Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2018, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02): 230 -235. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2018.02.017

Special Issue:

Original Article

Effects of macrosomia on pelvic floor function of puerperae

Hua Wang1, Guanglin Guo1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang No.1 People′s Hospital, Xiangyang 441100, Hubei Province, China
  • Received:2017-11-19 Revised:2018-03-22 Published:2018-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Guanglin Guo
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Guo Guanglin, Email:
Objective

To investigate effects of macrosomia on the incidence of early pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) in puerperae.

Methods

A total of 301 primiparae who had full-term pregnancy and vaginal delivery, and evaluated the pelvic floor function after 6-8 weeks postpartum from March to December 2014 in Affliated Hospital of Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang No.1 People′s Hospital, were chosen as research subjects. According to birth weight of newborns, they were divided into study group (n=145, macrosomia delivery, birth weight ≥4 000 g) and control group (n=156, normal weight fetus delivery, 3 000 g≤ birth weight<4 000 g). The general clinical data, the proportion of normal pelvic floor muscle strength, fatigue degree and vaginal dynamic pressure, incidence rates of postpartum stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP), and the results of maternal perineal ultrasonography were all statistically compared between two groups of puerperae by independent-samples t test or chi-square test. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Affliated Hospital of Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang No.1 People′s Hospital, and informed consents were obtained and signed by participants.

Results

① There were no significant differences between two groups of puerperae in general clinical data such as maternal age, body mass index before pregnancy, incidence rates of prolonged labor and perineal episiotomy, family monthly income, etc. (P>0.05). ②The proportions of normal pelvic floor typeⅠ and Ⅱ muscle fibers strength of puerperae were 9.7% and 11.0% in study group, and 19.2% and 21.2% in control group, respectively; The proportions of normal pelvic floor type Ⅰ and Ⅱ muscle fibers fatigue degrees of puerperae were 15.9% and 11.7% in study group, and 30.8% and 26.3% in control group, respectively; The proportions of normal vaginal dynamic pressure of puerperae were 31.0% in study group and 81.4% in control group, respectively. The above mentioned proportions of indexes of puerperae in study group were all lower than those in control group, and all the differences were statistically significant (χ2=5.521, P=0.019; χ2=5.646, P=0.017; χ2=9.265, P=0.002; χ2=10.238, P=0.001; χ2=77.873, P<0.001). ③The incidence rates of SUI, anterior and posterior vaginal walls prolapse of puerperae in study group (9.0%, 27.6%, 25.5%) were all higher than those in control group (2.6%, 11.5%, 10.3%), and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=5.779, P=0.016; χ2=12.441, P<0.001; χ2=12.064, P=0.001). ④The results of perineal ultrasonography in 38 cases of puerperae in study group and 40 cases of puerperae in control group showed that incidence rates of POP, the distance of downward dislocation of bladder neck and urethral metastatic angle during Valsalva movement, and the levator ani muscle hole area during calm state, anal contraction and Valsalva movements in study group [68.4%, (28.4±5.8) mm, (46.2±16.3)°, (15.1±3.5) mm2, (13.6±1.6) mm2, (22.9±5.2) mm2] were all higher, wider or larger than those in control group [40.0%, (6.4±4.4) mm, (19.3±13.2)°, (12.9±3.4) mm2, (11.1±2.3) mm2, (14.3±2.8) mm2], and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=6.334, P=0.012; t=18.930, P<0.001; t=8.029, P<0.001; t=2.816, P=0.006; t=5.545, P<0.001; t=9.157, P<0.001).

Conclusions

Macrosomia can reduce pelvic floor muscle strength and vaginal dynamic pressure of puerperae, increase muscle fatigue degree, which resulting in SUI and POP in postpartum. Mild PFD and injuries of levator ani muscle should be detected by postpartum three dimensional ultrasonography.

