切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版)

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 328 -333. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2019.03.014

所属专题： 文献；

论著

血管生成素2与炎症因子在脓毒症患儿中的表达
王凯旋1,†(), 徐丽丹1, 姜雪燕1, 梅金枝1, 张晨美2, 张静1   
  1. 1. 浙江大学金华医院儿科　321000
    2. 浙江大学医学院附属儿童医院，杭州　310000
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-08 修回日期:2019-04-27 出版日期:2019-06-01
  • 通信作者: 王凯旋

Expression of angiopoietin-2 and inflammatory factors in children with sepsis

Kaixuan Wang1,†(), Lidan Xu1, Xueyan Jiang1, Jinzhi Mei1, Chenmei Zhang2, Jing Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Jinhua Hospital of Zhejiang University, Jinhua 321000, Zhejiang Province, China
    2. The Children′s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang Province, China
  • Received:2019-02-08 Revised:2019-04-27 Published:2019-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Kaixuan Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Kaixuan, Email:
  • Supported by:
    General Research Program of Medical Science in Zhejiang Province(2015KYB416)
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

王凯旋, 徐丽丹, 姜雪燕, 梅金枝, 张晨美, 张静. 血管生成素2与炎症因子在脓毒症患儿中的表达[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(03): 328-333.

Kaixuan Wang, Lidan Xu, Xueyan Jiang, Jinzhi Mei, Chenmei Zhang, Jing Zhang. Expression of angiopoietin-2 and inflammatory factors in children with sepsis[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2019, 15(03): 328-333.

目的

探讨血清血管生成素(Ang)2、白细胞介素(IL)-6和肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α水平与儿童脓毒症严重程度的相关性，为儿童脓毒症临床诊断及治疗提供依据。

方法

选择2017年7月至2018年7月，在浙江大学金华医院儿科及浙江大学医学院附属儿童医院诊治的64例发热患儿为研究对象，其年龄为1个月至12岁。根据患儿是否罹患脓毒症及脓毒症分级标准，将其分为3组：A组(n＝22，脓毒症患儿)，B组(n＝24，感染不伴SIRS的的非脓毒症患儿)、C组(n＝18，严重脓毒症患儿)。选择同期于浙江大学金华医院儿童保健科进行体检的21例健康受试儿作为对照，纳入对照组，其年龄为3个月至12岁。采用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)法检测4组受试儿血清Ang-2、IL-6、TNF-α水平。绘制4组受试儿血清Ang-2水平诊断严重脓毒症患儿的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线，计算ROC曲线下面积(ROC-AUC)，根据约登指数最大原则，确定血清Ang-2水平诊断严重脓毒症患儿的最佳临界值，同时计算其敏感度和特异度。采用直线相关分析，对4组受试儿血清Ang-2水平分别与其血清IL-6、TNF-α水平进行相关性分析。本研究遵循的程序符合2013年修订的《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言》要求，并与所有受试儿监护人签署临床研究知情同意书。

结果

①4组受试儿年龄、性别构成比等一般临床资料比较，差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。②4组受试儿血清Ang-2、TNF-α和IL-6水平分别总体比较，差异均有统计学意义(F＝261.24、33.82、28.00，P均<0.001)。进一步进行两两比较的结果显示，C组受试儿血清Ang-2、TNF-α水平，均显著高于A组、B组和对照组，并且差异均有统计学意义(血清Ang-2水平：LSD-t＝－5.35、－15.98、25.31，P均<0.001；血清TNF-α水平：LSD-t＝－2.24、P＝0.030，LSD-t＝－4.91、P<0.001，LSD-t＝8.59、P均<0.001)；C组受试儿血清IL-6水平分别显著高于B组和对照组，并且差异有统计学意义(LSD-t＝－4.93、8.50，P均<0.001)。③ROC曲线分析结果显示，4组受试儿血清Ang-2水平诊断严重脓毒症患儿的ROC-AUC为0.998(95%CI：0.946～1.000，P<0.001)。根据约登指数最大原则，血清Ang-2水平诊断严重脓毒症患儿的最佳临界值为163.4 ng/L，此时其诊断严重脓毒症患儿的敏感度为100.0%，特异度为98.5%。④4组受试儿中，其血清Ang-2水平分别与血清IL-6、TNF-α水平呈正相关关系(r＝0.606、0.556，P均<0.001)。

结论

血清Ang-2水平随着脓毒症患儿病情严重程度增加而增高，可用于辅助判断脓毒症患儿病情严重程度。血清IL-6、TNF-α水平与血清Ang-2水平具有相关性，可以协助临床诊断脓毒症患儿。

关键词: 脓毒症, 血管生成素2, 白细胞介素6, 肿瘤坏死因子α, ROC曲线, 儿童
Objective

To evaluate the relationship between levels of serum angiopoietin (Ang)-2, interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and the severity of sepsis in children, and to provide evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment of children with sepsis.

Methods

A total of 64 cases of children with fever who were treated in Department of Pediatrics, Jinhua Hospital of Zhejiang University and The Children′s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine were selected as research subjects. Their age ranged from 1 month after birth to 12 years old. They were divided into three groups according to whether they suffered from sepsis or not and the grading standards of sepsis: group A (n=22, children with sepsis), group B [(n=24, children with infection and without systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)], and group C (n=18, children with severe sepsis). In the same period, another 21 children underwent health examination in Department of Child Healthcare, Jinhua Hospital of Zhejiang University were included into control group. Their age ranged from 3 months after birth to 12 years old. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to detect the levels of serum Ang-2, IL-6 and TNF-α. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of level of serum Ang-2 for diagnosing children with severe sepsis among 4 groups were drawn, and the area under the ROC curve (ROC-AUC) was calculated. The optimal critical value of serum Ang-2 level for diagnosing children with severe sepsis was determined according to the principle of maximum Youden index, and its sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Linear correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between levels of serum Ang-2 level and serum IL-6 and TNF-α. This study was in line with the requirements of World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013. The guardians of all children signed the clinical research informed consents.

Results

① There were no significant differences in age, gender composition ratio and other general clinical data among 4 groups (P>0.05). ②There were significant differences among 4 groups in the levels of serum Ang-2, TNF-α and IL-6 (F=261.24, 33.82, 28.00; P all<0.001). Further comparison results showed that the levels of serum Ang-2 and TNF-α in group C were significantly higher than those in group A, group B and control group, and all the differences were statistically significant (level of serum Ang-2: LSD-t=-5.35, -15.98, 25.31, P all<0.001; level of serum TNF-α: LSD-t=-2.24, P=0.030, LSD-t=-4.91, P<0.001, LSD-t=8.59, P<0.001). The level of serum IL-6 in group C was higher than that in group B and control group, respectively, and both the differences were statistically significant (LSD-t=-4.93, 8.50; P all<0.001). ③The results of ROC curve analysis showed that ROC-AUC of serum Ang-2 level in diagnosis of children with severe sepsis was 0.998 (95%CI: 0.946-1.000, P<0.001). According to the principle of maximum Youden index, the optimal critical value of serum Ang-2 level to predict children with severe sepsis was 163.4 ng/L, and its sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of children with severe sepsis were 100.0% and 98.5%, respectively. ④Among the children in 4 groups, serum Ang-2 level was positively correlated with serum IL-6 and TNF-α levels, respectively (r=0.606, 0.556; P all<0.001).

Conclusions

The level of serum Ang-2 is significantly elevated with the severity of children with sepsis, which can be used to evaluate the severity of children with sepsis. The levels of serum IL-6 and TNF-α are correlated with serum Ang-2 level, which can assist in the diagnosis of children with sepsis.

Key words: Sepsis, Angiopoietin-2, Interleukin-6, Tumor necrosis factor-alpha, ROC curve, Child
表1 4组受试儿一般临床资料比较
组别 例数 年龄(岁，±s) 性别[例数(%)]
男 女
A组 22 2.9±0.6 13(59.1) 9(40.9)
B组 24 3.4±0.7 12(50.0) 12(50.0)
C组 18 2.9±0.7 10(55.6) 8(44.4)
对照组 21 3.8±0.8 12(57.1) 9(42.9)
检验值 ? F＝1.29 χ2＝0.43
P值 ? 0.283 0.934
表2 4组受试儿血清Ang-2、IL-6、TNF-α水平比较(±s)
组别 例数 血清Ang-2水平(ng/L) 血清IL-6水平(pg/mL) 血清TNF-α水平(pg/mL)
A组 22 154.2±7.6 103.7±7.8 286.4±36.4
B组 24 122.7±12.2 82.6±23.9 246.2±75.7
C组 18 170.5±8.5 106.1±12.3 321.3±32.3
对照组 21 92.5±8.9 64.4±9.6 185.9±29.9
总体比较 ? ? ? ?
? F值 ? 261.24 33.82 28.00
? P值 ? <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
A组vs B组 ? ? ? ?
? LSD-t值 ? 11.12 4.67 2.78
? P值 ? <0.001 <0.001 0.007
A组vs C组 ? ? ? ?
? LSD-t值 ? －5.35 －0.51 －2.24
? P值 ? <0.001 0.620 0.030
A组vs对照组 ? ? ? ?
? LSD-t值 ? 21.07 8.43 6.74
? P值 ? <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
B组vs C组 ? ? ? ?
? LSD-t值 ? －15.98 －4.93 －4.91
? P值 ? <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
B组vs对照组 ? ? ? ?
? LSD-t值 ? 10.53 3.99 4.11
? P值 ? <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
C组vs对照组 ? ? ? ?
? LSD-t值 ? 25.31 8.50 8.59
? P值 ? <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
图1 血清Ang-2水平诊断严重脓毒症患儿的ROC曲线
图2 4组受试儿中，血清Ang-2水平与血清IL-6水平的相关性分析
图3 4组受试儿中，血清Ang-2水平与血清TNF-α水平的相关性分析
[1]
Stålhammar ME, Sindelar R, Douhan Håkansson L. Neutrophil receptor response to bacterial N-formyl peptides is similar in term newborn infants and adults in contrast to IL-8 [J]. Scand J Immunol, 2016, 84(6): 332-337.
[2]
Calis J, van Woensel J, Lemson J. Severe sepsis and septic shock[J]. N Engl J Med, 2013, 369(21): 2062.
[3]
Lanziotti VS, Póvoa P, Soares M, et al.The use of biomarkers in pediatric sepsis: a literature review[J]. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva, 2016, 28(4): 472-482.
[4]
Shehabi Y, Sterba M, Garrett PM, et al. Procalcitonin algorithm in critically ill adults with undifferentiated infection or suspected sepsis. A randomized controlled trial [J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2014, 190(10): 1102-1110.
[5]
Pallás Beneyto LA, Rodríguez Luis O, Saiz Sánchez C, et al. Prognostic value of interleukin 6 for death of patients with sepsis [J]. Med Clin (Barc), 2016, 147(7): 281-286.
[6]
中华医学会儿科学分会急救学组，中华医学会急诊医学分会儿科学组，中国医师协会儿童重症医师分会. 儿童脓毒性休克(感染性休克)诊治专家共识(2015版)[J]. 中华儿科杂志，2015, 53(8): 576-580.
[7]
Kang Q, Chen Y, Zhang X, et al. Heat shock protein A12B protects against sepsis-induced impairment in vascular endothelial permeability [J]. J Surg Res, 2016, 202(1): 87-94.
[8]
Lin B, Jia X, Xie Z, et al. Vascular endothelial cells activate peripheral natural killer T cells and participate in regulation of downstream immune cascades in patients with sepsis [J]. Med Sci Monit, 2018, 24: 7387-7398.
[9]
McHale TM, Garciarena CD, Fagan RP, et al. Inhibition of vascular endothelial cell leak following escherichia coli attachment in an experimental model of sepsis [J]. Crit Care Med, 2018, 46(8): e805-e810.
[10]
Heun Y, Pircher J, Czermak T, et al. Inactivation of the tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2 drives vascular dysfunction in sepsis [J]. EBioMedicine, 2019, 42: 120-132.
[11]
Zelic M, Roderick JE, O′Donnell JA, et al. RIP kinase 1-dependent endothelial necroptosis underlies systemic inflammatory response syndrome [J]. J Clin Invest, 2018, 128(5): 2064-2075.
[12]
Li S, Zhong M, Yuan Y, et al. Differential roles of p38 MAPK and ERK1/2 in angiopoietin-2-mediated rat pulmonary microvascular endothelial cell apoptosis induced by lipopolysaccharide [J]. Exp Ther Med, 2018, 16(6): 4729-4736.
[13]
Cao ZH, Gao L, Jiang L, et al. Effect of β-arrestin on damage of human umbilical vein endothelial cell induced by angiotensin Ⅱ [J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2017, 21(24): 5821-5826.
[14]
Li R, Mittelstein D, Fang K, et al. Angiopoeitin-2 modulates Survivin expression in OxLDL-induced endothelial cell apoptosis [J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2012, 417(1): 619-622.
[15]
Szederjesi J, Almasy E, Lazar A, et al. The role of angiopoietine-2 in the diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis [J]. J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures), 2015, 1(1): 18-23.
[16]
Melendez E, Whitney JE, Norton JS, et al. Systemic angiopoietin-1/2 dysregulation in pediatric sepsis and septic shock [J]. Int J Med Sci, 2019, 16(2): 318-323.
[17]
Lymperopoulou K, Velissaris D, Kotsaki A, et al. Angiopoietin-2 associations with the underlying infection and sepsis severity[J]. Cytokine. 2015, 73(1): 163-168.
[18]
Fang Y, Li C, Shao R, et al. Prognostic significance of the angiopoietin-2/angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-1/Tie-2 ratios for early sepsis in an emergency department [J]. Crit Care, 2015, 19: 367.
[19]
Liu XW, Ma T, Liu W, et al. Sustained increase in angiopoietin-2, heparin-binding protein, and procalcitonin is associated with severe sepsis[J]. J Crit Care, 2018, 45: 14-19.
[20]
Roth TL, Nayak D, Atanasijevic T, et al. Transcranial amelioration of inflammation and cell death after brain injury [J]. Nature, 2014, 505(7482): 223-228.
[21]
Sieve I, Münster-Kühnel AK, Hilfiker-Kleiner D. Regulation and function of endothelial glycocalyx layer in vascular diseases [J]. Vascul Pharmacol, 2018, 100: 26-33.
[22]
Lockyer P, Mao H, Fan Q, et al. LRP1-dependent BMPER signaling regulates lipopolysaccharide-induced vascular inflammation [J]. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2017, 37(8): 1524-1535.
[23]
Fiedler U, Reiss Y, Scharpfenecker M, et al. Angiopoietin-2 sensitizes endothelial cells to TNF-alpha and has a crucial role in the induction of inflammation [J]. Nat Med, 2006, 12(2): 235-239.
[24]
Gopinathan G, Milagre C, Pearce OM, et al. Interleukin-6 stimulates defective angiogenesis [J]. Cancer Res, 2015, 75(15): 3098-3107.
[25]
Tong Q, Wang XL, Li SB, et al. Combined detection of IL-6 and IL-8 is beneficial to the diagnosis of early stage esophageal squamous cell cancer: a preliminary study based on the screening of serum markers using protein chips [J]. Onco Targets Ther, 2018, 11: 5777-5787.
[1] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[2] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[3] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[4] 刘婷婷, 林妍冰, 汪珊, 陈幕荣, 唐子鉴, 代东伶, 夏焙. 超声衰减参数成像评价儿童代谢相关脂肪性肝病的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[5] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[6] 姚咏明. 如何精准评估烧伤脓毒症患者免疫状态[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 552-552.
[7] 米洁, 陈晨, 李佳玲, 裴海娜, 张恒博, 李飞, 李东杰. 儿童头面部外伤特点分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 511-515.
[8] 李维, 莫俊俏. 儿童呼吸道耐药流感嗜血杆菌基因型鉴定及耐药分析对抗菌药物治疗选择的意义[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 315-323.
[9] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[10] 李芳, 许瑞, 李洋洋, 石秀全. 循证医学理念在儿童腹股沟疝患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 782-786.
[11] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[12] 卓少宏, 林秀玲, 周翠梅, 熊卫莲, 马兴灶. CD64指数、SAA/CRP、PCT联合检测在小儿消化道感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[13] 刘笑笑, 张小杉, 刘群, 马岚, 段莎莎, 施依璐, 张敏洁, 王雅晳. 中国学龄前儿童先天性心脏病流行病学研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1021-1024.
[14] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
[15] 谭睿, 王晶, 於江泉, 郑瑞强. 脓毒症中高密度脂蛋白、载脂蛋白A-I和血清淀粉样蛋白A的作用研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 749-753.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号