Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (02): 158 -164. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2022.02.006

Original Article

Effects of different surgical methods in the treatment of cervical incompetence in non-pregnant women of childbearing age and pregnant women in the second trimester

Yan Wei, Jianru Luo(), Cong Xie   

  1. Department of Gynecology, Chengdu Women′s and Children′s Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2021-10-27 Revised:2022-03-09 Published:2022-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Jianru Luo
  • Supported by:
    General Application Project by Health Planning Committee of Sichuan Province(17PJ412)
Objective

To investigate clinical efficacy and pregnancy outcomes between patients with cervical incompetence (CI) of non-pregnant women of childbearing age underwent laparoscopic abdominal cervical cerclage (LAC), and of pregnant women in the second trimester (12-16 gestational weeks) underwent transvaginal cervical cerclage (TVC).

Methods

A total of 171 patients with CI who planned to undergo cervical cerclage (CC) from August 2016 to June 2020 in Chengdu Women′s and Children′s Central Hospital were selected as research subjects. According to whether CI patients were pregnant or not during CC treatment, they were divided into research group (n=118, non-pregnant women of childbearing age who received LAC) and control group (n=53, pregnant women who received TVC in the second-trimester). Clinical data, including successful rate of CC treatment (≥28 gestational weeks deliver), rate of ≥34 gestational weeks deliver, miscarriage rate, neonatal birth weight and surgery-related indicators between two groups were analyzed by prospective cohort study method and compared by independent-samples t test and chi-square test. The procedures followed in this study were in line with the requirements of newly revised World Medical Association Helsinki Declaration in 2013, and informed consent for clinical study was signed with all subjects enrolled in this study. There were no significant differences among clinical data of age, gravidity, times of abortion, gestational weeks at abortion, diameter of cervical internal os and length of cervix between two groups (P>0.05).

Results

①Average operation duration and volume of intraoperative blood loss of TVC in CI patients of research group were significantly longer or more than those in control group, and differences were statistically significant (t=9.742, Z=-9.463; both P<0.001). There was no statistical difference in hospitalization time between two groups (P>0.05). There were no complications during operation and postoperation between two groups, and all patients were discharged after operation. ②The overall successful rate of CC treatment between two groups after CC treatment was 90.6% (155/171). The successful rate of CC treatment, rates of term delivery (≥37 gestational weeks deliver), ≥34 gestational weeks deliver, and miscarriage, gestational age at deliver and neonatal birth weight in research group were all better than those in control group, and all differences were statistically significant (χ2=8.192, 10.858, 9.319, 8.192; t=3.452, 4.823; all P<0.05). There was no significant difference in rate of preterm birth (>28-37 gestational weeks deliver) between two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

Clinical curative effect of LAC that non-pregnant women with CI of childbearing age underwent is much better than that of TVC in pregnant women with CI in the second trimester. However, average operation duration and volume of intraoperative blood loss of TVC in pregnant women with CI in the second trimester were shorter and less, and vaginal delivery was available. LAC and TVC for treatment of CI patients have their own advantages, it is important to target CI patients to choice individual treatment schemes.

表1 2组CI患者一般临床资料比较(±s)
表2 2组CI患者CC治疗的手术持续时间、术中出血量及住院时间比较
表3 2组CI患者CC后妊娠结局比较
[1]
Wang SW, Ma LL, Huang S, et al. Role of cervical cerclage and vaginal progesterone in the treatment of cervical incompetence with/without preterm birth history[J]. Chin Med J, 2016, 129(22): 2670-2675. DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.193451.
[2]
Lim KI, Butt K, Nevo O, et al. Guideline No. 401: Sonographic cervical length in singleton pregnancies: techniques and clinical applications[J]. JOGC, 2020, 42(11): 1394.e1-1413.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.06.002.
[3]
王祎祎,段华,汪沙. 2019 SOGC《宫颈功能不全与宫颈环扎术临床实践指南》解读[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志2019, 35(8): 880-884. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2019080109.
[4]
Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Medley N. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017, 6(6): CD008991. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008991.pub3.
[5]
Wong CH, Chen CP, Wang KG, et al. Comparison of two cervical cerclages for the prevention of preterm birth and neonatal complications[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2017, 30(5): 551-555. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1177818.
[6]
蒋倩颖,袁华,赵绍杰. 宫颈机能不全非孕期不同术式干预后的临床比较[J]. 实用妇产科杂志2017, 33(5): 369-372.
[7]
Moawad GN, Tyan P, Bracke T,et al. Systematic review of transabdominal cerclage placed via laparoscopy for the prevention of preterm birth[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2018, 25(2): 277-286. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.021.
[8]
Brink J, Mourad J. 38: Robotic-assisted transabdominal cerclage placement in the pregnant patient: a case series[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 216(3):S596-S597. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.085.
[9]
Marchand GJ, Masoud AT, Galitsky A, et al. Complications of laparoscopic and transabdominal cerclage in patients with cervical insufficiency: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2021, 28(4): 759.e2-768.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.11.014.
[10]
李雪,张弘. 宫颈机能不全环扎与早产[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志2018, 34(2): 146-150. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2018020106.
[11]
梅玲,刘兴会. 宫颈环扎术后妊娠患者的孕期管理[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志2014, 30(2): 110-112.
[12]
王笑非,赵爱民. 孕期经阴道宫颈环扎术治疗宫颈机能不全[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志2014, 30(2): 105-108.
[13]
夏恩兰,刘玉环,黄晓武,等. 孕前环扎带腹腔镜宫颈环扎术[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2011, 12(5): 3635-3637. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2011.12.058.
[14]
王伟,姚书忠. 妊娠期宫颈机能不全诊治[J]. 实用妇产科杂志2018, 34(2): 90-93.
[15]
Ades A, Parghi S, Aref-Adib M. Laparoscopic transabdominal cerclage: outcomes of 121 pregnancies[J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2018, 58(6): 606-611. DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12774.
[16]
姚书忠. 宫颈机能不全诊治过程中存在的争议和思考[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志2017, 33(1): 31-35. DOI: 10.19538/j.fk2017010108.
[17]
Ramesh B, Chaithra TM, Prasanna G. Laparoscopic transabdominal cervical cerclage by broad ligament window technique[J]. Gynecol Minimall Invas Ther, 2018, 7(3): 139-140. DOI: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_50_18.
[18]
E Elgergawy A, Elhalwagy AE, A Salem H, et al. Outcome of laparoscopic adhesiolysis in infertile patients with pelvic adhesions following cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial[J]. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod, 2021, 50(5): 101969. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101969.
[19]
高蕾,王祎祎,贾宗洋,等. "经阴道拆除式"腹腔镜下宫颈环扎术13例临床分析[J]. 现代妇产科进展2019, 28(6): 407-411, 415. DOI: 10.13283/j.cnki.xdfckjz.2019.06.002.
[20]
Clark NV, Einarsson JI. Laparoscopic abdominal cerclage: a highly effective option for refractory cervical insufficiency[J]. Fertil Steril, 2020, 113(4): 717-722. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.02.007.
[21]
Hawkins E, Nimaroff M. Vaginal erosion of an abdominal cerclage seven years after laparoscopic placement[J]. J Minimall Invas Gynecol, 2013, 20(6): S144-S145. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a7114a.
[22]
Whittle WL, Singh SS, Allen L, et al. Laparoscopic cervico-isthmic cerclage: surgical technique and obstetric outcomes[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 201(4): 364.e1-364.e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.018.
[1] Xiaohui Du, Jianxin Cui. The strategy of D3 lymph node dissection for laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy on right colon cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[2] Yanbing Zhou, Xiaodong Liu. Choice of digestive tract reconstruction after laparoscopic right colectomy of colon cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[3] Yanhui Zhang, Jiao Zhang, Zhixian Zhu. Effect of indwelling anal tube on anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic total mesangectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with middle and low rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[4] Chunrong Wang, Jiang Chen, Chen Yu. Clinical application of laparoscopic anatomic left hemihepatectomy through Glisson pedicle extrathecal anatomy and Laennec membrane approach[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[5] Shijiang Pang, Yanyan Huang, Guanlie Zhu. Safety and efficacy of modified π-type anastomosis in laparoscopic total gastrectomy for digestive tract reconstruction[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[6] Jianxiong Tang, Shaojie Li. Continue to promote the standardization of laparoscopic hernia surgery in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 591-594.
[7] Wen Tian, Xiaodong Yang. Selection and attention of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[8] Tao Li, Gang Chen, Shiyong Li. Laparoscopic right oblique inguinal hernia repair (TAPP)[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[9] Bo Mo, Pei Wang, Heng Wang, Zhijun He, Jun Liang, Zhinan Hao. Curative effect of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and modified radical gastrectomy for early gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 644-647.
[10] LuoBu AChong, Ying Chen, Dekun Xie. Effect of laparoscopic complete exocyst dissection in the treatment of hepatic echinococcosis and its influence on liver function and prognosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 666-669.
[11] Duojie Suolang, Hongqiao Gao, Dunzhu Basang, Sang Ren. Clinical analysis of different laparoscopic procedures in the treatment of hepatic cystic echinococcosis in Tibet[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[12] Yuegang Liu, Zhenfeng Xue. Safety analysis of laparoscopic inguinal hernia day surgery in the elderly[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[13] Qingqing Zhu, Zhenqi Wei. Application value of self-efficacy management during perioperative period in patients with inguinal hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 773-777.
[14] Wei Dai, Guilin Jiang, Zhaoping Che, Jiao Zhang, Xingxing Wang, Haitao Zhao. Application effect of seamless surgical nursing in perioperative period of laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 778-781.
[15] Fang Li, Rui Xu, Yangyang Li, Xiuquan Shi. Application of the concept of evidence-based medicine in children with inguinal hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 782-786.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract