切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2015, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (01) : 68 -72. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2015.01.015

所属专题: 文献

论著

卵巢透明细胞癌合并卵巢子宫内膜异位症的临床病理学分析
朱丽莎1, 刘玲1, 邓燕杰1,*,*()   
  1. 1. 116021 辽宁省大连市妇幼保健院
  • 收稿日期:2014-04-05 修回日期:2014-10-10 出版日期:2015-02-01
  • 通信作者: 邓燕杰

Clinicopathological features of ovarian clear cell carcinoma associated with ovarian endometriosis

Lisha Zhu1, Ling Liu1, Yanjie Deng1()   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dalian Maternity Hospital, Dalian 116033, China
  • Received:2014-04-05 Revised:2014-10-10 Published:2015-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Yanjie Deng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Deng Yanjie, Email:
引用本文:

朱丽莎, 刘玲, 邓燕杰. 卵巢透明细胞癌合并卵巢子宫内膜异位症的临床病理学分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2015, 11(01): 68-72.

Lisha Zhu, Ling Liu, Yanjie Deng. Clinicopathological features of ovarian clear cell carcinoma associated with ovarian endometriosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2015, 11(01): 68-72.

目的

探讨卵巢透明细胞癌(OCCC)合并卵巢子宫内膜异位症(EM)的临床表现、病理学特点及预后。

方法

选择2002年1月至2011年11月在大连市妇产医院行手术治疗并经术后病理学检查确诊为卵巢癌的444例患者中的60例OCCC患者为研究对象,按照是否合并卵巢EM,将其分为A组(n=7,OCCC合并卵巢EM恶变患者),B组(n=15,除A组患者以外的OCCC合并卵巢EM患者)和C组(n=38,OCCC未合并卵巢EM患者)。本研究遵循的程序符合大连市妇幼保健院人体试验委员会所制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,分组征得受试对象本人的知情同意,并与之签署临床研究知情同意书。通过查阅病历,记录研究对象的一般情况、临床症状、辅助检查结果、病理学特点及预后情况。

结果

OCCC合并卵巢EM发生率为36.4%(22/60),OCCC合并卵巢EM恶变发生率为11.7%(7/60)。A组无生育史患者数多于C组,并且差异有统计学意义(χ2=23.72,P=0.021)。A组患者年龄显著低于C组,并且差异有统计学意义(F=24.48,P=0.005)。C组患者囊实混合性包块所占比例(81.6%)显著高于A组和B组(42.9%和53.3%),3组比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.88,P=0.032)。A组(100.0%)和B组(93.3%)血清CA125水平<500 U/L发生率均高于C组(84.2%),但3组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组和B组患者患者Ⅰ期发生率显著高于C组(100%和80.0% vs 57.9%),3组比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.10,P=0.047)。3组患者5年生存率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

OCCC合并卵巢EM患者常较年轻且无生育史,病理学分期以Ⅰ期为主,CA125水平相对较低,预后相对较好。年轻卵巢EM患者应警惕恶变可能。

Objective

To explore the clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma(OCCC) associated with endometriosis(EM).

Methods

From January 2002 to November 2011, a total of 60 women with OCCC were included in the study and analyzed retrospectively.They were divided into group A (n=7, OCCC associated with malignant transformation ovarian EM), group B (n=15, OCCC associated ovarian EM)and group C (n=38, OCCC only). The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of Dalian Maternity Hospital.Informed consent was obtained from each participants.The clinical data were compared among these groups.

Results

The incidence rate of OCCC associated with ovarian EM was 36.4%(22/60), and 11.7%(7/60) women were diagnosed as OCCC associated with malignant transformation ovarian EM.There were more nulliparity in group A than that of group C, and significant difference was found between them(χ2=23.72, P=0.021). The mean age in group A was significantly younger than that of group C, and there was statistically significant difference (F=24.48, P=0.005). Through ultrasound examination, Group C showed more cystic and solid mixed mass than that of other groups (81.6% vs 42.9% and 53.3%), and there were significant differences among them (χ2=6.88, P=0.032). There was no significant difference among three groups in the incidence rate of serum CA125<500 U/L(P>0.05). Most of the patients in groups A and B were diagnosed at stage Ⅰ, which was obviously higher than that of group C (100.0% and 80.0% vs 57.9%), and there was statistically significant difference (χ2=6.10, P=0.047). The five-year survival rate among three groups were 50.0%, 71.4%, 36.8%, respectively, no significant difference was observed among them(P>0.05).

Conclusions

Most of OCCC associated ovarian EM patients were found to be younger, nonporous, and at an early stage, lower serum CA125 level with better prognosis.Young patients with ovarian EM still need to wary of the malignant transformation.

表1 3组患者临床资料比较例数[例数(%)]
Table 1 Comparison of clinical data among three groups[case(%)]
图1 3组生存曲线
Figure 1 Survival curve of three groups
[1]
Mizuno M, Kikkawa F, Shibata K, et al. Long-term follow-up and prognostic factor analysis in clear cell adenocarcinoma of the ovary[J]. J Surg Oncol,2006,94(1):138–143.
[2]
Takano M, Kikuchi Y, Yaegashi N, et al.Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a retrospective multicentre experience of 254 patients with complete surgical staging[J].Br J Cancer,2006,94(10):1369–1374.
[3]
Pearce CL, Templeman C, Rossing MA, et al. Association between endometriosis and risk of histological subtypes of ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of case-control studies[J].Lancet Oncol,2012,13(4):385–394.
[4]
Sampson JA.Endometrial carcinoma of the ovary arising in endometrial tissue in that organ[J]. Arch Surg,1925,10(1):1–72.
[5]
Scott RB. Malignant changes in endometriosis[J]. Obstet Gynecol,1953,2(3):283–289.
[6]
Munksgaard PS,Blaakaer J. The association between endometriosis and ovarian cancer: a review of histological, genetic and molecular alterations[J]. Gynecol Oncol,2012,124(1):164–169.
[7]
Lim MC, Lee DO, Kang S, et al. Clinical manifestations in patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma with or without co-existing endometriosis[J].Gynecol Endocrinol,2009,25(7):435–440.
[8]
Orezzoli JP, Russell AH, Oliva E, et al. Prognostic implication of endometriosis in clear cell carcinoma of the ovary[J]. Gynecol Oncol,2008,110(3):336–344.
[9]
Matalliotakis I, Mahutte NG, Koukoura O, et al. Endometriosis associated with stage ⅠA clear cell ovarian carcinoma in a woman with IVF-ET treatments in the Yale Series[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet,2006,274(3):184–186.
[10]
Ozkan S, Murk W, Arici A. Endometriosis and infertility:epidemiology and evidence-based treatments[J].Ann N Y Acad Sci,2008,1127:92–100.
[11]
Kobayashi H, Sumomoto K, Kitanaka T, et al. Ovarian endometrioma-risks factors of ovarian cancer development[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2008,138(2):187–193.
[12]
Sugiyama T, Kamura T, Kigawa J, et al. Clinical characteristics of clear cell carcinoma of the ovary:a distinct histologic type with poor prognosis and resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy[J]. Cancer,2000,88(11):2584–2589.
[13]
Itamochi H, Kigawa J, Sugiyama T, et al. Low proliferation activity may be associated with chemoresistance in clear cell carcinoma of the ovary[J].Obstet Gynecol,2000,100(2):281–287.
[14]
Yamaquchi K, Mandai M, Toyokuni S, et al. Contents of endometriotic cysts, especially the high concentration of free iron, are a possible cause of carcinogenesis in the cysts through the iron-induced persistent oxidative stress[J]. Clin Cancer Res,2008.14(1):32–40.
[1] 罗丹, 孔为民, 陈姝宁, 赵小玲, 谢云凯. 子宫内膜异位症患者在位及异位内膜上皮细胞-间充质转化相关生物标志物的变化[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 530-539.
[2] 陈雨婷, 杨烨, 谢奇君, 凌秀凤. 女性不孕不育相关疾病患者的生殖道微生物组成异常研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(05): 615-620.
[3] 黄品秀, 曾定元. 孕酮受体在人子宫内膜基质细胞蜕膜化过程中的作用机制研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(02): 245-248.
[4] 邓洁, 王一然, 王平. 卵巢透明细胞癌患者并发静脉血栓栓塞症的影响因素[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(02): 150-157.
[5] 梁冬梅, 王燕, 戴峻. 调节性T细胞与子宫内膜异位症关系的研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(06): 627-633.
[6] 王玉, 盛洁, 靳灵鸽, 蒋子文, 卢丹. 不同止血方式对腹腔镜下卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿剥除术后卵巢储备功能的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(04): 420-424.
[7] 梁梦珊, 朱耀魁. 子宫内膜异位症发病机制的研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(02): 138-141.
[8] 于秀章, 郄明蓉, 侯敏敏. 子宫内膜异位症与干细胞研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2021, 17(02): 132-137.
[9] 杨泽成, 史常赛, 陈佳乐, 李金龙. 腹壁子宫内膜异位症相关性透明细胞癌一例及文献回顾[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 595-599.
[10] 孙超, 朱滢, 柴海娜, 孙欣欣. 直肠子宫内膜异位症10例临床分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(04): 246-248.
[11] 王丁然, 迟洪滨. 自身免疫甲状腺炎对子宫内膜异位症患者胚胎移植结局的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 682-688.
[12] 王宁, 吴慢莉, 杨东霞. 代谢组学生物标志物:子宫内膜异位症诊疗的新靶点[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(12): 1280-1283.
[13] 兰素伟, 王春辉, 常丽凤, 王杏茶, 翟明晶, 李阳. 血清miRNA-10b和miRNA-34a在子宫内膜异位症患者中的表达及与术后复发关系研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(08): 759-763.
[14] 汪泉, 周英妹, 何颖. p27、cyclin-E在子宫内膜异位症中的表达及其临床意义[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 546-552.
[15] 谢玉莹, 德丽娜尔·乌尔肯别克, 毛新敏, 张莉. 强化心理干预护理模式对子宫内膜异位症手术患者负性情绪的改善效果研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 457-462.
阅读次数
全文


摘要