切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2015, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (01) : 62 -67. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2015.01.014

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜手术对盆腔炎性包块患者的T淋巴细胞免疫功能及术后恢复的影响
何文聪1,*,*(), 叶红1, 李华1, 陈建玲1, 王中显1   
  1. 1. 443003 三峡大学第一临床医学院&宜昌市中心人民医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2014-01-10 修回日期:2014-12-27 出版日期:2015-02-01
  • 通信作者: 何文聪

Effects of laparoscopic surgery for pelvic inflammation mass resection on cellular immune function of T-lymphocyte subsets and postoperative recovery

Wencong He1(), Hong Ye1, Hua Li1, Jianling Chen1, Zhongxian Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, First College of Clinical Medical Science, China Three Gorges University & Yichang Central People's Hospital, Yichang 443003, Hubei Province, China
  • Received:2014-01-10 Revised:2014-12-27 Published:2015-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Wencong He
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: He Wencong, Email:
引用本文:

何文聪, 叶红, 李华, 陈建玲, 王中显. 腹腔镜手术对盆腔炎性包块患者的T淋巴细胞免疫功能及术后恢复的影响[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2015, 11(01): 62-67.

Wencong He, Hong Ye, Hua Li, Jianling Chen, Zhongxian Wang. Effects of laparoscopic surgery for pelvic inflammation mass resection on cellular immune function of T-lymphocyte subsets and postoperative recovery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2015, 11(01): 62-67.

目的

探讨腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗盆腔炎性包块对机体细胞免疫功能及术后恢复的影响。

方法

选择2008年1月至2013年1月在宜昌市中心人民医院就诊并诊断为盆腔炎性包块的56例患者为研究对象,平均年龄为(33±12)岁。按照不同手术类型,将其分为腹腔镜组(n=32,接受腹腔镜手术)和对照组(n=24,接受开腹手术)。于术前及术后2,24,72 h分别抽取肘静脉血10 mL,并进行以下测定。①采用荧光激活细胞分拣术(FACS)测定T淋巴细胞亚群CD3、CD4和CD8,同时测定辅助性T淋巴细胞(Th)1,Th2水平,并对两组间各亚群以及Th1、Th2和Th1/Th2的差异进行统计学分析。②酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)法测定两组患者血清白细胞介素(IL)-18,-10的水平。③术后恢复情况观察指标:肠道排气时间、体温恢复到正常时间、血常规恢复时间、住院时间等(本研究遵循的程序符合宜昌市中心人民医院人体试验委员会制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,分组征得受试对象的知情同意,并与之签署临床研究知情同意书)。

结果 结果

①腹腔镜组患者T淋巴细胞亚群CD3、CD4、CD8于术前及术后2,24,72 h比较,差异无统计学意义(t=1.83,1.69,t=1.74;P>0.05)。开腹组术后24,72 h时CD3、CD4、CD8水平均较术前显著降低,并且差异有统计学意义(术后24 h:t=2.38,2.47,2.45;P<0.05;术后72 h:t=2.41,2.46,2.56;P<0.05)。开腹组术后2,24 h的CD3、CD4、CD8水平显著低于腹腔镜组,并且差异有统计学意义(术后2 h:t=2.56,2.61,2.69;P<0.05;术后24 h:t=2.61,2.69,2.78;P<0.05);但两组术后72 h时CD3的水平比较,差异无统计学意义(t=1.68,P>0.05)。②两组患者术后2 h Th1减少、Th2增加,Th1/Th2水平下降,与术前比较,差异均有统计学意义(腹腔镜组:t=2.23,7.35,7.15;P<0.05;开腹组:t=9.45;7.18,8.56;P<0.01)。但术后24 h腹腔镜组Th1、Th2、Th1/Th2即恢复至术前水平,并且差异无统计学意义(t=1.82,1.38,1.72;P>0.05)。③两组患者术后2 h IL-18水平降低,IL-10水平升高,与术前比较,差异均有统计学意义(腹腔镜组:t=6.98,8.87;P<0.01;开腹组:t=10.17,7.18;P<0.01);但术后24 h腹腔镜组IL-18,-10水平即恢复至术前,并且差异无统计学意义(t=1.78,1.89;P>0.05)。④两组患者的术中出血量、术后排气时间、体温恢复到正常时间、血常规恢复时间及住院时间比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=6.34,12.38,15.32,2.37,7.15; P<0.05),而两组患者的手术时间、住院总费用、手术费用、抗菌药物使用时间比较,差异无统计学意义(t=1.37,1.67,1.35,1.87;P>0.05)。

结论

盆腔炎性包块切除术后细胞免疫功能紊乱可能影响术后恢复。腹腔镜下行盆腔炎性包块切除术对T细胞亚群及机体细胞免疫影响小,且Th1/Th2平衡恢复快。

Objective

To discuss effects of laparoscopic surgery for pelvic inflammation mass resection on cellular immune function of T lymphocyte and postoperative recovery.

Methods

A total of 56 patients with pelvic inflammation mass were admitted into Yichang Central People's Hospital from January 2008 to January 2013. Their average age was (33±12) years old. They were divided into two groups according to different surgery types, laparoscopy group (n=32) and open surgery group (n=24). The preoperation blood sample and 2, 24, 72 h after operation blood sample were collected from every subjects. ①T-lymphocyte subsets CD3, CD4 and CD8 were detected by flow cytometry (FCM), at the same time, helper T-lymphocyte (Th)1, Th2 were also detected. ②The levels of IL-18, -10 were detected by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). ③ The observation items after operation including intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exhaust time, duration of temperature back to normal, duration of complete blood count back to normal and hospitalization, duration of operation, hospitalization expense, operation expense and duration of antimicrobial use. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Yichang Central People's Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from the every participates.

Results

① There were no significant differences on T-lymphocyte subsets CD3, CD4, CD8 between preoperation and 2, 24, 72 h after operation in laparoscopy group (t=1.83, 1.69, 1.74; P>0.05). The levels of T-lymphocyte subsets CD3, CD4, CD8 at 24, 72 h after operation were lower than those of preoperation, with significant differences (24 h after operation: t=2.38, 2.47, 2.45; P<0.05; 72 h after operation: t=2.41, 2.46, 2.56; P<0.05). The levels of T-lymphocyte subsets CD3, CD4, CD8 at 2, 24 h postoperation in open surgery were significant lower than those of laparoscopy group (2 h after operation: t=2.56, 2.61, 2.69; P<0.05; 24 h after operation: t=2.61, 2.69, 2.78; P<0.05). But there were no significant difference on CD3 at 72 h after operation between two groups (t=1.68, P>0.05). ②The levels of Th1, Th1/Th2 decreased and Th2 increased at 2 h after operation, and there were significant differences of Th1, Th2 and Th1/Th2 at 2 h after operation between two groups (laparoscopy group: t=2.23, 7.35, 7.15; P<0.05; open surgery group: t=9.45; 7.18, 8.56; P<0.01). And the levels of Th1, Th2 and Th1/Th2 of laparoscopy group back to normal at 24 h after operation, there were no significant differences on the levels of Th1, Th2 and Th1/Th2 in laparoscopy group between preoperation and 24 h after operation (t=1.82, 1.38, 1.72; P>0.05). ③Compared with preoperation, the levels of IL-18 decreased and IL-10 increased at 2 h after operation in both two groups (laparoscopy group: t=6.98, 8.87; P<0.01; open surgery group: t=10.17, 7.18; P<0.01). The levels of IL-18, -10 back to normal at 24 h after operation, and there were significant differences on IL-18, -10 between preoperation and 24 h after operation in laparoscopy group (t=1.78, 1.89; P>0.05). ④There were significant differences on intraoperative blood loss, postoperative exhaust time, duration of temperature back to normal, duration of complete blood count back to normal and hospitalization between two groups (t=6.34, 12.38, 15.32, 2.37, 7.15; P<0.05). There were no significant differences on duration of operation, hospitalization expense, operation expense and duration of antimicrobial use between two groups (t=1.37, 1.67, 1.35, 1.87; P>0.05).