表1 2组产妇一般临床资料比较
表2 2组产妇盆底肌肌力及疲劳度,以及阴道动态压力正常者所占比例比较[例数(%)]
表3 2组产妇产后压力性尿失禁及阴道前、后壁脱垂发生率比较[例数(%)]
表4 2组产妇会阴超声检查结果比较
[1]
JundtK,PeschersU,KentenichH. The investigation and treatment of female pelvic floor dysfunction[J]. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2015, 112(33-34): 564-574.
[2]
HallockJL,HandaVL. The epidemiology of pelvic floor disorders and childbirth: an update[J]. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 2016, 43(1): 1-13.
[3]
VerhoevenCJ,NuijC,Janssen-RolfCR, et al. Predictors for failure of vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery: a case-control study[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2016, 200: 29-34.
[4]
Le NormandL,CossonM,CourF, et al. Clinical practice guidelines: synthesis of the guidelines for the surgical treatment of primary pelvic organ prolapse in women by the AFU, CNGOF, SIFUD-PP, SNFCP, and SCGP[J]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), 2016, 45(10): 1606-1613.
[5]
谢幸, 苟文丽. 妇产科学 [M].8版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2015: 8,287-288.
[6]
MemonHU,BlomquistJL,DietzHP, et al. Comparison of levator ani muscle avulsion injury after forceps-assisted and vacuum-assisted vaginal childbirth[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 125(5): 1080-1087.
[7]
MartinJA,HamiltonBE,VenturaSJ, et al. Births: final data for 2011[J]. Natl Vital Stat Rep, 2013, 62(1): 1-69, 72.
[8]
NilssonI,kervallS,MilsomI, et al. Long-term effects of vacuum extraction on pelvic floor function: a cohort study in primipara[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2016, 27(7): 1051-1056.
[9]
Allen-BradyK,Cannon-AlbrightLA,FarnhamJM, et al. Evidence for pelvic organ prolapse predisposition genes on chromosomes 10 and 17[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 212(6): 771.
[10]
GyhagenM,BullarboM,NielsenTF, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery[J]. BJOG, 2013, 120(2): 152-160.
[11]
WilsonD,DornanJ,MilsomI, et al. UR-CHOICE: can we provide mothers-to-be with information about the risk of future pelvic floor dysfunction[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2014, 25(11): 1449-1452.
[12]
SangsawangB. Risk factors for the development of stress urinary incontinence during pregnancy in primigravidae: a review of the literature[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2014, 178: 27-34.
[13]
SangsawangB,SangsawangN. Stress urinary incontinence in pregnant women: a review of prevalence, pathophysiology, and treatment[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2013, 24(6): 901-912.
[14]
LiuF,XuL,YingT, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound appearance of pelvic floor in nulliparous women and postpartum women one week after their first delivery[J]. Int J Med Sci, 2014, 11(3): 234-239.
[15]
HainsworthAJ,SolankiD,SchizasAM, et al. Total pelvic floor ultrasound for pelvic floor defaecatory dysfunction: a pictorial review[J]. Br J Radiol, 2015, 88(1055): 20150494.
[16]
MeriwetherKV,HallRJ,LeemanLM, et al. Anal sphincter complex: 2D and 3D endoanal and translabial ultrasound measurement variation in normal postpartum measurements[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2015, 26(4): 511-517.
[1] Haoyuan Yang, Jie Gong, Qingwei Zou, Hang Ruan. Current research status on adverse pregnancy outcomes of maternal and infant in pregnant women with asthma[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[2] Tiantian Chen, Xiaodong Wang, Haiyan Yu. Pregnancy outcome of twin pregnancy with Gitelman syndrome: a case report and literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[3] Xiaoqing Ju, Yunjie Jin, Xiaoyan Wang. Influencing factors of uterine rupture during vaginal delivery in patients with scarred uterus after cesarean section[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[4] Juan Gu, Qingqing Sun, Fangfang Hu, Yijuan Cao, Yujuan Qi. Clinical application of endometrial receptivity array to improve pregnancy outcomes in women with repeated embryo implantation failure[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[5] Beibei Wang, Qixiu Dong, Hongyan Xi, Qingyun Yu, Lijun Zhang, Guang Shi. Analysis of influencing factors of medical abortion failure of pregnant women in early pregnancy and construction of related prediction model and its predictive value for medical abortion success[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[6] Mengling Zhou, Zhiwei Xue, Shu Zhou. Changes in size of uterine myoma during pregnancy and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[7] Chenxi Ran, Rufei Shen, Mingyu Liao, Qian Liao, Ling Zhou, Yuling Zhang, Min Long. Treatment and management of pituitary tumor during pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 487-491.
[8] Jinqi Zhao, Nan Yang, Lifei Gong, Yue Tang, Lulu Li, Haihe Yang, Yuanyuan Kong. Analysis on birth status of small for gestational age infants in Beijing, 2011-2020[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 278-286.
[9] Li Chen, Xueqin Lei, Lian Duan, Yue Zeng, Guolin He. Analysis of influencing factors of success of trial of labor after twice cesarean sections and its pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 287-294.
[10] Ying Chen, Yanli Chen. Causes of heart rate variability and perinatal outcomes in elderly pregnant women[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 295-301.
[11] Danyan Feng, Xiaohui Cao, Yuxia Shi. Effect of serum adiponectin and placental leucine aminopeptidase levels on pregnancy outcome in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 302-308.
[12] Jinke Hu, Wen Zhong. Management and outcome of ureteral calculi in pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 377-381.
[13] Yuyan Zhang, Bin Hu, Weihong Zhang, Mei Xu, Hui Zhu, Xinyue Yang, Hailing Liu. Relationship between echocardiography parameters and liver function during the second trimester of pregnancy and their predictive value for adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[14] Xin Wang, Lin Liu, Zhejia Wen, Chunling Liu, Hong Zhang, Fang Lyu. Effect of stress exposure before pregnancy on subsequent pregnancy outcomes in mice[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 431-437.
[15] Yanli Zou, Wenjie Luan, Shujuan Wang, Yaqin Liu, Guizhi Chu, Songyang Li, Haoling Wang, Jinting Zhang, Xin Jiang, Zedong Luan. Ultrasonographic features of fetal right aortic arch in the first trimester[J]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 11(04): 227-232.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract