Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06): 715 -725. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2021.06.014

Original Article

Analysis of influencing factors of puerperal mastitis

Sha Liao1,1, Yan Huang2,2,(), Yuan Deng3,3   

  • Received:2021-08-31 Revised:2021-11-10 Published:2021-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Yan Huang
  • Supported by:
    Medical Science and Technology Project of Health Commission of Sichuan Province(21PJ134)
Objective

To explore influencing factors of puerperal mastitis (PM) in puerperae.

Methods

A total of 1 162 puerperae who gave birth in a tertiary hospital for women and children in Chengdu from September 1 to December 31, 2020 and were followed up for 42 days after delivery were selected as research subjects. According to occurrence of PM within 42 days after delivery or not, they were divided into PM group (n=103) and control group (n=1 059). Self-designed Questionnaire on Influencing Factors of Postpartum Mastitis (hereinafter referred to as the Questionnaire), and Chinese Simple Profile of Mood States (POMS) Scale (hereinafter referred to as the POMS Scale) were used for investigation in two groups. The Questionnaire mainly included 50 items in 10 dimensions: general demographic data, pregnancy and disease, perinatal drug use, breastfeeding, diet and living habits, and so on. The POMS Scale included 40 items in 7 dimensions of anxiety and so on. Items in the Questionnaire and scores of POMS Scale were compared between two groups by independent-samples t test, chi-square test and Fisher′s exact test. The procedures followed in this study complied with requirements of the Medical Ethics Committee of cases collected hospital, and was approved by its Ethics Committee[Approval No. 2021(29) of Scientific Research Review], and each subject signed an informed consent form for clinical research. There were no significant differences in general clinical data between two groups, such as maternal age, and so on (P>0.05).

Results

①The incidence of PM in puerperae included in this research was 8.9% (103/1 162), and incidences of PM in the 3rd and 4th weeks after delivery were the highest as 2.7% (31/1 162) and 2.4% (28/1 162), respectively. ②Proportion of iron supplementation and oral probiotics during perinatal period, constituent ratio of cracked nipple degree, time and frequency of using breast pump, frequency of using nipple shield and nipple protection cream, rate of correct breastfeeding connection posture, degree of breast pain during breastfeeding, and composition ratio of breastfeeding underwear wearing conditions of two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). ③Anxiety score of POMS Scale in PM group was (7.1±5.0) points, which was significantly higher than that in control group (5.3±4.1) points, and the difference was statistically significant (t=-3.540, P=0.001). ④A total of 10 influencing factors were included for multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis for influencing factors of PM based on factors with statistically significant differences in univariate analysis of the above influencing factors of PM, existing research results and clinical experience. Results of multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis showed that independent risk factors for PM in puerperae included: iron supplementation during perinatal period (OR=3.351, 95%CI: 1.949-5.758, P<0.001), cracked nipple (OR=3.564, 95%CI: 1.909-6.654, P<0.001), frequency of using breast pump>once a day (OR=5.102, 95%CI: 1.047-24.876, P=0.044), frequency of using nipple protection cream>once a day (OR=2.147, 95%CI: 1.156-3.987, P=0.016), incorrect breastfeeding connection posture (OR=2.311, 95%CI: 1.202-4.445, P=0.012), uncomfortable wearing of nursing underwear (OR=2.322, 95%CI: 1.008-5.347, P=0.048), without wearing nursing underwear (OR=3.516, 95%CI: 1.821-6.789, P<0.001), high anxiety score (OR=1.073, 95%CI: 1.007-1.143, P=0.029), and independent protective factor was oral probiotics during perinatal period (OR=0.110, 95%CI: 0.025-0.478, P=0.003).

Conclusions

Guiding perinatal puerperae to correct incorrect behaviors by formulating clinical intervention measures, such as misuse of perinatal iron supplements, breast pumps and nipple protection creams, improper wearing of nursing underwear and irregular breastfeeding behaviors, advocating oral administration of probiotics during perinatal period and relieving anxiety are of great significance for prevention of PM in puerperae.

图1 1 162例产妇的PM发生曲线注:PM为产褥期乳腺炎
表1 PM组与对照组产妇人口学资料比较
表2 PM组与对照组产妇相关临床资料比较[例数(%)]
表3 PM组与对照组产妇乳房情况比较[例数(%)]
表4 PM组与对照组产妇母乳喂养培训、经验及知识来源比较[例数(%)]
表5 PM组与对照组产妇哺乳行为比较[例数(%)]
组别 例数 每次哺乳时间 每次哺乳姿势变化次数
≤10 min >10~20 min >20~30 min >30 min 不固定 0 1次 2次 ≥3次
PM组 103 7(6.8) 38(36.9) 27(26.2) 12(11.7) 19(18.4) 52(50.5) 31(30.1) 16(15.5) 4(3.9)
对照组 1 059 97(9.2) 495(46.7) 203(19.2) 89(8.4) 175(16.5) 433(41.1) 336(31.9) 202(19.2) 82(7.8)
χ2   6.271 4.643
P   0.281 0.200
组别 例数 每天哺乳次数 吸奶器使用频率
≤3次 4~7次 8~11次 ≥12次 不固定 未使用 >0~1次/d 1次/d >1次/d
PM组 103 6(5.8) 31(30.1) 47(45.6) 10(9.7) 9(8.8) 17(16.5) 15(14.5) 22(21.4) 49(47.6)
对照组 1 059 59(5.6) 353(33.3) 484(45.7) 22(2.1) 141(13.3) 389(36.8) 226(21.3) 147(13.9) 297(28.0)
χ2   21.682 28.703
P   <0.001 <0.001
组别 例数 每次吸奶器使用时间 乳头保护罩使用频率
未使用 >0~10 min >10~20 min >20~30 min >30 min 不固定 未使用 >0~3次/d ≥3次/d
PM组 103 17(16.5) 19(18.4) 42(40.8) 14(13.6) 3(2.9) 8(7.8) 86(83.5) 4(3.9) 13(12.6)
对照组 1 059 339(32.0) 197(18.7) 263(24.8) 69(6.5) 30(2.8) 161(15.2) 1 001(94.5) 7(0.7) 51(4.8)
χ2   26.610 21.901
P   <0.001 <0.001
组别 例数 乳头保护霜使用频率 哺乳后涂抹乳汁于乳头频率
未使用 >0~1次/周 1次/周 >1~7次/周 1次/d >1次/d 从未 >0~3次/d ≥3次/d
PM组 103 52(50.5) 0(0) 4(3.9) 12(11.7) 11(10.7) 24(23.3) 47(45.6) 14(13.6) 42(40.8)
对照组 1 059 811(76.6) 37(3.5) 14(1.3) 46(4.3) 75(7.1) 76(7.2) 567(53.5) 168(15.9) 324(30.6)
χ2   56.224 4.510
P   <0.001 0.105
组别 例数 哺乳前乳头清洗频率 最常用乳汁移出方式 非医务人员通乳 哺乳衔接姿势正确
从未 >0~1次/d 1次/d >1次/d 婴儿吸吮 吸奶器 用手挤压乳房
PM组 103 16(15.5) 5(4.9) 33(32.0) 49(47.6) 68(66.0) 31(30.2) 4(3.8) 50(48.5) 69(67.0)
对照组 1 059 209(19.7) 102(9.6) 363(34.3) 385(36.4) 866(81.8) 159(15.0) 34(3.2) 504(47.6) 926(91.5)
χ2   6.483 16.089 0.007 55.959
P   0.090 <0.001 0.935 <0.001
表6 PM组与对照组产妇哺乳时乳头、乳房疼痛程度及哺乳后乳房舒适度提高率比较[例数(%)]
表7 PM组与对照组产妇生活习惯比较[例数(%)]
表8 PM组与对照组产妇《POMS量表》评分比较(分,±s)
表9 影响产妇发生PM因素的多因素非条件logistic回归分析结果
影响因素 B SE Wald P OR OR值95%CI
围生期是否口服益生菌(以围生期未口服益生菌为对照)            
  -2.208 0.750 8.667 0.003 0.110 0.025~0.478
围生期是否补充铁剂(以围生期未补充铁剂为对照)            
  1.209 0.276 19.148 <0.001 3.351 1.949~5.758
乳头是否皲裂(以未发生乳头皲裂为对照)            
  1.271 0.318 15.923 <0.001 3.564 1.909~6.654
每次吸奶器使用时间(min,以未使用吸奶器为对照)            
  >0~10 0.046 0.771 0.004 0.952 1.047 0.231~4.744
  >10~20 0.349 0.736 0.225 0.636 1.417 0.335~5.994
  >20~30 0.649 0.694 0.875 0.350 1.914 0.491~7.461
  >30 0.855 0.768 1.239 0.266 2.352 0.522~10.606
吸奶器使用频率(以未使用吸奶器为对照)            
  >1次/d 1.630 0.808 4.065 0.044 5.102 1.047~24.876
  1次/d 1.386 0.837 2.740 0.098 3.998 0.775~20.631
  >1~7次/周 0.626 0.859 0.531 0.466 1.870 0.347~10.071
  >0~1次/周 -0.094 1.072 0.008 0.930 0.910 0.111~7.447
乳头保护霜使用频率(以未使用乳头保护霜为对照)            
  >1次/d 0.764 0.316 5.849 0.016 2.147 1.156~3.987
  >0~1次/d 0.697 0.697 1.001 0.317 2.007 0.512~7.862
哺乳时乳房疼痛(以哺乳时乳房无疼痛感为对照)            
  -0.160 0.297 0.292 0.589 0.852 0.476~1.523
哺乳衔接姿势是否正确(以哺乳衔接姿势正确为对照)            
  0.838 0.334 6.304 0.012 2.311 1.202~4.445
哺乳内衣穿戴(以哺乳内衣穿戴舒适为对照)            
  穿戴不舒适 0.842 0.426 3.915 0.048 2.322 1.008~5.347
  不穿戴 1.257 0.336 14.028 <0.001 3.516 1.821~6.789
焦虑评分 0.070 0.032 4.792 0.029 1.073 1.007~1.143
常数项 -3.070 1.069 8.252 0.004 0.046
[1]
中国妇幼保健协会乳腺保健专业委员会乳腺炎防治与促进母乳喂养学组. 中国哺乳期乳腺炎诊治指南[J/CD]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(1): 10-14. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2020.01.005.
[2]
Pomeroy B, Sipka A, Hussen J, et al. Counts of bovine monocyte subsets prior to calving are predictive for postpartum occurrence of mastitis and metritis[J]. Vet Res, 2017, 48(1): 13. DOI: 10.1186/s13567-017-0415-8.
[3]
Sun K, Chen M, Yin Y, et al. Why Chinese mothers stop breastfeeding: mothers′ self-reported reasons for stopping during the first six months[J]. J Child Health Care, 2017, 21(3): 353-363. DOI: 10.1177/1367493517719160.
[4]
Yin Y, Yu Z, Zhao M, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of the risk of lactational mastitis in Chinese women: combined logistic regression analysis with receiver operating characteristic curve[J]. Biosci Rep, 2020, 40(3): BSR20190919. DOI: 10.1042/BSR20190919.
[5]
Zarshenas M, Zhao Y, Poorarian S, et al. Incidence and risk factors of mastitis in Shiraz, Iran: results of a cohort study[J]. Breastfeed Med, 2017, 12: 290-296. DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2016.0153.
[6]
谢芳,孙宇建,张董晓,等. 乳痈方结合外治法治疗非哺乳期乳腺炎100例临床观察[J]. 世界中西医结合杂志2017, 12(3): 372-373, 421.DOI: 10.13935/j.cnki.sjzx.170320.
[7]
Deng Y, Huang Y, Ning P, et al. Maternal risk factors for lactation mastitis: a Meta-analysis[J]. West J Nurs Res, 2021, 43(7): 698-708. DOI: 10.1177/0193945920967674.
[8]
Cooklin AR, Amir LH, Nguyen CD, et al. Physical health, breastfeeding problems and maternal mood in the early postpartum: a prospective cohort study[J]. Arch Womens Ment Health, 2018, 21(3): 365-374. DOI: 10.1007/s00737-017-0805-y.
[9]
祝蓓里. POMS量表及简式中国常模简介[J]. 天津体育学院学报1995, 10(1): 35-37. DOI: 10.13297/j.cnki.issn1005-0000.1995.01.007.
[10]
Khanal V, Scott JA, Lee AH, et al. Incidence of mastitis in the neonatal period in a traditional breastfeeding society: results of a cohort study[J]. Breastfeed Med, 2015, 10(10): 481-487. DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2015.0080.
[11]
Tang L, Lee AH, Qiu L, et al. Mastitis in Chinese breastfeeding mothers: a prospective cohort study[J]. Breastfeed Med, 2014, 9(1): 35-38. DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2013.0032.
[12]
Wilson E, Woodd SL, Benova L. Incidence of and risk factors for lactational mastitis: a systematic review[J]. J Hum Lact, 2020, 36(4): 673-686. DOI: 10.1177/0890334420907898.
[13]
Fernández L, Langa S, Martín V, et al. The human milk microbiota: origin and potential roles in health and disease[J]. Pharmacol Res, 2013, 69(1): 1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2012.09.001.
[14]
Wang L, Si W, Xue H, et al. A fibronectin-binding protein (FbpA) of weissella cibaria inhibits colonization and infection of Staphylococcus aureus in mammary glands[J]. Cell Microbiol, 2017, 19(8). DOI: 10.1111/cmi.12731.
[15]
Paricio-Talayero JM, Baeza C. Re: " Oral administration to nursing women of Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 prevents lactational mastitis development: a randomized controlled trial" by Hurtado et al[J]. Breastfeed Med, 2018, 13(6): 453-454. DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2018.0011.
[16]
Johns HM, Amir LH, McLachlan HL, et al. Breast pump use amongst mothers of healthy term infants in Melbourne, Australia: a prospective cohort study[J]. Midwifery. 2016, 33: 82-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.10.009.
[17]
Dennis CL, Jackson K, Watson J. Interventions for treating painful nipples among breastfeeding women[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2014, 12: CD007366. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007366.pub2.
[18]
Abe SK, Balogun OO, Ota E, et al. Supplementation with multiple micronutrients for breastfeeding women for improving outcomes for the the mother and baby[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016, 2: CD010647. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010647.pub2.
[19]
Lv J, Li J, Wang C, et al. Positive or negative emotion induced by feeding success or failure can affect behaviors, heart rate and immunity of suckling calves[J]. Physiol Behav, 2018, 196: 185-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.09.006.
[20]
高海凤,马祥君,汪洁,等. 难治性哺乳期乳腺炎的临床特点和治疗方法[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2013, 9(4): 550-551. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2013.04.035.
[1] Sisi Wang, Jing Jin, Jie Wang. Influencing factors of lactational mastitis in primiparas and construction of risk model[J]. Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(05): 272-276.
[2] Ling Gao, Zhe Yu, Ran Fan, Yinshan Zang. Evaluation value of peripheral blood cell count ratio for treatment efficacy of rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(05): 642-647.
[3] Wei Dai, Guilin Jiang, Zhaoping Che, Jiao Zhang, Xingxing Wang, Haitao Zhao. Application effect of seamless surgical nursing in perioperative period of laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(06): 778-781.
[4] Fan Wang, Qiuyue Ma, Xiaoli Liu. Analysis of factors influencing hospitalization costs for incisional hernia surgery patients based on quantile regression model[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(05): 522-529.
[5] Jingzhao Han, Hongfang Tuo, Zepu Wang, Yanhui Peng. Influencing factors and prevention strategies of urinary retention after inguinal hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 400-404.
[6] Li Jiang, Xiaohui Wang, Weiyi Li, Shuangyun Gou, Min Ding, Li Yang. Influence of innovative intelligent health education and follow-up management on anxiety of patients with pulmonary nodules: a randomized control trial[J]. Chinese Journal of Lung Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2023, 16(04): 485-489.
[7] Jiaojiao Gu, Yan Zou, Yichen Chen, Shiju Huang, Huiling Zhang, Nan Lin. Evaluation of nutritional status and influencing factors of patients with primary liver cancer after discharge based on Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(05): 534-539.
[8] Jing Yang, Hongye Gu, Yingying Zhao, Mengxia Sun, Yuanyuan Cha, Qi Wang. Influencing factors of short-term mortality in elderly hemodialysis patients and the predictive role of a nomogram model[J]. Chinese Journal of Kidney Disease Investigation(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(05): 254-259.
[9] Li Cheng, Xiaoliang Zhang. Relationship between serum uric acid combining cystatin C and diabetic kidney disease in patients with diabetic retinopathy and influencing factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Kidney Disease Investigation(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(04): 194-199.
[10] Zhenbin Zhang, Zhaolong Yan, Gongteng Wang, Wenqi Zhang, Xufeng Wang, Guangxing Li, Huaqiang Sun, Shufeng Li. Arthroscopic study on the effectiveness of high tibial osteotomy for knee osteoarthritis[J]. Chinese Journal of Geriatric Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2023, 09(04): 218-225.
[11] Qiang Fu, Liyuan Qin, Quanbo Li. Analysis of serum miR-15a level and significance in patients with neuropathic pain[J]. Chinese Journal of Brain Diseases and Rehabilitation(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(05): 293-298.
[12] Daijiang Liu, Junyan Jiang, Xiaoqiang Wan, Shaying Ma. Analysis of survival status and prognostic factors in patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastasis[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(05): 284-288.
[13] Zhenshuang Du, Qingfu Hu, Yingyi Lin, Yuexia Zhang, Meili Chen, Yiqi Li, Zhenhua Wang. Factors influencing motivation of community general practitioners[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(08): 876-883.
[14] Qi Li, Zhongying Huang, Ping Yuan, Zhenpeng Guan. Analysis of factors influencing nosocomial infection with multi-drug resistant bacteria in intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(07): 777-782.
[15] Yuanxia Duan, Liuna Gu, Lei Zhang, Liting Zhou, Haiying Zhu, Chao Yang, Haiying Chen, Xiaoqing Gu, Zongshang Gao, Jiaoling Huang. Analysis of cognition and influencing factors of atrial fibrillation among grassroots general practitioners in Fengxian District, Shanghai[J]. Chinese Journal of Heart and Heart Rhythm(Electronic Edition), 2023, 11(03): 154-159.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract