切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (04) : 430 -437. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2020.04.009

所属专题: 专题评论 文献

论著

改良振幅整合脑电图评分联合血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶水平对新生儿胆红素脑损伤的早期预测价值
陈利婷1, 刘慧苹2, 宋忠瑞1, 徐尚1, 郭玉秀1, 舒桂华1,()   
  1. 1. 苏北人民医院新生儿科,江苏扬州 225001(现在宿迁市第一人民医院儿科,江苏 223800)
    2. 苏北人民医院新生儿科,江苏扬州 225001
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-09 修回日期:2020-07-08 出版日期:2020-08-01
  • 通信作者: 舒桂华

Early predictive value of score of modified amplitude integrated electroencephalogram combined with serum level of neuron specific enolase in newborns with neonatal bilirubin brain injury

Liting Chen1, Huiping Liu2, Zhongrui Song1, Shang Xu1, Yuxiu Guo1, Guihua Shu1()   

  1. 1. Department of Neonatology, Northern Jiangsu People′s Hospital, Yangzhou 225001, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2020-04-09 Revised:2020-07-08 Published:2020-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Guihua Shu
  • Supported by:
    Yangzhou Jiangsu Province Science and Technology Project(YZ2016086)
引用本文:

陈利婷, 刘慧苹, 宋忠瑞, 徐尚, 郭玉秀, 舒桂华. 改良振幅整合脑电图评分联合血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶水平对新生儿胆红素脑损伤的早期预测价值[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(04): 430-437.

Liting Chen, Huiping Liu, Zhongrui Song, Shang Xu, Yuxiu Guo, Guihua Shu. Early predictive value of score of modified amplitude integrated electroencephalogram combined with serum level of neuron specific enolase in newborns with neonatal bilirubin brain injury[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2020, 16(04): 430-437.

目的

探讨改良振幅整合脑电图(aEEG)评分联合血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)水平,对新生儿胆红素脑损伤的早期预测价值。

方法

选择2017年3月至2018年2月,于苏北人民医院新生儿病房住院治疗的80例高胆红素血症新生儿为研究对象。根据头颅MRI检查结果是否有苍白球高信号改变,将其分为脑损伤组(n=37)及无脑损伤组(n=43);并选择本院产科同期出生的40例健康足月新生儿为对照组。对3组受试儿进行aEEG监测,并进行改良aEEG评分,检测血清总胆红素(TBiL)浓度及NSE水平,以及脑干听觉诱发电位(BAEP)。对3组受试儿一般临床资料、改良aEEG评分、血清TBiL浓度及NSE水平,采用单因素方差分析及最小显著性差异法(LSD)-t检验,进行总体比较及两两比较;对改良aEEG评分、血清NSE水平及aEEG分度分别与BAEP分度的相关性,采用Spearman秩相关分析法;绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),比较改良aEEG评分、血清NSE水平及二者联合,对高胆红素血症新生儿发生胆红素脑损伤的预测价值。本研究遵循本院伦理委员会所制定的伦理学标准,并得到批准(审批文号:2016KY-064),所有纳入对象监护人知情同意。

结果

①3组新生儿性别构成,入院时日龄及胎龄,出生时体重、身长、头围及胸围,以及其母亲孕次、产次比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。②脑损伤组新生儿的改良aEEG评分为(7.7±1.6)分,分别低于无脑损伤组及对照组的(10.4±1.5)分和(10.9±1.3)分;而血清TBiL浓度及NSE水平分别为(349.7±74.0) μmol/L、(47.6±13.2) μg/L,均分别高于无脑损伤组的(295.7±31.4) μmol/L、(32.3±7.7) μg/L及对照组的(185.1±35.9) μmol/L、(28.6±7.3) μg/L,并且差异均有统计学意义(均为P<0.001)。③本研究受试儿的改良aEEG评分与BAEP分度呈负相关关系(rs=-0.718,P<0.001),血清NSE水平及aEEG分度,均与BAEP分度呈正相关关系(rs=0.685,P<0.001;rs=0.647,P<0.001)。④改良aEEG评分、血清NSE水平及二者联合,预测高胆红素血症新生儿发生胆红素脑损伤的ROC曲线下面积(ROC-AUC)分别为0.875(95%CI:0.795~0.954,P<0.001),0.853(95%CI:0.769~0.937,P<0.001)及0.938(95%CI:0.861~0.980,P<0.001);3种方法预测脑损伤的敏感度分别为86.5%、62.2%、83.8%,特异度分别为74.4%、93.0%、90.7%。

结论

改良aEEG评分联合血清NSE水平,对新生儿胆红素脑损伤的早期预测价值,较单一采用改良aEEG评分或血清NSE水平更高。

Objective

To explore early predictive value of scores of modified amplitude integrated electroencephalogram (aEEG) combined with serum level of neuron specific enolase (NSE) in newborns with neonatal bilirubin brain injury.

Methods

From March 2017 to February 2018, a total of 80 cases of newborns with hyperbilirubinemia who were hospitalized in neonatal ward of Northern Jiangsu People′s Hospital were selected as research subjects. According to results of head MRI examination of being present high signal changes in globus pallidus or not, they were divided into brain injury group (n=37) and non brain injury group (n=43). Meanwhile, there were 40 cases of healthy and full term newborns who born in the same hospital were selected as control group. For newborns in above 3 groups, their aEEG was monitored, and scores of aEEG were performed; serum concentration of total bilirubin (TBiL) and level of NSE, and brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) were detected. The general clinical data, score of modified aEEG, serum concentration of TBiL and level of NSE of newborns in 3 groups were overall compared and further compared between each two groups by one-way ANOVA and least significant difference (LSD)-t test. Spearman rank correlation analysis was used to analyze correlation between score of modified aEEG, serum level of NSE, aEEG degree respectively, and BAEP degree. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was drawn to compare predictive value of score of modified aEEG, serum level of NSE and combination of these two indicators of bilirubin brain injury in neonates with hyperbilirubinemia. This study followed the ethical standards formulated by the Ethics Committee of our hospital, and was approved (Approval No. 2016KY-064). All guardians of included subjects were informed concents.

Results

①There were no significant differences among 3 groups in gender composition, admission age and gestational age, weight, height, head and chest circumference at birth of newborns, and pregnancy and parity of their mothers (P>0.05). ② Scores of modified aEEG of newborns in brain injury group was (7.7±1.6) scores, which was lower than those of (10.4±1.5) scores and (10.9±1.3) scores in non brain injury group and control group, respectively; while serum concentration of TBiL and level of NSE were (349.7±74.0) μmol/L and (47.6±13.2) μg/L, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of (295.7±31.4) μmol/L and (32.3±7.7) μg/L in brain injury group, and those of (185.1±35.9) μmol/L and (28.6±7.3) μg/L in control group, and all the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.001). ③ For all subjects in this study, score of modified aEEG was negatively correlated with BAEP degree (rs=-0.718, P<0.001), serum level of NSE and aEEG degree were both positively correlated with BAEP degree (rs=0.685, P<0.001; rs=0.647, P<0.001). ④ Area under curve of ROC (ROC-AUC) of score of modified aEEG, serum level of NSE and combination of these two indicators for prediction of bilirubin brain injury of neonates with hyperbilirubinemia were 0.875 (95%CI: 0.795-0.954, P<0.001), 0.853 (95%CI: 0.769-0.937, P<0.001) and 0.938 (95%CI: 0.861-0.980, P<0.001), respectively, the sensitivity of these three methods for prediction of brain injury of newborns were 86.5%, 62.2%, 83.8%, and the specificity were 74.4%, 93.0%, 90.7%, respectively.

Conclusion

The early predictive value of score of modified aEEG combined with serum level of NSE was higher than that of score of modified aEEG or serum level of NSE only.

表1 3组新生儿一般临床资料比较
表2 3组新生儿改良aEEG评分、血清TBiL浓度及NSE水平比较(±s)
图1 3种方法预测高胆红素血症新生儿发生胆红素脑损伤的ROC(图1A:改良aEEG评分;图1B:血清NSE水平;图1C:改良aEEG评分联合血清NSE水平)
[1]
Shapiro SM. Definition of the clinical spectrum of kernicterus and bilirubin-induced neurologic dysfunction (BIND)[J]. J Perinatol, 2005, 25(1): 54-59. DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211157.
[2]
邵肖梅,叶鸿瑁,丘小汕. 实用新生儿学[M]. 4版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2011: 296-299.
[3]
赵丹,蒙丹华,韦秋芬,等. ROC曲线评价血清总胆红素、振幅整合脑电图和脑干听觉诱发电位对新生儿急性胆红素脑病的早期诊断价值[J]. 中国小儿急救医学,2017, 24(9): 686-690. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4912.2017.09.011.
[4]
罗芳,林慧佳,鲍毓,等. 新生儿胆红素脑病急性期脑功能监测[J]. 中华儿科杂志,2013, 51(3): 221-226. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2013.03.014.
[5]
徐文慧,刘娜娜,柳涛,等. 改良aEEG、NCIS、SNAPPE-Ⅱ评分对高危儿脑损伤早期诊断价值比较[J]. 南昌大学学报(医学版), 2015, 55(2): 25-31. DOI: 10.13764/j.cnki.ncdm.2015.02.007.
[6]
Burdjalov VF, Baumgart S, Spitzer AR. Cerebral function monitoring: a new scoring system for the evaluation of brain maturation in neonates[J]. Pediatrics, 2003, 112(4): 855-861. DOI: 10.1542/peds.112.4.855.
[7]
陈凌,苏晓娟,陈煜,等. 血清NSE水平联合头颅MRI检查在新生儿高胆红素血症脑损伤评价中的价值[J]. 白求恩医学杂志,2015, 13(5): 491-492. DOI: 10.16485/j.issn.2095-7858.2015.05.016.
[8]
刘登礼,邵肖梅,汪吉梅. 振幅整合脑电图在足月儿缺氧缺血性脑病早期诊断和预后评估的意义[J]. 中华儿科杂志,2007, 45(1): 20-23. DOI: 10.3760/j.issn:0578-1310.2007.01.005.
[9]
Luo F, Chen Z, Lin H, et al. Evaluation of cerebral function in high risk term infants by using a scoring system based on aEEG[J]. Transl Pediatr, 2014, 3(4): 278-286. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2224-4336.2014.10.03.
[10]
潘映辐. 临床诱发电位学[M]. 2版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2000: 351-357.
[11]
黄跃,潘新年,甘金梅,等. 听性脑干反应在诊断足月新生儿高间接胆红素血症引起脑损害中的应用探讨[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2008, 22(7): 322-323. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1781.2008.07.012.
[12]
Sgro M, Campbell D, Shah V. Incidence and causes of severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in Canada[J]. CMAJ, 2006, 175(6): 587-590. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.060328.
[13]
Maimburg RD, Bech BH, Bjerre JV, et al. Obstetric outcome in Danish children with a validated diagnosis of kernicterus[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2009, 88(9): 1011-1016. DOI: 10.1080/00016340903124917.
[14]
中华医学会儿科学分会新生儿学组,中国新生儿胆红素脑病研究协作组. 中国新生儿胆红素脑病的多中心流行病学调查研究[J]. 中华儿科杂志,2012, 50(5): 331-335. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2012.05.004.
[15]
Rodrigues CM, Solá S, Castro RE, et al. Perturbation of membrane dynamics in nerve cells as an early event during bilirubin-induced apoptosis[J]. J Lipid Res, 2002, 43(6): 885-894.
[16]
葛佳静. 足月及近足月新生儿胆红素脑病的临床分析[D]. 杭州:浙江大学,2016.
[17]
孙路璐. 新生儿脑脊液胆红素水平、头颅MRI、BAEP及NBNA与胆红素脑病的相关研究[D]. 合肥:安徽医科大学,2013.
[18]
董淑兰. 新生儿高胆红素血症对远期预后的影响[J]. 实用儿科临床杂志,2004, 19(12): 1056-1057. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-515X.2004.12.022.
[19]
任常军,万丽,李然,等. 脑干诱发电位技术在新生儿急性胆红素脑病早期诊断中的价值[J]. 实用医学杂志,2014, 30(4): 563-565. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2014.04.020.
[20]
赵培. NSE对预测新生儿高胆红素血症脑损伤的价值进行系统评价[D]. 石家庄:河北医科大学,2017.
[21]
靳国伟,韩世波,陈跃平. 神经元特异性烯醇化酶的临床应用研究进展[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志,2013, 18(3): 189-191. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-153X.2013.03.025.
[22]
彭好,蒲友华. 新生儿生后血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶浓度的动态变化[J]. 中国当代儿科杂志,2014, 16(11): 1122-1124. DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2014.11.010.
[23]
Abbasoglu A, Sarialioglu F, Yazici N, et al. Serum neuron-specific enolase levels in preterm and term newborns and in infants 1-3 months of age[J]. Pediatr Neonatol, 2015, 56(2): 114-119. DOI: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2014.07.005.
[24]
中华医学会肝病学分会,中华医学会消化病学分会. 常用肝脏生物化学试验的临床意义及评价共识[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志,2010, 18(5): 387-393. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2010.05.020.
[25]
罗芳,林慧佳,王陈红,等. 振幅整合脑电图对新生儿重症监护病房神经系统高风险危重患儿的脑功能监测意义[J]. 中华儿科杂志,2013, 51(8): 614-620. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2013.08.013.
[26]
邵肖梅. 胎儿和新生儿脑损伤[M]. 2版. 上海:上海科技教育出版社,2017: 231-239.
[1] 徐婷婷, 詹泳池, 王晓东, 刘兴会. 电子胎心监测结果出现正弦波形的胎母输血综合征围生期结局分析[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(04): 382-389.
[2] 梅娟, 陶旭炜. 弥散性血管内凝血为首发表现先天性肝内门体静脉分流新生儿2例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(03): 322-330.
[3] 郑伟军, 郑超, 方一凡, 吴典明, 王翔, 陈飞, 刘明坤. 新生儿急性阑尾炎17例诊治分析并文献回顾[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 291-293.
[4] 王守森, 傅世龙, 鲜亮, 林珑. 深入理解控制性减压技术对创伤性颅脑损伤术中脑膨出的预防机制与效果[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 257-262.
[5] 吴东阳, 林向丹, 石佐林, 赵玉龙, 王振, 文安国, 纪鑫, 李俊之, 赵明光. NF-L、NLRP3、S100B 蛋白在颅脑损伤严重程度及预后评估中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 279-285.
[6] 罗磊, 熊建平, 郑宏伟, 王嗣嵩, 柴祥, 吴青, 潘海鹏. 静脉留置针穿刺引流治疗颅骨修补术后硬膜外积液一例报道[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 315-317.
[7] 张晟豪, 周杰, 姚鹏飞, 李长栋, 屈晓东, 南亚强, 曹丽. 雷公藤红素在创伤性脑损伤后继发性损伤中的作用及机制研究[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 132-140.
[8] 从长春, 王春琳, 武孝刚, 王金标, 章福彬, 孙磊, 王李. 重型颅脑损伤患者呼吸机相关性肺炎的危险因素及病原学分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 151-157.
[9] 毛进鹏, 陶治鹤, 刘琦, 王勇, 周明安, 陈劲松, 田少斌. 保守治疗大量创伤性硬膜外血肿的体会(附10例报告)[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 164-168.
[10] 辛强, 朱文豪, 何川, 李文臣, 陈勃, 王海峰. 神经胶质细胞来源的外泌体miRNAs对创伤性颅脑损伤后神经炎症的影响[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 169-173.
[11] 王如海, 王绅, 张敏, 李春, 韩超, 于强, 胡海成, 李习珍. 重型创伤性脑损伤患者去骨瓣减压术后短期死亡风险的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 285-291.
[12] 司楠, 孙洪涛. 创伤性脑损伤后肾功能障碍危险因素的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(05): 300-305.
[13] 胡志恒, 任洪波, 宋志远, 张运刚, 韩晓正. 血清sTIM-3及其配体Gal-9、CEACAM-1与创伤性颅脑损伤患者脑损伤程度及预后的关系[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 201-207.
[14] 王燕, 梁海乾, 郭姗姗. 炎症小体在创伤性脑损伤中作用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(03): 177-181.
[15] 李茂军, 唐彬秩, 吴青, 阳倩, 梁小明, 邹福兰, 黄蓉, 陈昌辉. 新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的管理:多国指南/共识及RDS-NExT workshop 共识陈述简介和评价[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 607-617.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?