切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (06) : 699 -704. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2016.06.015

所属专题: 文献

论著

儿童与成年人心电图右束支传导阻滞的临床分析
刘童1, 秦方1, 郑志洁2, 乔莉娜3, 卢永义3, 魏丽3,()   
  1. 1. 610041成都市第一人民医院心内科
    2. 610041成都,四川大学华西第四医院心电图室
    3. 610041成都,四川大学华西第二医院儿科
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-09 修回日期:2016-11-04 出版日期:2016-12-01
  • 通信作者: 魏丽

Clinical analysis of right bundle branch block pattern for children and adults electrocardiogram

Tong Liu1, Fang Qin1, Zhijie Zheng2, Lina Qiao3, Yongyi Lu3, Li Wei3,()   

  1. 1. Department of Cardiology, Chengdu First People′s Hospital, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
    2. Department of Electrocardiogram, West China Fourth Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
    3. Department of Pediatrics, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2016-03-09 Revised:2016-11-04 Published:2016-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Li Wei
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wei Li, Email:
引用本文:

刘童, 秦方, 郑志洁, 乔莉娜, 卢永义, 魏丽. 儿童与成年人心电图右束支传导阻滞的临床分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 12(06): 699-704.

Tong Liu, Fang Qin, Zhijie Zheng, Lina Qiao, Yongyi Lu, Li Wei. Clinical analysis of right bundle branch block pattern for children and adults electrocardiogram[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2016, 12(06): 699-704.

目的

探讨儿童与成年人心电图右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)的年龄、病因、合并阻滞类型分布及心电图QRS波宽的差异。

方法

选择2013年1月至12月于成都市第一人民医院、四川大学华西第二医院及四川大学华西第四医院心电图室门诊或住院确诊为RBBB的830例患者为研究对象。根据其年龄分为儿童组(n=330,<18岁)与成年人组(n=500,≥18岁)。统计学比较2组受试者年龄、病因、合并阻滞类型分布及心电图QRS波宽。

结果

①儿童组RBBB患者中,3~7岁者为132例,占儿童组总人数的40.0%(132/330);成年人组RBBB患者中,50~70岁者为204例,占成年人组总人数的40.8%(204/500)。②儿童组RBBB患者中,以先天性心脏病为最主要的病因,先天性心脏病术前者占29.1%(96/330),术后者占56.4%(186/330)。成年人组RBBB患者中,慢性肺部疾病或明确有心脏病史者占65.6%(328/500)。③儿童组与成年人组RBBB合并其他阻滞类型的发生率分别为16.4%(54/330)与50.4%(252/500)。2组患者RBBB合并其他阻滞类型的构成比比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.250,P=0.993)。成年人和儿童RBBB均以合并左前分支传导阻滞(LAFB)最为常见。④儿童组不完全性RBBB(IRBBB)患者QRS波宽为(78.2±12.6)ms,低于成年人组IRBBB患者的(98.9±9.3)ms,二者比较,差异有统计学意义(t=-3.193,P=0.013)。儿童组完全性RBBB(CRBBB)患者QRS波宽为(118.4±8.9)ms,低于成年人组CRBBB患者的(148.2±21.4)ms,二者比较,差异有统计学意义(t=-3.214,P=0.012)。

结论

儿童与成年人RBBB患者的年龄、病因、心电图QRS波宽分布不同,但是RBBB合并其他阻滞类型比较无差异。

Objective

To analyze the age, etiologic distribution, combined type of block and the QRS wave width of electrocardiogram in children and adults with right bundle branch block (RBBB).

Methods

A total of 830 cases of outpatients and inpatients who were diagnosed as RBBB by electrocardiogram in Chengdu First People′s Hospital, West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University and West China Fourth Hospital of Sichuan University from January to December in 2013 were selected as the subjects. According to the age, they were divided into children group (n=330, all <18 years old) and adults group (n=500, all ≥18 years old). The age, etiologic distribution, combined types of blocks, QRS width of two groups were analyzed by statistical methods.

Results

①The age of RBBB patients in children group was mainly distributed in 3 to 7 years old, accounting for 40.0% (132/330) of the total number of children group. The age of RBBB patients in adult group was mainly distributed in 50 to 70 years old, accounting for 40.8% (204/500) of the total number of adults group. ②Congenital heart disease was the most common cause of RBBB in children, preoperative and postoperative congenital heart disease patients accounted for 29.1% (96/330) and 56.4% (186/330), respectively in children group. Adults with chronic lung disease or a clear history of heart disease accounted for 65.6% (328/500) in adults group. ③The incidence of RBBB combined with other types of block in children group and adults group was 16.4% (54/330) and 50.4% (252/500), respectively. There was no significant difference in the constituent ratio of RBBB combined with other types of blocks in children and adults group (χ2=0.250, P=0.993). RBBB combined with left anterior branch block (LAFB) was the most common combined type of blocks both in adults and children group. ④The width of QRS in children with incomplete right bundle branch block (IRBBB) was (78.2±12.6) ms, which was lower than (98.9±9.3) ms in adults group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=-3.193, P=0.013). The QRS width of children with complete right bundle branch block (CRBBB) was (118.4±8.9) ms, which was significantly lower than (148.2±21.4) ms in adults group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=-3.214, P=0.012).

Conclusions

The distributions of RBBB in age, etiology, QRS width of electrocardiogram in children and adults are different. But there is no difference in the combination of other types of blocks betweeen children and adults with RBBB.

表1 儿童组与成年人组右束支传导阻滞患者年龄分布情况
表2 儿童组与成年人组右束支传导阻滞患者病因分布情况
表3 儿童组与成年人组右束支传导阻滞合并其他阻滞类型分布情况[例数(%)]
表4 2组右束支传导阻滞患者QRS波宽比较(ms,±s)
[1]
王安宁,南婷婷,葛艳霞,等. 新发右束支传导阻滞与冠心病关系的随访研究[J]. 中国心血管病研究,2013, 11(8):588-591.
[2]
郜玲,卢喜烈. 新发右束支传导阻滞的临床意义[J]. 心电与循环,2012,31(5): 373-374.
[3]
黄元铸. 右束支阻滞的多面性与临床意义[J]. 临床心电学杂志,2012, 21(2): 135-136.
[4]
Widimsky P, Rohác F, Stásek J, et al. Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction with right bundle branch block: should new onset right bundle branch block be added to future guidelines as an indication for reperfusion therapy?[J]. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33(1): 86-95.
[5]
Strauss DG, Loring Z, Selvester RH, et al. Right, but not left, bundle branch block is associated with large anteroseptal scar[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2013, 62(11): 959-967.
[6]
Devarapally SR, Arora S, Ahmad A, et al. Right ventricular failure predicted from right bundle branch block: cardiac magnetic resonance imaging validation[J]. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther, 2016, 6(5): 432-438.
[7]
Adams JC, Nelson MR, Chandrasekaran K, et al. Novel ECG criteria for right ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with right bundle branch block[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2013, 167(4): 1385-1389.
[8]
Marterer R, Hongchun Z, Tschauner S, et al. Cardiac MRI assessment of right ventricular function: impact of right bundle branch blockon the evaluation of cardiac performance parameters[J]. Eur Radiol, 2015, 25(12): 3528-3535.
[9]
Willems JL, Robles de Medina EO, Bernard R, et al. Criteria for intraventricular conduction disturbances and preexcitation[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1985, 5(6): 1261-1275.
[10]
Steinfurt J, Biermann J, Bode C, et al. The diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment of Brugada syndrome[J]. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2015, 112(23): 394-401.
[11]
Naseef A, Behr ER, Batchvarov VN. Electrocardiographic methods for diagnosis and risk stratification in the Brugada syndrome[J]. J Saudi Heart Assoc, 2015, 27(2): 96-108.
[12]
Lev M, Unger PN, Lesser ME, et al. Pathology of the conduction system in acquired heart disease: complete right bundle branch block[J]. Am Heart J, 1961, 61: 593-614.
[13]
戴静,符赛琼,杨光瑞,等. 心电图右束支阻滞的临床意义[J]. 实用医技杂志,2014,21(9): 1010.
[14]
Seitelberger R, Wild T, Serbecic N, et al. Significance of right bundle branch block in the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2000, 18(2): 187-193.
[15]
Krongrad E, Heller SE, Bowman FO, et al. Further observation on the etiology of the right boundle branch block pattern following right ventriculotomy[J]. Circulation, 1974, 50(6): 1105-1113.
[16]
阚亚楠,李丽,王瑾,等. 房间隔缺损婴幼儿心电图中RAVR和SI的特点[J]. 广东医学,2014, 35(4): 641.
[17]
Brembilla-Perrot B, Suty-Selton C, Houriez P, et al. Value of non-invasive and invasive studies in patients with bundle branch block, syncope and history of myocardial infarction[J]. Europace, 2001, 3(3): 187-194.
[18]
李华,王联发,周文兵,等. 无事件Brugada综合征1例[J]. 临床心血管病杂志,2014, 30(2): 181-182.
[19]
Brugada R, Brugada J, Antzelevitch C, et al. Sodium channel blockers identify risk for sudden death in patients with ST-segment elevation and right bundle branch block but structurally normal hearts[J]. Circulation, 2000, 101(5): 510-515.
[20]
魏丽,周同甫. 新生儿心电图判读指南(二)[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志:电子版,2009, 5(1): 91-93.
[21]
娄占玉,相有章. 克山病、心肌炎及先天性心脏病束支传导阻滞的临床分析[J]. 中国地方病防治杂志,2002, 17(4): 235-237.
[22]
李金秀. 23例体检小儿不完全性右束支传导阻滞心电图结果分析[J]. 北方药学,2014, 11(7): 137.
[23]
魏丽,卢永义,华益民,等. 儿童心电图V1导联T波直立的意义[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志:电子版,2012, 8(6): 769-770.
[24]
王安宁. 新发右束支传导阻滞378例临床诊治分析[J]. 内科,2014, 9(4): 381-382.
[25]
金辰,李卫,杨跃进,等. 合并右束支阻滞的冠心病患者临床及冠状动脉造影特点分析[J]. 中国分子心脏病学杂志,2014, 14(2): 857-859.
[1] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[2] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[3] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[4] 刘婷婷, 林妍冰, 汪珊, 陈幕荣, 唐子鉴, 代东伶, 夏焙. 超声衰减参数成像评价儿童代谢相关脂肪性肝病的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[5] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[6] 孙佳英, 黄云洲, 任书堂, 王翠华, 陈新华, 于艾嘉, 陈元禄. 无创心肌做功对左束支传导阻滞患者左心室整体及节段心肌收缩功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 836-843.
[7] 米洁, 陈晨, 李佳玲, 裴海娜, 张恒博, 李飞, 李东杰. 儿童头面部外伤特点分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 511-515.
[8] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[9] 李芳, 许瑞, 李洋洋, 石秀全. 循证医学理念在儿童腹股沟疝患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 782-786.
[10] 彭永辉, 张文杰, 李炳根, 聂向阳, 吴凯, 杨六成. 单孔双针疝囊高位结扎术在儿童巨大腹股沟疝的临床应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 566-569.
[11] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[12] 卓少宏, 林秀玲, 周翠梅, 熊卫莲, 马兴灶. CD64指数、SAA/CRP、PCT联合检测在小儿消化道感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[13] 刘笑笑, 张小杉, 刘群, 马岚, 段莎莎, 施依璐, 张敏洁, 王雅晳. 中国学龄前儿童先天性心脏病流行病学研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1021-1024.
[14] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
[15] 余林阳, 王美英, 李建斌, 楼骁斌, 谢思远, 马志忠, 齐海英, 李稼. 高原地区肺炎合并右心功能衰竭体征患儿的肺动脉压力和心脏形态与功能的特征[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 535-544.
阅读次数
全文


摘要