切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (06) : 705 -709. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2016.06.016

所属专题: 文献

论著

经阴道髂尾肌筋膜固定术联合传统术式治疗盆腔脏器脱垂的疗效分析
刘丽萍1,(), 刘丽丽2, 刘丽燕2, 龚敏1, 黄石娣1, 李婧1, 鲍明霞1, 范锡平1, 邹宗峰3   
  1. 1. 517300广东省河源市龙川县人民医院妇产科
    2. 450015广东省佛山市南海区第六人民医院妇产科
    3. 510240广州,广东药学院社会医学与卫生统计教研室
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-29 修回日期:2016-11-14 出版日期:2016-12-01
  • 通信作者: 刘丽萍

Effect analysis of transvaginal iliococcygeal fixation combined with traditional surgery in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

Liping Liu1,(), Lili Liu2, Liyan Liu2, Min Gong1, Shidi Huang1, Jing Li1, Mingxia Bao1, Xiping Fan1, Zongfeng Zou3   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Longchuan County People′s Hospital, Heyuan 517300, Guangdong Province, China
    2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Sixth People′s Hospital of Foshan Nanhai District, Foshan 450015, Guangdong Province, China
    3. Department of Social Medicine and Health Statistics, Guangdong College of Pharmacy, Guangzhou 510240, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2016-06-29 Revised:2016-11-14 Published:2016-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Liping Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Liping, Email:
引用本文:

刘丽萍, 刘丽丽, 刘丽燕, 龚敏, 黄石娣, 李婧, 鲍明霞, 范锡平, 邹宗峰. 经阴道髂尾肌筋膜固定术联合传统术式治疗盆腔脏器脱垂的疗效分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2016, 12(06): 705-709.

Liping Liu, Lili Liu, Liyan Liu, Min Gong, Shidi Huang, Jing Li, Mingxia Bao, Xiping Fan, Zongfeng Zou. Effect analysis of transvaginal iliococcygeal fixation combined with traditional surgery in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2016, 12(06): 705-709.

目的

探讨经阴道髂尾肌筋膜固定术联合经阴道全子宫切除术+阴道前、后壁修补术治疗盆腔脏器脱垂(POP)的应用价值。

方法

选取2014年1月至2015年12月,广东省河源市龙川县人民医院与广东省佛山市南海区第六人民医院收治的98例POP患者为研究对象。根据POP患者接受的手术治疗方式,将其分为观察组(n=48,接受经髂尾肌筋膜固定术联合经阴道全子宫切除术+阴道前、后壁修补术治疗)与对照组(n=50,仅接受经阴道全子宫切除术+阴道前、后壁修补术治疗)。统计学比较2组患者的一般临床资料、手术时间、术中出血量、术后胃肠功能恢复时间、住院时间、治疗费用、治疗有效率、不良反应率,以及复诊时感染率、手术创面愈合不良发生率及复发率。

结果

①2组患者年龄、人体质量指数、产次、绝经时间及POP量化分期法(POP-Q)分度、合并症构成比等一般临床资料分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。②2组患者手术时间及术中出血量比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组患者术后胃肠功能恢复时间为(8.5±2.7)h,较对照组的(10.6±3.2)h短,并且差异有统计学意义(t=3.504,P=0.035)。③观察组患者住院时间为(8.4±1.2)d,较对照组的(10.5±1.7)d短,差异有统计学意义(t=7.038,P<0.001)。观察组治疗费用为(6 084.7±844.9)元,较对照组的(6 515.6±1 018.4)元低,并且差异亦有统计学意义(t=2.275,P=0.047)。④观察组治疗有效率为97.9%(47/48),住院期间不良反应率为4.2%(2/48),对照组分别为90.0%(45/50)与8.0%(4/50),二者分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。复诊时,2组患者感染率、手术创面愈合不良发生率及复发率分别比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

经阴道髂尾筋膜固定术联合传统术式治疗POP,疗效及安全性较为可靠,并且治疗费用较低。

Objective

To analyze the value of transvaginal iliococcygeal fixation combined with transvaginal hysterectomy, anterior and posterior colporrhaphy in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Methods

From January 2014 to December 2015, 98 patients with POP in Longchuan County People′s Hospital and the Sixth People′s Hospital of Foshan Nanhai District were chosen as study subjects. According to the surgical method, all patients were divided into study group (n=48, received transvaginal iliococcygeal fixation + transvaginal hysterectomy + anterior and posterior colporrhaphy treatment) and control group (n=50, received transvaginal hysterectomy+ anterior and posterior colporrhaphy treatment). The clinical baseline data, surgery duration, transoperative bleeding volume, the recovery time of gastrointestinal function, hospitalization, treatment cost, cure rate, adverse reaction rate, infection rate, unhealing rate of wound and recurrence rate were compared between two groups by statistical methods.

Results

①There were no significant differences between two groups in age, body mass index, parity, menopause time, pelvic organ prolapse quantitation (POP-Q) and complications constituent ratio (P>0.05). ②There were no significant differences between two groups in transoperative bleeding volume and surgery duration (P>0.05). While the recovery time of gastrointestinal function of study group was (8.5±2.7) h, which was shorter than (10.6±3.2) h of control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=3.504, P=0.035). ③The hospitalization of study group was (8.4±1.2) d, which was shorter than (10.5±1.7) d of control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=7.038, P<0.001). The treatment cost of study group was (6 084.7±844.9) yuan, which was lower than (6 515.6±1 018.4) yuan of control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=2.275, P=0.047). ④In study group, the cure rate was 97.9% (47/48), the adverse reaction rate during hospitalization was 4.2% (2/48), and in control group, they were 90.0% (45/50) and 8.0% (4/50), respectively, but both the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). There were no significant differences between two groups in the infection rate, unhealing rate of wound and the recurrence rate at the time of return visit (P>0.05).

Conclusions

The effect and safety of transvaginal iliococcygeal fixation combined with transvaginal hysterectomy, anterior and posterior colporrhaphy in treatment of POP are reliable, and its cost is relatively lower.

表1 2组盆腔脏器脱垂患者一般临床资料比较
表2 2组盆腔脏器脱垂患者手术情况比较(±s)
表3 2组盆腔脏器脱垂患者住院时间及治疗费用比较(±s)
表4 2组盆腔脏器脱垂患者住院期间不良反应情况及复诊时感染、手术创面愈合不良、复发情况比较[例数(%)]
[1]
Lecomte-Grosbras P, Witz JF, Brieu M, et al. Quantification of pelvic mobility on dynamic magnetic resonance images: using mechanical insight to help diagnose pelvic pathologies[J]. Strain, 2015, 51(4): 301-310.
[2]
周丽莉,王霞,穆玉明. 经会阴超声评估女性产后前盆腔脏器脱垂的临床研究[J]. 医学临床研究,2015, 32(8): 1584-1586.
[3]
刘晓瑛,周维,刘保华,等. 689例妇科检查者盆底脏器脱垂患病状况分析[J]. 广州医科大学学报,2014, 42(5): 67-69.
[4]
张海清,李斌. 腹腔镜下全子宫切除与腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除的比较[J]. 中国微创外科杂志,2013, 13(3): 258-261.
[5]
施如霞,刘素芬,谢晔玲,等. 盆底悬吊术与传统经阴道子宫切除术在治疗盆底功能障碍性疾病中的临床疗效比较研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志:电子版,2011, 7(1): 34-38.
[6]
Morris R, Mock S, Dmochowski R. The case for robotics in pelvic prolapse surgery[J]. Curr Bladd Dysfunc Rep, 2014, 9(1): 1-5.
[7]
施敏莅,陈娟. 补片修补盆底重建术与传统阴式修补术治疗重度盆腔器官脱垂的临床分析[J]. 中国医药指南,2013, 11(28): 353-354.
[8]
祖月娥,肖亚玲,李建军,等. 长沙地区农村妇女盆底功能障碍调查及其相关因素分析[J]. 医学临床研究,2012, 29(9): 1745-1749.
[9]
苏园园,韩燕华,曹丽,等. 中山地区产后42天妇女盆腔器官脱垂筛查及防治研究[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2015, 30(24): 4132-4134.
[10]
郑晓红,鲍国. 盆底重建术治疗盆腔器官脱垂临床研究[J]. 中国基层医药,2013, 20(2): 184-186.
[11]
黄骊莉,赵艳,陈晓辉,等. 全盆底重建术与阴式全子宫切除术治疗女性盆底功能障碍性疾病的临床研究[J]. 南通大学学报:医学版,2014, 34(6): 535-536.
[12]
龙燕,王建凤. 40例重度盆底脏器脱垂患者盆底重建术治疗效果观察[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2015, 30(3): 475-476.
[13]
蒋清阔. 盆底重建术治疗重度盆腔脏器脱垂的临床效果观察[J]. 医学信息,2014, 27(4): 443.
[14]
徐春佳,陆安伟,唐建军. 手术治疗盆腔器官脱垂62例疗效观察[J]. 山东医药,2010, 50(50): 96-97.
[15]
哈丽娅. 经阴道手术治疗老年女性前盆腔器官脱垂疗效观察[J]. 中国伤残医学,2013, 21(9): 193.
[1] 许正文, 李振, 侯振扬, 苏长征, 朱彪. 富血小板血浆联合植骨治疗早期非创伤性股骨头坏死[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-779.
[2] 王宏宇. 固定与活动平台假体在全膝关节置换术中的应用价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 871-876.
[3] 高玲, 于哲, 范然, 臧银善. 外周血细胞计数比值评估类风湿关节炎疗效的价值[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 642-647.
[4] 王泽勇, 覃健. 白细胞含量对富血小板血浆治疗运动系统损伤的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 684-688.
[5] 闫兆龙, 张镇斌, 李广兴, 赵璋, 张业勇, 殷鲁旭, 李树锋. 胫骨高位截骨术治疗膝骨关节炎的早期效果及影响因素[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 492-499.
[6] 张海涛, 康婵娟, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎效果观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 654-657.
[7] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[8] 黎熊, 曹永宽. 不同远切缘距离的ISR在局部进展期直肠癌新辅助治疗后的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 443-446.
[9] 冯树森, 张东成, 郭奇, 张皓露, 陈阔. 两种手术方法对急性阑尾炎患者的临床疗效及对炎性因子的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 447-450.
[10] 卜晓沛, 刘冰, 张江华, 赵臣, 张金江, 尚培中. 子宫直肠瘘1例报告[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 469-470.
[11] 王峰杰, 王礼光, 廖珊, 刘颖, 符荣党, 陈焕伟. 腹腔镜右半肝切除术治疗肝癌的安全性与疗效[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 517-522.
[12] 刘丹峰, 荚卫东. 基层医院开展腹腔镜肝脏手术的体会与思考[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 263-266.
[13] 郭世龙, 杨潇, 胡欢欢, 杨梁, 周文富, 丛魁武, 张雨胜, 李英锋. ERCP在胆胰疾病微创治疗中的有效性及安全性[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(02): 216-220.
[14] 边震, 宋绍永, 杨国旺, 范凤尾, 黄庆红, 李健, 金鑫. 江苏省基层医院围麻醉期危机状况的调查分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 499-506.
[15] 杨国旺, 边震, 季雨萌, 李艺轩, 陈诗雯, 高建瓴, 金鑫. 江苏省基层医院围麻醉期不良事件的调查分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 136-141.
阅读次数
全文


摘要