Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (04): 403 -410. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2025.04.005

Original Article

Correlation between surgical complexity, residual disease, and postoperative complications in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

Haozheng Yan, Yue Huang, Zhengyu Li()   

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Disease of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2025-01-05 Revised:2025-07-03 Published:2025-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Zhengyu Li
  • Supported by:
    Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province(2023NSFSC0743)
Objective

To investigate the correlation between surgical complexity score (SCS), disease score (DS), and residual disease (RD) in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) undergoing interval debulking surgery (IDS), with the aim of informing individualized surgical decision-making.

Methods

A total of 160 patients with advanced EOC who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by IDS at West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, between September 2013 and June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to whether complete cytoreduction (R0) was achieved, patients were categorized into the R0 group (n=86) and the RD group (n=74). Clinical data, including baseline characteristics, histopathological findings, laboratory results, postoperative complications, and prognosis, were collected for both groups. Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson′s chi-square test, or Fisher′s exact test, as appropriate, to compare clinical variables between the two groups. Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify independent factors associated with achieving R0 resection in advanced EOC patients. The Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test was used to evaluate the correlation between SCS and DS. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with the Log-rank test was employed to compare overall survival (OS) between the R0 and RD groups. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, and conducted in accordance with its ethical requirements (Approval No. 2022-167).

Results

① The preoperative carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) level in the RD group was significantly higher than that in the R0 group (Z=-2.52, P=0.012). ② The distribution of DS grades between the two groups differed significantly was (χ2=10.92, P=0.004), the distribution of SCS between the two groups also differed significantly (χ2=15.41, P=0.001). DS was an independent risk factor for reaching R0 after receiving IDS, while SCS was an independent protective factor. Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis indicated that patients with moderate DS had a significantly lower likelihood of achieving R0 resection compared with those with low DS (OR=0.094, 95%CI: 0.021-0.431, P=0.002), whereas patients with moderate SCS were more likely to achieve R0 compared with those with low SCS (OR=13.660, 95%CI: 2.150-86.803, P=0.006). ③ Mantel-Haenszel χ2 test revealed no significant trend correlation between DS and SCS in patients with advanced EOC (χ2=0.01, P=0.906). ④ The Log-rank test demonstrated that the survival curves of the two groups differed significantly (χ2=9.46, P=0.002). ⑤ Comparisons of age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, DS grade, and SCS grade between patients with and without postoperative complications showed no significant differences (all P>0.05).

Conclusions

For patients with advanced EOC treated with NACT followed by IDS, increasing surgical complexity may facilitate the achievement of R0 resection and improve prognosis. However, such an approach requires careful consideration of tumor burden and the risk of postoperative complications. Preoperative comprehensive evaluation and individualized decision-making are therefore recommended.

表1 SCS的手术复杂度评分表(分)[9]
表2 本研究160例晚期EOC患者的临床资料[例数(%)]
表3 R0组与RD组晚期EOC患者临床资料比较
表4 晚期EOC患者IDS达R0的多因素非条件logistic回归分析
表5 晚期EOC患者DS与SCS的相关性分析(例)
图1 2组晚期EOC患者的OS曲线注:EOC为上皮性卵巢癌,OS为总体生存。R0组指肿瘤细胞减灭术中无肉眼可见残留病灶,RD组指肿瘤细胞减灭术中有肉眼可见残留病灶
表6 160例晚期EOC患者IDS后30 d内有无并发症者的临床资料比较
[1]
何欣林,阎昊铮,赵亦非,等. 新辅助化疗联合间歇性肿瘤细胞减灭术对上皮性卵巢癌患者预后及血清学与影像学指标对患者预后的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版)202420(1):47-57. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2024.01.007.
[2]
董静,熊伟. 卵巢癌手术患者预后的危险因素分析[J].当代医学202228(12):143-145. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393.2022.12.050.
[3]
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. (NCCN) Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Ovarian cancer/fallopian tube cancer/primary peritoneal cancer version: 1.2025 (EB/OL). [2025-04-18].

URL    
[4]
中国抗癌协会妇科肿瘤专业委员会. 卵巢恶性肿瘤诊断与治疗指南(2021年版) [J].中国癌症杂志2021, 31(6): 490-500. DOI: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2021.06.07.
[5]
Bristow RE, Tomacruz RS, Armstrong DK, et al. Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a Meta-analysis [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2023, 41(25): 4065-4076. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.02765.
[6]
Horowitz NS, Miller A, Rungruang B, et al. Does aggressive surgery improve outcomes? Interaction between preoperative disease burden and complex surgery in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer: an analysis of GOG 182 [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2015, 33(8): 937-943. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.3106.
[7]
Kalampokas E, Young H, Bednarek A, et al. Surgical outcomes and morbidity after radical surgery for ovarian cancer in Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, the Northeast of Scotland Gynaecologic Oncology Centre [J]. Anticancer Res, 2018, 38(2): 923-928. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12304.
[8]
Winter WE, Maxwell GL, Tian C, et al. Tumor residual after surgical cytoreduction in prediction of clinical outcome in stage Ⅳ epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26(1): 83-89. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.1953.
[9]
Aletti GD, Eisenhauer EL, Santillan A, et al. Identification of patient groups at highest risk from traditional approach to ovarian cancer treatment [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2011, 120(1): 23-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.09.010.
[10]
Lee YJ, Lee JY, Nam EJ, et al. Rethinking radical surgery in interval debulking surgery for advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy [J]. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(4): 1235. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9041235.
[11]
Yao T, DeJong SR, McGree ME, et al. Frailty in ovarian cancer identified the need for increased postoperative care requirements following cytoreductive surgery [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2019, 153(1): 68-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.12.025.
[12]
Thrall MM, Goff BA, Symons RG, et al. Thirty-day mortality after primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer in the elderly [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 118(3): 537-547. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822a6d56.
[13]
陈荟竹,郭应坤,汪昕蓉,等. 上皮性卵巢癌"二元论模型"的分子生物学研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版)2023, 19(4):394-402. DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2023.04.004.
[14]
Chang SJ, Bristow RE, Chi DS, et al. Role of aggressive surgical cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer [J]. J Gynecol Oncol, 2015, 26(4): 336-342. DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2015.26.4.336.
[15]
Tseng JH, Cowan RA, Zhou Q, et al. Continuous improvement in primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: do increased complete gross resection rates independently lead to increased progression-free and overall survival? [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2018, 151(1): 24-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.08.014.
[16]
Nishikimi K, Tate S, Matsuoka A, et al. Aggressive surgery could overcome the extent of initial peritoneal dissemination for advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinoma [J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 21307. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78296-0.
[17]
Aletti GD, Dowdy SC, Podratz KC, et al. Relationship among surgical complexity, short-term morbidity, and overall survival in primary surgery for advanced ovarian cancer [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 197(6): 676. e1-e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.10.495.
[18]
Narasimhulu DM, Kumar A, Weaver AL, et al. Using an evidence-based triage algorithm to reduce 90-day mortality after primary debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2019, 155(1): 58-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.08.004.
[19]
Narasimhulu DM, Kumar A, Weaver AL, et al. Less guessing, more evidence in identifying patients least fit for cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer: a triage algorithm to individualize surgical management [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2020, 157(3): 572-577. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.03.024.
[20]
Jiang C, Li Z. Performance validation of the Mayo triage algorithm applied to individualize surgical management of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2021, 162(2): 339-344. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.06.003.
[21]
Narasimhulu DM, Thannickal A, Kumar A, et al. Appropriate triage allows aggressive primary debulking surgery with rates of morbidity and mortality comparable to interval surgery after chemotherapy [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2021, 160(3): 681-687. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.026.
[1] Jie Zhang, Zhiyang Zhang, Yong Nie, Tiemin Jiang. Technical innovations and clinical advancements in ex vivo liver resection and autotransplantation[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(05): 351-355.
[2] Lijun Zhou, Jiaojiao Li, Yan Sun, Lu Wang, Rong Qian. The impact of different anastomotic methods on postoperative recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(06): 642-645.
[3] Da Wang, Jianmin Zhu. Predictive efficacy of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio for neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in breast cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(06): 650-653.
[4] Yi Wang, Jianqiao Kong, Peng Zhang, Yang Dai, Hengping Li. Laparoscopic ultrasound-guided duodenoscopy for the treatment of gallbladder combined with common bile duct stones[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(06): 658-661.
[5] Chao Ma, Chuanjia Wang, Wufang Zhang. Comparative study of single-port laparoscopic breast-conserving surgery via axillary approach versus traditional open surgery for early breast cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(06): 674-677.
[6] Chao Zhang, Jian Chang. Comparison of short-and mid-term follow-up outcomes between hybrid approach and medial-to-lateral approach in laparoscopic radical resection for right-sided colon cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(06): 685-688.
[7] Kaiyv Jian, Ruyv Chang, Da Wang, Qianru Xu, Lin Jiang, Baolei Jia, Yuxuan Qiu, Feng Liang. A study on the short-term efficacy of different surgical approaches for advanced esophagogastric junction cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(05): 517-522.
[8] Min Yang, Linpu Xin, Junfeng Du. A study on the preventive effect of the three-precision management plan on stoma complications after colostomy for rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(05): 531-534.
[9] Xiaona Liu, Bohui Shi, Xiaoxia Ma, Yao Chen, Na Hao. A comparative study on the impact of different surgical approaches for breast cancer on postoperative complications and rehabilitation[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(05): 551-554.
[10] Junjun Ouyang, Bao Cai, Bing Xu. A study on the impact of transumbilical single-port and conventional laparoscopic appendectomy on children with appendicitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(05): 566-569.
[11] Yinyong Deng, Jie Zhong, Lili Jiang, Jie Yang. Prediction and prevention of complications after colorectal tumor surgery: latest advances based on clinical research[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(05): 579-583.
[12] Yanling Zhao, Heng Wang, Qin Qin, Jing Li. Observation on the application of different surgeries in patients with esophageal hiatal hernia complicated with gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(04): 421-424.
[13] Pan Li, Huaqin Zhang. A comparative study on the efficacy of different laparoscopic cholecystectomies in the treatment of gallstone disease[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(04): 388-391.
[14] Daquan Wang, Kaijun Ying, Yunhao Sun, Yao Wang. Effects of video-assisted thoracoscopic bronchial sleeve resection on postoperative complications and respiratory function in lung cancer patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2025, 18(04): 620-625.
[15] Jiangtao Liao, Zhenyu Song, Hao Xu, Yi Li, Dongdong Xu, Wei Yu, Zhipeng Dai, Hongtao Tian, Wei Tong. Cross-sectional study on serum total testosterone levels and the risk of osteoarthritis in Middle-aged and Elderly Women[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2025, 11(05): 271-279.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract