Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (06): 665 -673. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2025.06.009

Original Article

Clinical characteristics and genetic etiology of children with MECP2 gene variants

Ran Hua1, Junhong Jiang1, Baotian Wang1, De Wu1, Jiulai Tang1, Li Yang1,2,()   

  1. 1Department of Pediatrics/Child Neurorehabilitation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230022, Anhui Province, China
    2Department of Pediatrics, Hanshan Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hanshan 238100, Anhui Province, China
  • Received:2025-06-20 Revised:2025-11-16 Published:2025-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Li Yang
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(82473641)
Objective

To investigate the clinical characteristics, genetic features, and follow-up outcomes of children with MECP2 gene mutations.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 15 children with MECP2 gene mutations diagnosed by molecular testing at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from October 2017 to March 2025. Data collected included general information, clinical phenotypes, auxiliary examination results, treatment, and follow-up records. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed to detect gene mutations in the children and their parents, with Sanger sequencing for verification and pedigree co-segregation analysis. Pathogenicity grading was performed according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines, combined with RTT diagnostic criteria and clinical staging for comprehensive evaluation. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (Approval No. PJ-2024-12-62), and all legal guardians of the subjects provided written informed consent.

Results

① Among the 15 children, 11 were female and 4 were male. Ten cases met the diagnostic criteria for typical RTT, three were atypical RTT, and two did not meet the RTT diagnostic threshold (one case with pervasive developmental delay and regression, and one with autism spectrum disorder). All typical RTT cases exhibited developmental regression, loss of hand function and language ability, and associated with hand stereotyped movements. Male children showed significant clinical phenotypic heterogeneity. ②At initial diagnosis, six cases had coexisting epilepsy, two had only abnormal electroencephalogram (EEG), and three of the seven with normal EEG developed epilepsy during the course of the disease. At initial diagnosis, 2 cases exhibited abnormal cranial MRI findings. Among the 15 pediatric patients, 5 cases had nonsense mutations, 4 cases had missense mutations, 4 cases had frameshift/splicing site mutations, and 2 cases had copy number variations (CNV). Of these, 12 cases presented with novel mutations, and 3 cases were maternally inherited. According to the ACMG/AMP guidelines, all identified mutations were classified as pathogenic (L) or potentially pathogenic (LP), including a frameshift mutation (p.L383Profs*5) reported for the first time in this study. Among the 13 RTT patients, 10 were in stage Ⅱ at initial diagnosis, and 3 were in stage Ⅰ. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 96 months. Three male patients died, all exhibiting rapid disease progression with severe complications. The disease progression in 9 RTT patients was observed over time, with 1 case showing no progression and 2 cases with stable conditions (non-RTT). Among the 9 cases finally diagnosed with epilepsy, 3 cases were refractory epilepsy with poor prognosis, 4 cases had well-controlled epilepsy, and 2 cases had controlled epilepsy after short-term follow-up.

Conclusions

MECP2 gene mutations are associated with significant clinical phenotypic heterogeneity. Female patients predominantly present with classic RTT phenotypes, while male patients exhibit rapid disease progression and poor prognosis, manifesting as developmental delay or severe fatal encephalopathy. Epilepsy control is correlated with the degree of functional preservation.

表1 本研究先证者1~15的临床特征及随访结果比较
编号 性别/确诊时年龄 基因变异位点(NM_004992.4)及变异来源 变异类型 父母表型/基因检测结果 临床诊断及特征 随访结果
1 女/5岁 c.674C>G, p.P225R;de novo 错义变异 父:正常/野生型
母:正常/野生型
典型RTT,癫痫 13岁进展至Ⅳ期,LEV+VPA,未规律诊疗,难治性癫痫
2 男/3岁1个月 c.1148_1198delinsC, p. L383Profs*5;inherited 移码变异 父:正常/野生型
母:智力低下/杂合
非典型RTT 8岁进展至Ⅳ期,抽搐发作且难以控制,合并重症肺炎、Ⅱ型呼吸衰竭。8岁10个月于PICU放弃治疗后死亡
3 男/9个月龄 c.806delG,p.G269Afs*20;de novo 移码变异 父:正常/野生型
母:正常/野生型
典型RTT,特殊面容(眉毛粗、人中长、右手断掌) 病情迅速退化,18个月龄时死亡
4 女/1岁3个月 c.763C>T, p.R255X;de novo 无义变异 父:正常/野生型
母:正常/野生型
典型RTT 4岁进展至Ⅱ期时出现癫痫,VPA控制可,7岁时进展至Ⅲ期
5 女/3岁5个月 c.808C>T, p.R270X;de novo 无义变异 父:正常/野生型
母:正常/野生型
典型RTT,癫痫 9岁进展至Ⅲ期,不能独走,VPA+KD治疗5年,癫痫控制可
6 女/4岁 c.916C>T(exon4),p.r306C;de novo 错义变异 父:正常/野生型
母:正常/野生型
典型RTT,癫痫、高磷血症、肾源性血尿 10岁进展至Ⅲ期,KD+VPA治疗,癫痫控制可
7 女/2岁 c.799C>T,p.R267X;de novo 无义变异 父:正常/野生型
母:正常/野生型
典型RTT 8岁进展至Ⅲ期
8 女/1岁7个月 c.378-3(IVS3)C>G;de novo 剪接位点变异 父:正常/野生型
母:正常/野生型
非典型RTT,卵圆孔未闭 7岁进展至Ⅲ期
9a 男/7岁1个月 chrX:153295817-153363188,673.72 kb, gainMECP2 (exon:1-4); inherited 单倍体重复 父:正常/野生型
母:正常/单倍重复
全面性发育落后;6个月龄出现发育倒退 12岁可独走,双足内收,重度智力低下,言语缺失,社交能力落后
10 男/4岁11个月 c.909C>G, p.I303M;inherited 错义变异 父:正常/野生型
母:正常/杂合
典型RTT,发育倒退,1岁合并癫痫 予LEV+VPA等治疗,难治性癫痫,7岁时死亡
11 女/1岁5个月 MECP2基因部分exon4杂合缺失;de novo 外显子缺失 父:正常/野生型
母:正常/野生型
典型RTT 5岁进展至Ⅱ期
12 女/1岁4个月 c.538C>T,p.R180X,319;de novo 无义变异 父:正常/野生型
母:正常/野生型
典型RTT 3岁局灶性癫痫,予OXC治疗,癫痫控制可。现3岁10个月进展至Ⅱ期,不能独走
13 女/3岁6个月 c.916C>T(exon3);p.R306*,193;de novo 无义变异 父:正常/野生型
母:正常/野生型
非典型RTT,癫痫,特殊面容(前额窄小、鼻梁低、眼距窄) LEV治疗1年癫痫无发作,5岁进展至Ⅲ期,可说叠词,手部功能差,可独走
14 女/1岁8个月 c.1000C>G,p.P334A;de novo 错义变异 父:正常/野生型
母:正常/野生型
ASD,认知、运动等发育落后 3岁有ASD表现,喜吃手
15 女/4岁4个月 c.47_57(exon1) delGCGAGGAGGAG,p.Gly16Glufs*22;de novo 移码变异 父:正常/野生型
母:正常/野生型
典型RTT,7个月龄后出现发育倒退,2岁合并癫痫,未规范治疗 LEV治疗2个月,癫痫控制可。现4岁6个月Ⅱ期,独走欠稳,语言几无,手功能差,绞手
图1 MECP2蛋白结构域及变异位点的分布示意图注:先证者1~15均为MECP2基因变异。图1基于Ensembl GRCh37坐标绘制。NTD为N末端结构域,MBD为甲基-CpG结合结构域,ID为中间结构域,TRD为转录抑制因子结合结构域,CTD为C末端结构域
图2 遗传学病因为母系遗传的先证者2(男性,3岁1个月)及先证者10(男性,4岁11个月)与先证者9(男性,7岁1个月)家系系谱图[图2A:先证者2的家系系谱图;图2B:先证者10的家系系谱图;图2C:先证者9的家系系谱图]注:先证者2、9、10均为MECP2基因变异患儿。↗表示先证者。●表示MECP2基因变异女性患儿,■表示MECP2基因变异男性患儿,表示MECP2基因变异女性携带者,表示已故男性;Ⅰ~Ⅲ表示该家系中第1~3代
[1]
Pejhan S, Rastegar M. Role of DNA methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 in Rett syndrome pathobiology and mechanism of disease [J]. Biomolecules. 2021, 11(1): 75. DOI: 10.3390/biom11010075.
[2]
Pini G, Bigoni S, Congiu L, et al. Rett syndrome: a wide clinical and autonomic picture [J].Orphanet J Rare Dis, 2016, 11(1): 132.DOI:10.1186/s13023-016-0499-7.
[3]
Petriti U, Dudman DC, Scosyrev E, et al. Global prevalence of Rett syndrome: systematic review and Meta-analysis [J]. Syst Rev, 2023, 12(1): 5. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02169-6..
[4]
Pascual-Alonso A, Martínez-Monseny AF, Xiol C, et al.MECP2-related disorders in males [J]. Int J Mol Sc, 2021, 22(17): 9610. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22179610.
[5]
中华医学会医学遗传学分会遗传病临床实践指南撰写组,关荣伟,李秋炎,等. Rett综合征的临床实践指南[J]. 中华医学遗传学杂志2020, 37(3):308-312. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1003-9406.2020.03.014.
[6]
Villard L. MECP2 mutations in males [J]. J Med Genet, 2007, 44(7): 417-423. DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2007.049452.
[7]
Smeets E, Terhal P, Casaer P, et al. Rett syndrome in females with CTS hot spot deletions: a disorder profile [J]. Am J Med Genet A, 2005, 132A(2): 117-120. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30410.
[8]
Gold WA, Percy AK, Neul JL, et al. Rett syndrome [J]. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2024, 10(1): 84. DOI: 10.1038/s41572-024-00568-0.
[9]
Courgeon L, Uguen K, Lefranc J, et al. MECP2 dysautonomia phenotypes in boys [J]. Pediatr Neurol, 2022, 134: 31-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2022.06.001.
[10]
Neul JL, Benke TA, Marsh ED, et al. The array of clinical phenotypes of males with mutations in Methyl-CpG binding protein 2 [J]. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet, 2019, 180(1): 55-67. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32707.
[11]
Operto FF, Mazza R, Pastorino G, et al. Epilepsy and genetic in Rett syndrome: a review [J]. Brain Behav, 2019, 9(5): e01250. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1250.
[12]
Tillotson R, Bird A. The molecular basis of MECP2 function in the brain [J]. J Mol Biol, 2020, 432(6): 1602-1623. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.10.004.
[13]
Neul JL, Kaufmann WE, Glaze DG, et al. Rett syndrome: revised diagnostic criteria and nomenclature [J]. Ann Neurol, 2010, 68(6): 944-950. DOI:10.1002/ana.22124.
[14]
Zvereff V, Carpenter L, Patton D, et al. Molecular diagnostic dilemmas in Rett syndrome [J]. Brain Dev, 2012, 34(9): 750-755. DOI: 10.1016/j.braindev.2011.12.012.
[15]
Fang X, Butler KM, Abidi F, et al. Analysis of X-inactivation status in a Rett syndrome natural history study cohort [J]. Mol Genet Genomic Med, 2022, 10(5): e1917. DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1917.
[16]
Ta D, Downs J, Baynam G, et al. A brief history of MECP2 duplication syndrome: 20-years of clinical understanding [J]. Orphanet J Rare Dis, 2022, 17(1): 131. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-022-02278-w.
[17]
D′Mello SR. MECP2 and the biology of MECP2 duplication syndrome [J]. J Neurochem, 2021, 159(1): 29-60. DOI: 10.1111/jnc.15331.
[18]
Neul JL, Percy AK, Benke TA, et al. Trofinetide for the treatment of Rett syndrome: a randomized phase 3 study [J]. Nat Med, 2023, 29(6): 1468-1475. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02398-1.
[19]
Fu C, Armstrong D, Marsh E, et al. Consensus guidelines on managing Rett syndrome across the lifespan [J]. BMJ Paediatr Open, 2020, 4(1): e000717. DOI: 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000717.
[1] Qun Wu, Pei Li, Ning Ma, Fangyun Wang, Lin Zheng, Haiyan Wei, Xin Zhang. Echocardiographic diagnosis of congenital coronary artery fistula complicated with giant coronary artery aneurysm in children[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2025, 22(11): 1080-1085.
[2] Qingqing Liu, Jin Yu, Weize Xu, Zhiwei Zhang, Xiaohua Pan, Qiang Shu, Jingjing Ye. Value of OBICnet image classification model in ultrasound screening for congenital heart disease in children[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2025, 22(08): 754-760.
[3] Junqing Zhang, Mi Zhou, Wenjun Zhang, Jing Tan, Lixue Yin. Ultrasound characteristics and correlation of liver hardness and left ventricular function in patients with liver cirrhosis with preserved ejection fraction[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2025, 22(08): 768-776.
[4] Xufang Luo, Yanzi Wang, Hongna Teng, Deli Zhao, Li Yuan, Siyu Jin, Hao Guan. A qualitative study through the lens of timing theory: the care experience of caregivers for severely burned children[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2026, 21(01): 40-46.
[5] Shaowei Zhu. Spigelian hernia without cryptorchidism in a child: a case report and literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(06): 722-724.
[6] Haiyun Hu, Zhouqi Hui, Chun Wang, Ting Zhang, Xiaolu Li, Dan Li, Lingling Zhang, Aizhu Shen, Jingjia Zhang, Huanhuan Gao. Analysis of respiratory pathogen infections and epidemiological characteristics in children in shanghai area[J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2026, 19(01): 117-123.
[7] Saiwen Chen, Qingjie Wu, Yudong Lin, Sicheng Zhang. Comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided closed reduction Kirschner wirefixation and open reduction Kirschner wire fixation in the treatment of medial epicondyle fractures of the humerus in children[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2026, 14(01): 38-44.
[8] Hui Wang, Yongqi Sun. New insights into pediatric genetic kidney disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Kidney Disease Investigation(Electronic Edition), 2026, 15(01): 8-14.
[9] Taipeng Sun, Yonggui Yuan. Current status and future prospects of mental health services for children and adolescents[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(11): 805-808.
[10] Xiaoyan Ke. Neurodevelopmental disorders: a practical guide under the ICD-11 CCDR framework[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(11): 809-813.
[11] Su Hong, Li Kuang. Mood disorders in children and adolescents: a practical guide under the ICD-11 CDDR framework[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(11): 814-817.
[12] Yan Chen, Jue Chen. Psychosomatic disorders in children and adolescents: a practical guide under the ICD-11 CCDR framework[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(11): 818-822.
[13] Xiaoshuang Shen, Qiyong Zheng, Hongyu Zheng, Qianwen Deng, Hui Zhong. Childhood trauma, implicit/explicit memory characteristics, and their correlation in first-degree relatives of children with comorbid attention deficit hyperactivity disorder[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(11): 831-838.
[14] Lin Du, Feiyong Jia. Advances in understanding of multifactorial etiology of depressive disorder in children and adolescents[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(11): 854-859.
[15] Jianxing Gao, Jingjing Ma, Jie Xia, Xiaoyan Ke, Hui Fang. Clinical characteristics of first-episode depression and factors associated with non-suicidal self-injury in children and adolescents[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(09): 633-641.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract