: when MI setting increased from 0.10 to 0.30, there were no significant differences in AT and TTP (P>0.05). When MI setting increased from 0.10 to 0.20, PI increased with increased of MI (P<0.05), and PI reached the maximum when MI setting was 0.20. When MI setting increased from 0.20 to 0.30, PI showed no significant difference (P>0.05). ② CEUS results of placental fetal surface of pregnant rats in 4 groups when MI setting was 0.20: AT, TTP and PI of C group were (0.95±0.45) s, (7.9±3.0) s and (30.6±4.2) dB, which were significantly different from (1.67±0.83) s, (12.5±2.8) s and (25.5±4.8) dB of those in A group, and the differences were statistically significant (P=0.004, 0.001, 0.004). There were no significant differences between C group and B group, also between C group and D group in those 3 indexes (P>0.05). There were significant differences between B group and D group in AT and TTP (P<0.05); However, there were no significant differences between B group and A group in those 3 indexes, and between B group and D group in PI (P>0.05). There were significant differences between D group and A group in those 3 indexes (P<0.05). With contrast agent dose increased, AT and TTP shorten, while PI increased.

Conclusions

When CEUS was performed on the placental fetal surface of SD rats in late pregnancy, SHM dose was 0.09 mL/kg and MI setting was 0.20 that CEUS may had best imaging quality.

图1 孕龄28 d的SD孕鼠经胎鼠脐静脉团注造影剂(黄色箭头所示为脐静脉)
表1 设置不同MI值,C组10只孕鼠胎盘胎儿面进行CEUS(经胎鼠脐静脉注射SHM剂量为0.09 mL/kg)的TIC 3项指标比较(±s)
表2 经胎鼠脐静脉注射不同剂量SHM时,4组孕鼠胎盘胎儿面进行CEUS(MI值为0.20)的TIC 3项指标比较(±s)
[1]
陈佩文,陈欣林,赵胜,等. 声诺维超声造影观察晚孕孕鼠胎盘超微结构改变的初步研究[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2009, 6(1): 19-24. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6448.2009.01.005.
[2]
Stride E, Tang MX, Eckersley RJ. Physical phenomena affecting quantitative imaging of ultrasound contrast agents[J]. Appl Acoust, 2009, 70(10): 1352-1362. DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2008.10.003.
[3]
李杰,董宝玮,于晓玲,等. 肝灰阶超声造影剂量与效果关系的实验研究[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志,2004, 13(7): 547-550. DOI: 10.3760/j.issn:1004-4477.2004.07.018.
[4]
李云华,常才. 超声微泡造影剂在高强度聚焦超声增效领域的研究进展[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志,2015, 24(8): 732-735. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2015.08.031.
[5]
董倩,游小钧,邓琼珍. 微泡造影剂介导的声空效应对胶质瘤大鼠血脑屏障通透性及替莫唑胺疗效的影响[J]. 解放军医学杂志,2017, 42(5): 389-393. DOI: 10.11855/j.issn.0577-7402.2017.05.06.
[6]
郭辉,刘隆忠,郑玮,等. 高频条件不同机械指数下SonoVue与Sonazoid对兔肝超声造影效能的比较[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2011, 8(5): 958-967. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2011.05.006.
[7]
Barnett SB, Duck F, Ziskin M. Recommendations on the safe use of ultrasound contrast agents[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2007, 33(2): 173-174. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.07.002.
[8]
李硕阳,尹庭辉,李景果,等. 载siRNA微泡实现肿瘤治疗与疗效评估一体化的可行性分析[J]. 南方医科大学学报,2015, (6): 874-878. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4254.2015.06.019.
[9]
王潇,周青,陈茜,等. 超声破坏SonoVue微泡介导Ang-1基因的体外体内转染[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志,2012, 21(1): 65-70. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2012.01.023.
[10]
崔晶晶,周青,曹省,等. 超声靶向破坏微泡联合核定位信号肽增强基因转染治疗犬心肌梗死的实验研究[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志,2017, 26(2): 159-164. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2017.02.018.
[11]
Vancraeynest D, Havaux X, Pasquet A, et al. Myocardial injury induced by ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction: evidence for the contribution of myocardial ischemia[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2009, 35(4): 672-679. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.10.005.
[12]
许杨青,陈欣林,谢明星,等. 大鼠胎盘超声造影灌注特征和生物效应的初步研究[J]. 中国医学影像技术,2008, 24(1): 5-8. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1003-3289.2008.01.002.
[13]
Yasui K, Lee J, Tuziuti T, et al. Influence of the bubble-bubble interaction on destruction of encapsulated microbubbles under ultrasound[J]. J Acoust Soc Am, 2009, 126(3): 973-982. DOI: 10.1121/1.3179677.
[14]
郭辉,李安华,刘隆忠,等. 高频条件下(7MHz) SonoVue与Sonazoid剂量变化对兔肝造影效能的比较[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2011, 8(3): 482-489. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2011.03.005.
[15]
杨琛,彭婵娟. 超声造影定量评价体系及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国肿瘤,2016, 25(3): 212-218. DOI: 10.11735/j.issn.1004-0242.2016.03.A012.
[1] Jianquan Zhang, Jie Cheng, Hongqiong Chen, Lei Yan. Evaluation of ablated thyroid areas using ACR-TIRADS:a survey study[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] Hui Luo, Ye Fang. Application of quality control circles in improving detection rate of thyroid nodules by fine-needle aspiration[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] Zhong Yang, Jingye Shi, Xuedong Deng, Wei Jiang, Linliang Yin, Qi Pan, Hong Liang, Jianfang Ma, Zhenqi Wang, Jun Zhang, Shanshan Dong. Diagnostic value of prenatal ultrasound in fetal 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] Yanjuan Bao, Xiaohong Yang, Tao Zhang, Sheng Zhao, Li Zhang. Ultrasound diagnosis and clinical analysis of obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal anomaly syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(09): 859-864.
[5] Sirui Liu, Chenyang Zhao, Rui Zhang, Yixiu Zhang, Meng Yang. Comprehensive evaluation of hemodynamic parameters at different segments of the uterine artery in pregnant rats using Doppler ultrasonography[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(09): 877-883.
[6] Jiali Sun, Lin Jin, Cuiqin Shen, Qingqing Chen, Yanping Lin, Zhaojun Li, Dong Xu. Ultrasound-guided robot-assisted percutaneous puncture: an experimental study[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[7] Xuebing Shi, Yingdong Xie, Ni Xie, Chaoli Xu, Bin Yang, Guo Sun. Acoustic radiation force imaging for evaluating efficacy of radiotherapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal vein tumor thrombus[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[8] Qianmei Li, Guannan He, Jing Zhao, Xi Chen, Yuying Tang, Liqiong Ma, Rong Liang, Tao Yuan, Mingxing Li. Placental microvascular flow imaging characteristics and prognosis of early low-risk and high-risk pregnancies[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(07): 726-732.
[9] Yang Li, Jinyu Cai, Xiaozhi Dang, Wanying Chang, Yan Ju, Yi Gao, Hongping Song. Application value of a deep learning-based model for generating strain elastography images using breast grayscale ultrasound images[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[10] Wei Hong, Xirong Ye, Zhihong Liu, Yinfeng Yang, Zhihong Lyu. Value of ultrasound radiomics combined with clinicopathological features in predicting complete pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[11] Ziyang Wang, Wenli Yang, Dongjun Li, Wei Chen, Qi Zhao, Yifeng Li, Rui Cui, Lin Shen, Qian Liu, Chuanchuan Wei. Clinical observation of the eyeball wall with high frequency linear array probe[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(06): 580-584.
[12] Wenjing Xiang, Yan Xu, Tong Ru, Mingming Zheng, Yan Gu, Chenyan Dai, Xiangyu Zhu, Chenchen Yan. Application of neurosonography in prenatal diagnosis of fetal corpus callosum malformations[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(05): 470-476.
[13] Ke Hu, Rong Lu. Multi-parameter ultrasound-based diagnostic model for stress urinary incontinence in middle-aged and elderly women[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(05): 477-483.
[14] Qiong Gao, Zhongxia Sun, Ge Zhang, Min Wang, Zihang Xu, Jiateng Zhang, Tian'an Jiang. Causes and countermeasures of missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis of pancreatic space-occupying lesions by ultrasound[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(05): 517-521.
[15] Jingyu Qian, Mingming Zheng. Interpretation of the Italian guidelines on non-invasive and invasive prenatal diagnosis:executive summary of recommendations for practice the Italian Society for Obstetrics and Gynecology(SIGO)[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2024, 20(05): 486-492.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract