切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (03) : 257 -261. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2021.03.003

述评

胎儿MRI:出生缺陷产前影像学诊断的生力军
宁刚()   
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-30 修回日期:2021-05-19 出版日期:2021-06-01
  • 通信作者: 宁刚

Fetal MRI: plays a key role in prenatal imaging diagnosis of birth defects

Gang Ning()   

  • Received:2021-04-30 Revised:2021-05-19 Published:2021-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Gang Ning
  • Supported by:
    Sub-project of Key Project of Reproductive Health and Prevention & Control of Major Birth Defects of National Key Research and Development Program " Research on Standardization System of Comprehensive Prevention & Control of Birth Defects Based on Whole Chain of Pre-pregnancy, Prenatal and Postnatal Birth" (2018YFC1002200) : Research on Standardization System of Prenatal Screening and Diagnosis of Structural Malformations Based on Imaging(2018YFC1002202-2)
引用本文:

宁刚. 胎儿MRI:出生缺陷产前影像学诊断的生力军[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(03): 257-261.

Gang Ning. Fetal MRI: plays a key role in prenatal imaging diagnosis of birth defects[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2021, 17(03): 257-261.

产前影像学诊断包括产前胎儿超声和胎儿MRI,是出生缺陷二级防控的重要手段。胎儿MRI的优势为安全性高,迄今尚未发现3.0 T及以下MRI检查会对孕妇和胎儿造成任何不良后果;而且MRI以其软组织对比好、大视野、多方位及多参数成像,具有无辐射、非侵入性,不受孕妇肥胖体型、羊水量过少、胎头钙化等因素影响的特点,成为产前超声诊断中、晚孕期胎儿疑似结构异常的重要补充手段。胎儿MRI检查的目的是确认胎儿超声检查结果,或者胎儿超声怀疑胎儿结构异常,但是不能明确诊断时。由于胎儿MRI检查,可能获得比胎儿超声更多的信息,因此可弥补胎儿超声检查的不足。胎儿MRI的适应证包括:对产前超声检查怀疑胎儿中枢神经系统畸形、脑室扩张、脑中线结构异常、后颅窝增宽或小脑蚓部异常等,唇裂是否合并腭裂或牙槽骨异常,胎儿耳廓畸形是否合并外耳道闭锁或中耳、内耳发育不良,怀疑胎儿心外大血管畸形的进一步确诊,对胎儿腹、盆部肿块定位及定性,对胎儿肠道畸形、泌尿道生殖道畸形及单绒毛双胎并发症,对胎儿疾病治疗前、后疗效进行评价及对预后与严重疾病终止妊娠前进行评估等。胎儿MRI检查结果可为产前诊断、优生优育及遗传咨询提供相关信息,为胎儿疾病治疗方案制定、分娩方式选择及医患沟通提供依据。尽管胎儿MRI可以对胎儿解剖进行标准及完整的评估,但是仍然不作为产前影像学诊断的首选。

Prenatal imaging diagnosis includes prenatal fetal ultrasound and fetal MRI, which is an important means of secondary prevention and control of birth defects. The advantage of fetal MRI is safe, and so far, it has not been found that MRI examination of 3.0 T or below will bring any adverse consequences to pregnant women and fetuses. MRI has become an important supplementary means for prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of fetal structural abnormalities in the second and third trimester of pregnancy, because of good soft tissue contrast, wide field of vision, multi-orientation and multi-parameter imaging, and advantages of non-radiation and non-invasion, and not affected by factors such as maternal obesity, oligohydramnios, and fetal head calcification. The purpose of fetal MRI examination is to confirm results of prenatal ultrasound examination, or when an abnormality is suspected by prenatal ultrasound without a definitive diagnosis. MRI examination may obtain more information from fetus than prenatal ultrasound, and make up for some deficiencies of prenatal ultrasound. Indications of fetal MRI include central nervous system congenital malformations suspected of fetus by prenatal ultrasound examination, ventricular dilatation, brain midline structural abnormalities, posterior cranial fossa widening or abnormalities of cerebellar vermis of fetus, whether fetal cleft lip accompanied by cleft palate or alveolar bone abnormalities, whether fetal auricle malformations associated with atresia of the external auditory canal or dysplasia of the middle and inner ears, extracardiac macrovascular malformations suspected by ultrasound examination, location and characterization of abdominal and pelvic masses, evaluation of intestinal malformations, genitourinary tract malformations and singleton twins complications, evaluation of curative effect and prognosis before and after treatment of fetal diseases, and evaluation before termination of pregnancy for severe diseases of fetus, etc.. Overall, fetal MRI examination can provide relevant information of fetus for prenatal diagnosis, eugenics and genetic counseling, and provide basis for fetal treatment plan formulation, delivery mode selection and doctor-patient communication. Although fetal MRI can make a standard and complete evaluation of fetal anatomy, it is still not the first choice for prenatal imaging diagnosis.

[1]
中华人民共和国卫生部. 中国出生缺陷防治报告(2012)[R]. 北京:中华人民共和国卫生部,2012: 1-16.
[2]
Malinger G, Paladini D, Haratz KK, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system. Part 1: performance of screening examination and indications for targeted neurosonography[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 56(3): 476-484. DOI: 10.1002/uog.22145.
[3]
中国医师协会超声医师分会. 中国产科超声检查指南[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2019: 19-97.
[4]
Smith F, Adam AH, Phillips WD. NMR imaging in pregnancy[J]. Lancet, 1983, 321(8314-8315): 61-62. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)91588-x.
[5]
中华医学会放射学分会儿科学组,中华医学会儿科学分会放射学组. 胎儿MRI中国专家共识[J]. 中华放射学杂志2020, 54(12): 1153-1161. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112149-20200605-00779.
[6]
American College of Radiology. ACR-SPR practice parameter for the safe and optimal performance of fetal MRI. Revised, 2015 (Resolution 11)[EB/OL]. [2021-05-11].

URL    
[7]
李欣,邵剑波. 中华医学影像·儿科卷 [M]. 2版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2019: 833-891.
[8]
Fox NS, Monteagudo A, Kuller JA, et al. Mild fetal ventriculomegaly: diagnosis, evaluation, and management[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 219(1): B2-B9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.039.
[9]
李旭,胡克非. 胎儿唇腭裂的MRI诊断价值[J]. 放射学实践2016, 31(11): 1084-1088. DOI: 10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2016.11.014.
[10]
李奎,颜国辉,郑伟增,等. 胎儿尿道下裂产前MRI检查的诊断价值分析[J]. 中华妇产科杂志2019, 54(8): 548-551. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2019.08.008.
[11]
Dunn K, Reissland N, Reid VM. The functional foetal brain: a systematic preview of methodological factors in reporting foetal visual and auditory capacity[J]. Dev Cogn Neurosci, 2015, 13: 43-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.04.002.
[12]
Jardri R, Houfflin-Debarge V, Delion P, et al. Assessing fetal response to maternal speech using a noninvasive functional brain imaging technique[J]. Int J Dev Neurosci, 2012, 30(2): 159-161. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2011.11.002.
[13]
Dagklis T, Plasencia W, Maiz N, et al. Choroid plexus cyst, intracardiac echogenic focus, hyperechogenic bowel and hydronephrosis in screening for trisomy 21 at 11+0 to 13+6 weeks[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 31(2): 132-135. DOI: 10.1002/uog.5224.
[14]
Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, et al. ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2007, 188(6): 1447-1474. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.06.1616.
[15]
Joel GR, Marian JV, Aditya B, et al. Association between MRI exposure during pregnancy and fetal and childhood outcomes[J]. JAMA, 2016, 316(9): 952-961. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.12126.
[16]
Chartier AL, Bouvier MJ, McPherson DR, et al. The safety of maternal and fetal MRI at 3 T[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2019, 213(5): 1170-1173. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.19.21400.
[1] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[2] 戢秀勤, 杨小红, 赵胜, 路小军, 张晓燕, 张涛, 黄晓宇. 早孕期双胎反向动脉灌注序列征的产前超声诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(12): 1355-1360.
[3] 曾晴, 文华轩, 袁鹰, 丁妍, 罗丹丹, 廖伊梅, 梁美玲, 秦越, 彭桂艳, 林毅, 邹于, 李胜利. 二维横切面新方法对胎儿胼胝体结构异常的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(09): 899-907.
[4] 任芸芸. 无创产前诊断时代早孕期超声检查的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(09): 873-876.
[5] 何冠南, 陈曦, 赵婧, 汤蓓, 白艳, 张玲. 颅面部五切面法在11~13+6周胎儿颅面部畸形诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(08): 791-795.
[6] 薛超, 张烨, 赵映, 韩建成, 谷孝艳, 孙琳, 刘晓伟, 宋伟, 何怡华. 胎儿先天性肺动脉瓣缺如综合征的超声特征及预后分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 410-418.
[7] 张雯, 张彦春, 刘凯波, 徐宏燕. 北京市胎儿先天性脑积水的产前MRI诊断及围产期转归[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 345-349.
[8] 曾照敏, 余海燕. 超雌综合征的临床认知[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 145-150.
[9] 胡青, 余海燕. 胎儿宫内治疗及风险评估[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 23-30.
[10] 张禾璇, 宋咏刚, 杨雪. 孕妇无创产前检测结果的大样本分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(06): 685-691.
[11] 张璐, 杨惠娟, 刘凯波. 影响双胎消失综合征存活儿围生期结局危险因素研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(04): 400-409.
[12] 刘磊, 李颖思, 周航, 程肯, 霍颖, 雷婷缨. 单脐动脉合并其他先天性结构畸形胎儿预后的临床分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(04): 427-432.
[13] 李全喜, 唐辉军, 张健生, 杨飞. 基于MUSE-DWI与SS-DWI技术在前列腺癌图像中的对比研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 553-557.
[14] 胡宝茹, 尚乃舰, 高迪. 中晚期肝细胞癌的DCE-MRI及DWI表现与免疫治疗预后的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 399-403.
[15] 苏兰芳, 李韩建, 万江花, 刘旭东. 不同弥散加权成像感兴趣区ADC值对直肠癌疗效的评估价值分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 182-188.
阅读次数
全文


摘要