Conclusions

Cellular immune dysfunction of post-pelvic inflammatory disease may be involved in post-operative recovery. Laparoscopic surgery for pelvic inflammation mass resection had little influence on T cell subsets, body's cellular immune, and the Th1/Th2 balance back to normal soon.

图1 两组患者CD3+、CD4+、CD8+T淋巴细胞术前、术后的动态变化比较
Figure 1 Dynamic changes of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+T-lymphocyte subsets in laparoscopic group and open surgery group
图2 两组患者Th1和Th2术前、术后的动态变化
Figure 2 Dynamic changes of Th1 cell and Th2 cell in laparoscopic group and open group
图3 两组患者白细胞介素-18,-10术前、术后的动态变化
Figure 3 Dynamic changes of interleukin-18, -10 in laparoscopic group and open surgery group
表1 两组患者术中及术后情况比较(±s)
Table 1 Comparison of intraoperative and postoperative conditions between laparoscopic surgery group and laparotomy group(±s)
[1]
Lareau SM,Beigi RH. Plevic inflammatory disease and tubo-ovarian abscess[J]. Infect Dis Clin North Am,2008,22(4):693–708.
[2]
Rosen M,Breitkopf D,Waud K,et al. Tubo-ovarian abscess management options for women who desire fertility[J]. Obstet Gynecol Sury,2009,64(10):681–689.
[3]
Sivalingam N,Vanitha NS,Loh KY,et al. Managing pelvic inflammatory disease[J]. Med J Malaysia,2007,62(5):425–427.
[4]
Gómez-Torres MJ, Acién P, Campos A,et al. Embryotoxicity of peritoneal fluid in women with endometriosis. Its relation with cytokines and lymphocyte populations [J]. Hum Repord, 2002,17(3):777–783.
[5]
Hansbrough JF, Bender EM, Zapata-Sirvent R,et al. Altered helper and supp ressor lymphocyte populations in surgical patients [J]. Am J Surg, 1994, 148(4):303–307.
[6]
Romagnani S. Lymphokine production by human T cell in disease states [J]. Annu Res Immunol, 1994,12(4):353–360.
[7]
Ikamura H,Tsutsi H,Komatsu T, et al. Cloning of a new cytokine that induces IFN-production by T cells [J]. Nature, 1995, 378 (6552):88–91.
[8]
Dao T,Ohashi K,Kayano T,et al. Interferon-γ-inducing factor,a novel cytokine,enhances Fas ligand-mediated cytotoxicity of murine T helper cells[J]. Cell Immunol, 1996, 173(2):230–235.
[9]
Hensler T,Hecker H,Heeg K,et al. Distinct mechanisms of immunosuppression as a consequence of major surgery[J]. Infect Immun, 1997, 65(21):2283–2289.
[10]
Decker D,Schondorf M,Bidlingmaier F, et al. Surgical stress induces a shift in the type 1/ type 2 T-helper cell balance, suggesting downregulation of cell-mediated and upregulation of antibody-mediated immunity commensurate to the trauma [J] .Surgery, 1996,119(3):316–325.
[11]
Gitzelmann CA,Mendoza-Sagaon M,Talamini MA,et al. Cell-mediated immune response is better preserved by laparoscopy than laparotomy [J].Surgery, 2000,127(1):65–71.
[12]
Evans DT,Jaleel H,Kinsella MT,et al. A retrospective audit of the management and complications of pelvic inflammatory disease[J]. Int J STD AIDS,2008,19(2):123–124.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[11] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[12] 冯旺, 马振中, 汤林花. CT扫描三维重建在肝内胆管细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要