切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版) ›› 2011, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (01) : 45 -47. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2011.01.012

论著

剖宫产术后再次妊娠分娩387例临床分析
朱庆双   
  1. 100053 北京,首都医科大学宣武医院
  • 出版日期:2011-02-01

Clinical Analysis of 387 Cases of Pregnancy Delivery After Cesarean Section

Qing-shuang ZHU   

  1. Capital University of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China
  • Published:2011-02-01
引用本文:

朱庆双. 剖宫产术后再次妊娠分娩387例临床分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2011, 07(01): 45-47.

Qing-shuang ZHU. Clinical Analysis of 387 Cases of Pregnancy Delivery After Cesarean Section[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2011, 07(01): 45-47.

目的

探讨剖宫产术后再次妊娠时的分娩方式选择和拟采取措施及阴道分娩的安全性和可行性。

方法

采用回顾性分析法,分析2004年1月至2009年12月在本院剖宫产术后再次足月妊娠的387例患者的临床病历资料。其中,41例符合阴道试产的适应证,且愿接受阴道试产,将32例接受阴道试产成功者纳入观察组,将另外355例再次接受剖宫产的孕妇纳入对照组(本研究遵循的程序符合本院人体试验委员会指定的伦理学标准,得到该委员会审查、批准。分组征得受试对象同意,并与其签订临床研究知情同意书)。比较两组患者产后24 h内出血量、产褥病率、新生儿Apgar评分、住院时间、住院费用等。总结观察组分娩特点。

结果

剖宫产术后再次妊娠分娩患者中,阴道分娩成功率为78.0%(32/41),无1例发生子宫破裂。两组患者在产后出血、产褥病率、住院时间、住院费用方面比较,差异有显著意义(P<0.05),而新生儿窒息发生率比较,差异无显著意义(P>0.05)。

结论

剖宫产术后再次足月妊娠分娩,通过严密观察产程,发现难产及时处理、严格掌握阴道分娩适应证,多数可经阴道安全分娩。剖宫产术后再次妊娠,并非绝对阴道分娩禁忌证。

Objective

To explore the delivery mode of patients with prior cesarean section, and the safety and feasibility of vaginal delivery after cesarean section.

Methods

From January 2004 to December 2009, 387 cases of pregnancy delivery after cesarean section were recruited into this study. They were divided into two groups according to different method of delivery, observation group (n=32, virginal delivery) and control group (n=355, cesarean section). The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of Investigation in Human Being of Centre for Capital University of Medical Sciences. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. The following indexes were compared between two groups: 24 h post-partum bleeding volume, neonatal Apgar score, length of stay, hospital charges, etc.

Results

The successful rate of vaginal delivery was 78.0% (32/41) with no uterine rupture. The rest of 355 cases were chosen to accept cesarean section. There had statistically significant differences of postpartum hemorrhage, puerperal morbidity, length of stay, hospital charges between two groups (P<0.05), but had no significant difference of incidence of neonatal asphyxia (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Most of the patients with prior cesarean section could deliver safely through vaginal labor, if the indication and contraindication of vaginal labor were grasped strictly and the labor processes were observed intensively. Pregnancy after cesarean section is not a absolute indicator for cesarean section again.

1 Huang B. Clinical analysis of vaginal delivery of pregnancy in a uterine scar: 32 cases report [J]. J Youjiang Med Coll Nat, 2005, 27(6): 846-847. [黄斌. 瘢痕子宫再次妊娠阴道分娩32例分析[J]. 右江民族医学院学报,2005, 27(6): 846-847.]
2 Zhou SQ. Scar uterine pregnancies vaginal trial-produce full-term again[J]. Zhejiang Clin Med, 2008, 10(7): 904-905. [周素琴.瘢痕子宫再次足月妊娠阴道试产分析[J].浙江临床医学,2008, 10(7): 904-905.]
3 Liu PE. Value of ultrasounic diagnosis of cesarean scar pregnancy [J]. Med J PLA, 2009, 34(5): 642. [刘平儿.超声对剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠诊断的价值[J]. 解放军医学杂志,2009, 34(5): 642.]
4 Li HX. Clinical analysis of 15 cases with incomplete uterine rupture after cesarean section[J]. China Mod Doc, 2008, 46(27): 129. [李红霞.瘢痕子宫足月妊娠者子宫不全破裂15例分析[J].中国现代医师,2008, 46(27): 129.]
5 Dong SF. Clinical analysis of caesarean section pregnancy: 62 cases report [J]. China Med Herald, 2008, 5(27): 37. [董书芳. 62例瘢痕子宫再妊娠临床分析[J]. 中国医药导报,2008, 5(27): 37.]
6 Zhao YY, Zhang XL. Clinical analysis of different delivery modes after caesarean section and its pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chin Pract J Rural Doctor, 2005, 12(7): 24. [赵予颍,张香兰. 瘢痕子宫不同分娩方式与母婴结局分析[J]. 中国实用乡村医生杂志,2005,12(7): 24.]
7 Zhang CQ, He GH, Wang DM, et al. Study on the vaginal delivery of the re-pregnant woman after caesarean section[J]. Mod Clin Nurs, 2008, 7(12): 30. [张翠琼,何桂华,王冬梅,等. 剖宫产术后再次妊娠阴道分娩产程的观察及护理[J]. 现代临床护理,2008, 7(12): 30.]
8 Tang LP. Clinical analysis of subsequent pregnancy after cesarean section: 170 cases [J]. J Pract Med, 2008, 24 (18): 3227-3228. [唐丽平.剖宫产术后再次妊娠170例分娩方式分析[J].实用医学杂志,2008, 24(18): 3227-3228.].
9 Wei HJ, Wei FB. Clinical analysis of blood loss during cesarean section again [J]. Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet, 2003, 19(7): 414. [隗洪进,隗伏冰.再次剖宫产术中出血的临床分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2003, 19(7): 414.]
10 Zhou Y, Zhou DJ, Luo Y. Investigation of cesarean scar pregnancy [J]. Anat Clin, 2006,11(1): 57-58. [周云,周杜娟,罗岩.疤痕子宫再次妊娠分娩问题的探讨[J].解剖与临床,2006, 11(1): 57-58.]
11 Ding LJ. Investigation of delivery modes of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Chin J Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 7(3): 208. [丁丽娟.疤痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式探讨[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2006, 7(3): 208.]
[1] 杨皓媛, 龚杰, 邹青伟, 阮航. 哮喘孕妇的母婴不良妊娠结局研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[2] 陈甜甜, 王晓东, 余海燕. 双胎妊娠合并Gitelman综合征孕妇的妊娠结局及文献复习[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[3] 居晓庆, 金蕴洁, 王晓燕. 剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫患者再次妊娠阴道分娩发生子宫破裂的影响因素分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[4] 顾娟, 孙擎擎, 胡方方, 曹义娟, 祁玉娟. 子宫内膜容受性检测改善胚胎反复种植失败患者妊娠结局的临床应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[5] 王蓓蓓, 董启秀, 郗红燕, 于庆云, 张丽君, 式光. 早孕期孕妇药物流产失败的影响因素分析与构建相关预测模型及其对药物流产成功的预测价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 588-594.
[6] 陈絮, 詹玉茹, 王纯华. 孕妇ABO血型联合甲状腺功能检测对预测妊娠期糖尿病的临床价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 604-610.
[7] 周梦玲, 薛志伟, 周淑. 妊娠合并子宫肌瘤的孕期变化及其与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[8] 冉晨曦, 沈如飞, 廖明钰, 廖倩, 周玲, 张玉玲, 隆敏. 垂体瘤孕妇的诊治与围分娩期管理[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 487-491.
[9] 王跃, 唐敏, 李鹏超, 吕强. 妊娠期膀胱副神经节瘤伴严重出血一例报告[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 410-411.
[10] 胡金科, 钟文. 妊娠期输尿管结石的处理与转归[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 377-381.
[11] 杨聚荣. 透析患者妊娠的管理[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 300-300.
[12] 方可, 笪欢欢, 汪君, 孙瑞祥, 王涛, 李阳, 江海娇, 鲁卫华. ECMO联合肾上腺切除救治妊娠期嗜铬细胞瘤并儿茶酚胺心肌病一例并文献回顾[J]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 304-310.
[13] 张郁妍, 胡滨, 张伟红, 徐楣, 朱慧, 羊馨玥, 刘海玲. 妊娠中期心血管超声参数与肝功能的相关性及对不良妊娠结局的预测价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[14] 王欣, 刘琳, 闻哲嘉, 刘春玲, 张弘, 吕芳. 妊娠前应激暴露对小鼠后续妊娠的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 431-437.
[15] 邹艳丽, 栾文杰, 王淑娟, 刘亚琴, 初桂芝, 李松洋, 王好玲, 张锦婷, 姜鑫, 栾泽东. 早孕期胎儿右位主动脉弓的产前超声诊断学特征[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 227-232.
阅读次数
全文


摘要