Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (06): 695 -702. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2019.06.014

Special Issue:

Original Article

Clinical research of caffeine citrate combined with heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula for prevention of extubation failure in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome

Bao Jin1, Xiangyu Gao1,(), Bo Yang1, Di Huang1, Yi Ren1   

  1. 1. Department of Neonatology, Affiliated Xuzhou Hospital of Southeast University, Xuzhou 221009, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2019-06-18 Revised:2019-11-01 Published:2019-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiangyu Gao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Gao Xiangyu, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Maternal and Child Health Research Project of Jiangsu Province Health and Family Planning Commission(F201752); Key Research and Development Project of Xuzhou Science and Technology Bureau(Social Development KC18188)
Objective

To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of caffeine citrate combined with heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for prevention of extubation failure in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).

Methods

From September 2017 to February 2019, a total of 72 premature infants with RDS (28 weeks≤gestational age<32 weeks) who were prepared for noninvasive mechanical ventilation after a period of invasive mechanical ventilation with an endotracheal tube in neonatal intensive care unit of the Affiliated Xuzhou Hospital of Southeast University, were chosen as research subjects. They were randomly divided into two groups by random digits table method. In the combined treatment group (n=47), they were given caffeine citrate 24 h before extubation combined with HHHFNC after extubation for prevention of extubation failure; and in the control group (n=43), they were given NCPAP after extubation without caffeine citrate for prevention of extubation failure. The general clinical data, incidence of extubation failure, duration of noninvasive ventilation and total duration of oxygen inhaling, the days of achieving adequate oral feeding and related complications of noninvasive mechanical ventilation between two groups of premature infants were compared by independent-samples t test or chi-square test. The study was reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Xuzhou Hospital of Southeast University (Approval No. 2017-13), and clinical research informed consents were signed by the guardians of all premature infants.

Results

① There were no significant differences between two groups in general clinical data including gender composition ratio, gestational age, gravidity, birth weight, and the rate of premature rupture of membranes, cesarean section rate, composition ratio of conception, glucocorticoid application rate 24 h to 7 d before delivery, incidence rate of hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy of mother, incidence of grade Ⅲ RDS, 1 min and 5 min Apgar scores of RDS premature infants after birth, usage rate of pulmonary surfactant (PS) and duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (P>0.05). ② The incidence of extubation failure, duration of noninvasive ventilation and total duration of oxygen inhaling, length of hospitalization, times of apnea in combined treatment group were 8.1% (3/37), 3.5 d (1.0-15.0 d), 11.0 d (4.0-28.0 d), 15.5 d (6.0-29.0 d) and 11.0 times (7.0-15.0 times), respectively, which were significant less or lower or shorter than those in control group 20% (7/35), 6.5 d (2.5-18.0 d), 15.0 d (6.0-32.0 d), 22.0 d (7.0-36.0 d) and 18.0 times (8.0-25.0 times), and all the differences were statistically significant(χ2=4.712, P=0.030; Z=-2.030, P=0.018; Z=-2.129, P=0.012; Z=-2.889, P=0.008; Z=-2.105, P=0.022). The time for children in the combination treatment group to achieve adequate oral feeding was shorter than that in control group which were 10.0 d (6.0-20.0 d) and 16.0 d (8.0-28.0 d), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=—2.857, P=0.010). ③The incidence rates of nasal injury, abdominal distention and head shaping in combined treatment group were 10.8% (4/37), 10.8% (4/37) and 8.1% (3/37), respectively, which were significant lower than those in control group, 22.9% (8/35), 28.6% (10/35) and 31.4% (11/35), and all the differences were statistically significant (χ2=4.782, 5.140, 5.982; P=0.028, 0.021, 0.012).

Conclusions

Compared with the application of NCPAP alone, caffeine citrate combined with HHHFNC for prevention of extubation failure in premature infants with RDS can reduce the incidence of extubation failure, nasal injury, and abdominal distension, and shorten the duration of noninvasive mechanical ventilation and oxygen inhaling. It′s a safe and effective respiratory support model for premature infants with RDS.

表1 2组呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿一般临床资料比较
表2 2组呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿临床疗效比较
表3 2组呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿无创辅助通气相关并发症比较[例数(%)]
[1]
Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, et al. European consensus guidelines on the management of respiratory distress syndrome-2016 update[J]. Neonatology: 2017, 111(2): 107-125.
[2]
王华,母得志. 新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的通气策略[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 13(1): 10-13.
[3]
李文星,唐军,陈超,等. 预防早产儿拔管失败:加温湿化高流量鼻导管通气与经鼻持续气道正压通气效果比较的Meta分析[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(2): 171-179.
[4]
邵肖梅,叶鸿瑁,丘小汕. 实用新生儿学[M]. 4版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2011: 395-398.
[5]
《中华儿科杂志》编辑委员会,中华医学会儿科学分会新生儿学组. 新生儿机械通气常规[J]. 中华儿科杂志,2015, 53(5): 327-330.
[6]
赵颖,田秀英,刘鸽. 不同剂量咖啡因治疗早产儿原发性呼吸暂停临床效果评估[J]. 中华儿科杂志,2016, 54(1): 33-36.
[7]
Lista G, Castoldi F, Fontana P, et al. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) versus bi-level nasal CPAP in preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomised control trial [J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2010, 95(2): F85-F89.
[8]
Lodeserto FJ, Lettich TM, Rezaie SR. High-flow nasal cannula: mechanisms of action and adult and pediatric indications [J]. Cureus, 2018, 10(11): e3639.
[9]
Schmid F, Olbertz DM, Ballmann M. The use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) as respiratory support in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units in Germany: a nationwide survey [J]. Respir Med, 2017, 131: 210-214.
[10]
Shetty S, Hickey A, Rafferty GF, et al. Work of breathing during CPAP and heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula[J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2016, 101(5): F404-F407.
[11]
Garg BD, Bajaj N, Sharma D. To compare the efficacy of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula and continuous positive airway pressure in post-extubation period in VLBW infants [J]. J Trop Pediatr, 2018, 64(4): 262-266.
[12]
Soonsawad S, Swatesutipun B, Limrungsikul A, et al. Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula for prevention of extubation failure in preterm infants [J]. Indian J Pediatr, 2017, 84(4): 262-266.
[13]
Wilkinson D, Andersen C, O′Donnell CP, et al. High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016, 2: CD006405.
[14]
Hermeto F, Martins BM, Ramos JR, et al. Incidence and main risk factors associated with extubation failure in newborns with birth weight < 1, 250 grams [J]. J Pediatr (Rio J), 2009, 85(5): 397-402.
[15]
Abu-Shaweesh JM, Martin RJ. Caffeine use in the neonatal intensive care unit [J]. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med, 2017, 22(5): 342-347.
[16]
Dekker J, Hooper SB, van Vonderen JJ, et al. Caffeine to improve breathing effort of preterm infants at birth: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Pediatr Res, 2017, 82(2): 290-296.
[17]
Henderson-Smart DJ, Davis PG. Prophylactic methylxanthines for endotracheal extubation in preterm infants [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2010, 12: CD000139.
[18]
Davis PG, Schmidt B, Roberts RS, et al. Caffeine for apnea of prematurity trial benefits may vary in subgroups[J]. J Pediatr, 2010, 156(3): 382-387.
[19]
Fleeman N, Mahon J, Bates V, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula compared with usual care for preterm infants: systematic review and economic evaluation[J]. Health Technol Assess, 2016, 20(30): 1-68.
[20]
Yoder BA, Stoddard RA, Li M, et al. Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for respiratory support in neonates [J]. Pediatrics, 2013, 131(5): e1482-e1490.
[21]
Lavizzari A, Veneroni C, Colnaghi M, et al. Respiratory mechanics during NCPAP and HHHFNC at equal distending pressures [J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2014, 99(4): F315-F320.
[22]
Al-Alaiyan S, Dawoud M, Al-Hazzani F. Positive distending pressure produced by heated, humidified high flow nasal cannula as compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants [J]. J Neonatal Perinatal Med, 2014, 7(2): 119-124.
[23]
Collins CL, Holberton JR, Barfield C, et al. A randomized controlled trial to compare heated humidified high-flow nasal cannulae with nasal continuous positive airway pressure postextubation in premature infants [J]. J Pediatr, 2013, 162(5): 949-954.
[24]
刘翠青,夏耀方,江雨桐,等. 加温湿化高流量经鼻导管正压通气治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征[J]. 中华围产医学杂志,2013, 16(4): 240-243.
[25]
Soonsawad S, Tongsawang N, Nuntnarumit P. Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula for weaning from continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Neonatology, 2016, 110 (3): 204-209.
[26]
Lemyre B, Davis PG, De Paoli AG, et al. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017, 2: CD003212.
[27]
Lemyre B, Davis PG, De Paoli AG, et al. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014, 9: CD003212.
[28]
Armanian AM, Iranpour R, Parvaneh M, et al. Heated humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) is not an effective method for initial treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) versus nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation (NIMV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) [J]. J Res Med Sci, 2019, 24: 73.
[29]
Kugelman A, Riskin A, Said W, et al. A randomized pilot study comparing heated humidified high-flow nasal cannulae with NIPPV for RDS [J]. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2015, 50(6): 576-583.
Roberts CT, Owen LS, Manley BJ, et al. Nasal high-flow therapy for primary respiratory support in preterm infants[J]. N Engl J Med, 2016, 375(12): 1142-1151.
[30]
Poets CF, Lorenz L. Prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely low gestational age neonates: current evidence [J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2018, 103(3): F285-F291.
[31]
Pakvasa MA, Saroha V, Patel RM. Optimizing caffeine use and risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants: a systematic review, Meta-analysis, and application of grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation methodology [J]. Clin Perinatol, 2018, 45(2): 273-291.
[32]
耿晓萌,刘俊丽,李桂芳,等. 咖啡因在早产儿机械通气中效果的临床研究[J]. 中华新生儿科杂志,2017, 32(6): 443-447.
[1] Zhichao Yang, Zhi Song, Xianghong Peng, Deyu Ji. Clinical observation of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in patients undergoing continuous positive airway pressure and high-flow humidification cannula oxygen therapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine(Electronic Edition), 2020, 13(03): 195-199.
[2] Jingfang Zhai, Jiebin Wu, Xiao Liu, bao Jin, Yanbo Wang, Yang Chen, Yun Wang, Guangling Zhou, Bin Zhou. Application of noninvasive high frequency oscillation ventilation in initial respiratory support of very low birth weight premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2021, 17(05): 598-605.
[3] Yuanhua Zhuang, Na Wang, Xiaoying Li, Jianhong Liu. Application of nasal bi level positive airway pressure and continuous positive airway pressure in premature neonates with severe neonatal respiratory distress syndrome after extubation[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2020, 16(03): 316-321.
[4] Fudong Wang, Mingfeng Fu, Minhua Chen, Mingfu Wu, Xiangfang Song, Li Zhang, Feng Liu, Lijun Jiang. Clinical research of different pulmonary surfactant administration techniques on premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2020, 16(03): 299-308.
[5] Li Liu, Jun Tang. Current status of prevention and treatment of neonatal meconium aspiration syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2020, 16(03): 249-256.
[6] Jingfang Zhai, Jiebin Wu, Bao Jin, Xiao Liu, Yanbo Wang, Guangling Zhou, Xiaoyu Song, Ke Wang, Bin Zhou, Kai Wang. Comparison of heated humidified high flow nasal cannula and nasal continuous positive airway pressure in initial respiratory support of mild neonatal respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2019, 15(06): 632-638.
[7] Wenxing Li, Jun Tang, Chao Chen, Xia Qiu, Yan Yue, Yan Zeng, Yi Qu, Dezhi Mu. Comparison of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula and nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preventing extubation failure in preterm infants: a Meta-analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2019, 15(02): 171-179.
[8] Shuqiang Gao, Rong Ju, Sheng Yang, Yiting Du, Wenbin Dong. Pulmonary ultrasonic manifestations in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2019, 15(01): 68-72.
[9] Bao Jin, Xiangyu Gao, Bo Yang, Di Huang, Xiuhui Ma, Min Su. Caffeine citrate combined with duo positive airway pressure in treatment of premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2018, 14(06): 656-662.
[10] Wei Tan, Langhuan Lei, Liping Yao, Qiufen Wei, Yan Li. Comparison of curative effects of using pulmonary surfactant at different time in treatment of premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2017, 13(04): 455-460.
[11] Wen Han, Yong Xie, Xiaoying Feng, Liming Yin, Yongli Xuan, Xiaolei Yang, Xinxia Hai. Clinical application of optimization strategy of early respiratory support in the management of respiratory distress syndrome-high-risk premature infants[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2016, 12(06): 710-714.
[12] Qizhou Qiu, Guihui Cheng, Hongyu Chen, Wei Xiong, Renhong Liu, Yi Xiao. Influence of different breathing patterns on clinical rehabilitation in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2016, 12(02): 206-210.
[13] Shijun Wen, Yunhuan Zhang, Chengyuan Li. Value of PS combined with bi-level continuous positive airway pressure in the treatment of preterm infants with NRDS[J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2020, 13(06): 755-759.
[14] Junlan Li, Xiaorong Zhang. Effect of pulmonary surfactant combined with NCPAP on serum ET-1 and CC16 in neonates with respiratory failure[J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2020, 13(05): 623-627.
[15] Juhua Ji, Ming Xu, Fei Hong, Lei Song. Effect of caffeine citrate plus phenobarbital on serum NF-κB and TLR2 in preterm infants with brain injury[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(02): 141-145.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract