切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2011, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (05) : 443 -445. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2011.05.009

论著

妊娠合并帆状胎盘对围生结局的影响
吴玲玲, 尹玉竹, 梅志雄, 侯红瑛   
  1. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院
  • 出版日期:2011-10-01

Effects of Gestational Velamentous Cord Insertion on Perinatal Outcomes

Ling-ling WU, Yu-zhu YIN, Zhi-xiong MEI, Hong-ying HOU   

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Affiliated Hospital, SUN Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong Province, China
  • Published:2011-10-01
  • Supported by:
    * Project No. 2008B030301065, supported by Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province
引用本文:

吴玲玲, 尹玉竹, 梅志雄, 侯红瑛. 妊娠合并帆状胎盘对围生结局的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2011, 07(05): 443-445.

Ling-ling WU, Yu-zhu YIN, Zhi-xiong MEI, Hong-ying HOU. Effects of Gestational Velamentous Cord Insertion on Perinatal Outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2011, 07(05): 443-445.

目的

探讨妊娠合并帆状胎盘(VCI)对围生结局的影响。

方法

采用回顾性分析法分析中山大学附属第三医院2007年1月至2009年12月收治的45例妊娠合并VCI产妇的临床资料(研究组)。选择同期在本院分娩的非妊娠合并VCI产妇50例的临床资料纳入对照组,比较两组孕妇的围生结局(本研究遵循的程序符合本院人体试验委员会所制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准)。两组孕妇年龄及孕、产次比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结果

研究组剖宫产、早产、胎膜早破、胎儿生长受限(FGR)、胎儿窘迫发生率高于对照组(68.9% vs. 46.0%,26.7% vs. 10.0%, 33.3% vs. 14.0%,15.6% vs. 2.0%,28.9% vs. 4.0%),两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。但新生儿窒息和低出生体重儿发生率两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组中仅3例(6.67%,3/45)在分娩前经超声检查确诊为妊娠合并VCI。

结论

妊娠合并VCI的产前诊断率低,导致的围生结局不良。提高妊娠合并VCI的产前超声诊断率及对已明确诊断的孕妇采取正确的孕期监护及治疗,可改善围生结局。

Objective

To investigate the impacts of gestational velamentous cord insertion (VCI) on pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

From January 2007 to December 2009, a total of 45 pregnant women with VCI were retrospectively analyzed in this study (study group). Another 50 normal pregnant women were randomly selected and recruited into control group. Informed consent was obtained from all participates. The pregnancy outcomes of two groups were detected.

Results

Cesarean section incidence rate, premature delivery, premature rupture of membrane, fetal growth restriction(FGR), fetal distress of study group were markedly higher than those of control group(68.9% vs. 46.0%, 26.7% vs. 10.0%, 33.3% vs. 14.0%, 15.6% vs. 2.0%, 28.9% vs. 4.0%)(P<0.05). In study group, only 3 (6.67%, 3/45) pregnant women with VCI were diagnosed before delivery.

Conclusion

Prenatal diagnosis rate of pregnant women with VCI is low, so pregnancy outcomes of pregnant women with VCI has a higher incidence of poor perinatal outcomes. To increase prenatal ultrasound diagnosis rate of pregnant women with VCI and take proper care and treatment them, it will be able to improve the perinatal outcomes.

1 Liu BN. Placental pathology in late pregnancy. //Cao ZY, ed. Chinese obstetrics and gynecology. 2nd ed [M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2007, 491.[刘伯宁.晚期妊娠胎盘病理.//曹泽毅,主编.中华妇产科学.2版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004,491.]
2 Luo HY. One case of umbilical core developmental anomaly pregnant women combination with velamentous placenta insertion [J/CD]. Chin J Obstet Gynecol Pediatr (Electron Ed), 2009,5 (3): 315. [罗虹瑛.帆状胎盘合并脐带发育异常1例[J/CD].中华妇幼临床医学杂志:电子版,2009,5(3):315.]
3 Lai QR. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of fetal umbilical cord attached to the exception of 29 cases [J]. J Pract Med Tech, 2007, 14(36): 4965. [赖秋荣.产前超声诊断胎儿脐带附着异常29例[J].实用医技杂志,2007,14(36):4965.]
4 Ren QZ, Qian ZH, Gu GY. Clinical analysis of 66 cases about velamentous cord insertion [J]. Suzhou Univ J Med Sci, 2008, 28 (2): 334-335. [任琼珍,钱志红,顾光宇.帆状胎盘66例临床特点分析[J].苏州大学学报:医学版,2008,28(2):334-335.]
5 Gagnon R, Morin L, Bly S, et al. Guidelines for the management of vasa previa [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2009, 31 (8): 748-760.
6 Yampolsky M, Salafia CM, Shlakhter O, et al. Centrality of the umbilical cord insertion in a human placenta influences the placental efficiency [J]. Placenta, 2009, 30(12): 1058-1064.
7 Sepulveda W. Velamentous insertion of the umbilical cord: A first-trimester sonographic screening study [ J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2006, 25(8): 963-968.
8 Hasegawa J, Matsuoka R, Ichizuka K, et al. Cord insertion into the lower third of the uterus in the first trimester is associated with placental and umbilical cord abnormalities [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 28(2): 183-186.
9 Sepulveda W, Rojas I, Robert JA, et al. Prenatal detection of velamentous insertion of the umbilical cord: A prospective color Doppler ultrasound study [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 21(6): 564-569.
10 Sinha P, Kaushik S, Kuruba N, et al. Vasa praevia: a missed diagnosis [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2008, 28(6): 600-603.
11 Papinniemi M, Keski-Nisula L, Heinonen S. Placental ratio and risk of velamentous umbilical cord insertion are increased in women with placenta previa [J]. Am J Perinatol, 2007, 24(6): 353-357.
12 Zhou P, Li YY, Zhao FX. Analysis of maternal factors and treatment of intrauterine fetal death: 40 cases [J/CD]. Chin J Obstet Gynecol Pediatr (Electron Ed), 2011, 7(2): 117-120.[周萍,李渊渊,赵富鲜.胎死宫内40例母体因素及治疗分析[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志:电子版,2011,7(2):117-120.]
13 Zhang WF, Wang SM. Velamentous cord insertion clinical significance in obstetrics [J]. Chin J Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 4 (6): 458-459. [张伟峰,王山米.帆状胎盘在产科临床中的意义[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2003,4(6):458-459.]
14 Hasegawa J, Matsuoka I, Chizuka K, et al. Do fetal heart rate deceleration patterns during labor differ between various umbilical cord abnormalities [J]? J Perinat Med, 2009, 37(3): 276-280.
[1] 杨皓媛, 龚杰, 邹青伟, 阮航. 哮喘孕妇的母婴不良妊娠结局研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[2] 陈甜甜, 王晓东, 余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[3] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[4] 顾娟, 孙擎擎, 胡方方, 曹义娟, 祁玉娟. 子宫内膜容受性检测改善胚胎反复种植失败患者妊娠结局的临床应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[5] 王蓓蓓, 董启秀, 郗红燕, 于庆云, 张丽君, 式光. 早孕期孕妇药物流产失败的影响因素分析与构建相关预测模型及其对药物流产成功的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[6] 陈絮, 詹玉茹, 王纯华. 孕妇ABO血型联合甲状腺功能检测对预测妊娠期糖尿病的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[7] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[8] 冉晨曦, 沈如飞, 廖明钰, 廖倩, 周玲, 张玉玲, 隆敏. 垂体瘤孕妇的诊治与围分娩期管理[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 487-491.
[9] 王跃, 唐敏, 李鹏超, 吕强. 妊娠期膀胱副神经节瘤伴严重出血一例报告[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 410-411.
[10] 胡金科, 钟文. 妊娠期输尿管结石的处理与转归[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 377-381.
[11] 杨聚荣. 透析患者妊娠的管理[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 300-300.
[12] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[13] 金秀英, 陈锋. 经腹和阴道超声联合β-HCG测定对剖宫产切口部妊娠的诊断价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(03): 155-159.
[14] 王欣, 刘琳, 闻哲嘉, 刘春玲, 张弘, 吕芳. 妊娠前应激暴露对小鼠后续妊娠的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 431-437.
[15] 邹艳丽, 栾文杰, 王淑娟, 刘亚琴, 初桂芝, 李松洋, 王好玲, 张锦婷, 姜鑫, 栾泽东. 早孕期胎儿右位主动脉弓的产前超声诊断学特征[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 227-232.
阅读次数
全文


摘要