切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (03) : 339 -346. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2021.03.016

论著

一次性球囊宫颈扩张器在单纯性临界羊水过少与单纯性羊水过少足月妊娠产妇引产中的临床应用
曹佳晨1,1, 孔祥1,2,,1,2(), 葛凡1,1, 鞠捷1,1, 徐金金1,1, 陆杨1,1, 冯翀1,1   
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-09 修回日期:2021-04-27 出版日期:2021-06-01
  • 通信作者: 孔祥

Clinical application of one-off single balloon cervical dilator used for labor induction in full-term parturients with isolated borderline oligohydramnios and isolated oligohydramnios

Jiachen Cao1,1, Xiang Kong1,2,1,2,(), Fan Ge1,1, Jie Ju1,1, Jinjin Xu1,1, Yang Lu1,1, Chong Feng1,1   

  • Received:2020-06-09 Revised:2021-04-27 Published:2021-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiang Kong
  • Supported by:
    Maternal and Child Health Research Project of Jiangsu Province(F201809); Practical Innovation Program for Graduate Students of Yangzhou University, Jiangsu Province(XSJCX19-111)
引用本文:

曹佳晨, 孔祥, 葛凡, 鞠捷, 徐金金, 陆杨, 冯翀. 一次性球囊宫颈扩张器在单纯性临界羊水过少与单纯性羊水过少足月妊娠产妇引产中的临床应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(03): 339-346.

Jiachen Cao, Xiang Kong, Fan Ge, Jie Ju, Jinjin Xu, Yang Lu, Chong Feng. Clinical application of one-off single balloon cervical dilator used for labor induction in full-term parturients with isolated borderline oligohydramnios and isolated oligohydramnios[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2021, 17(03): 339-346.

目的

探讨一次性球囊宫颈扩张器(以下简称为球囊)对单纯性临界羊水过少(IBO)与单纯性羊水过少(IO)足月妊娠产妇的引产效果及其妊娠结局。

方法

选择2018年6月至2020年6月,于江苏省苏北人民医院采取球囊引产的346例足月妊娠产妇为研究对象。根据晚孕期羊水指数(AFI)值,将其分为IBO组(n=135,5 cm<AFI值≤8 cm),IO组(n=38,AFI值≤5 cm)与对照组(n=173,AFI值正常)。观察3组产妇放置球囊时孕龄,放置前、后宫颈Bishop评分,促宫颈成熟有效率,阴道分娩率、中转急诊剖宫产术分娩率,第一产程时长,不良妊娠结局(羊水胎粪污染、产后发热、产后出血)与球囊相关并发症发生情况及新生儿结局等,并采用单因素方差分析、Kruskal-Wallis H检验、χ2检验对3组受试者的上述指标进行总体比较,进一步两两比较,采用最小显著性差异(LSD)-t检验或Bonferroni法调整检验水准(α′=0.05/3=0.017)。3组产妇的年龄、孕次、人体质量指数(BMI)等一般临床资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。本研究遵循的程序符合2013年新修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》要求。

结果

①IBO组、IO组、对照组产妇使用球囊引产后,宫颈Bishop评分分别为(7.7±1.6)分、(8.1±1.5)分与(8.0±1.5)分,均较引产前的(3.1±0.5)分、(3.1±0.7)分与(3.2±0.6)分显著增加,并且差异均有统计学意义(t=-31.883、-19.546、-37.544,P<0.001)。3组产妇放置球囊前、后宫颈Bishop评分,以及促宫颈成熟总有效率分别总体比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。②IBO组、IO组、对照组产妇放置球囊时孕龄分别为39.7孕周(39.3~40.1孕周)、38.9孕周(37.8~39.7孕周)与40.4孕周(40.3~40.6孕周),3组总体比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=157.093,P<0.001),进一步两两比较结果显示,IBO组、IO组产妇放置球囊时孕龄均显著低于对照组,IBO组显著低于IO组,并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001、<0.001、=0.006)。3组产妇分娩方式构成比比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.565,P=0.038),进一步两两比较结果显示,IO组中转急诊剖宫产术分娩率显著高于对照组,并且差异有统计学意义(28.9% vs 12.7%,χ2=6.221,P=0.013)。3组因发现胎心异常行急诊剖宫产术产妇所占比例比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.649,P=0.022),进一步两两比较结果显示,IO组显著高于对照组,并且差异有统计学意义(72.7% vs 22.7%,P=0.003)。③3组产妇羊水胎粪污染发生率总体比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=11.368,P=0.003),进一步两两比较结果显示,IO组显著高于IBO组与对照组,并且差异均有统计学意义(23.7% vs 7.4%、6.9%,P=0.008、0.005)。3组产妇产后发热发生率总体比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.109,P=0.015),进一步两两比较结果显示,IO组显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P=0.010)。3组产妇第一产程时长、球囊相关并发症发生率分别总体比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。④3组产妇分娩新生儿的出生体重总体比较,差异有统计学意义(F=7.677,P=0.001),进一步两两比较结果显示,IO组新生儿出生体重显著低于IBO组、对照组,并且差异均有统计学意义[(3 186.8±278.2) g vs(3 353.6±335.1) g、(3 405.3±301.1) g,P=0.004、<0.001]。3组新生儿生后1 min Apgar评分、转入新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)所占比例分别总体比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

晚孕期IBO与IO可造成医源性早产,对该类足月妊娠产妇使用球囊引产,促进宫颈成熟效果明显,不增加相关并发症发生率及影响第一产程。

Objective

To explore effects of one-off single balloon cervical dilator (hereinafter referred as ballon) used for labor induction in full-term parturients with isolated borderline oligohydramnios (IBO) and isolated oligohydramnios (IO) and their pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

A total of 346 parturients who were hospitalized in Northern Jiangsu People′s Hospital from June 2018 to June 2020 with labor induction by balloon were selected as research subjects. According to amniotic fluid index (AFI) of parturients in the third trimester, they were divided into IBO group (n=135, 5 cm<AFI≤8 cm), IO group (n=38, AFI≤5 cm), and control group (n=173, parturients with normal AFI). The gestational age of placing balloon, Bishop scores before and after placement, effective rate of cervical maturation, vaginal delivery rate, rate of transition to emergency cesarean section, duration of the first labor, postpartum adverse pregnancy outcomes (amniotic fluid meconium contamination, postpartum fever, postpartum hemorrhage) and related complications of balloon, and newborn outcomes were observed and were compared by one-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis H test, and chi-square test among three groups. Least significant difference (LSD)-t test and Bonferroni method for adjusting the significant level (α′=0.05/3=0.017) were used for further comparisons. There were no statistical differences in general clinical data among three groups, such as age, gravidity, body mass index (BMI), and so on (P>0.05). The procedure followed in this study complied with the requirements of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013.

Results

①After labor induction by balloon in IBO group, IO group, and control group, cervical Bishop scores were (7.7±1.6) scores, (8.1±1.5) scores and (8.0±1.5) scores respectively, which were significantly increased compared with those (3.1±0.5) scores, (3.1± 0.7) scores and (3.2±0.6) scores before labor induction, and all the differences were statistically significant (t=-31.883, -19.546, -37.544; P<0.001). There were no statistical differences in cervical Bishop scores before and after balloon placement, and total effective rate of promoting cervical ripening among three groups (P>0.05). ②The gestational ages of parturients in IBO group, IO group, and control group were 39.7 weeks (39.3-40.1 weeks), 38.9 weeks (37.8-39.7 weeks), and 40.4 weeks (40.3-40.6 weeks), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=157.093, P<0.001). Further pairwise comparison results showed that the gestational ages of placing balloon of parturients in IBO group and IO group were significantly lower than that of control group, and IBO group was significantly lower than that in IO group, and all differences were statistically significant (P<0.001, <0.001, =0.006). There was statistical difference in constituent ratio of delivery methods among three groups (χ2=6.565, P=0.038), and further pairwise comparison results showed that the rate of emergency cesarean section in IO group was statistically higher than that of control group, and the difference was statistically significant (28.9% vs 12.7%, χ2=6.221, P=0.013). Comparison of the proportion of parturients undergoing emergency cesarean section due to abnormal fetal heart rate monitoring among three groups was statistically significant (χ2=7.649, P=0.022), and further pairwise comparison results showed that the rate of IO group was higher than that of control group, and the difference was statistically significant (72.7% vs 22.7%, P=0.003). ③There was statistically significant difference in the incidence of meconium contamination among three groups (χ2=11.368, P=0.003), and further pairwise comparison results showed that the incidence in IO group was statistically higher than those in IBO group and control group (23.7% vs 7.4% and 6.9%, P=0.008, 0.005). Comparison of the incidence of postpartum fever among three groups was statistically significant (χ2=8.109, P=0.015), and further pairwise comparison results showed that the incidence in IO group was statistically higher that in control group (P=0.010). There were no statistical differences in duration of the first labor and incidence of related complications of balloon among three groups (P>0.05). ④The comparison of birth weights of neonates among three groups was statistically significant (F=7.677, P=0.001), and further pairwise comparison results showed that birth weight of neonates in IO group was significantly lower than that of IBO group and control group [(3 186.8±278.2) g vs (3 353.6±335.1) g and (3 405.3±301.1) g, P=0.004, <0.001]. Apgar scores at 1 min after birth and proportion of neonates transferred to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) among three groups showed no significant differences (P>0.05).

Conclusions

IBO and IO in the third trimester can lead to iatrogenic preterm birth. The use of balloon for labor induction can effectively promote cervical ripening without increasing the incidence of related complications of balloon and affecting the first stage of labor.

表1 3组产妇宫颈Bishop评分与促宫颈成熟效果比较
表2 3组产妇放置球囊时孕龄、分娩方式与中转急诊剖宫产术分娩原因比较
表3 3组产妇第一产程时长、不良妊娠结局及球囊相关并发症发生情况比较
表4 3组产妇分娩新生儿情况比较
[1]
Rathod S, Samal SK. Evaluation of maternal and perinatal outcomes of induction in borderline oligohydramnios at term[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2017, 11(9): QC5-QC7. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/26313.10612.
[2]
应红军,江元,范琦慧,等. 宫颈扩张球囊用于足月引产120例临床分析[J]. 现代实用医学2014, 26(3): 265-267. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0800.2014.03.014.
[3]
胡社英,王春琴,余有妹,等. Cook宫颈扩张球囊联合缩宫素引产对母婴结局的影响研究[J]. 重庆医学2020, 49(6): 977-980. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2020.06.
[4]
汪文雁,郑剑兰,付景丽,等. 足月妊娠羊水过少患者不同分娩方式的观察[J]. 安徽医科大学学报2013, 48(8): 985-987. DOI: 10.19405/j.cnki.issn1000-1492.2013.08.035.
[5]
Yang F, Huang S, Long Y, et al. Double-balloon versus single-balloon catheter for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2018, 44(1): 27-34. DOI: 10.1111/jog.13551.
[6]
Rutherford SE, Phelan JP, Smith CV, et al. The four-quadrant assessment of amniotic fluid volume: an adjunct to antepartum fetal heart rate testing[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1987, 70(3 Pt 1): 353-356.
[7]
Rossi AC, Prefumo F. Perinatal outcomes of isolated oligohydramnios at term and post-term pregnancy: a systematic review of literature with Meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2013, 169(2): 149-154. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.03.011.
[8]
吕玉霞. 球囊引产对初产妇分娩方式和新生儿结局及产后出血的影响[J]. 当代医学2019, 25(25): 104-106. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393.2019.25.042.
[9]
胡娅莉,王志群. 宫颈成熟与引产[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志2002, 18(5): 16-18.
[10]
Tahmina S, Prakash S, Daniel M. Maternal and perinatal outcomes of induction of labor in oligohydramnios at term-a retrospective cohort study[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2020, 33(13): 2190-2194. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1543654.
[11]
Rabie N, Magann E, Steelman S, et al. Oligohydramnios in complicated and uncomplicated pregnancy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 49(4): 442-449. DOI: 10.1002/uog.15929.
[12]
Hederlingová J, Redecha M, Záhumensky' J. The finding of isolated oligohydramnios after 37th week of gestation and its association with perinatal outcome[J]. Ceska Gynekol, 2017, 82(5): 351-354.
[13]
Shechter-Maor G, Haran G, Sadeh-Mestechkin D, et al. Intra-vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus double-balloon catheter for labor induction in term oligohydramnios[J]. J Perinatol, 2015, 35(2): 95-98. DOI: 10.1038/jp.2014.173.
[14]
Krispin E, Netser T, Wertheimer A, et al. Induction of labor methods in isolated term oligohydramnios[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2019, 299(3): 765-771. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05080-5.
[15]
李晓红,胡丽文,朱苹苹,等. 宫颈扩张球囊及控释地诺前列酮栓用于促宫颈成熟及引产的对比研究[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究2016, 27(5): 623-625. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5293.2016.05.025.
[16]
郑国华. 妊娠晚期单纯羊水过少经阴道分娩和剖宫产对妊娠结局的作用评价[J/CD]. 实用妇科内分泌电子杂志2019, 6(13): 148-149. DOI: 10.16484/j.cnki.issn2095-8803.2019.13.090.
[17]
Sarreau M, Isly H, Poulain P, et al. Balloon catheter vs oxytocin alone for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2020, 99(2): 259-266. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13712.
[18]
Oyelese Y, Culin A, Ananth CV, et al. Meconium-stained amniotic fluid across gestation and neonatal acid-base status[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 108(2): 345-349. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000226853.85609.8d.
[19]
石苇,郭晓辉. 电子胎心监护临床应用规范的建议(二)[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志2021, 37(3): 390-395. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2021030127.
[20]
Beckmann M, Gibbons K, Flenady V, et al. Induction of labour using prostaglandin E2 as an inpatient versus balloon catheter as an outpatient: a multicentre randomised controlled trial[J]. BJOG, 2020, 127(5): 571-579. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16030.
[21]
Karahanoglu E, Akpinar F, Demirdag E, et al. Obstetric outcomes of isolated oligohydramnios during early-term, full-term and late-term periods and determination of optimal timing of delivery[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2016, 42(9): 1119-1124. DOI: 10.1111/jog.13024.
[1] 危玲, 李会, 陈奕. 孕产妇产超广谱β-内酰胺酶的肠杆菌定植/感染与母婴传播研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 517-521.
[2] 杨皓媛, 龚杰, 邹青伟, 阮航. 哮喘孕妇的母婴不良妊娠结局研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[3] 陈甜甜, 王晓东, 余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[4] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[5] 顾娟, 孙擎擎, 胡方方, 曹义娟, 祁玉娟. 子宫内膜容受性检测改善胚胎反复种植失败患者妊娠结局的临床应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[6] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[7] 李振华, 解宝江, 易为, 李丽, 卫雅娴, 周明书, 伊诺. 82例孕产妇对新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情防控认知的心理干预及常态化疫情防控应对要点[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 173-179.
[8] 任国华, 杜晓晓, 洪善玲, 邵帅. 妊娠期高血压并发急性肾损伤患者血清白细胞介素-22、硫化氢及护骨素水平的变化与意义[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 150-155.
[9] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[10] 王欣, 刘琳, 闻哲嘉, 刘春玲, 张弘, 吕芳. 妊娠前应激暴露对小鼠后续妊娠的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 431-437.
[11] 王晓丽, 林少华, 刘莹莹, 范颖. 妊娠期女性盆底肌自主收缩的力量差异及对分娩、产后压力性尿失禁的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 260-265.
[12] 吴晓翔, 杨波, 李景漩, 张凤玲, 郭桂辉, 郑少培. 脐动脉超声检查联合NLR、sFlt-1/PLGF对妊娠高血压综合征患者不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 266-271.
[13] 张丽姿, 陈敦金. 胎盘植入性疾病的不良结局及远期影响[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 155-158.
[14] 岳永飞, 朱利平, 王晓艳. 磁共振成像技术在预测胎盘植入性疾病患者剖宫产术中出血量的研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 167-172.
[15] 陆晓勤, 刘先保, 龙尚乾, 宋可欣, 邓艳红, 张春芳. 不同程度胎盘植入患者剖宫产的麻醉决策及母婴结局[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 187-192.
阅读次数
全文


摘要