切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2011, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (05) : 443 -445. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2011.05.009

论著

妊娠合并帆状胎盘对围生结局的影响
吴玲玲, 尹玉竹, 梅志雄, 侯红瑛   
  1. 510630 广州,中山大学附属第三医院
  • 出版日期:2011-10-01

Effects of Gestational Velamentous Cord Insertion on Perinatal Outcomes

Ling-ling WU, Yu-zhu YIN, Zhi-xiong MEI, Hong-ying HOU   

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Affiliated Hospital, SUN Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong Province, China
  • Published:2011-10-01
  • Supported by:
    * Project No. 2008B030301065, supported by Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province
引用本文:

吴玲玲, 尹玉竹, 梅志雄, 侯红瑛. 妊娠合并帆状胎盘对围生结局的影响[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2011, 07(05): 443-445.

Ling-ling WU, Yu-zhu YIN, Zhi-xiong MEI, Hong-ying HOU. Effects of Gestational Velamentous Cord Insertion on Perinatal Outcomes[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2011, 07(05): 443-445.

目的

探讨妊娠合并帆状胎盘(VCI)对围生结局的影响。

方法

采用回顾性分析法分析中山大学附属第三医院2007年1月至2009年12月收治的45例妊娠合并VCI产妇的临床资料(研究组)。选择同期在本院分娩的非妊娠合并VCI产妇50例的临床资料纳入对照组,比较两组孕妇的围生结局(本研究遵循的程序符合本院人体试验委员会所制定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会批准)。两组孕妇年龄及孕、产次比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结果

研究组剖宫产、早产、胎膜早破、胎儿生长受限(FGR)、胎儿窘迫发生率高于对照组(68.9% vs. 46.0%,26.7% vs. 10.0%, 33.3% vs. 14.0%,15.6% vs. 2.0%,28.9% vs. 4.0%),两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。但新生儿窒息和低出生体重儿发生率两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组中仅3例(6.67%,3/45)在分娩前经超声检查确诊为妊娠合并VCI。

结论

妊娠合并VCI的产前诊断率低,导致的围生结局不良。提高妊娠合并VCI的产前超声诊断率及对已明确诊断的孕妇采取正确的孕期监护及治疗,可改善围生结局。

Objective

To investigate the impacts of gestational velamentous cord insertion (VCI) on pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

From January 2007 to December 2009, a total of 45 pregnant women with VCI were retrospectively analyzed in this study (study group). Another 50 normal pregnant women were randomly selected and recruited into control group. Informed consent was obtained from all participates. The pregnancy outcomes of two groups were detected.

Results

Cesarean section incidence rate, premature delivery, premature rupture of membrane, fetal growth restriction(FGR), fetal distress of study group were markedly higher than those of control group(68.9% vs. 46.0%, 26.7% vs. 10.0%, 33.3% vs. 14.0%, 15.6% vs. 2.0%, 28.9% vs. 4.0%)(P<0.05). In study group, only 3 (6.67%, 3/45) pregnant women with VCI were diagnosed before delivery.

Conclusion

Prenatal diagnosis rate of pregnant women with VCI is low, so pregnancy outcomes of pregnant women with VCI has a higher incidence of poor perinatal outcomes. To increase prenatal ultrasound diagnosis rate of pregnant women with VCI and take proper care and treatment them, it will be able to improve the perinatal outcomes.

1 Liu BN. Placental pathology in late pregnancy. //Cao ZY, ed. Chinese obstetrics and gynecology. 2nd ed [M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2007, 491.[刘伯宁.晚期妊娠胎盘病理.//曹泽毅,主编.中华妇产科学.2版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004,491.]
2 Luo HY. One case of umbilical core developmental anomaly pregnant women combination with velamentous placenta insertion [J/CD]. Chin J Obstet Gynecol Pediatr (Electron Ed), 2009,5 (3): 315. [罗虹瑛.帆状胎盘合并脐带发育异常1例[J/CD].中华妇幼临床医学杂志:电子版,2009,5(3):315.]
3 Lai QR. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of fetal umbilical cord attached to the exception of 29 cases [J]. J Pract Med Tech, 2007, 14(36): 4965. [赖秋荣.产前超声诊断胎儿脐带附着异常29例[J].实用医技杂志,2007,14(36):4965.]
4 Ren QZ, Qian ZH, Gu GY. Clinical analysis of 66 cases about velamentous cord insertion [J]. Suzhou Univ J Med Sci, 2008, 28 (2): 334-335. [任琼珍,钱志红,顾光宇.帆状胎盘66例临床特点分析[J].苏州大学学报:医学版,2008,28(2):334-335.]
5 Gagnon R, Morin L, Bly S, et al. Guidelines for the management of vasa previa [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2009, 31 (8): 748-760.
6 Yampolsky M, Salafia CM, Shlakhter O, et al. Centrality of the umbilical cord insertion in a human placenta influences the placental efficiency [J]. Placenta, 2009, 30(12): 1058-1064.
7 Sepulveda W. Velamentous insertion of the umbilical cord: A first-trimester sonographic screening study [ J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2006, 25(8): 963-968.
8 Hasegawa J, Matsuoka R, Ichizuka K, et al. Cord insertion into the lower third of the uterus in the first trimester is associated with placental and umbilical cord abnormalities [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 28(2): 183-186.
9 Sepulveda W, Rojas I, Robert JA, et al. Prenatal detection of velamentous insertion of the umbilical cord: A prospective color Doppler ultrasound study [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 21(6): 564-569.
10 Sinha P, Kaushik S, Kuruba N, et al. Vasa praevia: a missed diagnosis [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2008, 28(6): 600-603.
11 Papinniemi M, Keski-Nisula L, Heinonen S. Placental ratio and risk of velamentous umbilical cord insertion are increased in women with placenta previa [J]. Am J Perinatol, 2007, 24(6): 353-357.
12 Zhou P, Li YY, Zhao FX. Analysis of maternal factors and treatment of intrauterine fetal death: 40 cases [J/CD]. Chin J Obstet Gynecol Pediatr (Electron Ed), 2011, 7(2): 117-120.[周萍,李渊渊,赵富鲜.胎死宫内40例母体因素及治疗分析[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志:电子版,2011,7(2):117-120.]
13 Zhang WF, Wang SM. Velamentous cord insertion clinical significance in obstetrics [J]. Chin J Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 4 (6): 458-459. [张伟峰,王山米.帆状胎盘在产科临床中的意义[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2003,4(6):458-459.]
14 Hasegawa J, Matsuoka I, Chizuka K, et al. Do fetal heart rate deceleration patterns during labor differ between various umbilical cord abnormalities [J]? J Perinat Med, 2009, 37(3): 276-280.
[1] 李钱梅, 何冠南, 赵婧, 陈曦, 唐玉英, 马丽琼, 梁蓉, 袁桃, 李明星. 早孕期低危妊娠和高危妊娠胎盘微血流成像特征及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 726-732.
[2] 刘涵, 刘晓菲, 陈翰翰, 陈延君, 张雁. 妊娠期肉芽肿性乳腺炎一例[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 253-254.
[3] 张舒沁, 陈练. 产后宫腔内妊娠物残留的诊断和临床处理[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 493-497.
[4] 刘子洋, 崔俭俭, 赵茵. 产科弥散性血管内凝血及其评分系统的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 511-518.
[5] 谢江燕, 王亚菲, 贺芳. 妊娠合并血栓性血小板减少性紫癜2例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 556-563.
[6] 张静, 刘畅, 华成舸. 妊娠期患者口腔诊疗进展[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 340-344.
[7] 徐敬云, 丁波, 蒋宇慧, 沈杨. 妊娠期单孔腹腔镜手术实施行与思[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 262-266.
[8] 俞慧慧, 尹宗智. 妊娠期胃穿孔[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 209-213.
[9] 鲁珊, 姚蕴珊, 廖色坭, 陈子恩, 张一剑, 蓝健皓, 魏薇, 刘艳杨, 陈艳红, 陈敦金. 妊娠合并急性阑尾炎100例临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 214-219.
[10] 汪文雁, 郑剑兰, 朱丽慈. 体外受精-胚胎移植术后妊娠患者孕产期风险的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 220-226.
[11] 傅新露, 李之岳, 卢丹. 妊娠合并结肠癌穿孔致脓毒症休克一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 227-231.
[12] 朱丽慈, 郑剑兰, 刘士璇, 张文蕾, 胡群, 陈丽旋. 妊娠期子宫嵌顿一例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 232-236.
[13] 胡小靖, 张华. 妊娠期卵巢囊肿蒂扭转的诊断与治疗[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 197-201.
[14] 黎璞, 生秀杰. 妊娠合并子宫颈癌的管理[J/OL]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 202-208.
[15] 杭中霞, 王朝霞, 孙琴, 李妮. 血清Irisin、TSH 及Hcy 在妊娠期甲状腺功能减退症诊断中的应用[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 265-269.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?