切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2014, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (01) : 9 -12. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2014.01.003

所属专题: 文献

论著

新生儿化脓性脑膜炎临床分析
高洁1, 杨丽2, 毛雪3, 夏斌3,*,*()   
  1. 1. 610041 成都,四川大学华西第二医院儿科;四川省蒲江县人民医院儿科
    2. 610041 成都,四川大学华西第二医院儿科;四川省长宁县人民医院儿科
    3. 610041 成都,四川大学华西第二医院儿科
  • 收稿日期:2013-11-30 修回日期:2014-01-16 出版日期:2014-02-01
  • 通信作者: 夏斌

Clinical Analyzing of Neonatal Purulent Meningitis

Jie Gao1, Li Yang2, Xue Mao3, Bin Xia3()   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2013-11-30 Revised:2014-01-16 Published:2014-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Bin Xia
  • About author:
    (Corresponding author: Xia Bin, Email: )
引用本文:

高洁, 杨丽, 毛雪, 夏斌. 新生儿化脓性脑膜炎临床分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2014, 10(01): 9-12.

Jie Gao, Li Yang, Xue Mao, Bin Xia. Clinical Analyzing of Neonatal Purulent Meningitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2014, 10(01): 9-12.

目的

探讨新生儿化脓性脑膜炎的临床表现、治疗及转归。

方法

采用回顾性分析法分析2008年1月至2012年12月于四川大学华西第二医院新生儿科住院治疗并确诊为新生儿化脓性脑膜炎的52例患儿的临床病历资料。对其临床表现、实验室检查结果、头颅影像学检查情况及临床转归进行分析(本研究遵循的程序符合四川大学华西第二医院人体试验委员会制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准,征得受试对象监护人的知情同意,并与其签署临床研究知情同意书)。

结果

本组52例患儿中,61.54% (32/ 52)临床表现为反应差,57.69%(30/ 52)为发热,肌张力改变为51.92%(27/ 52),惊厥为28.85%(15/52),前囟张力增加为19.23%(10/ 52),脑膜刺激征异常为3.85%(2/ 52)。本组患儿初次外周血感染指标检查结果和脑脊液(CSF)检查阳性率均不高,其中外周血C-反应蛋白(CRP)异常(阳性)率明显高于外周血白细胞(WBC)计数异常(降低或升高)率(63.50% vs. 38.46%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);CSF中WBC计数异常率明显高于蛋白含量异常率(67.31% vs.38.46%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。从血液和CSF培养出的各种致病菌中,革兰阴性(G-)菌多于革兰阳性(G+)菌,其中以大肠埃希菌最多,占26.92%(7/ 26),100.00%(26/ 26)为条件致病菌,多重耐药菌占69.23%(18/ 26).本组多数患儿均使用抗菌药物联合治疗,其中43例(82.69%)使用3代头孢菌素,20例使用美罗培南,3例使用4代头孢菌素(头孢吡肟),3例使用万古霉素。其抗菌药物使用时间为(20.17 ± 11.93) d(2~ 49 d),治愈率为59.62%(31/52)。

结论

新生儿化脓性脑膜炎的临床诊断困难。对该病的早期识别依赖于临床对具有高危因素患儿的密切临床监测和反复CSF检查。导致该病致病菌的耐药率高。该病的治疗疗效差、预后差。

Objective

To study the clinical manifestations, treatment and hospitalized outcomes of neonatal purulent meningitis.

Methods

This was a prospective observational study with institutional ethics approval of West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University and written consent from the parents of each participating neonate. From January 2008 to December 2012, a total of 52 neonates with neonatal purulent meningitis in West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University were recruited. Their clinical manifestations, lab examination results, head image results, and prognoses were analyzed respectively.

Results

The most frequently signs were low response(61.54%,32/ 52) and fever(57.69%, 30/ 52) , the incidence of nerver system abnormal signs such as abnormal muscle tone(51.92%,27/ 52) , seizure(28.85%,15/ 52) , bulging fontanel(19.23%,10/ 52) and positive meningeal irritation sign(3.85%,2/52) was low among 52 neonates with neonatal purulent meningitis.The positive incidence of the first result of lab test including infection markers in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was low also.There had significance difference between blood white blood cell (WBC) and C-reacting protein(CRP) (63.50% vs. 38.46%, P<0.05) , and between WBC and protein amount in CSF (67.31% vs. 38.46%, P<0.01) , respectively.The pathogenic bacteria raised from blood and CSF, Gram-negative(G-) bacteria were more than Gram-positive (G+) , the Escherichia coli took the first place (26.92%, 7/ 26) ; All bacteria were conditional pathogenic bacteria, most of these were multiple resistant bacteria (69.23%, 18/ 26) .Every patient received at least two antibiotics, the 3rd generation cephalosporin were the most popular(82.69%, 43/ 52) , following meropenem (38.46%,20/ 52) , there were 3 cases used vancomycin and cefepime (4th generation cephalosporin) respectively.

Conclusions

To discriminate neonatal purulent meningitis early, we need a constant surveillance for neonatal having high risk factors of meningitis and serial CSF examing. Most pathogens were multiple resistant bacteria. It is hard to be cured, and the prognoses are poor.

