切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 141 -146. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2018.02.003

所属专题: 文献

论著

单绒毛膜双羊膜囊三胎妊娠围生期管理及结局分析
徐婷婷1, 王晓东1, 余海燕1,()   
  1. 1. 610041 成都,四川大学华西第二医院妇产科、出生缺陷与相关妇儿疾病教育部重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-09 修回日期:2018-03-10 出版日期:2018-04-01
  • 通信作者: 余海燕

Perinatal outcomes and managements for monochorionic diamniotic triplet pregnancies

Tingting Xu1, Xiaodong Wang1, Haiyan Yu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2017-12-09 Revised:2018-03-10 Published:2018-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Haiyan Yu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yu Haiyan, Email:
引用本文:

徐婷婷, 王晓东, 余海燕. 单绒毛膜双羊膜囊三胎妊娠围生期管理及结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2018, 14(02): 141-146.

Tingting Xu, Xiaodong Wang, Haiyan Yu. Perinatal outcomes and managements for monochorionic diamniotic triplet pregnancies[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2018, 14(02): 141-146.

目的

探讨单绒毛膜双羊膜囊(MCDA)三胎妊娠的围生期管理及其围生结局。

方法

采用回顾性分析方法,收集2012年1月至2017年9月于四川大学华西第二医院产科分娩的4例MCDA三胎妊娠孕妇的一般临床资料,包括孕妇年龄、产妇类型、受孕情况、产前检查情况,并收集其妊娠结局,包括分娩方式、围生儿结局及围生儿死亡率。同时,于4例MCDA三胎妊娠孕妇分娩后,进行胎盘及脐带检查,以进一步明确MCDA诊断及脐带缠绕情况。

结果

本组4例MCDA三胎妊娠孕妇的年龄为20~28岁,均为自然受孕的初产妇。其中,在本院接受定期产前检查的孕妇为2例(No.1、No.2孕妇),MCDA三胎诊断时,其孕龄分别为13+4、18+5孕周,并且分别于32+3、32+5孕周时采取剖宫产术分别分娩3例女活婴,共计6例女活婴,随访结果显示这6例新生儿均生长发育良好。另外2例孕妇(No.3、No.4孕妇)均因未足月胎膜早破(PPROM),分别于孕龄为28、21+3孕周时急诊转入本院。这2例孕妇孕期均未接受正规产前检查,均于产时确诊为MCDA三胎妊娠。其中,No.3孕妇因母体因素于孕龄为28+3孕周时采取剖宫产术终止妊娠,娩出3例男活胎,这3例新生儿分别于出生后6 d(1例)、23 d(2例)死亡。No.4孕妇于孕龄为21+3孕周时发生PPROM,1例胎儿入院前流产死亡(单独羊膜囊内胎儿),入院后另外2例胎儿随即流产死亡(1例合并唇腭裂、1例为无心畸胎)。本组MCDA三胎妊娠孕妇的围生儿死亡率为11.1%(1/9)。对本组4例MCDA三胎妊娠孕妇进行产后胎盘及脐带检查的结果均证实MCDA三胎的诊断,而且No.1、2、3孕妇三胎中处于同一羊膜囊内的双胎,均存在脐带缠绕、打结。

结论

MCDA三胎妊娠十分罕见,为取得较好的围生结局,对其围生期管理宜早期诊断、定期规律产前检查、严密监护,完善产前保健,并与孕妇本人及其家属进行充分的病情沟通。

Objective

To study perinatal management and outcomes for monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) triplet pregnancies.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate perinatal management and outcomes of MCDA triplet pregnancies in West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University from January 2012 to September 2017 including general clinical data, such as maternal age, primipara or multipara, pregnancy condition and prenatal examination, and pregnancy outcomes, such as delivery mode and perinatal outcomes and mortality. Meanwhile, placental and umbilical cord examination were given after delivery to identify the diagnosis of MCDA and umbilical cord entanglement.

Results

A total of 4 cases of MCDA triplet pregnancies included in our study all were primiparae and spontaneously conceived with age between 20 to 28 years. Two cases (No.1 and No.2 pregnant women) had regular prenatal examinations in our hospital and were diagnosed as MCDA triplet pregnancies at 13+ 4, 18+ 5 gestational weeks, respectively. They had caesarean section at 32+ 3, 32+ 5 gestational weeks and gave birth to six health and survival female babies. And the following-up results showed that all the 6 neonates grew well. And No.3 and No.4 pregnant women were transferred to our hospital due to preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) at 28, 21+ 3 gestational weeks, respectively. Both of them did not have regular prenatal examinations. The diagnosis of MCDA triplet pregnancies were made during childbirth. No.3 pregnant woman had cesarean section due to maternal factor at 28+ 3 gestational weeks and gave birth to three male live babies. But these three newborns were died in 6 days after birth (1 newborn), 23 days after birth (2 newborns). No.4 pregnant woman gave birth to three dead fetus at 21+ 3 gestational weeks for inevitable abortion, and one still fetus (in single amniotic cyst) occurred abortion before admission in our hospital, and two fetuses were complicated with malformations (one fetus had cleft lip and palate, the other one were acardiac). The perinatal mortality of MCDA triplet pregnancies in this study was 11.1% (1/9). The placental and umbilical cord examination of 4 pregnant women were given after delivery, and all confirmed the prenatal diagnosis of MCDA triple pregnancies. The twin fetuses in single amniotic cyst of No.1, No.2, and No.3 pregnant women all had umbilical cord entanglement.

Conclusions

MCDA triplet pregnancies are very rare. To get a better perinatal outcome of MCDA triplet pregnancies, we recommend early diagnosis, regular prenatal examinations, close prenatal monitoring to improve prenatal care, and communication with patients and their families.

[1]
MyrianthopoulosNC. An epidemiologic survey of twins in a large, prospectively studied population[J]. Am J Hum Genet, 1970, 22(6): 611-629.
[2]
SavelliL,GabrielliS,PiluG. Two- and three-dimensional sonography of a monochorionic triplet gestation[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2001, 18(6): 683-684.
[3]
YoussefA,MilanoV,PiluG, et al. Three-dimensional sonograph of a monochorionic diamniotic triplet pregnancy[J]. J Clin Ultrasound, 2012, 40(4): 227-230.
[4]
ReynoldsMA,SchieveLA,MartinJA, et al. Trends in multiple births conceived using assisted reproductive technology, United States, 1997-2000[J]. Pediatrics, 2003, 111(5 Pt 2): 1159-1162.
[5]
YonetaniN,IshiiK,MabuchiA, et al. Prenatally diagnosed monochorionic diamniotic triplet pregnancy[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2015, 41(8): 1266-1268.
[6]
SuizuA,SatoY,MaruyamaS, et al. Successful management of monochorionic diamniotic triplet pregnancy[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2016, 36(6): 758-759.
[7]
YongPJ,FarquharsonDF,UbhiJ. Monochorionic diamniotic triplet pregnancy with prenatal diagnosis of cord entanglement[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2010, 32(3): 274-277.
[8]
MayJS,LanniS,JakowskiJD. A case of twin reversed arterial perfusion (TRAP) sequence in a monochorionic diamniotic triplet pregnancy with two acardiac fetuses[J]. Int J Diagnost Imaging, 2016, 3(2): 59-64.
[9]
FennessyKM,DoyleLW,NaudK, et al. Triplet pregnancy: is the mode of conception related to perinatal outcomes? [J]. Twin Res Hum Genet, 2015, 18(3): 321-327.
[10]
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. ACOG practice bulletin No. 144: multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 123(5): 1118-1132.
[11]
KahnB,LumeyLH,ZybertPA, et al. Prospective risk of fetal death in singleton, twin, and triplet gestations: implications for practice[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 102(4): 685-692.
[12]
AlexanderGR,KoganM,MartinJ, et al. What are the fetal growth patterns of singletons, twins, and triplets in the United States?[J]. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 1998, 41(1): 114-125.
[13]
AlmeidaP,DominguesAP,BeloA, et al. Triplet pregnancies: perinatal outcome evolution[J]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet, 2014, 36(9): 393-397.
[14]
MorikawaM,ChoK,YamadaT, et al. Clinical features and short-term outcomes of triplet pregnancies in Japan[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2013, 121(1): 86-90.
[15]
D′AntonioF,ThilaganathanB,TomsJ, et al. Perinatal outcome after fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome in triplet pregnancies[J]. BJOG, 2016, 123(3): 328-336.
[16]
MorlandoM,FerraraL,D′AntonioF, et al. Dichorionic triplet pregnancies: risk of miscarriage and severe preterm delivery with fetal reduction versus expectant management. Outcomes of a cohort study and systematic review[J]. BJOG, 2015, 122(8): 1053-1060.
[17]
ChaveevaP,KosinskiP,BirdirC, et al. Embryo reduction in dichorionic triplets to dichorionic twins by intrafetal laser[J]. Fetal Diagn Ther, 2014, 35(2): 83-86.
[18]
UnalER. Fetal surveillance and timing of delivery for multiples[J]. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 58(3): 676-689.
[1] 武玺宁, 欧阳云淑, 张一休, 孟华, 徐钟慧, 张培培, 吕珂. 胎儿心脏超声检查在抗SSA/Ro-SSB/La抗体阳性妊娠管理中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1056-1060.
[2] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[3] 赵红娟, 赵博文, 潘美, 纪园园, 彭晓慧, 陈冉. 应用多普勒超声定量分析正常中晚孕期胎儿左心室收缩舒张时间指数[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 951-958.
[4] 张璟璟, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 毛彦恺, 潘陈可, 朱玲艳, 朱琳琳, 蓝秋晔. 胎儿超声心动图测量McGoon指数在评价胎儿肺血管发育中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 860-865.
[5] 旺久, 陈军, 朱霞, 米玛央金, 赵胜, 陈欣林, 李建华, 王双. 山南市妇幼保健院开展胎儿系统超声筛查的效果分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 728-733.
[6] 徐鹏, 李军, 高巍伦, 王峥, 庞珅, 李春妮, 朱霆. 快速旋转扫查法在胎儿超声心动图检查中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 761-766.
[7] 谭芳, 杨娇娇, 沈玉琴, 李炎菲海, 王海蕊, 范思涵, 纪学芹. 胎儿心脏定量分析技术对正常胎儿心脏形态及收缩功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 598-604.
[8] 罗刚, 泮思林, 陈涛涛, 许茜, 纪志娴, 王思宝, 孙玲玉. 超声心动图在胎儿心脏介入治疗室间隔完整的肺动脉闭锁中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 605-609.
[9] 黄佳, 石华, 张玉国, 胡佳琪, 陈茜. 胎儿左头臂静脉正常与异常超声图像特征及其临床意义[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 610-617.
[10] 袁泽, 庄丽. 超声检测胎儿脐动脉和大脑中动脉血流对胎儿宫内窘迫的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 618-621.
[11] 刘镭, 杨昕, 许晓华, 林胜谋, 熊初琴, 农丽录, 董振宇, 李胜利. 中孕期胎儿鼻前皮肤厚度及鼻骨长度筛查胎儿染色体病的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(05): 506-510.
[12] 李博, 孔德璇, 彭芳华, 吴文瑛. 超声在胎儿肺静脉异位引流诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(04): 437-441.
[13] 薛超, 张烨, 赵映, 韩建成, 谷孝艳, 孙琳, 刘晓伟, 宋伟, 何怡华. 胎儿先天性肺动脉瓣缺如综合征的超声特征及预后分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 410-418.
[14] 刘磊, 王优, 黄锐斌, 张丽娜, 宋一丹, 雷婷缨. 染色体微阵列分析技术在股骨长度偏短胎儿遗传学诊断中的应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 437-445.
[15] 邹艳丽, 栾文杰, 王淑娟, 刘亚琴, 初桂芝, 李松洋, 王好玲, 张锦婷, 姜鑫, 栾泽东. 早孕期胎儿右位主动脉弓的产前超声诊断学特征[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 227-232.
阅读次数
全文


摘要