Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (06): 727 -732. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2020.06.016

Special Issue:

Original Article

Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic hysterectomy with suspension in elderly female patients

Zhongxian Wang1, Ping Wang1, Donghua Wang1, Shixiong Gong1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gynecology, Wuhan No.1 Hospital, Wuhan 430022, Hubei Province, China
  • Received:2020-06-08 Revised:2020-11-01 Published:2020-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Shixiong Gong
  • Supported by:
    Wuhan Medical Scientific Research Project(WX20D77)
Objective

To investigate clinical efficacy of laparoscopic hysterectomy with suspension type in elderly female patients.

Methods

From January 2014 to April 2017, a total of 80 elderly female patients with severe endometrial dysplasia, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3, endometrioid adenocarcinoma, and uterine fibroids who underwent hysterectomy in the Department of Gynecology, Wuhan No. 1 Hospital were selected into this study. By random number table method, they were divided into laparoscope group (n=42, laparoscopic hysterectomy with suspension type) and laparotomy group (n=38, open hysterectomy). The age, operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain score, incision length, early ambulation after operation, postoperative anus exhaust time and hospital stay were statistically compared between two groups by independent-samples t test. The incidence rate of complications such as incision infection, incision dehiscence, bladder injury, intestinal obstruction, lower limb venous thrombosis and pulmonary infection between two groups were statistically analyze by chi-square test. The procedures followed in this study were in line with the requirements of World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Results

①There were no significant differences in general clinical data, such as age, number of previous operations, time interval between last operation and this operation between two groups (P>0.05). ②The operation duration, ambulation after operation, postoperative anal exhaust time and hospitalization time of patients in laparoscopic group were shorter than those in laparotomy group, and the intraoperative blood loss volume, postoperative pain score and incision length of patients in laparoscopic group were less than those in laparotomy group, and the differences between two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). ③The incidence of incision infection, incision dehiscence and bladder injury in laparoscopic group were 2.4% (1/42), 0 and 0, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in laparotomy group 18.4% (7/38), 13.2% (5/38) and 13.2% (5/38), there were statistically significant differences (χ2=4.060, 3.863, 3.863; P=0.044, 0.049, 0.049). There was no statistical significance in the incidence of complications such as intestinal obstruction, lower limb venous thrombosis and pulmonary infection between two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

Elderly female patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy with suspension type had significant efficacy. As the sample size of this study is relatively small, whether this operation method is worthy of clinical application or not, it still needs to be confirmed by large-sample, multi-center and randomized controlled studies.

表1 2组接受子宫切除术患者的一般临床资料比较
表2 2组接受子宫切除术患者术中及术后情况比较(±s)
表3 2组子宫切除术患者术后并发症发生率比较[例数(%)]
[1]
仉立辉,宫建,杨朋,等. 老年女性2型糖尿病患者甲状腺结节超声特征的临床分析[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2016,12 (1): 35-39. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2016.01.007.
[2]
谢朝云,李耀福,蒙桂鸾,等. 无症状菌尿与中老年女性开腹子宫切除手术部位感染的相关性[J]. 中国医学科学院学报,2019,41(5):630-635. DOI:10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.10832.
[3]
Corzo C, Barrientos SN, Westin SN, et al. Updates on conservative management of endometrial cancer[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2018, 25(2): 308-313. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.022.
[4]
Suchonska B, Gajewska M, Zygula A, et al. Endometriosis resembling endometrial cancer in a postmenopausal patient[J]. Climacteric, 2018, 21(1): 88-91. DOI: 10.1080/13697137.2017.1398229.
[5]
Zakhari A, Czuzoj-Shulman N, Spence AR, et al. Hysterectomy for uterine cancer in the elderly: a comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted techniques[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2016, 26(7): 1222-1227. DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000764.
[6]
Reich H. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: indications, techniques and outcomes[J]. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 19(4): 337-344. DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328216f99a.
[7]
王沂峰. 子宫切除术式的改进及评价[J].中国妇产科临床,2002,3(1):8-12.
[8]
Philipp L, Juliette T, Marie-Pierre B, et al. Pain management after laparoscopic hysterectomy: systematic review of literature and PROSPECT recommendations[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2019, 44(4): 425-436. DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100024.
[9]
王黔,贺通,杨弘鑫. 膜解剖理论的规范化应用与发展——学习膜解剖理论过程中可能存在的误区[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志,2020, 23(7): 681-682. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2020.07.105.
[10]
Ishikawa K, Nakao S, Nakamuro M, et al. The retroperitoneal interfascial planes: current overview and future perspectives[J]. Acute Med Surg, 2016, 3(3): 219-229. DOI: 10.1002/ams2.188.
[11]
Cusimano MC, Simpson AN, Dossa F, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients with obesity: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of conversions and complications[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 221(5): 410-428. e19. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.05.004.
[12]
Fitch K, Huh W, Bochner A. Open vs. minimally invasive hysterectomy: commercially insured costs and readmissions[J]. Manag Care, 2016, 25(8):40-47.
[13]
李丹,刘辉,李冉红. 妇科腹腔镜手术并发症分析[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2018, 14 (5): 589-595. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2018.05.016.
[14]
董诗萌,陈琳,王亚雯,等. 单孔与多孔腹腔镜手术治疗妇科良、恶性肿瘤的疗效及患者满意度比较[J/CD]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版),2020,16 (4): 409-416. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2020.04.006
[15]
英卫东. 加速康复外科多学科团队建设[J]. 中华外科杂志,2018, 56(1): 14-17. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2018.01.005.
[16]
Inoue S, Ito H, Hosono S, et al. Net survival of elderly patients with gynecological cancer aged over 75 years in 2006-2008[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2019, 20(2): 437-442. DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.2.437.
[17]
Bourgin C, Lambaudie E, Houvenaeghel G, et al. Impact of age on surgical staging and approaches (laparotomy, laparoscopy and robotic surgery) in endometrial cancer management[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2017, 43(4): 703-709. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.10.022.
[18]
Malanowska E, Soltes M, Starczewski A, et al. Laparoscopic approach to pelvic organ prolapse - the way to go or a blind alley?[J]. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 2019, 14(4): 469-475. DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2019.88749.
[19]
Śliwa J, Kryza-Ottou A, Zimmer-Stelmach A, et al. A new technique of laparoscopic fixation of the uterus to the anterior abdominal wall with the use of overfascial mesh in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2020, 31(10): 2165-2167. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-020-04287-4.
[20]
Bishop EA, Java JJ, Moore KN, et al. Surgical outcomes among elderly women with endometrial cancer treated by laparoscopic hysterectomy: a NRG/Gynecologic Oncology Group study[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 218(1): 1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.09.026.
[21]
郎景和,王辰,瞿红,等. 妇科手术后深静脉血栓形成及肺栓塞预防专家共识[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2017, 52(10): 649-653. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2017.10.001.
[22]
Takeda A, Yamase Y, Koike W, et al. Pulmonary thromboembolism as a result of ovarian vein thrombosis after laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for uterine myoma[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2016, 42(6): 743-747. DOI: 10.1111/jog.12973.
[23]
Woojin C, Anthony HB, Kimia M.Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism events after different routes of pelvic organ prolapse repairs[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 223(2): 268. e1-268. e26. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.020.
[24]
中华医学会老年医学分会,郝秋奎,李峻,等. 老年患者衰弱评估与干预中国专家共识[J]. 中华老年医学杂志,2017, 36(3): 251-256. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-9026.2017.03.007.
[25]
雷建国,陈善萍,杨永学. 衰弱与老年人腹腔镜术后快速康复相关性探讨[J]. 中华老年医学杂志,2018, 37(1): 62-65. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-9026.2018.01.015.
[1] Ziyu Li, Xinxing Lu, Shuangxi Li, Fei Shan. The selection of reconstruction methods in laparoscopic surgery for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[2] Leping Li, Ronghua Zhang, Liang Shang. Laparoscopic lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[3] Fangpeng Chen, Dawei Yang, Congwen Jin. Effect of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy combined with modified esophagogastrostomy to reconstruct His Angle in patients with postoperative reflux esophagitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[4] Jie Xu, Yajun Li, Junwei Han. Comparison of the efficacy of radical laparoscopic total gastrectomy in the treatment of overweight gastric cancer with two approaches[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[5] Liuqing Li, Xiaoxiang Chen, Chengyu Lv. Comparison of total laparoscopic and laparoscopic assisted radical gastrectomy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer in the near and medium term[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[6] Shijun Liu, Jie Ma, Lujing Shi. Near-and medium-term follow-up study of complete mesangectomy plus standard D2 radical resection for advanced gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[7] Jia Ren, Shenghui Ma, Xin Wang, Xiuxia Shi, Shuyun Cai. Clinical observation of laparoscopic total gastrectomy and interposition jejunal gastrectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] Lixia Zhao, Chunxia Wang, Yifeng Chen, Dongping Hu, Weisheng Zhang, Tao Wang, Honglai Zhang. Effects of visceral obesity on early complications after laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] Huazhi Li, Guang Cao, Diangang Liu, Yajing Zhang. Clinical comparison of descending hepatectomy with different approaches for primary hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[10] Xiaowei Chang, Yu Cai, Zhiyong Zhao, Wei Zhang. Efficacy and safety analysis of high intensity focused ultrasound ablation combined with hepatic arterial chemoembolization in the treatment of primary hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[11] Ji Han, Li Yang, Yu Chen. Study on the relationship between abdominal morphological CT parameters and blood loss during total laparoscopic gastrectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[12] Lu Wang, Lijun Zhou. Effects of different anastomotic methods in total laparoscopic distal subtotal gastrectomy on gastric function recovery and complication rate in patients with gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[13] Wang Feng, Zhenzhong Ma, Linhua Tang. Clinical study of CT scanning 3D reconstruction in laparoscopic hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 104-107.
[14] Su Yan, Bowen Huo. Laparoscopic radical dissection for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[15] Chaojun Zhang, Xinpu Yuan. Laparoscopic assisted radical resection of low rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(06): 602-602.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract