切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (05) : 569 -576. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2022.05.011

论著

女性泌尿生殖道支原体感染及其耐药率分析
高坎坎, 钟华敏, 谢永强, 邓秋连, 高飞, 王洁琳, 龙燕()   
  1. 广州医科大学附属广州市妇女儿童医疗中心检验科,广州 510630
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-21 修回日期:2022-08-18 出版日期:2022-10-01
  • 通信作者: 龙燕

Female genitourinary tract Mycoplasma infection and its resistance rate

Kankan Gao, Huamin Zhong, Yongqiang Xie, Qiulian Deng, Fei Gao, Jielin Wang, Yan Long()   

  1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Guangzhou Women and Children′s Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2022-04-21 Revised:2022-08-18 Published:2022-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Yan Long
  • Supported by:
    Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province(2018A0303130314)
引用本文:

高坎坎, 钟华敏, 谢永强, 邓秋连, 高飞, 王洁琳, 龙燕. 女性泌尿生殖道支原体感染及其耐药率分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(05): 569-576.

Kankan Gao, Huamin Zhong, Yongqiang Xie, Qiulian Deng, Fei Gao, Jielin Wang, Yan Long. Female genitourinary tract Mycoplasma infection and its resistance rate[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(05): 569-576.

目的

探讨女性泌尿生殖道支原体感染(GTMI)的临床特点与采集泌尿生殖道分泌物标本的抗菌药物耐药率。

方法

选择2014年8月至2020年12月,于广州医科大学附属广州市妇女儿童医疗中心进行泌尿生殖道解脲脲原体(UU)和人型支原体(MH)培养的30 952例疑似GTMI女性为研究对象。采用回顾性研究方法,根据疑似GTMI女性年龄,将其分为3组,适龄组(n=22 863,年龄≥20~35岁),高龄组(n=7 786,年龄≥35~60岁)与老龄组(n=303,年龄≥60岁)。采集疑似GTMI女性宫颈拭子分泌物标本,采用液体培养法进行UU和MH及其对抗菌药物耐药率检测。采用χ2检验与线性趋势χ2检验,对3组疑似GTMI女性的GTMI发生率、2014—2020年GTMI发生率逐年变化趋势及单纯UU与UU+MH患者宫颈拭子分泌物标本对抗菌药物耐药率,以及耐药率逐年变化趋势进行统计学比较。本研究遵循的程序符合2013年新修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》要求。

结果

①本研究30 952例疑似GTMI女性中,GTMI总体发生率为39.2%(12 130/30 952,95%CI: 38.7%~39.7%)。2014—2020年,疑似GTMI女性GTMI发生率总体变化呈逐年上升趋势(χ2=191.19,P<0.001)。②12 130例GTMI患者中,单纯UU患者占比为82.1%(9 956/12 130),显著高于UU+MH患者(15.9%,1 934/12 130),并且差异有统计学意义(χ2=10 614.62,P<0.001);单纯UU、UU+MH患者占比,均显著高于单纯MH患者(2.0%,240/12 130),并且差异亦均有统计学意义(χ2=15 970.82、1 449.91,P<0.001)。2014-2020年,单纯UU患者和单纯MH患者占比均呈逐年下降趋势(χ2=124.29、17.46,P<0.001),而UU+MH患者占比,则呈逐年上升趋势(χ2=176.09,P<0.001)。③适龄组疑似GTMI女性的GTMI发生率为41.6%(9 505/22 863),显著高于高龄组的32.3%(2 516/7 786)和老龄组的36.0%(109/303),并且差异均有统计学意义(χ2=208.51、3.86,P<0.001、=0.049)。2014—2020年,适龄组和高龄组疑似GTMI女性的GTMI发生率均呈逐年上升趋势(χ2=134.00、84.50,P<0.001)。④UU+MH患者宫颈拭子分泌物标本对多西环素、盐酸米诺环素、环丙沙星、氧氟沙星、司帕沙星、罗红霉素、阿奇霉素、克拉霉素、交沙霉素及大观霉素的耐药率,均显著高于单纯UU者,并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。单纯UU和UU+MH患者宫颈拭子分泌物标本对多西环素、盐酸米诺环素和交沙霉素耐药率均较低,分别为2.8%(280/9 956)与12.5%(241/1 934),6.8%(682/9 956)与16.4%(317/1 934),1.1%(113/9 956)与14.4%(278/1 934)。2014—2020年,单纯UU与UU+MH患者宫颈拭子分泌物标本对大观霉素耐药率,均呈逐年上升趋势(χ2=184.89、56.19,P<0.001)。

结论

2014—2020年,本研究疑似GTMI女性中,适龄女性的GTMI发生率明显呈逐年上升趋势,对多种抗菌药物耐药率较高。

Objective

To explore clinical characteristics of genitourinary tract Mycoplasma infection (GTMI) in female and its resistance rate of antimicrobial resistance rate of collected cervical swab specimens.

Methods

A total of 30 952 females with suspected GTMI who underwent urogenital Ureaplasma urealyticum (UU) and Mycoplasma hominis (MH) culture in Guangzhou Women and Children′s Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University were selected as research subjects. They were divided into 3 groups according to the age: childbearing-age group (n=22 863, ≥20-35 years), senior-age group (n=7 786, ≥35-60 years), and elder group (n=303, ≥60 years) by retrospective study method. Cervical swab specimens were collected for detection of UU and MH infection and its drug resistance by broth method. Incidence of GTMI among 3 groups, change trend of incidence of GTMI from 2014 to 2020, and antimicrobial resistance rate of collected cervical swab specimens in patients with UU infection and UU+ MH combined infection and their change trend from 2014 to 2020 were compared by chi-square test and linear trend chi-square test. This study was conducted in accordance with the requirements of Helsinki Declaration of the World Medical Association revised in 2013.

Results

①Among the 30 952 suspected GTMI females, incidence of GTMI was 39.2% (12 130/30 952, 95%CI: 38.7%-39.7%), and the incidence shown an overall upward trend from 2014 to 2020 (χ2=191.19, P<0.001). ②Among 12 130 cases of GTMI patients, the proportion of UU patients was 82.1% (9 956/12 130), which was significantly higher than the proportion of UU+ MH patients 15.9% (1 934/12 130), and the difference was significantly different (χ2=10 614.62, P<0.001). Proportions of UU patients and UU+ MH patients both were significantly higher than the proportion of MH patients 2.0% (240/12 130), and both differences were significantly different (χ2=15 970.82, 1 449.91; P<0.001). Proportions of UU patients and MH patients both showed a downward trend from 2014 to 2020 (χ2=124.29, 17.46; P<0.001), while proportion of UU+ MH patients showed an upward trend from 2014 to 2020 (χ2=176.09, P<0.001). ③Incidence of GTMI in childbearing-age group was 41.6% (9 505/22 863), which was significantly higher than that of senior-age group 32.3% (2 516/7 786) and elder group 36.0% (109/303), and both differences were statistically significant (χ2=208.51, 3.86; P<0.001, =0.049), and incidence of GTMI in childbearing-age group and senior-age group both showed upward trends from 2014 to 2020 (χ2=134.00, 84.50; P<0.001). ④Resistance rates of cervical swab specimens in UU+ MH patients to doxycycline, minocycline hydrochloride, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, sparfloxacin, roxithromycin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, josamycin, and spectinomycin, all were significantly higher than those of UU patients (P<0.001). Resistance rates of cervical swab specimens in UU patients and UU+ MH patients to doxycycline, minocycline, and josamycin were relatively low, which were 2.8% (280/9 956) and 12.5% (241/1 934), 6.8% (682/9 956) and 16.4% (317/1 934), and 1.1% (113/9 956) and 14.4% (278/1 934), respectively. Resistance rates of cervical swab specimens in UU patients and UU+ MH patients to spectinomycin both showed upward trends from 2014 to 2020 (χ2=184.89, 56.19; P<0.001).

Conclusions

From 2014 to 2020, incidence of GTMI in suspected GTMI female of childbearing age of this study shows a significant upward trend, and the resistance to multiple antibiotics is relatively severe.

图1 2014—2020年,本研究30 952例疑似GTMI女性的GTMI发生率变化趋势注:GTMI为泌尿生殖道支原体感染
图2 2014—2020年,各年被诊断为GTMI患者中的单纯UU、MH及UU+MH患者占比比较注:GTMI为泌尿生殖道支原体感染。MH为人型支原体,UU为解脲脲原体
图3 2014—2020年,3组疑似GTMI女性GTMI发生率变化趋势比较注:GTMI为泌尿生殖道支原体感染
表1 被本研究诊断为单纯UU患者与UU+MH患者宫颈分泌物标本对10种抗菌药物的耐药率比较[例数(%)]
图4 2014—2020年,被本研究诊断为单纯UU与UU+MH患者宫颈分泌物标本的抗菌药物耐药率变化趋势图注:UU为解脲脲原体,MH为人型支原体
[1]
宣岩,魏兰馨,洪翔,等. 我国不同人群泌尿生殖道支原体感染率的Meta分析[J]. 中华流行病学杂志2021, 42(2): 335-342. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20200530-00791.
[2]
王宏波,王宇鹏,李皇庆,等. 长沙地区1 409例泌尿生殖道支原体感染者的感染状况及药敏分析[J]. 中国微生态学杂志2020, 32(2): 172-175, 179. DOI: 10.13381/j.cnki.cjm.202002010.
[3]
王达. 2 100例女性泌尿生殖道感染的病原学检测及耐药性分析[J]. 吉林医学2020, 41(1): 186-187. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-0412.2020.01.084.
[4]
姚晓燕,唐爽,陈欣,等. 生殖道支原体和衣原体感染与妇女不孕及性功能障碍的关系[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志2020, 30(5): 738-741. DOI: 10.11816/cn.ni.2020-190911.
[5]
程玲,颜晓红,李友筑,等. 不孕患者生殖道支原体感染及药敏结果分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健2020, 35(8): 1490-1492. DOI: 10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2020.08.041.
[6]
董晓娟,何婵凤,王妍,等. 孕妇生殖道沙眼衣原体与解脲脲支原体感染对胚胎停育的影响分析[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志2016, 26(8): 1868-1870. DOI: 10.11816/cn.ni.2016-153077.
[7]
谢幸,苟文丽. 妇产科学[M]. 8版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2013: 64-100.
[8]
张岱,刘朝晖. 生殖道支原体感染诊治专家共识[J]. 中国性科学2016, 25(3): 80-82. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1993.2016.03.026.
[9]
Peretz A, Tameri O, Azrad M, et al. Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma carriage in pregnant women: the prevalence of transmission from mother to newborn[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2020, 20(1): 456. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-03147-9.
[10]
Ansari NS, Asztalos E, Rolnitsky A. Mycoplasma hominis meningitis in an extremely preterm newborn: a case report[J]. BMC Pediatr, 2021, 21(1): 69. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-021-02532-3.
[11]
高亮. 我院2012—2017年女性泌尿生殖道分离支原体的药敏分析[J]. 锦州医科大学学报2020, 41(2): 86-89. DOI: 10.13847/j.cnki.lnmu.2020.02.023.
[12]
Jang YS, Min JW, Kim YS. Positive culture rate and antimicrobial susceptibilities of Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum[J]. Obstet Gynecol Sci, 2019, 62(2): 127-133. DOI: 10.5468/ogs.2019.62.2.127.
[13]
Doroftei B, Ilie OD, Armeanu T, et al. The prevalence of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis infections in infertile patients in the northeast region of Romania[J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2021, 57(3): 211. DOI: 10.3390/medicina57030211.
[14]
Soni S, Horner P, Rayment M, et al. British Association for Sexual Health and HIV national guideline for the management of infection with Mycoplasma genitalium (2018)[J]. Int J STD AIDS, 2019, 30(10): 938-950. DOI: 10.1177/0956462419825948.
[15]
Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, et al. Sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines, 2021[J]. MMWR Recomm Rep, 2021, 70(4): 1-187. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7004a1.
[16]
Jensen JS, Cusini M, Gomberg M, et al. 2021 European guideline on the management of Mycoplasma genitalium infections[J]. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2022, 36(5): 641-650. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.17972.
[17]
卢丽君,张苗苗,王翔. 台州地区皮肤性病门诊患者生殖道支原体感染情况及不同治疗方案有效性评估[J]. 中国艾滋病性病2020, 26(6): 642-644. DOI: 10.13419/j.cnki.aids.2020.06.20.
[18]
杨时瀚,罗育豪,蔡锦楠,等. 广东潮汕地区3 785例泌尿生殖道感染患者支原体分布及药敏分析[J]. 临床皮肤科杂志2019, 48(11): 659-661. DOI: 10.16761/j.cnki.1000-4963.2019.11.003.
[19]
王毅超,谢姣贵,吴波,等. 环介导等温扩增技术对解脲脲原体的临床检测[J]. 中国微生态学杂志2020, 32(1): 83-86. DOI: 10.13381/j.cnki.cjm.202001019.
[20]
Morris DJ, Jones LC, Davies RL, et al. MYCO WELL D-ONE detection of Ureaplasma spp. and Mycoplasma hominis in sexual health patients in Wales[J]. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2020, 39(12): 2427-2440. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-020-03993-7.
[21]
石小玉,董学. 女性泌尿生殖道支原体感染及药物敏感分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2013, 9(2): 227-229. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2013.02.026.
[22]
殷玉华,吕朝阳. 女性泌尿生殖道支原体感染分布情况及耐药性分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2013, 9(1): 101-102. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2013.01.026.
[23]
杜强,洪锴,潘伯臣. 两种检测男性生殖道沙眼衣原体和解脲支原体方法的对比[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 785-788. DOI: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.04.027.
[24]
尹小毛,唐慧芬,王治伟. LAMP检测三种常见泌尿生殖道支原体的应用评价[J]. 热带医学杂志2021, 21(7): 857-859. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3619.2021.07.011.
[25]
赵立红,赵书平,聂升刚,等. 507例男性生殖道感染病原体分布及耐药特征[J]. 山东大学学报(医学版), 2021, 59(1): 55-58. DOI: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-7554.0.2020.1128.
[1] 王雪菲, 海琳悦, 李立方, 肖春花. Luminal A型乳腺癌的内分泌治疗与化疗[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 294-300.
[2] 马敏榕, 李聪, 周勤. 宫颈癌治疗研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 497-504.
[3] 林昌盛, 战军, 肖雪. 上皮性卵巢癌患者诊疗中基因检测及分子靶向药物治疗[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 505-510.
[4] 顾娟, 孙擎擎, 胡方方, 曹义娟, 祁玉娟. 子宫内膜容受性检测改善胚胎反复种植失败患者妊娠结局的临床应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[5] 周东杰, 蒋敏, 范海瑞, 高玲玲, 孔祥, 卢丹, 王丽萍. 非编码RNA在卵泡发育成熟中作用及其机制的研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 387-393.
[6] 陈荟竹, 郭应坤, 汪昕蓉, 宁刚, 陈锡建. 上皮性卵巢癌"二元论模型"的分子生物学研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 394-402.
[7] 韩春颖, 王婷婷, 李艳艳, 朴金霞. 子宫内膜癌患者淋巴管间隙浸润预测因素研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 403-409.
[8] 涂家金, 廖武强, 刘金晶, 涂志鹏, 毛远桂. 严重烧伤患者鲍曼不动杆菌血流感染的危险因素及预后分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 491-497.
[9] 李维, 莫俊俏. 儿童呼吸道耐药流感嗜血杆菌基因型鉴定及耐药分析对抗菌药物治疗选择的意义[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 315-323.
[10] 张小曼, 马筱秋, 许正锯, 张纯瑜, 何彩婷. 乙型肝炎病毒逆转录酶区耐药突变对血清乙型肝炎病毒表面抗原水平的影响[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 324-332.
[11] 曹长青, 郭新艳, 高源, 张存, 唐海利, 樊东, 杨小军, 张松, 赵华栋. 肿瘤微环境参与介导HER2阳性乳腺癌曲妥珠单抗耐药的研究进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 90-95.
[12] 刘付有欢, 吴秀芹, 邓翠婷, 苏青. 基于模型的西妥昔单抗治疗胃癌细胞系的反应和耐药因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 385-388.
[13] 王晓丹, 王媛, 崔向宇, 任晓磊. 上尿路结石内镜手术后尿源性脓毒血症病原菌耐药及死亡高危因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 611-615.
[14] 李静静, 翟蕾, 赵海平, 郑波. 多囊肾合并囊肿的多重耐药菌感染一例并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 920-923.
[15] 李琪, 黄钟莹, 袁平, 关振鹏. 基于某三级医院的ICU多重耐药菌医院感染影响因素的分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 777-782.
阅读次数
全文


摘要