切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (02) : 235 -241. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2023.02.016

论著

2017—2022年成都市儿童流行性感冒流行特征及儿童早期预警评分对病情严重程度的预测
刘丽1, 贾小慧1, 刘艳1, 沈晓佳1, 周谦1,(), 张海洋2, 向丽佳3, 温晓滨1, 周元琳1, 许婉婷1, 杨磊3, 李磊1, 王林4, 唐义蓉5   
  1. 1成都市第二人民医院儿科,成都 610017
    2四川大学华西第二医院儿童重症医学科,成都 610041
    3成都市第二人民医院感染科,成都 610017
    4成都市青白江区人民医院儿科,成都 610399
    5成都市锦江区莲新社区卫生服务中心,成都 610065
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-22 修回日期:2023-03-21 出版日期:2023-04-01
  • 通信作者: 周谦

The epidemiological characteristics of pediatric influenza in Chengdu from 2017 to 2022 and the prediction of pediatric early warning score for severity of illness

Li Liu1, Xiaohui Jia1, Yan Liu1, Xiaojia Shen1, Qian Zhou1,(), Haiyang Zhang2, Lijia Xiang3, Xiaobin Wen1, Yuanlin Zhou1, Wanting Xu1, Lei Yang3, Lei Li1, Lin Wang4, Yirong Tang5   

  1. 1Department of Pediatrics, Chengdu Second People′s Hospital, Chengdu 610017, Sichuan Province, China
    2Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
    3Department of Infection, Chengdu Second People′s Hospital, Chengdu 610017, Sichuan Province, China
    4Department of Pediatrics, Chengdu Qingbaijiang District People′s Hospital, Chengdu 610399, Sichuan Province, China
    5Lianxin Community Health Center, Jinjiang District, Chengdu, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2022-11-22 Revised:2023-03-21 Published:2023-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Qian Zhou
  • Supported by:
    Technological Innovation R&D Project of Chengdu Science and Technology Bureau(2019-YF05-00140-SN); Medical Research Project of Chengdu Health Commission(2020113)
引用本文:

刘丽, 贾小慧, 刘艳, 沈晓佳, 周谦, 张海洋, 向丽佳, 温晓滨, 周元琳, 许婉婷, 杨磊, 李磊, 王林, 唐义蓉. 2017—2022年成都市儿童流行性感冒流行特征及儿童早期预警评分对病情严重程度的预测[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 235-241.

Li Liu, Xiaohui Jia, Yan Liu, Xiaojia Shen, Qian Zhou, Haiyang Zhang, Lijia Xiang, Xiaobin Wen, Yuanlin Zhou, Wanting Xu, Lei Yang, Lei Li, Lin Wang, Yirong Tang. The epidemiological characteristics of pediatric influenza in Chengdu from 2017 to 2022 and the prediction of pediatric early warning score for severity of illness[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(02): 235-241.

目的

探讨2017—2022年,成都市儿童流行性感冒(简称为流感)流行特征及儿童早期预警评分(PEWS)对患儿病情严重程度的预测。

方法

选择2017年1月至2022年9月,于成都市第二人民医院、四川大学华西第二医院、成都市青白江区人民医院及成都市锦江区莲新社区卫生服务中心4家医疗机构确诊的6 785例流感患儿为研究对象。采取回顾性分析法,按照病情轻重将其分别纳入轻症组(n=6 141,普通患儿),重症组(n=448,重症患儿)及危重症组(n=196,危重患儿)。采用χ2检验,对甲型与乙型流感患儿的重症+危重症发生率进行统计学比较;采用方差分析及Bonferroni法,对3组患儿PEWS进行总体及两两比较;通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,分析PEWS预测患儿发生流感重症及危重症的最佳临界值。本研究遵循的程序经成都市第二人民医院伦理委员会批准(审批文号:202212)。所有患儿监护人知情同意。

结果

①防治新型冠状病毒感染(COVID-19)疫情的非药物干预(NPIs)措施实施前(2017年1月至2019年12月),儿童冬、春季感染甲型流感病毒为主,多发生于婴儿期、幼儿期及学龄前期儿童,共计占比为75.7%(4 280/5 654),重症+危重症患儿占比为10.1%;NPIs实施后(2020年1月至2022年9月),儿童以感染乙型流感病毒为主,甲型、乙型流感病毒交替感染小流行,以学龄期+青春期儿童感染为主,共计占比为66.1%(748/1 131),重症+危重症患儿占比为6.3%。②本研究轻症组、重症组及危重症组患儿PEWS分别为(0.27±0.57)分、(2.44±0.64)分及(5.16±1.17)分,重症组及危重症组患儿PEWS分别高于轻症组,并且差异均有统计学意义(t=5.46、35.92,P<0.001、0.001)。③甲型流感患儿的重症+危重症发生率为9.9%(472/4 757),高于乙型流感患儿的8.5%(172/2 028),并且差异有统计学意义(χ2=19.88,P<0.001)。重症+危重症患儿中,甲型流感患儿的PEWS高于乙型流感患儿[(4.33±0.55)分vs (3.58±0.25)分,t=4.74、P<0.001];④PEWS预测流感患儿发生重症的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.916±0.041,最佳临界值为2.50分;PEWS预测流感重症患儿发生危重症的ROC-AUC为0.959±0.017,最佳临界值为5.21分。

结论

NPIs实施后,成都市儿童流感呈现低水平流行,甲、乙型流感病毒感染交替流行。PEWS可预测儿童流感病情严重程度。

Objective

To explore the epidemiological characteristics of pediatric influenza in Chengdu from 2017 to 2022 and the application of pediatric early warning score (PEWS) in prediction of the severity of illness in children.

Methods

From January 2017 to September 2022, a total of 6 785 pediatric influenza cases were selected from 4 medical institutions, including Chengdu Second People′s Hospital, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Qingbaijiang District People′s Hospital, and Lianxin Community Health Center, Jinjiang District, Chengdu. Took retrospective analysis method, according to the severity of illness, they were divided into three groups: mild group (n=6 141, ordinary cases), severe group (n=448, severe cases) and critical group (n=196, critical cases). The clinical data of children were analyzed retrospectively. Chi-square test was used to compare the incidence rate of severe and critical cases between influenza A and influenza B children. One-way ANOVA and Bonferroni method were used to overall and pairwise compare the PEWS among the three groups. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the optimal threshold score of PEWS in predicting the occurrence of severe and critical influenza in children. All procedures in this study were approved by the Ethics Committee of Chengdu Second People′s Hospital (Approval No. 202212). Informed consents were obtained from guardians of all children.

Results

① Before the implementation of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) for preventing and control the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (from Janurary 2017 to September 2019), children were mainly infected with influenza A virus in winter and spring. It mainly affected infants, toddlers, and preschoolers, the total proportion was 75.7% (4 280/5 654), the proportion of severe and critical cases was 10.1%. After implementation of NPIs (from January 2020 to September 2022), children were mainly infected with influenza B virus, and influenza A and B viruses were alternately infected with small epidemics. School-age and adolescents were primarily affected, with the total proportion of 66.1% (748/1 131), the proportion of severe and critical cases was 6.3%. ②The PEWS of children in mild group, severe group and critical group were (0.27±0.57) score, (2.44±0.64) score and (5.16±1.17) score, respectively, the PEWS of children in severe and critical group were higher than those of in mild group, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (t=5.46, 35.92; both with P<0.001). ③The incidence rate of severe and critical cases in influenza A children was 9.9% (472/4 757), which was higher than that in influenza B children (8.5%, 172/2 028), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=19.88, P<0.001). Among severe and critical cases, the PEWS of influenza A children was (4.33±0.55) score, which was higher than that of (3.58±0.25) score in influenza B children, and the difference was statistically significant (t=4.74, P<0.001). ④The area under the ROC curve (ROC-AUC) of PEWS predicting severe influenza in influenza children was 0.916±0.041, and the optimal threshold score was PEWS with 2.50 score; The ROC-AUC of PEWS predicting critical influenza in severe influenza children was 0.959±0.017, the optimal threshold score was PEWS with 5.21 score.

Conclusions

After the implementation of NPIs, the pediatric influenza in Chengdu showed a low level epidemic, with alternating of influenza A and B virus infection. The PEWS can be used to predict the severity of influenza in children.

图1 NPIs实施前、后,成都市流感儿童年龄分布柱状图(图1A:NPIs实施前;图1B:NPIs实施后)注:NPIs实施前是指2017年1月至2019年12月,NPIs实施后是指2020年1月至2022年9月。婴儿期为1个月龄至<1岁,幼儿期为1~<3岁,学龄前期为3~<6岁,学龄期为6~<13岁,青春期为13~<18岁。NPIs为非药物干预
图2 NPIs实施前、后,成都市儿童甲、乙型流感流行情况(图2A:NPIs实施前;图2B:NPIs实施后)注:NPIs实施前是指2017年1月至2019年12月,NPIs实施后是指2020年1月至2022年9月。NPIs为非药物干预
图3 PEWS预测流感患儿发生重症的ROC曲线注:PEWS为儿童早期预警评分。ROC为受试者工作特征
图4 PEWS预测流感重症患儿发生危重症的ROC曲线注:PEWS为儿童早期预警评分。ROC为受试者工作特征
[1]
Uyeki TM, Hui DS, Zambon M, et al. Influenza[J]. Lancet, 2022, 400(10353): 693-706. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00982-5.
[2]
Flerlage T, Boyd DF, Meliopoulos V, et al. Influenza virus and SARS-CoV-2: pathogenesis and host responses in the respiratory tract[J]. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2021, 19(7): 425-441. DOI: 10.1038/s41579-021-00542-7.
[3]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会,国家中医药管理局. 流行性感冒诊疗方案(2020年版)[J]. 中华临床感染病杂志2020, 13(6): 401-405, 411. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2397.2020.06.001.
[4]
中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 新型冠状病毒感染诊疗方案(试行第十版)[J]. 中国合理用药探索2023, 20(1): 1-11. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3327.2023.01.001.
[5]
闫温馨,朱正,吴昀效,等. 新冠疫情防控中NPIs与疫苗覆盖效果分析——基于澳大利亚、韩国、新加坡、以色列、印度5个国家生态比较研究[J]. 中国公共卫生2022, 38(5): 597-603. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws1138325.
[6]
Shafi OM, Diego Rondon JD, Gulati G. Can the pediatric early warning score (PEWS) predict hospital length of stay?[J]. Cureus, 2020, 12(11): e11339. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.11339.
[7]
周麟永,陈建丽,凌萍,等. 儿童早期预警评分对急诊收入重症监护室患儿病情判断的有效性[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志2019, 34(18): 1394-1397. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-428X.2019.18.009.
[8]
Maltezou HC, Theodoridou K, Poland G. Influenza immunization and COVID-19[J]. Vaccine, 2020, 38(39): 6078-6079. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.07.058.
[9]
Piri A, Kim HR, Park DH, et al. Increased survivability of coronavirus and H1N1 influenza virus under electrostatic aerosol-to-hydrosol sampling[J]. J Hazard Mater, 2021, 413: 125417. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125417.
[10]
中国国家流感中心. 中国流感流行情况概要(截至2020年9月13日)[EB/OL]. (2020-09-29)[2022-11-20].

URL    
[11]
Nagai M, Moriyama M, Ichinohe T. Oral bacteria combined with an intranasal vaccine protect from influenza A virus and SARS-CoV-2infection[J]. mBio, 2021, 12(4): e0159821. DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01598-21.
[12]
Hirose R, Ikegaya H, Naito Y, et al. Survival of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and influenza virus on human skin: importance of hand hygiene in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2021, 73(11): e4329-e4335. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1517.
[13]
崔娜娜,郭旭伟,侯小霞. 磷酸奥司他韦治疗儿童甲型、乙型流行性感冒临床疗效及对炎性因子水平的影响[J]. 包头医学2022, 46(1): 13-14. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3507.2022.01.007.
[14]
卢艳辉,刘振奎,李世阳,等. 儿童早期预警评分与急性呼吸窘迫综合征儿童机械通气并发症发生的巢式病例对照研究[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2019, 44(9): 996-1002. DOI: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2019.180372.
[15]
Shen KL, Yang YH, Wang TY, et al. Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of 2019 novel coronavirus infection in children: experts′ consensus statement[J]. World J Pediatr, 2020, 16(3): 223-231. DOI: 10.1007/s12519-020-00343-7.
[16]
Chotpitayasunondh T, Fischer TK, Heraud JM, et al. Influenza and COVID-19: what does co-existence mean?[J]. Influenza Other Respi Viruses, 2021, 15(3): 407-412. DOI: 10.1111/irv.12824.
[17]
Musher DM. Bacterialcoinfection in COVID-19 and influenza pneumonia[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2021, 204(5): 498-500. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202106-1467ED.
[18]
Conlon A, Ashur C, Washer L, et al. Impact of the influenza vaccine on COVID-19 infection rates and severity[J]. Am J Infect Control, 2021, 49(6): 694-700. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.02.012.
[1] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[2] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[3] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[4] 刘婷婷, 林妍冰, 汪珊, 陈幕荣, 唐子鉴, 代东伶, 夏焙. 超声衰减参数成像评价儿童代谢相关脂肪性肝病的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[5] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[6] 米洁, 陈晨, 李佳玲, 裴海娜, 张恒博, 李飞, 李东杰. 儿童头面部外伤特点分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 511-515.
[7] 李维, 莫俊俏. 儿童呼吸道耐药流感嗜血杆菌基因型鉴定及耐药分析对抗菌药物治疗选择的意义[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 315-323.
[8] 邬文莉, 万约翰, 高梓君, 黎凡. 外科手术联合口服西罗莫司治疗儿童口腔颌面部淋巴管畸形[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 345-352.
[9] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[10] 李芳, 许瑞, 李洋洋, 石秀全. 循证医学理念在儿童腹股沟疝患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 782-786.
[11] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[12] 卓少宏, 林秀玲, 周翠梅, 熊卫莲, 马兴灶. CD64指数、SAA/CRP、PCT联合检测在小儿消化道感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[13] 刘笑笑, 张小杉, 刘群, 马岚, 段莎莎, 施依璐, 张敏洁, 王雅晳. 中国学龄前儿童先天性心脏病流行病学研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1021-1024.
[14] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
[15] 余林阳, 王美英, 李建斌, 楼骁斌, 谢思远, 马志忠, 齐海英, 李稼. 高原地区肺炎合并右心功能衰竭体征患儿的肺动脉压力和心脏形态与功能的特征[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 535-544.
阅读次数
全文


摘要