切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (01) : 107 -113. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2020.01.014

所属专题: 文献

论著

盆底肌训练联合神经肌电刺激治疗盆腔脏器脱垂的临床疗效
程慧1, 成杰1,(), 张蓓1, 张艳玲1, 李妍雨1   
  1. 1. 徐州市中心医院妇产科,江苏 221009
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-18 修回日期:2020-01-06 出版日期:2020-02-01
  • 通信作者: 成杰

Effects of pelvic floor muscle training combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

Hui Cheng1, Jie Cheng1,(), Bei Zhang1, Yanling Zhang1, Yanyu Li1   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou 221009, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2019-03-18 Revised:2020-01-06 Published:2020-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Jie Cheng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Cheng Jie, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Maternal and Child Health Research Fund of Jiangsu Province(F201662)
引用本文:

程慧, 成杰, 张蓓, 张艳玲, 李妍雨. 盆底肌训练联合神经肌电刺激治疗盆腔脏器脱垂的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(01): 107-113.

Hui Cheng, Jie Cheng, Bei Zhang, Yanling Zhang, Yanyu Li. Effects of pelvic floor muscle training combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2020, 16(01): 107-113.

目的

探讨盆底肌训练(PFMT)联合神经肌电刺激(NMES)治疗,对盆腔脏器脱垂(POP)患者的临床疗效。

方法

选择2015年6月至2018年4月,于徐州市中心医院接受治疗的150例POP患者为研究对象。采用随机数字表法,将其分为观察组(n=80)及对照组(n=70)。对观察组患者采用PFMT联合NMES治疗,对照组患者仅采用PFMT治疗。采用《盆腔脏器脱垂/尿失禁性生活质量问卷(PISQ)-12》,评价患者性生活质量;采用《SF-36健康调查量表》,评价患者生活质量(QoL);采用神经肌电刺激治疗仪,评估患者盆底肌力;采用《汉密顿焦虑量表》(HAMA)及《汉密顿抑郁量表》(HAMD),评估患者焦虑及抑郁情况;采用腹部超声检查,评估患者POP程度。采用t检验或χ2检验,对2组POP患者治疗前及治疗1年时的上述相关指标,进行组内或组间比较。本研究遵循的程序经徐州市中心医院伦理委员会批准(审批文号:20150056),与所有受试者签署知情同意书。

结果

①性生活质量比较:观察组中经治疗后有性生活的POP患者治疗1年时PISQ-12评分为(24.5±8.0)分,显著高于其治疗前的(19.7±8.2)分,亦显著高于对照组中经治疗后有性生活的POP患者治疗1年时的(20.6±7.1)分,并且差异均有统计学意义(t=8.326、P=0.037,t=7.422、P=0.042)。②生活质量比较:治疗1年时,观察组POP患者生理功能(PF)、生理职能(RP)、躯体疼痛(BP)、总体健康(GH)、生理健康总评(PCS)、活力(VT)、社会功能(SF)、情感职能(RE)、精神健康(MH)、心理健康总评(MCS)分值分别为(88.0±13.4)分、(91.9±22.6)分、(98.4±22.6)分、(88.1±9.5)分、(90.8±21.7)分、(92.1±19.6)分、(91.6±18.5)分、(92.1±21.6)分、(91.2±27.4)分、(91.9±14.5)分,均显著高于对照组POP患者的(71.6±8.5)分、(76.9±9.5)分、(73.8±12.1)分、(69.4±8.6)分、(79.1±10.3)分、(76.8±10.4)分、(75.5±11.7)分、(78.6±9.5)分、(75.2±11.6)分、(80.1±7.3)分,并且差异均有统计学差异(t=8.805、9.537、8.643、10.335、8.036、8.605、9.060、8.254、8.814、8.541,均为P<0.001)。③盆底肌力比较:治疗1年时,观察组POP患者盆底肌力为Ⅲ级+Ⅳ级+Ⅴ级所占比例为90.0%,显著高于对照组的44.3%,并且差异有统计学意义(χ2=12.652,P=0.011)。④焦虑及抑郁情况比较:治疗1年时,观察组POP患者HAMA、HAMD评分分别为(7.4±2.1)分、(8.1±3.1)分,均显著低于对照组的(10.3±2.3)分、(10.1±3.1)分,并且差异均有统计学意义(t=5.170、P=0.041,t=5.352、P=0.039)。⑤POP程度比较:治疗1年时,观察组POP患者膀胱颈及宫颈外口距基线的距离分别为(0.71±0.62) cm、(1.5±0.8) cm,均显著长于对照组患者的(0.14±0.74) cm、(1.1±0.6) cm;肛提肌裂孔面积为(18.2±2.8) cm2,显著小于对照组的(22.5±4.9) cm2,并且差异均有统计学意义(t=3.275、P=0.039,t=3.073、P=0.046,t=3.770、P=0.043)。

结论

采用PFMT联合NMES治疗,可使POP患者性生活质量改善、生活质量及盆底肌力提高,POP严重程度下降,而且焦虑、抑郁情绪缓解。

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Methods

A total of 150 patients with POP who were treated in Xuzhou Central Hospital from June 2015 to April 2018, were chosen as research subjects. They were divided into observation group (n=80) and control group (n=70) according to random digits table method. Patients in observation group were treated with PFMT combined with NMES, while patients in control group were only treated with PFMT. Quality of sexual life was evaluated by Pelvic Organ Prolapse /Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire Short Form (PISQ)-12. Quality of life (QoL) of patients was evaluated by Mos 36-Item Short form Health Survey. The pelvic floor muscle strength of patients was evaluated by neuromuscular stimulation therapy apparatus. The anxiety and depression of patients were evaluated by Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) and Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD). The degree of POP of patients was evaluated by abdominal ultrasonography. The related indexes above mentioned before treatment and until one year of treatment of POP patients were compared intra-group or inter-group by t test or chi-square test. The study was carried out with the approval of Ethics Committee of Xuzhou Central Hospital (Approval No. 20150056). All patients had informed consent to the study.

Results

① Comparison of quality of sexual life: PISQ-12 score of POP patients who had sexual life after treatment in observation group until one year of treatment was (24.5±8.0) scores, which was higher than that of (19.7±8.2) sores before treatment in observation group who had sexual life after treatment, also higher than that of (20.6±7.1) sores of POP patients in control group until one year of treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (t=8.326, P=0.037; t=7.422, P=0.042). ② Comparison of QoL: the score of physiological function (PF), role physiological (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), physical component summary (PCS), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role emotional (RE), mental health (MH) and mental component summary (MCS) of POP patients in observation group until one year of treatment were (88.0±13.4) scores, (91.9±22.6) scores, (98.4±22.6) scores, (88.1±9.5) scores, (90.8±21.7) scores, (92.1±19.6) scores, (91.6±18.5) scores, (92.1±21.6) scores, (91.2±27.4) scores and (91.9±14.5) scores, which were higher than those of (71.6±8.5) scores, (76.9±9.5) scores, (73.8±12.1) scores, (69.4±8.6) scores, (79.1±10.3) scores, (76.8±10.4) scores, (75.5±11.7) scores, (78.6±9.5) scores, (75.2±11.6) scores and (80.1±7.3) scores in control group until one year of treatment, and the differences were statistically significant (t=8.805, 9.537, 8.643, 10.335, 8.036, 8.605, 9.060, 8.254, 8.814, 8.541, all P<0.001). ③ Comparison of pelvic floor muscle strength: the proportion of grades of pelvic floor muscle strength of Ⅲ+ Ⅳ+ Ⅴ of POP patients in observation group until one year of treatment was 90.0%, which was higher than that of 44.3% in control group until one year of treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=12.652, P=0.011). ④ Comparison of anxiety and depression conditions: the score of HAMA and HAMD of POP patients in observation group until one year of treatment were (7.4±2.1) scores, (8.1±3.1) scores, which were lower than those of (10.3±2.3) scores, (10.1±3.1) scores in control group until one year of treatment, and the differences were statistically significant (t=5.170, P=0.041; t=5.352, P=0.039). ⑤ Comparison of degree of POP: the distance from bladder neck to baseline and from cervix to baseline of POP patients in observation group until one year of treatment were (0.71±0.62) cm, (1.5±0.8) cm, which were longer than those of (0.14±0.74) cm, (1.1±0.6) cm in control group until one year of treatment; the hiatus area of levator ani muscle of POP patients in observation group was (18.2±2.8) cm2, which was less than that of (22.5±4.9) cm2 in control group, and all the differences above were statistically significant (t=3.275, P=0.039; t=3.073, P=0.046; t=3.770, P=0.043).

Conclusions

PFMT combined with NMES for treatment of POP can improve the quality of sexual life, QoL and pelvic floor muscle strength of patients, also reduce the severity degree of POP, and relieve anxiety and depression.

表1 2组盆腔脏器脱垂患者治疗前一般临床资料比较
表2 2组经治疗后有性生活的盆腔脏器脱垂患者(139例)治疗前、后PISQ-12评分比较(分,±s)
表3 2组盆腔脏器脱垂患者治疗前、后《SF-36健康调查量表》评分结果比较(分,±s)
表4 2组盆腔脏器脱垂患者治疗前、后HAMA及HAMD评分比较(分,±s)
表5 2组盆腔脏器脱垂患者治疗前、后盆腔脏器位置及肛提肌裂孔面积比较(±s)
[1]
鲍颖洁,胡孟彩,高桂香,等. 产后盆腔脏器脱垂的产科因素分析[J]. 中国临床研究,2016, 29(1): 98-100. DOI: 10.13429/j.cnki.cjcr.2016.01.030.
[2]
胡俊,杨欣慰,潘伟. 产后盆底功能障碍防治中肌电刺激加生物反馈盆底技术对性生活质量和盆底功能的影响及临床观察[J]. 中国性科学,2018, 27(7):104-109. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1993.2018.07.031.
[3]
中华医学会妇产科学分会妇科盆底学组. 盆腔器官脱垂的中国诊治指南(草案)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2014, 49(9):647-651. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2014.09.002.
[4]
李芳兵,张丹丹,高琴,等. 经阴道植入网片全盆底重建术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的疗效及对性功能的影响[J]. 中国性科学,2017, 26(6):55-58. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1993.2017.06.020.
[5]
朱萍,赵志梅,綦小蓉,等. 晚孕期孕妇健康相关生命质量及其影响因素分析[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 13(4): 403-408. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2017.04.006.
[6]
刘苑文,李建梅. 盆底肌肉训练对女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的康复效果[J]. 现代诊断与治疗,2015, 26(18): 4220-4221.
[7]
马燕,唐莉萍,王东霞,等. 脑小血管病变后焦虑、抑郁的护理干预措施[J]. 实用临床医药杂志,2019, 23(22): 110-112. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201922037.
[8]
张璐,郑萍,孙如意,等. 生物反馈联合电刺激在女性盆底功能障碍性疾病治疗中的临床应用[J]. 现代生物医学进展,2017, 17(7): 1263-1265, 1285. DOI: 10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2017.07.015.
[9]
王秀凤,尚陈,尹晓辉,等. 盆底肌功能锻炼联合肌电刺激对盆底功能障碍患者功能恢复及生活质量的影响[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志,2016, 25(17): 1907-1909. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-8849.2016.17.030.
[10]
Mifuka Ouchi, Kumiko Kato, Momokazu Gotoh, et al. Physical activity and pelvic floor muscle training in patients with pelvic organ prolapse: a pilot study[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2017, 28(12): 1807-1815. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-017-3356-x.
[11]
曹锦慧,郑春艳,罗树玲,等. 盆底肌锻炼与盆底肌锻炼联合电刺激对多发性硬化症女性性功能障碍的疗效比较[J]. 中国现代医学杂志,2016, 26(19): 120-123. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8982.2016.19.025.
[12]
孙梅芳,母华欣. 盆底肌电刺激联合盆底肌肉锻炼治疗产后盆底器官功能障碍的疗效观察[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志,2015, 23(1): 29-31. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8189.2015.01.
[13]
黄慧,张红莉,韦云芳,等. 盆底电刺激联合阴道哑铃锻炼对产后尿失禁患者盆底肌力的影响[J]. 四川医学,2018, 39(7): 808-810. DOI: 10.16252/j.cnki.issn1004-0501-2018.07.022.
[14]
郭蕾,叶璐,张艺. 神经肌肉刺激治疗仪对女性盆底功能障碍疗效及预后的影响[J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科,2017, 9(7): 31-33. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4020.2017.07.09.
[15]
王晓光,魏勇. 电生理技术在女性盆底疾病领域的应用[J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科,2016, 8(8): 15-16, 21. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4020.2016.08.05.
[16]
Johnson MI. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) as an adjunct for pain management in perioperative settings: a critical review[J]. Expert Rev Neurother, 2017, 17(10):1013-1027. DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2017.1364158.
[17]
Beckwée D, Bautmans I, Lefeber N, et al. Effect of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation on pain after total knee arthroplasty: a blind randomized controlled trial[J]. J Knee Surg, 2018, 31(2):189-196. DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1602134.
[1] 陈翠萍, 李佩君, 杜景榕, 谢青梅, 许一宁, 卓姝妤, 李晓芳. 互联网联合上门护理在老年全髋关节置换术后的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 676-681.
[2] 张舒沁, 陈练. 产后宫腔内妊娠物残留的诊断和临床处理[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 493-497.
[3] 石皆春, 范子玉, 邢燕. 不同筛查方法预警宫颈原位腺癌的效能[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 575-581.
[4] 唐丹, 姚晓曦, 杨博文, 薛绍龙, 李梦瑶, 韦柳杏, 郄明蓉. 双肾上腺皮质激素样激酶1对子宫内膜样腺癌患者临床特征的影响[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 582-590.
[5] 李煜, 王鹏, 陆翮, 冯蓉琴, 韩军涛. 采用低频脉冲电刺激治疗深Ⅱ度烧伤创面的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 474-478.
[6] 张熙东, 贾贺杰, 冯锐, 李路亚, 乔永志, 郑颖. 急诊患者家属焦虑的影响因素[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 319-324.
[7] 李玲, 刘亚, 李培玲, 张秀敏, 李萍. 直肠癌患者术后肠道菌群的变化与抑郁症相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 607-610.
[8] 高金红, 陈玉梅, 郭韵. 基于King互动达标理论的心理疏导在腹腔镜肝癌切除术患者的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 517-520.
[9] 杜晨阳, 王勇, 段鑫, 柯文杰, 石念, 武英翔, 罗文. 腹腔镜下食管裂孔疝修补术后吞咽困难的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 523-527.
[10] 张璇, 高杨, 房雅君, 姚艳玲. 保护性机械通气在肺癌胸腔镜肺段切除术中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 563-567.
[11] 马锦芳, 何正光, 郑劲平. 盐酸氨溴索雾化吸入治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病黏痰症患者的疗效和安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 568-574.
[12] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
[13] 王玲, 樊文彬, 倪嘉淳, 蔡增进. 功能性便秘与焦虑抑郁共病的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 411-416.
[14] 白杰, 王唯一, 陈超, 王帆, 肖新如. 神经外科住培医师职业倦怠及影响因素研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 662-670.
[15] 王丽娜, 吕书霞, 李亚男. 脑卒中偏瘫患者健康焦虑元认知与疾病接受度、恐惧疾病进展的相关性[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 434-440.
阅读次数
全文


摘要