切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (02) : 240 -244. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2022.02.017

综述

采用不同种类缝线进行宫颈环扎术治疗宫颈功能不全育龄女性疗效研究进展
徐崇彬, 李映桃(), 周梦阳, 陈佳, 肖晓梅, 温景锋   
  1. 广州医科大学附属第三医院产科、广东省产科重大疾病重点实验室 510150
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-11 修回日期:2022-01-20 出版日期:2022-04-01
  • 通信作者: 李映桃

Research progress of curative effects on cervical cerclage with different types of sutures for treatment of women of reproductive age with cervical incompetence

Chongbin Xu, Yingtao Li(), Mengyang Zhou, Jia Chen, Xiaomei Xiao, Jingfeng Wen   

  1. Department of Obstetrics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, Guangzhou 510150, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2021-01-11 Revised:2022-01-20 Published:2022-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Yingtao Li
  • Supported by:
    Guangdong Province Health Appropriate Technology Promotion Project(201701150823205861); Guangzhou University Innovation and Entrepreneurship (Employment) Education Project(2020PT105)
引用本文:

徐崇彬, 李映桃, 周梦阳, 陈佳, 肖晓梅, 温景锋. 采用不同种类缝线进行宫颈环扎术治疗宫颈功能不全育龄女性疗效研究进展[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(02): 240-244.

Chongbin Xu, Yingtao Li, Mengyang Zhou, Jia Chen, Xiaomei Xiao, Jingfeng Wen. Research progress of curative effects on cervical cerclage with different types of sutures for treatment of women of reproductive age with cervical incompetence[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2022, 18(02): 240-244.

宫颈功能不全(CI)是导致育龄女性反复中孕期流产及早产的重要原因,宫颈环扎术(CC)是目前治疗育龄女性CI的唯一有效方法。目前,国内外评价不同种类缝线对CC治疗育龄女性CI疗效影响的研究尚少,而且研究结论尚未达成共识。笔者拟对国内外CC治疗育龄女性CI时所采用的不同种类缝线特点、CC疗效评价及对妊娠结局影响等的最新研究进展进行综述,旨在为临床医师对CI育龄女性进行CC选择合适缝线提供参考。

Cervical incompetence (CI) is an important cause of repeated second trimester miscarriage and premature birth in women of reproductive age. Cervical cerclage (CC) is an unique and effective method for treatment of women of reproductive age with CI. At present, there are not enough literature at home and abroad evaluating curative effect of CC with different types of sutures for treatment of women of reproductive age with CI, and there is no consensus on research conclusions. The latest research progress of the characteristics of different types of sutures in CC for treatment of women of reproductive age with CI, the evaluation of curative effects of CC and its impact on pregnancy outcomes are reviewed, in order to provide a reference for clinicians to choose suitable sutures in CC for treatment of women of reproductive age with CI.

表1 宫颈环扎术常用缝线成分及其特点比较
[1]
Shennan AH, Story L, Royal College of Obstetricians, et al. Cervical cerclage: green-top guideline No. 75 Febuary 2022: green-top guideline No. 75[J]. BJOG, 2022, 10.1111/1471-0528.17003. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17003.
[2]
Brown R, Gagnon R, Delisle MF. No. 373-cervical insufficiency and cervical cerclage[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2019, 41(2): 233-247. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.08.009.
[3]
Park JY, Oh KJ, Lee S, et al. A new quantification system for assessing the degree of acute cervical insufficiency based on physical and sonographic examination[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2021, 256: 372-378. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.11.039.
[4]
夏恩兰. 《ACOG宫颈环扎术治疗宫颈机能不全指南》解读[J]. 国际妇产科学杂志2016, 43(6): 652-656. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1870.2016.06.014.
[5]
Krispin E, Danieli-Gruber S, Hadar E, et al. Primary, secondary, and tertiary preventions of preterm birth with cervical cerclage[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2019, 300(2): 305-312. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05184-y.
[6]
Byrne M, Aly A. The surgical suture[J]. Aesthet Surg J, 2019, 39(Suppl_2): S67-S72. DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjz036.
[7]
Melvin AJ, Litsky AS, Juncosa-Melvin N. FiberSecure suture compared to braided polyester suture[J]. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2017, 105(5): 1126-1130. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33657.
[8]
Şükür YE, Sarıdoǧan E. Tips and tricks for laparoscopic interval transabdominal cervical cerclage; a simplified technique[J]. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc, 2019, 20(4): 272-274. DOI: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2019.2019.0028.
[9]
Novy MJ. Transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage for the management of repetitive abortion and premature delivery[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1982, 143(1): 44-54. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(82)90682-2.
[10]
陈佳,李映桃,钟彩娟,等. 双胎妊娠紧急宫颈环扎术一例并文献复习[J]. 国际妇产科学杂志2020, 47(4): 408-412,后插1. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1870.2020.04.011.
[11]
Arce J, Palacios A, Alvítez-Temoche D, et al. Tensile strength of novel nonabsorbable PTFE (Teflon®) versus other suture materials: an in vitro study[J]. Int J Dent, 2019, 2019: 7419708. DOI: 10.1155/2019/7419708.
[12]
Jo YY, Kweon H, Kim DW, et al. Accelerated biodegradation of silk sutures through matrix metalloproteinase activation by incorporating 4-hexylresorcinol[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 42441. DOI: 10.1038/srep42441.
[13]
Uchide K, Ueno H, Sumitani H, et al. Modifications to the modified Shirodkar operation[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2000, 17(8): 437-439. DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-13451.
[14]
Mahran M. Transabdominal cervical cerclage during pregnancy. A modified technique[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1978, 52(4): 502-506.
[15]
Caspi E, Schneider DF, Mor Z, et al. Cervical internal os cerclage: description of a new technique and comparison with Shirodkar operation[J]. Am J Perinatol, 1990, 7(4): 347-349. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-999520.
[16]
Kim M, Ishioka S, Endo T, et al. Importance of uterine cervical cerclage to maintain a successful pregnancy for patients who undergo vaginal radical trachelectomy[J]. Int J Clin Oncol, 2014, 19(5): 906-911. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-013-0631-9.
[17]
Ishioka S, Endo T, Baba T, et al. Successful delivery after transabdominal cerclage of uterine cervix for cervical incompetence after radical trachelectomy[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2015, 41(8): 1295-1299. DOI: 10.1111/jog.12716.
[18]
李改赢,郭一俨,崔倩,等. 皮肤外科常用缝线的分类及其特点[J]. 中国皮肤性病学杂志2018, 32(11): 1331-1335. DOI: 10.13735/j.cjdv.1001-7089.201710065.
[19]
Yorifuji T, Makino S, Yamamoto Y, et al. Effectiveness of delayed absorbable monofilament suture in emergency cerclage[J]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 53(3): 382-384. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2014.04.023.
[20]
Yag-Howard C. Sutures, needles, and tissue adhesives: a review for dermatologic surgery[J]. Dermatol Surg, 2014, 40 (Suppl 9): S3-S15. DOI: 10.1097/01.DSS.0000452738.23278.2d.
[21]
Regula CG, Yag-Howard C. Suture products and techniques: what to use, where, and why[J]. Dermatol Surg, 2015, 41 (Suppl 10): S187-S200. DOI: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000492.
[22]
Gupta D, Sharma U, Chauhan S, et al. Improved outcomes of scar revision with the use of polydioxanone suture in comparison to polyglactin 910: a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2018, 71(8): 1159-1163. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.03.021.
[23]
赵玉沛,张太平. 普通外科缝合技术的基本原则与缝合材料规范化使用[J]. 中国实用外科杂志2019, 39(1): 3-5. DOI: 10.19538/j.cjps.issn1005-2208.2019.01.02.
[24]
Israfil-Bayli F, Toozs-Hobson P, Lees C, et al. Cervical cerclage and type of suture material: a survey of UK consultants′ practice[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2014, 27(15): 1584-1588. DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2013.870551.
[25]
Sato Y, Hidaka N, Nakano T, et al. Efficacy of an emergency cervical cerclage using absorbable monofilament sutures[J]. J Pregnancy, 2018, 2018: 4049792. DOI: 10.1155/2018/4049792.
[26]
Egbunah UP, Adamson O, Fashina A, et al. Comparing the treatment outcomes of absorbable sutures, nonabsorbable sutures, and tissue adhesives in cleft lip repair: a systematic review[J]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 2022, 59(1): 110-120. DOI: 10.1177/1055665621996107.
[27]
Giraldo-Isaza MA, Fried GP, Hegarty SE, et al. Comparison of 2 stitches vs 1 stitch for transvaginal cervical cerclage for preterm birth prevention[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 208(3): 209. e1-e209. e2099. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.11.039.
[28]
Zhao B, Dong T, Chen Y, et al. Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage during pregnancy: a simplified approach[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2022, S0002-9378(22)00209-5[Online ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.03.038.
[29]
Nemescu D, Tanasa IA, Bohiltea RE, et al. Anatomical and functional changes in arteries of uterine circulation after modified laparoscopic transabdominal cerclage in pregnancy: a case report and review of the literature[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2020, 20(3): 2465-2469. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2020.8807.
[30]
Kindinger LM, Kyrgiou M, MacIntyre DA, et al. Preterm birth prevention post-conization: a model of cervical length screening with targeted cerclage[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(11): e0163793. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163793.
[31]
Battarbee AN, Pfister A, Manuck TA. Suture thickness and transvaginal cervical cerclage outcomes[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM, 2019, 1(4): 100056. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2019.100056.
[32]
Abdelhak YE, Sheen JJ, Kuczynski E, et al. Comparison of delayed absorbable suture v nonabsorbable suture for treatment of incompetent cervix[J]. J Perinat Med, 1999, 27(4): 250-252. DOI: 10.1515/JPM.1999.035.
[33]
李美艳,韩新彦,呼君瑜,等. 普迪思线用于宫颈环扎术15例报道[J]. 海南医学2013, 24(9): 1357-1358. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2013.09.0570.
[34]
Bassaw B, Roopnarinesingh S. The efficacy of cervical cerclage[J]. West Indian Med J, 1990, 39(1): 39-42.
[35]
Kindinger LM, MacIntyre DA, Lee YS, et al. Relationship between vaginal microbial dysbiosis, inflammation, and pregnancy outcomes in cervical cerclage[J]. Sci Transl Med, 2016, 8(350): 350ra102. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aag1026.
[1] 陈志超, 张志伟, 蒋勰, 顾祖超, 蒋菁芸, 许婷婷. 带线锚钉结合缝线捆扎固定髌骨下极粉碎性骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 732-735.
[2] 马敏榕, 李聪, 周勤. 宫颈癌治疗研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 497-504.
[3] 林昌盛, 战军, 肖雪. 上皮性卵巢癌患者诊疗中基因检测及分子靶向药物治疗[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 505-510.
[4] 杨皓媛, 龚杰, 邹青伟, 阮航. 哮喘孕妇的母婴不良妊娠结局研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[5] 陈甜甜, 王晓东, 余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[6] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[7] 顾娟, 孙擎擎, 胡方方, 曹义娟, 祁玉娟. 子宫内膜容受性检测改善胚胎反复种植失败患者妊娠结局的临床应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[8] 王蓓蓓, 董启秀, 郗红燕, 于庆云, 张丽君, 式光. 早孕期孕妇药物流产失败的影响因素分析与构建相关预测模型及其对药物流产成功的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[9] 陈絮, 詹玉茹, 王纯华. 孕妇ABO血型联合甲状腺功能检测对预测妊娠期糖尿病的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[10] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[11] 胡诤贇, 史建伟, 申建伟, 王冰, 蒋春苗, 刘冲. 基于机器学习鉴定早产儿支气管肺发育不良的关键基因[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 446-454.
[12] 冉晨曦, 沈如飞, 廖明钰, 廖倩, 周玲, 张玉玲, 隆敏. 垂体瘤孕妇的诊治与围分娩期管理[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 487-491.
[13] 杨聚荣. 透析患者妊娠的管理[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 300-300.
[14] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[15] 邹艳丽, 栾文杰, 王淑娟, 刘亚琴, 初桂芝, 李松洋, 王好玲, 张锦婷, 姜鑫, 栾泽东. 早孕期胎儿右位主动脉弓的产前超声诊断学特征[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 227-232.
阅读次数
全文


摘要