Clinical efficacy on treatment of abdominal wall endometriosis by different strategies

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2020.03.015

Objective

To analyze clinical efficacy on treatment of abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) by high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation and surgical resection.

Methods

From January 2015 to October 2018, 85 patients with AWE admitted to Nanchong Central Hospital and Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University were included into this study. According to different treatment methods, 29 patients treated with HIFU ablation were included in HIFU group while 56 patients who underwent resection of AWE lesions were included in surgery group. The age, body mass index (BMI), number of cesarean deliveries, number and diameter of lesions, length of hospital stay, irradiation time, treatment intensity and treatment energy of two groups were statistically compared by independent-samples t test. The treatment time, intraoperative blood loss and treatment power were statistically compared by Wilcoxon rank sum test. The chi-square test was used to statistically analyze the complete remission rate, clinical response rate, 1-year recurrence rate and complication rate. This study met the requirements of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki revised in 2013.

Results

① The age of patients in HIFU group was (31.6±4.7) years old, which was younger than that of patients in surgery group (34.8±4.8) years old. There was significant difference between the two groups (t=-2.958, P=0.004). However, there were no significant differences in BMI, number of deliveries by cesarean section, interval from surgery to the occurrence of clinical symptoms, proportion of patients previously treated with drugs, proportion of patients with different degrees of pain, number of lesions, and lesion diameter between two groups (P>0.05). ② The median intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay of patients in HIFU group were 0 and (4.6±1.0) d, respectively, which were less than 10.0 mL (10.0-10.0 mL) and (6.3±1.8) d in HIFU group, and the differences between two groups had statistical significance (Z=-8.306, P<0.001; t=-5.692, P<0.001). The treatment time in HIFU group was 52.0 min (33.5-62.5 min), which was longer than the 30.0 min (25.0-43.8 min) in surgery group, and the difference between two groups was also statistically significant (Z=3.546, P<0.001). However, there were no significant differences in the complete remission rate, clinical response rate and 1-year recurrence rate between two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions

HIFU ablation is safe and effective for AWE, but it still needs to be further verified by multicenter, prospective and randomized controlled trials.

Key words: Endometriosis, Abdominal wall endometriosis, High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation, Cicatrix, Abdominal wound pain, Recurrence, Comparative effectiveness research, Women

表1 2组AWE患者一般临床资料比较

组别	例数	年龄(岁，±s)	BMI (kg/m²，±s)	剖宫产术史(次，±s)	末次经腹子宫手术至出现临床症状间隔时间[月，M(P₂₅～P₇₅)]	既往因AWE接受药物治疗[例数(%)]
组别	例数	年龄(岁，±s)	BMI (kg/m²，±s)	剖宫产术史(次，±s)	末次经腹子宫手术至出现临床症状间隔时间[月，M(P₂₅～P₇₅)]	无	有
HIFU组	29	31.6±4.7	21.8±2.4	1.2±0.4	30(18～48)	22(75.9)	7(24.1)
手术组	56	34.8±4.8	21.8±2.3	1.1±0.3	24(12～45)	45(80.4)	11(19.6)
检验值		t＝—2.958	t＝0.297	t＝0.589	Z＝—0.824	χ² ＝ 0.231
P值		0.004	0.767	0.557	0.416	0.631
组别	例数	腹壁伤口周期性疼痛[例数(%)]			AWE数量(个，±s)	AWE直径(mm，±s)
组别	例数	轻度	中度	重度	AWE数量(个，±s)	AWE直径(mm，±s)
HIFU组	29	2(6.9)	23(79.3)	4(13.8)	1.07±0.26	26.6±7.0
手术组	56	12(21.4)	34(60.7)	10(17.9)	1.04±0.33	31.0±13.7
检验值		Z＝－0.793			t＝0.474	t＝－1.619
P值		0.428			0.636	0.109

表1 2组AWE患者一般临床资料比较

组别	例数	年龄(岁，±s)	BMI (kg/m²，±s)	剖宫产术史(次，±s)	末次经腹子宫手术至出现临床症状间隔时间[月，M(P₂₅～P₇₅)]	既往因AWE接受药物治疗[例数(%)]
组别	例数	年龄(岁，±s)	BMI (kg/m²，±s)	剖宫产术史(次，±s)	末次经腹子宫手术至出现临床症状间隔时间[月，M(P₂₅～P₇₅)]	无	有
HIFU组	29	31.6±4.7	21.8±2.4	1.2±0.4	30(18～48)	22(75.9)	7(24.1)
手术组	56	34.8±4.8	21.8±2.3	1.1±0.3	24(12～45)	45(80.4)	11(19.6)
检验值		t＝—2.958	t＝0.297	t＝0.589	Z＝—0.824	χ² ＝ 0.231
P值		0.004	0.767	0.557	0.416	0.631
组别	例数	腹壁伤口周期性疼痛[例数(%)]			AWE数量(个，±s)	AWE直径(mm，±s)
组别	例数	轻度	中度	重度	AWE数量(个，±s)	AWE直径(mm，±s)
HIFU组	29	2(6.9)	23(79.3)	4(13.8)	1.07±0.26	26.6±7.0
手术组	56	12(21.4)	34(60.7)	10(17.9)	1.04±0.33	31.0±13.7
检验值		Z＝－0.793			t＝0.474	t＝－1.619
P值		0.428			0.636	0.109

表2 2组AWE患者治疗情况比较

组别	例数	治疗时间[min，M(P₂₅～P₇₅)]	术中出血量[mL，M(P₂₅～P₇₅)]	住院时间(d，±s)	临床疗效[例数(%)]
组别	例数	治疗时间[min，M(P₂₅～P₇₅)]	术中出血量[mL，M(P₂₅～P₇₅)]	住院时间(d，±s)	CR	临床有效	1年复发
HIFU组	29	52.0(33.5～62.5)	0(0～0)	4.6±1.0	21(72.4)	28(96.6)	2(6.9)
手术组	56	30.0(25.0～43.8)	10.0(10.0～10.0)	6.3±1.8	51(91.0)	56(100.0)	1(1.8)
检验值		Z＝－3.546	Z＝－8.306	t＝－5.692	—	—	—
P值		<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	0.052	0.341	0.267

表2 2组AWE患者治疗情况比较

组别	例数	治疗时间[min，M(P₂₅～P₇₅)]	术中出血量[mL，M(P₂₅～P₇₅)]	住院时间(d，±s)	临床疗效[例数(%)]
组别	例数	治疗时间[min，M(P₂₅～P₇₅)]	术中出血量[mL，M(P₂₅～P₇₅)]	住院时间(d，±s)	CR	临床有效	1年复发
HIFU组	29	52.0(33.5～62.5)	0(0～0)	4.6±1.0	21(72.4)	28(96.6)	2(6.9)
手术组	56	30.0(25.0～43.8)	10.0(10.0～10.0)	6.3±1.8	51(91.0)	56(100.0)	1(1.8)
检验值		Z＝－3.546	Z＝－8.306	t＝－5.692	—	—	—
P值		<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	0.052	0.341	0.267

表3 HIFU组29例患者的HIFU消融治疗参数

项目	参数
治疗时间[min，M(P₂₅～P₇₅)]	52.0(33.5～62.5)
辐照时间(s，±s)	313.6±194.6
治疗设备输出功率[W，M(P₂₅～P₇₅)]	95.0(80.0～112.0)
治疗强度(s/h，±s)	316.3±109.9
治疗能量(J，±s)	31 807.7±19 655.1

表3 HIFU组29例患者的HIFU消融治疗参数

项目	参数
治疗时间[min，M(P₂₅～P₇₅)]	52.0(33.5～62.5)
辐照时间(s，±s)	313.6±194.6
治疗设备输出功率[W，M(P₂₅～P₇₅)]	95.0(80.0～112.0)
治疗强度(s/h，±s)	316.3±109.9
治疗能量(J，±s)	31 807.7±19 655.1

图2 AWE患者接受AWE病灶切除术后切口愈合不良

表4 2组AWE患者术后并发症发生率比较[例数(%)]

组别	例数	血尿	腹壁伤口处皮肤热痛	腹壁伤口处皮肤灼伤	腹壁伤口愈合不良	合计
HIFU组	29	1(3.4)	1(3.4)	1(3.4)	0(0)	3(10.3)
手术组	56	1(1.8)	0(0)	0(0)	3(5.4)	4(7.1)
χ²值		—	—	—	0.421^a	0.009^a
P值		1.000	0.341	0.341	0.516	0.926

表4 2组AWE患者术后并发症发生率比较[例数(%)]

组别	例数	血尿	腹壁伤口处皮肤热痛	腹壁伤口处皮肤灼伤	腹壁伤口愈合不良	合计
HIFU组	29	1(3.4)	1(3.4)	1(3.4)	0(0)	3(10.3)
手术组	56	1(1.8)	0(0)	0(0)	3(5.4)	4(7.1)
χ²值		—	—	—	0.421^a	0.009^a
P值		1.000	0.341	0.341	0.516	0.926

[1]	Grigore M, Socolov D, Pavaleanu I, et al. Abdominal wall endometriosis: an update in clinical, imagistic features, and management options [J]. Med Ultrason, 2017, 19(4): 430-437. DOI: 10.11152/mu-1248.
[2]	Morales Martínez C, Tejuca Somoano S. Abdominal wall endometriosis [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 217(6): 701-702. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.033.
[3]	Kang J, Baek JH, Lee WS, et al. Clinical manifestations of abdominal wall endometriosis: a single center experience [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2013, 287(2): 301-305. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-012-2565-2.
[4]	Ding Y, Zhu J. A retrospective review of abdominal wall endometriosis in Shanghai, China [J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2013, 121(1): 41-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.11.011.
[5]	Khan Z, Zanfagnin V, El-Nashar SA, et al. Risk factors, clinical presentation, and outcomes for abdominal wall endometriosis [J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2017, 24(3): 478-484. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.01.005.
[6]	Bektas H, Bilsel Y, Sari YS, et al. Abdominal wall endometrioma; a 10-year experience and brief review of the literature [J]. J Surg Res, 2010, 164(1): e77-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.07.043.
[7]	张文，冷金花. 腹壁子宫内膜异位症诊断和治疗的研究进展 [J]. 现代妇产科进展，2019, 28(5): 391-392. DOI: 10.13283/j.cnki.xdfckjz.2019.05.017.
[8]	Horton JD, Dezee KJ, Ahnfeldt EP, et al. Abdominal wall endometriosis: a surgeon′s perspective and review of 445 cases [J]．Am J Surg, 2008, 196(2): 207-212. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.07.035.
[9]	Vaz-de-Macedo C, Gomes-da-Costa A, Mendes S, et al. Abdominal wall endometriosis excision with mesh closure-report of two cases [J]. Surg Technol Int, 2016, 28: 196-201.
[10]	Zhang J, Liu X. Clinicopathological features of endometriosis in abdominal wall--clinical analysis of 151 cases [J]. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 43(3): 379-383.
[11]	Zhao XY, Duan H, Wang JJ, et al. Clinical analysis of high-intensity focussed ultrasound ablation for abdominal wall endometriosis: a 4-year experience at a specialty gynecological institution [J]. Int J Hyperthermia, 2019, 36(1): 87-94. DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1534276.
[12]	任卫华，王建宏，张华，等. 超声引导下高强度聚焦超声对腹壁子宫内膜异位症的治疗效果研究 [J]. 饮食保健，2016, 3(2): 207.
[13]	Luo S, Zhang C, Huang JP, et al. Ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for abdominal wall endometriosis: a retrospective study [J]. BJOG, 2017, 124 (Suppl 3): 59-63. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14741.
[14]	Zhang L, Rao F, Setzen R. High intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of adenomyosis: selection criteria, efficacy, safety and fertility [J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2017, 96(6): 707-714. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13159.
[15]	Shi S, Ni G, Ling L, et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of abdominal wall endometriosis[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2020, 27(3): 704-711. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.06.012.
[16]	Cozzolino M, Magnolfi S, Corioni S, et al. Abdominal wall endometriosis on the right port site after laparoscopy: case report and literature review [J]. Ochsner J, 2015, 15(3): 251-255.
[17]	赵玲，彭松，张家文，等. 手术与高强度聚焦超声对腹壁瘢痕子宫内膜异位症治疗疗效初步对比研究 [J]. 重庆医学，2016, 45(28): 3928-3930. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2016.28.013.
[18]	Zhu X, Chen L, Deng X, et al. A comparison between high-intensity focused ultrasound and surgical treatment for the management of abdominal wall endometriosis[J]. BJOG, 2017, 124 Suppl 3: 53-58. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14737.
[19]	Zhao L, Deng Y, Wei Q, et al. Comparison of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation and surgery for abdominal wall endometriosis [J]. Int J Hyperthermia, 2018, 35(1): 528-533. DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1511836.
[20]	Carsote M, Terzea DC, Valea A, et al. Abdominal wall endometriosis (a narrative review) [J]. Int J Med Sci, 2020, 17(4): 536-542. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.38679.
[21]	Sosa-Durán EE, Aboharp-Hasan Z, Mendoza-Morales RC, et al. Clear cell adenocarcinoma arising from abdominal wall endometriosis[J]. Cir Cir, 2016, 84(3): 245-249. DOI: 10.1016/j.circir.2015.06.024.
[22]	Gentile J, Migliore R, Kistenmacker F, et al. Malignant transformation of abdominal wall endometriosis to clear cell carcinoma: case report [J]. Sao Paulo Med J, 2018, 136(6): 586-590. DOI: 10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0103300417.
[23]	Lai Y, Hsu H, Kuo K, et al. Clear cell carcinoma of the abdominal wall as a rare complication of general obstetric and gynecologic surgeries: 15 years of experience at a large academic institution [J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2019, 16(4): 552-564. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16040552.
[24]	Hensen JH, Van Breda Vriesman AC, Puylaert JB. Abdominal wall endometriosis: clinical presentation and imaging features with emphasis on sonography [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2006, 186(3): 616-620. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.04.1619.
[25]	Sedhain N, Dangal G, Karki A, et al. Caesarean scar endometriosis [J]. J Nepal Health Res Counc, 2018, 15(3): 292-294. DOI: 10.3126/jnhrc.v15i3.18859.
[26]	Huber M, Grosel J, Showen C. Recognizing abdominal wall endometriosis [J]. JAAPA, 2019, 32(7): 30-33. DOI: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000558237.67863.aa.
[27]	Pas K, Joanna SM, Renata R, et al. Prospective study concerning 71 cases of caesarean scar endometriosis (CSE) [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2017, 37(6): 775-778. DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1305333.
[28]	Xiong Y, Yue Y, Shui L, et al. Ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) ablation for the treatment of patients with adenomyosis and prior abdominal surgical scars: a retrospective study [J]. Int J Hyperthermia, 2015, 31(7): 777-783. DOI: 10.3109/02656736.2015.1071436.

[1]	Qinqin Song, Shuangru Li, Lin Li, Juan Du, Jisong Liu. Research progress on the role of stem cell-derived exosomes in improving pathological cicatrix[J]. Chinese Journal of Injury Repair and Wound Healing(Electronic Edition), 2024, 19(06): 550-553.
[2]	Liuqing Li, Xiaoxiang Chen, Chengyu Lv. Comparison of total laparoscopic and laparoscopic assisted radical gastrectomy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer in the near and medium term[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[3]	Shijun Liu, Jie Ma, Lujing Shi. Near-and medium-term follow-up study of complete mesangectomy plus standard D2 radical resection for advanced gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[4]	Tianwei Xie, Yufan Pang, Li Wu. Effect of different ultrasound-guided ablation on the volume reduction rate and recurrence rate of benign thyroid nodules[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(01): 80-83.
[5]	Zhao Zhang, Chengyu Luo, Shuqi Zhang, Ping He, Xubin Li. Comparison of the effect, complication rate and recurrence rate of different operation methods in treating early breast cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 494-497.
[6]	Fanli Zeng, Zhikai Qi, Heqing Yang. Comparison of oncologic efficacy and risk of two kinds of hepatectomy via Glisson pedicle sheath anatomical route for primary liver cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 525-527.
[7]	Jianxin Gao, Xiaofei Wang, Miao Yu, Yiping Lu. A clinical study of ISR after neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 539-543.
[8]	Zhixiang Ding, Peng Yu, Shaobin Duan. The value of plasma BRAF gene detection for pyloric lymph node dissection during laparoscopic D3 radical resection of right colon cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 570-573.
[9]	Wei Li, Zijian Song, Yancheng Lai, Rui Zhou, Han Wu, Longxin Deng, Rui Chen. The current state and prospects of artificial intelligence applied to prognosis prediction in prostate cancer patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(06): 541-546.
[10]	Yan Zhou, Ying Li, Xiaobing Zhou, Fahui Cheng, Hengzheng He. Efficacy of different types of mesh combined with Nissen fundoplication for repairing hiatal hernia and potential risk factors for recurrence[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[11]	Yafei Yan, Xuesheng Fan, Jian Zhang, Yong Wu. Clinical effect of recurrent inguinal hernia treated by trans-abdominal preperitoneal hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 552-556.
[12]	Yu Gong, Yuan Liao, Mei Shang. Influencing factors and prediction model for recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after TACE[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[13]	Zhendong Jiao, Peng Hui, Shangbo Jin. Application of three-dimensional visualization combined with ICG imaging technology in laparoscopic hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Hepatic Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 13(06): 859-864.
[14]	Li Hang, Yaohui Zhang, Wenkai Sun. Effect of Shenba Kangliu Liquid on intestinal function, inflammatory index and recurrence after colorectal adenomatous polyp surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2024, 14(05): 413-416.
[15]	Zhaorong Guo, Xinguang Wang, Yiqiang Liu, Yingjian He, Lize Wang, Yang Yang, Xing Wang, Wei Cao, Chongshan Gu, Tie Fan, Jinfeng Li, Zhaoqing Fan. Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic risk factors of different subtypes of phyllodes tumor of the breast[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

142

Just accepted	Online first	Issue

0	0	142

From	Others	local

Times	82	60
Rate	58%	42%

Just accepted

Online first

Just accepted

Online first