切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (03) : 339 -346. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2021.03.016

论著

一次性球囊宫颈扩张器在单纯性临界羊水过少与单纯性羊水过少足月妊娠产妇引产中的临床应用
曹佳晨1,1, 孔祥1,2,,1,2(), 葛凡1,1, 鞠捷1,1, 徐金金1,1, 陆杨1,1, 冯翀1,1   
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-09 修回日期:2021-04-27 出版日期:2021-06-01
  • 通信作者: 孔祥

Clinical application of one-off single balloon cervical dilator used for labor induction in full-term parturients with isolated borderline oligohydramnios and isolated oligohydramnios

Jiachen Cao1,1, Xiang Kong1,2,1,2,(), Fan Ge1,1, Jie Ju1,1, Jinjin Xu1,1, Yang Lu1,1, Chong Feng1,1   

  • Received:2020-06-09 Revised:2021-04-27 Published:2021-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiang Kong
  • Supported by:
    Maternal and Child Health Research Project of Jiangsu Province(F201809); Practical Innovation Program for Graduate Students of Yangzhou University, Jiangsu Province(XSJCX19-111)
引用本文:

曹佳晨, 孔祥, 葛凡, 鞠捷, 徐金金, 陆杨, 冯翀. 一次性球囊宫颈扩张器在单纯性临界羊水过少与单纯性羊水过少足月妊娠产妇引产中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(03): 339-346.

Jiachen Cao, Xiang Kong, Fan Ge, Jie Ju, Jinjin Xu, Yang Lu, Chong Feng. Clinical application of one-off single balloon cervical dilator used for labor induction in full-term parturients with isolated borderline oligohydramnios and isolated oligohydramnios[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2021, 17(03): 339-346.

目的

探讨一次性球囊宫颈扩张器(以下简称为球囊)对单纯性临界羊水过少(IBO)与单纯性羊水过少(IO)足月妊娠产妇的引产效果及其妊娠结局。

方法

选择2018年6月至2020年6月,于江苏省苏北人民医院采取球囊引产的346例足月妊娠产妇为研究对象。根据晚孕期羊水指数(AFI)值,将其分为IBO组(n=135,5 cm<AFI值≤8 cm),IO组(n=38,AFI值≤5 cm)与对照组(n=173,AFI值正常)。观察3组产妇放置球囊时孕龄,放置前、后宫颈Bishop评分,促宫颈成熟有效率,阴道分娩率、中转急诊剖宫产术分娩率,第一产程时长,不良妊娠结局(羊水胎粪污染、产后发热、产后出血)与球囊相关并发症发生情况及新生儿结局等,并采用单因素方差分析、Kruskal-Wallis H检验、χ2检验对3组受试者的上述指标进行总体比较,进一步两两比较,采用最小显著性差异(LSD)-t检验或Bonferroni法调整检验水准(α′=0.05/3=0.017)。3组产妇的年龄、孕次、人体质量指数(BMI)等一般临床资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。本研究遵循的程序符合2013年新修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》要求。

结果

①IBO组、IO组、对照组产妇使用球囊引产后,宫颈Bishop评分分别为(7.7±1.6)分、(8.1±1.5)分与(8.0±1.5)分,均较引产前的(3.1±0.5)分、(3.1±0.7)分与(3.2±0.6)分显著增加,并且差异均有统计学意义(t=-31.883、-19.546、-37.544,P<0.001)。3组产妇放置球囊前、后宫颈Bishop评分,以及促宫颈成熟总有效率分别总体比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。②IBO组、IO组、对照组产妇放置球囊时孕龄分别为39.7孕周(39.3~40.1孕周)、38.9孕周(37.8~39.7孕周)与40.4孕周(40.3~40.6孕周),3组总体比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=157.093,P<0.001),进一步两两比较结果显示,IBO组、IO组产妇放置球囊时孕龄均显著低于对照组,IBO组显著低于IO组,并且差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001、<0.001、=0.006)。3组产妇分娩方式构成比比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.565,P=0.038),进一步两两比较结果显示,IO组中转急诊剖宫产术分娩率显著高于对照组,并且差异有统计学意义(28.9% vs 12.7%,χ2=6.221,P=0.013)。3组因发现胎心异常行急诊剖宫产术产妇所占比例比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.649,P=0.022),进一步两两比较结果显示,IO组显著高于对照组,并且差异有统计学意义(72.7% vs 22.7%,P=0.003)。③3组产妇羊水胎粪污染发生率总体比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=11.368,P=0.003),进一步两两比较结果显示,IO组显著高于IBO组与对照组,并且差异均有统计学意义(23.7% vs 7.4%、6.9%,P=0.008、0.005)。3组产妇产后发热发生率总体比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.109,P=0.015),进一步两两比较结果显示,IO组显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P=0.010)。3组产妇第一产程时长、球囊相关并发症发生率分别总体比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。④3组产妇分娩新生儿的出生体重总体比较,差异有统计学意义(F=7.677,P=0.001),进一步两两比较结果显示,IO组新生儿出生体重显著低于IBO组、对照组,并且差异均有统计学意义[(3 186.8±278.2) g vs(3 353.6±335.1) g、(3 405.3±301.1) g,P=0.004、<0.001]。3组新生儿生后1 min Apgar评分、转入新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)所占比例分别总体比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

晚孕期IBO与IO可造成医源性早产,对该类足月妊娠产妇使用球囊引产,促进宫颈成熟效果明显,不增加相关并发症发生率及影响第一产程。

Objective

To explore effects of one-off single balloon cervical dilator (hereinafter referred as ballon) used for labor induction in full-term parturients with isolated borderline oligohydramnios (IBO) and isolated oligohydramnios (IO) and their pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

A total of 346 parturients who were hospitalized in Northern Jiangsu People′s Hospital from June 2018 to June 2020 with labor induction by balloon were selected as research subjects. According to amniotic fluid index (AFI) of parturients in the third trimester, they were divided into IBO group (n=135, 5 cm<AFI≤8 cm), IO group (n=38, AFI≤5 cm), and control group (n=173, parturients with normal AFI). The gestational age of placing balloon, Bishop scores before and after placement, effective rate of cervical maturation, vaginal delivery rate, rate of transition to emergency cesarean section, duration of the first labor, postpartum adverse pregnancy outcomes (amniotic fluid meconium contamination, postpartum fever, postpartum hemorrhage) and related complications of balloon, and newborn outcomes were observed and were compared by one-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis H test, and chi-square test among three groups. Least significant difference (LSD)-t test and Bonferroni method for adjusting the significant level (α′=0.05/3=0.017) were used for further comparisons. There were no statistical differences in general clinical data among three groups, such as age, gravidity, body mass index (BMI), and so on (P>0.05). The procedure followed in this study complied with the requirements of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013.

Results

①After labor induction by balloon in IBO group, IO group, and control group, cervical Bishop scores were (7.7±1.6) scores, (8.1±1.5) scores and (8.0±1.5) scores respectively, which were significantly increased compared with those (3.1±0.5) scores, (3.1± 0.7) scores and (3.2±0.6) scores before labor induction, and all the differences were statistically significant (t=-31.883, -19.546, -37.544; P<0.001). There were no statistical differences in cervical Bishop scores before and after balloon placement, and total effective rate of promoting cervical ripening among three groups (P>0.05). ②The gestational ages of parturients in IBO group, IO group, and control group were 39.7 weeks (39.3-40.1 weeks), 38.9 weeks (37.8-39.7 weeks), and 40.4 weeks (40.3-40.6 weeks), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=157.093, P<0.001). Further pairwise comparison results showed that the gestational ages of placing balloon of parturients in IBO group and IO group were significantly lower than that of control group, and IBO group was significantly lower than that in IO group, and all differences were statistically significant (P<0.001, <0.001, =0.006). There was statistical difference in constituent ratio of delivery methods among three groups (χ2=6.565, P=0.038), and further pairwise comparison results showed that the rate of emergency cesarean section in IO group was statistically higher than that of control group, and the difference was statistically significant (28.9% vs 12.7%, χ2=6.221, P=0.013). Comparison of the proportion of parturients undergoing emergency cesarean section due to abnormal fetal heart rate monitoring among three groups was statistically significant (χ2=7.649, P=0.022), and further pairwise comparison results showed that the rate of IO group was higher than that of control group, and the difference was statistically significant (72.7% vs 22.7%, P=0.003). ③There was statistically significant difference in the incidence of meconium contamination among three groups (χ2=11.368, P=0.003), and further pairwise comparison results showed that the incidence in IO group was statistically higher than those in IBO group and control group (23.7% vs 7.4% and 6.9%, P=0.008, 0.005). Comparison of the incidence of postpartum fever among three groups was statistically significant (χ2=8.109, P=0.015), and further pairwise comparison results showed that the incidence in IO group was statistically higher that in control group (P=0.010). There were no statistical differences in duration of the first labor and incidence of related complications of balloon among three groups (P>0.05). ④The comparison of birth weights of neonates among three groups was statistically significant (F=7.677, P=0.001), and further pairwise comparison results showed that birth weight of neonates in IO group was significantly lower than that of IBO group and control group [(3 186.8±278.2) g vs (3 353.6±335.1) g and (3 405.3±301.1) g, P=0.004, <0.001]. Apgar scores at 1 min after birth and proportion of neonates transferred to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) among three groups showed no significant differences (P>0.05).

Conclusions

IBO and IO in the third trimester can lead to iatrogenic preterm birth. The use of balloon for labor induction can effectively promote cervical ripening without increasing the incidence of related complications of balloon and affecting the first stage of labor.

表1 3组产妇宫颈Bishop评分与促宫颈成熟效果比较
表2 3组产妇放置球囊时孕龄、分娩方式与中转急诊剖宫产术分娩原因比较
表3 3组产妇第一产程时长、不良妊娠结局及球囊相关并发症发生情况比较
表4 3组产妇分娩新生儿情况比较
[1]
Rathod S, Samal SK. Evaluation of maternal and perinatal outcomes of induction in borderline oligohydramnios at term[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2017, 11(9): QC5-QC7. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/26313.10612.
[2]
应红军,江元,范琦慧,等. 宫颈扩张球囊用于足月引产120例临床分析[J]. 现代实用医学2014, 26(3): 265-267. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0800.2014.03.014.
[3]
胡社英,王春琴,余有妹,等. Cook宫颈扩张球囊联合缩宫素引产对母婴结局的影响研究[J]. 重庆医学2020, 49(6): 977-980. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2020.06.
[4]
汪文雁,郑剑兰,付景丽,等. 足月妊娠羊水过少患者不同分娩方式的观察[J]. 安徽医科大学学报2013, 48(8): 985-987. DOI: 10.19405/j.cnki.issn1000-1492.2013.08.035.
[5]
Yang F, Huang S, Long Y, et al. Double-balloon versus single-balloon catheter for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2018, 44(1): 27-34. DOI: 10.1111/jog.13551.
[6]
Rutherford SE, Phelan JP, Smith CV, et al. The four-quadrant assessment of amniotic fluid volume: an adjunct to antepartum fetal heart rate testing[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1987, 70(3 Pt 1): 353-356.
[7]
Rossi AC, Prefumo F. Perinatal outcomes of isolated oligohydramnios at term and post-term pregnancy: a systematic review of literature with Meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2013, 169(2): 149-154. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.03.011.
[8]
吕玉霞. 球囊引产对初产妇分娩方式和新生儿结局及产后出血的影响[J]. 当代医学2019, 25(25): 104-106. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393.2019.25.042.
[9]
胡娅莉,王志群. 宫颈成熟与引产[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志2002, 18(5): 16-18.
[10]
Tahmina S, Prakash S, Daniel M. Maternal and perinatal outcomes of induction of labor in oligohydramnios at term-a retrospective cohort study[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2020, 33(13): 2190-2194. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1543654.
[11]
Rabie N, Magann E, Steelman S, et al. Oligohydramnios in complicated and uncomplicated pregnancy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 49(4): 442-449. DOI: 10.1002/uog.15929.
[12]
Hederlingová J, Redecha M, Záhumensky' J. The finding of isolated oligohydramnios after 37th week of gestation and its association with perinatal outcome[J]. Ceska Gynekol, 2017, 82(5): 351-354.
[13]
Shechter-Maor G, Haran G, Sadeh-Mestechkin D, et al. Intra-vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus double-balloon catheter for labor induction in term oligohydramnios[J]. J Perinatol, 2015, 35(2): 95-98. DOI: 10.1038/jp.2014.173.
[14]
Krispin E, Netser T, Wertheimer A, et al. Induction of labor methods in isolated term oligohydramnios[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2019, 299(3): 765-771. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05080-5.
[15]
李晓红,胡丽文,朱苹苹,等. 宫颈扩张球囊及控释地诺前列酮栓用于促宫颈成熟及引产的对比研究[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究2016, 27(5): 623-625. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5293.2016.05.025.
[16]
郑国华. 妊娠晚期单纯羊水过少经阴道分娩和剖宫产对妊娠结局的作用评价[J/CD]. 实用妇科内分泌电子杂志2019, 6(13): 148-149. DOI: 10.16484/j.cnki.issn2095-8803.2019.13.090.
[17]
Sarreau M, Isly H, Poulain P, et al. Balloon catheter vs oxytocin alone for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2020, 99(2): 259-266. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13712.
[18]
Oyelese Y, Culin A, Ananth CV, et al. Meconium-stained amniotic fluid across gestation and neonatal acid-base status[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 108(2): 345-349. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000226853.85609.8d.
[19]
石苇,郭晓辉. 电子胎心监护临床应用规范的建议(二)[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志2021, 37(3): 390-395. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2021030127.
[20]
Beckmann M, Gibbons K, Flenady V, et al. Induction of labour using prostaglandin E2 as an inpatient versus balloon catheter as an outpatient: a multicentre randomised controlled trial[J]. BJOG, 2020, 127(5): 571-579. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16030.
[21]
Karahanoglu E, Akpinar F, Demirdag E, et al. Obstetric outcomes of isolated oligohydramnios during early-term, full-term and late-term periods and determination of optimal timing of delivery[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2016, 42(9): 1119-1124. DOI: 10.1111/jog.13024.
[1] 李霞林, 贺芳. 产后出血风险评估和早期预警系统[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 498-503.
[2] 刘子洋, 崔俭俭, 赵茵. 产科弥散性血管内凝血及其评分系统的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 511-518.
[3] 曾凡英, 阮洁, 刘兴会, 何国琳. 新生育形势下的围产医学研究现状及孕期保健中的应对策略[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 519-524.
[4] 李小飞, 刘洪莉, 石丘玲, 田静, 李莉, 漆洪波, 罗欣. 自然分娩产妇低强度聚焦超声子宫复旧治疗防治产后出血的前瞻性随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 534-539.
[5] 杜佳丽, 鲍睿, 乔春红, 韩伟. 中孕期宫颈功能不全孕妇经阴道紧急宫颈环扎术后不良妊娠结局预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 403-409.
[6] 姚金含, 王伟娜, 张玉泉. 妊娠相关深静脉血栓形成患者的预后研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 367-373.
[7] 李欣, 魏艺, 张娟, 张娟娟, 凌秀凤, 赵纯, 张媔秋. 高龄女性冻胚移植周期临床妊娠结局的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 276-283.
[8] 花卉, 许晨莹, 刘金凤. 盆底肌训练时机对高龄初产妇产后盆底肌张力及性功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 284-291.
[9] 薛静, 孙雅楠, 朱丽丽, 李淑红. 妊娠期急性脂肪肝孕产妇诊疗及其妊娠结局[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 312-321.
[10] 陈义思, 梁敏, 李红雨, 夏雪, 刘燕茜, 李晨曲, 王丹. 妊娠合并慢性肾病围产期多学科团队管理价值研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 133-139.
[11] 俞慧慧, 尹宗智. 妊娠期胃穿孔[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 209-213.
[12] 鲁珊, 姚蕴珊, 廖色坭, 陈子恩, 张一剑, 蓝健皓, 魏薇, 刘艳杨, 陈艳红, 陈敦金. 妊娠合并急性阑尾炎100例临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 214-219.
[13] 汪文雁, 郑剑兰, 朱丽慈. 体外受精-胚胎移植术后妊娠患者孕产期风险的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 220-226.
[14] 柯彩萍, 林丽萍, 王晓怡, 李虹晔, 陈敦金. 关于双绒毛膜双羊膜囊双胎妊娠第二胎儿延迟分娩的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 159-167.
[15] 胡淼, 杜丽丽, 张丽姿, 林琳, 张瑜亮, 古士锋, 古仲嘉, 赖思莹, 梁景英, 刘雨, 黄敏珊, 黄媛媛, 黄晴晴, 罗世君, 陈敦金. 体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射受孕患者胎盘植入分级及围产结局的研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 183-189.
阅读次数
全文


摘要