切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版)

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2013, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (03) : 353 -356. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2013.03.016

所属专题： 文献；

论著

儿童鱼胆中毒的临床分析
丘力1, 钟琳1,*,*()   
  1. 1. 610041　成都，四川大学华西第二医院儿科
  • 收稿日期:2013-04-24 修回日期:2013-05-22 出版日期:2013-06-01
  • 通信作者: 钟琳

Clinical Analysis of Fish Bile Poisoning in Children

Li QIU1, Lin ZHONG1()   

  1. 1. Department of pediatrics, West China Second University Hospital, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2013-04-24 Revised:2013-05-22 Published:2013-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Lin ZHONG
  • About author:
    (Corresponding author: ZHONG Lin, Email: )
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

丘力, 钟琳. 儿童鱼胆中毒的临床分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2013, 09(03): 353-356.

Li QIU, Lin ZHONG. Clinical Analysis of Fish Bile Poisoning in Children[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2013, 09(03): 353-356.

目的

探讨儿童鱼胆中毒的临床特征、救治方法和治疗效果。

方法

选择2008年1月至2012年8月于本院就诊的18例误服鱼胆中毒患儿为研究对象。按照治疗方法不同将其分为血液净化组(n＝14)和非血液净化组(n＝4)，并将血液净化组继续分为血液灌流亚组(n＝5)、血浆置换亚组(n＝5)和连续性肾替代治疗(CRRT)亚组(n＝4)。对两组患儿中毒发病时间、临床症状、实验室检查结果及治疗方法进行回顾性分析，比较血液净化组中3个亚组患儿疗效(本研究遵循的程序符合本院人体试验委员会所制定的伦理学标准，得到该委员会批准，分组征得受试对象监护人的知情同意，并与之签署临床研究知情同意书)。两组患儿年龄、性别等一般情况比较，差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结果

两组患儿误服鱼胆后中毒发病时间为(0.5～5.0) h，平均为(0.64±0.32)h。两组患儿均出现消化道症状及不同程度肝、肾功能异常(100%)。两组患儿住院时间比较，差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。血液净化组患儿初次血液净化治疗前、后丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)结果比较，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)，尿素氮(BUN)、肌酐(Cr)、血红蛋白(Hb)、血小板(PLT)及纤维蛋白原比较，差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。血液净化组中3个亚组患儿初次治疗前、后肝、肾功能变化比较，差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

儿童鱼胆中毒易导致多器官功能衰竭(MOF)，临床应根据患儿中毒时间和器官受损程度，进行早期或预防性血液净化治疗，提高鱼胆中毒患儿的救治成功率。

关键词: 鱼胆中毒, 多器官功能障碍综合征, 血液净化, 儿童
Objective

To explore the characteristics and the most effective treatments of fish bile poisoning in children.

Methods

From January 2008 to August 2012, a total of 18 children with fish bile poisoning were included in the study, and divided into blood purification group(n=14) and non-blood purification group(n=4) according to their treatment strategies. The blood purification group was continued to be divided into hemoperfusion subgroup(n=5), plasma exchange subgroup (n=5) and continuous renal replacement therapy(CRRT) subgroup (n=4). The time of appearing toxicity, symptoms, lab results and treatment methods were analyzed in both groups. The clinical effects were compared among three subgroups. There was no significant difference in age between two groups(P>0.05). The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of West China Second University Hospital.Informed consent was obtained from each parent.

Results

The time of appearing toxicity was (0.5~5.0)h after taken fish bile. Gastrointestinal symptoms, abnormal liver and kidney function were found in all patients(100%). There was no significant difference in hospital stay between two groups(P>0.05). In blood purification group, there had significant differences in alanine aminotransferase(ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase(AST) between before and after primary treatment(P<0.05). Meanwhile there was no significant difference in urea nitrogen(BUN), creatinine(Cr), hemoglobin(Hb), platelet(PLT) and fibrinogen between before and after primary treatment(P>0.05). No significant difference were found in clinical effect of treatment among three subgroups(P>0.05).

Conclusions

Fish bile poisoning in children may lead to multiple organ failure(MOF), and the blood purification treatment can benefit their rehabilitation.

Key words: fish bile poisoning, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, blood purification, child
表1 两组患儿平均住院时间比较(d，±s)
Table 1 Comparison of average hospital stay between two groups(d，±s)
　 n 平均住院时间
血液净化组 14 11.20±3.82
非血液净化组 4 7.50±0.70
F 　 4.57
P 　 0.218
表2 血液净化组患儿初次血液净化治疗前、后实验室检查结果比较(±s)
Table 2 Comparison of lab results between before and after primary treatment in blood purification group(±s)
组别 ALT(U/L) AST(U/L) BUN(mmol/L) Cr(μmol/L) Hb(g/L) PLT(×109/L) 纤维蛋白原(mg/dL)
治疗前 2266.29±2665.77 1574.79±2060.71 31.23±13.06 467.00±329.06 108.79±18.94 177.36±68.71 370.50± 93.23
治疗后 488.71± 138.34 325.85± 724.55 23.02±15.30 289.07±296.43 99.50±24.44 160.14±51.82 338.50±101.74
t 2.604 2.753 2.047 2.135 1.941 1.116 0.864
P 0.022 0.016 0.061 0.052 0.074 0.285 0.334
表3 血液净化组3个亚组患儿初次治疗前、后肝、肾功能水平比较(±s)
Table 3 Comparison of lab tests results before and after primary treatment among three subgroups of blood purification group(±s)
组别 n ALT(U/L) AST(U/L) BUN(mmol/L) Cr(μmol/L)
治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后 治疗前 治疗后
血液灌流亚组 5 1810.80±1579.53 757.00±780.53 1717.80±2200.67 636.20±1208.76 27.24±11.79 16.44±11.79 342.80±291.62 4116.60± 84.30
血浆置换亚组 5 3884.40±3832.07 249.00±211.99 926.20±1135.08 83.00±　55.66 33.30± 9.90 19.44± 9.53 509.20±233.20 412.80±428.39
CRRT亚组 4 813.00± 601.73 453.00±267.33 2206.75±2993.13 241.50± 233.05 33.62±19.54 35.73±19.98 569.50±490.53 350.00±215.80
F 　 1.779 1.267 0.407 0.735 0.325 2.407 0.550 1.464
P 　 0.214 0.320 0.675 0.501 0.729 0.136 0.592 0.273
[1]
Gu XD, Sun HC, Nie SN, et al.Study on 8 patients with organ dysfunction syndrome after fish bile poisoning[J].Chin J Crit Care Med, 2009, 29(7):634-636.
[2]
Zhou SL, Yang XC, Wang L, et al. An analysis of 100 patients with acute renal failure caused by food poisoning in west China[J]. Chin J Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2002, 11(2):133-137.
[3]
Zeng GF, Lei XW, Wang JQ, et al.Research progress on treatment of fish bile poisoning[J].Chin Crit Care Med, 2008, 4(17):177-178.
[4]
Zhang L, Zhang WC.Clinical research progress on diagnosis and treatment of fish bile poisoning[J].Shandong Med J, 2010, 50(25):113-114.
[5]
Luo JC, Ren L, Han YC, et al.The effects of fish Bile on kidney function in rabbit[J].West China Med J, 2012, 27(6):841-844.
[6]
Zhang WW.Emergency internal medicine[M].Beijing:People's Publishing House, 2007:716-716.
[7]
Meng XK, Deng YL. Research progress on fish bile poisoning[J]. Chin Crit Care Med, 2000, 12(7):437-438.
[1] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[2] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[3] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[4] 刘婷婷, 林妍冰, 汪珊, 陈幕荣, 唐子鉴, 代东伶, 夏焙. 超声衰减参数成像评价儿童代谢相关脂肪性肝病的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[5] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[6] 米洁, 陈晨, 李佳玲, 裴海娜, 张恒博, 李飞, 李东杰. 儿童头面部外伤特点分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 511-515.
[7] 吴少峰, 张轶男, 孙杰. 机器人辅助手术在儿童微创泌尿手术中的应用和展望[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 440-444.
[8] 朱良振, 于永刚, 陈杲, 廖松柏. 儿童高级别闭合性肾损伤肾动脉栓塞与手术探查的疗效比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 461-465,475.
[9] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[10] 李芳, 许瑞, 李洋洋, 石秀全. 循证医学理念在儿童腹股沟疝患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 782-786.
[11] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[12] 卓少宏, 林秀玲, 周翠梅, 熊卫莲, 马兴灶. CD64指数、SAA/CRP、PCT联合检测在小儿消化道感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[13] 陆猛桂, 黄斌, 李秋林, 何媛梅. 蜂蛰伤患者发生多器官功能障碍综合征的危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1010-1015.
[14] 刘笑笑, 张小杉, 刘群, 马岚, 段莎莎, 施依璐, 张敏洁, 王雅晳. 中国学龄前儿童先天性心脏病流行病学研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1021-1024.
[15] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号