表1 本组52例患儿临床症状及体征比较[n(%)]
Table 1 Comparison of signs and symptoms among 52 neonates with neonatal purulent meningitis[n(%)]
表2 入院时患儿外周血白细胞计数、C-反应蛋白水平与脑脊液中白细胞计数及蛋白含量比较[n(%)]
Table 2 Comparison between white blood cell count and C-reacting protein in blood,white blood cell count and protein in cerebrospinal fluid just be hospitalized[n(%)]
表3 患儿血液与脑脊液细菌培养阳性率比较[n(%)]
Table 3 Comparison of positive bacterial culture rates between blood and cerebrospinal fluid [n(% )]
表4 本组26例细菌培养呈阳性患儿的细菌学资料比较
Table 4 Comparison of positive cultured bacteria results
[1]
邵肖梅,叶鸿瑁,丘小汕.实用新生儿学.4版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:347-351.
[2]
Furyk S,Swann O,Molyneux E.Neonatal meningitis in the developing world[J].Trop Med Int Health,2011,16(6):672-679.
[3]
Galiza EP,Heath PT.Improving the outcome of neonatal meningitis[J].Curr Opin Infect Dis,2009,22(3):229-234.
[4]
Holt DE,Halket S,de Louvois J,et al.Neonatal meningitis in England and Wales:10 years on[J].Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed,2001,84(2):F85-F89.
[5]
米荣,徐放生,李莉,等.新生儿、小婴儿化脓性脑膜炎73例[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2007,22(10):751-752.
[6]
Berardi A,Lugli L,Rossi C,et al.Neonatal bacterial meningitis[J].Minerva Pediatr,2010,62(3 suppl 1):51-54.
[7]
赖源,李先斌,尤灿,等.156例新生儿化脓性脑膜炎病原菌分布及其耐药性分析[J].中国感染控制杂志,2007,6(2):117-119,126-128.
[8]
Garges HP,Moody MA,Cotten CM,et al.Neonatal meningitis:what is the correlation among cerebrospinal fluid cultures,blood cultures,and cerebrospinal fluid parameters?[J].Pediatrics,2006,117(4):1094-1100.
[9]
Kanegaye JT,Soliemanzadeh P,Bradley JS.Lumbar puncture in pediatric bacterial meningitis:determining the time interval for recovery of cerebrospinal fluid pathogens after parenteral antibiotic pretreatment[J].Pediatrics,2001,108(5):1169-1174.
[10]
Heath PT,Nik Yusoff NK,Baker CJ.Neonatal meningitis[J].Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed,2003,88(3):F173-F178.
[11]
马俊仙,沈王景,常开延.35例新生儿化脓性脑膜炎与脐炎的探讨[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2005,13(10):88-89.
[12]
刘改英,伊文芳,李彬.新生儿化脓性脑膜炎31例诊治分析[J].临床合理用药,2012,5(7C):86-87.
[1] 包艳娟, 杨小红, 杨星海, 潘圣宝, 杨帆, 赵胜. 腹膜后内寄生胎产前和新生儿期的临床与超声影像学特征[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(12): 1349-1354.
[2] 谢燕华, 陈伟玲, 唐子鉴, 陶宏伟, 何学智, 黄兵旋, 许娜, 夏焙. 新生儿及小婴儿化脓性髋关节炎的超声诊断:病例系列研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(12): 1377-1382.
[3] 王鹏, 商广前, 王英振, 龙云泽, 徐浩. 静电纺丝药物释放系统防治植入物感染的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 243-247.
[4] 董晓燕, 赵琪, 唐军, 张莉, 杨晓燕, 李姣. 奥密克戎变异株感染所致新型冠状病毒感染疾病新生儿的临床特征分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 595-603.
[5] 杨莹, 刘艳, 王央丹. 新生儿结节性硬化症相关性癫痫1例并文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 464-472.
[6] 魏徐, 张鸽, 伍金林. 新生儿脓毒症相关性凝血病的监测和治疗[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 379-386.
[7] 赵金琦, 杨楠, 宫丽霏, 唐玥, 李璐璐, 杨海河, 孔元原. 2011—2020年北京市小于胎龄儿出生状况分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(03): 278-286.
[8] 陈玉莲, 刘瀚旻. 人体生命早期呼吸系统菌群与肺部微生物组发育特征及早期菌群稳态研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 31-37.
[9] 张雯, 徐宏燕, 张彦春, 刘凯波. 2017—2021年北京市先天性心脏病流行病学资料分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 61-68.
[10] 郝萧, 刘兴莉, 夏小叶, 刁雪芹, 姚美雪. 母亲免疫球蛋白G不规则抗体效价及其效价积分对母婴Rh血型不合新生儿溶血病患儿换血治疗的预测分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(06): 677-684.
[11] 李佳丽, 吴杨, 张莉, 夏斌, 何洋, 陈忠, 唐军, 母得志. 新生儿消化道穿孔患儿的临床特点及治疗结局[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(06): 703-711.
[12] 李东明, 何升. 先天性巨细胞病毒感染早期筛查研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(06): 627-633.
[13] 李维, 莫俊俏. 儿童呼吸道耐药流感嗜血杆菌基因型鉴定及耐药分析对抗菌药物治疗选择的意义[J]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 315-323.
[14] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[15] 强光峰, 孟兰兰, 赵静, 牛峰海, 任雪云. 肺部超声评分对呼吸困难新生儿使用有创机械通气的预测价值[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 104-108.
阅读次数
全文


摘要