Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2011, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (01): 45 -47. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2011.01.012

Original Article

Clinical Analysis of 387 Cases of Pregnancy Delivery After Cesarean Section

Qing-shuang ZHU   

  1. Capital University of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China
  • Published:2011-02-01
Objective

To explore the delivery mode of patients with prior cesarean section, and the safety and feasibility of vaginal delivery after cesarean section.

Methods

From January 2004 to December 2009, 387 cases of pregnancy delivery after cesarean section were recruited into this study. They were divided into two groups according to different method of delivery, observation group (n=32, virginal delivery) and control group (n=355, cesarean section). The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of Centre for Capital University of Medical Sciences. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. The following indexes were compared between two groups: 24 h post-partum bleeding volume, neonatal Apgar score, length of stay, hospital charges, etc.

Results

The successful rate of vaginal delivery was 78.0% (32/41) with no uterine rupture. The rest of 355 cases were chosen to accept cesarean section. There had statistically significant differences of postpartum hemorrhage, puerperal morbidity, length of stay, hospital charges between two groups (P<0.05), but had no significant difference of incidence of neonatal asphyxia (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Most of the patients with prior cesarean section could deliver safely through vaginal labor, if the indication and contraindication of vaginal labor were grasped strictly and the labor processes were observed intensively. Pregnancy after cesarean section is not a absolute indicator for cesarean section again.

1 Huang B. Clinical analysis of vaginal delivery of pregnancy in a uterine scar: 32 cases report [J]. J Youjiang Med Coll Nat, 2005, 27(6): 846-847. [黄斌. 瘢痕子宫再次妊娠阴道分娩32例分析[J]. 右江民族医学院学报,2005, 27(6): 846-847.]
2 Zhou SQ. Scar uterine pregnancies vaginal trial-produce full-term again[J]. Zhejiang Clin Med, 2008, 10(7): 904-905. [周素琴.瘢痕子宫再次足月妊娠阴道试产分析[J].浙江临床医学,2008, 10(7): 904-905.]
3 Liu PE. Value of ultrasounic diagnosis of cesarean scar pregnancy [J]. Med J PLA, 2009, 34(5): 642. [刘平儿.超声对剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠诊断的价值[J]. 解放军医学杂志,2009, 34(5): 642.]
4 Li HX. Clinical analysis of 15 cases with incomplete uterine rupture after cesarean section[J]. China Mod Doc, 2008, 46(27): 129. [李红霞.瘢痕子宫足月妊娠者子宫不全破裂15例分析[J].中国现代医师,2008, 46(27): 129.]
5 Dong SF. Clinical analysis of caesarean section pregnancy: 62 cases report [J]. China Med Herald, 2008, 5(27): 37. [董书芳. 62例瘢痕子宫再妊娠临床分析[J]. 中国医药导报,2008, 5(27): 37.]
6 Zhao YY, Zhang XL. Clinical analysis of different delivery modes after caesarean section and its pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chin Pract J Rural Doctor, 2005, 12(7): 24. [赵予颍,张香兰. 瘢痕子宫不同分娩方式与母婴结局分析[J]. 中国实用乡村医生杂志,2005,12(7): 24.]
7 Zhang CQ, He GH, Wang DM, et al. Study on the vaginal delivery of the re-pregnant woman after caesarean section[J]. Mod Clin Nurs, 2008, 7(12): 30. [张翠琼,何桂华,王冬梅,等. 剖宫产术后再次妊娠阴道分娩产程的观察及护理[J]. 现代临床护理,2008, 7(12): 30.]
8 Tang LP. Clinical analysis of subsequent pregnancy after cesarean section: 170 cases [J]. J Pract Med, 2008, 24 (18): 3227-3228. [唐丽平.剖宫产术后再次妊娠170例分娩方式分析[J].实用医学杂志,2008, 24(18): 3227-3228.].
9 Wei HJ, Wei FB. Clinical analysis of blood loss during cesarean section again [J]. Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet, 2003, 19(7): 414. [隗洪进,隗伏冰.再次剖宫产术中出血的临床分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2003, 19(7): 414.]
10 Zhou Y, Zhou DJ, Luo Y. Investigation of cesarean scar pregnancy [J]. Anat Clin, 2006,11(1): 57-58. [周云,周杜娟,罗岩.疤痕子宫再次妊娠分娩问题的探讨[J].解剖与临床,2006, 11(1): 57-58.]
11 Ding LJ. Investigation of delivery modes of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Chin J Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 7(3): 208. [丁丽娟.疤痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式探讨[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2006, 7(3): 208.]
[1] Haoyuan Yang, Jie Gong, Qingwei Zou, Hang Ruan. Current research status on adverse pregnancy outcomes of maternal and infant in pregnant women with asthma[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[2] Tiantian Chen, Xiaodong Wang, Haiyan Yu. Pregnancy outcome of twin pregnancy with Gitelman syndrome: a case report and literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[3] Xiaoqing Ju, Yunjie Jin, Xiaoyan Wang. Influencing factors of uterine rupture during vaginal delivery in patients with scarred uterus after cesarean section[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[4] Juan Gu, Qingqing Sun, Fangfang Hu, Yijuan Cao, Yujuan Qi. Clinical application of endometrial receptivity array to improve pregnancy outcomes in women with repeated embryo implantation failure[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[5] Beibei Wang, Qixiu Dong, Hongyan Xi, Qingyun Yu, Lijun Zhang, Guang Shi. Analysis of influencing factors of medical abortion failure of pregnant women in early pregnancy and construction of related prediction model and its predictive value for medical abortion success[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[6] Mengling Zhou, Zhiwei Xue, Shu Zhou. Changes in size of uterine myoma during pregnancy and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[7] Chenxi Ran, Rufei Shen, Mingyu Liao, Qian Liao, Ling Zhou, Yuling Zhang, Min Long. Treatment and management of pituitary tumor during pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(04): 487-491.
[8] Jinqi Zhao, Nan Yang, Lifei Gong, Yue Tang, Lulu Li, Haihe Yang, Yuanyuan Kong. Analysis on birth status of small for gestational age infants in Beijing, 2011-2020[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 278-286.
[9] Li Chen, Xueqin Lei, Lian Duan, Yue Zeng, Guolin He. Analysis of influencing factors of success of trial of labor after twice cesarean sections and its pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 287-294.
[10] Jinke Hu, Wen Zhong. Management and outcome of ureteral calculi in pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 377-381.
[11] Yuyan Zhang, Bin Hu, Weihong Zhang, Mei Xu, Hui Zhu, Xinyue Yang, Hailing Liu. Relationship between echocardiography parameters and liver function during the second trimester of pregnancy and their predictive value for adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[12] Xiuying Jin, Feng Chen. Diagnostic value of transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography combined with serumβ-HCG detection in cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(03): 155-159.
[13] Xin Wang, Lin Liu, Zhejia Wen, Chunling Liu, Hong Zhang, Fang Lyu. Effect of stress exposure before pregnancy on subsequent pregnancy outcomes in mice[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 431-437.
[14] Xiaoxiang Wu, Bo Yang, Jingxuan Li, Fengling Zhang, Guihui Guo, Shaopei Zheng. Predictive value of umbilical artery ultrasonography parameters, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, and sFlt-1/PLGF ratio for adverse pregnancy outcomes in patients with pregnancy induced hypertension syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(03): 266-271.
[15] Yanli Zou, Wenjie Luan, Shujuan Wang, Yaqin Liu, Guizhi Chu, Songyang Li, Haoling Wang, Jinting Zhang, Xin Jiang, Zedong Luan. Ultrasonographic features of fetal right aortic arch in the first trimester[J]. Chinese Journal of Diagnostics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 11(04): 227-232.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract