Chinese Medical E-ournals Database

Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (02): 155 -160. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2020.02.006

Special Issue:

Forum

Research status of delayed interval delivery in multiple pregnancy

Jun Zhan1, Aiyun Xing1,(), Guangdong Liao1, Lin Wu1, Xi Tan1, An Tong1   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2019-11-01 Revised:2020-03-23 Published:2020-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Aiyun Xing
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Xing Aiyun, Email:
  • Supported by:
    Science and Technology Plan Project by Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province(2017JY0257)

Definition of delayed interval delivery (DID) in multiple pregnancy is that in the middle pregnancy, especially when gestational age ≤ 24-week, after the abortion or preterm delivery of one of the fetuses (fetus 1) among multiple pregnancy fetuses, the uterine contraction of pregnant women gradually decreases, the uterine orifice gradually retracts, and even cervical canal is closed. If intervention measures are taken in time, the other fetuses can remain in the uterus of pregnant women for several days or even several weeks, and then be delivered after the organs of remaining fetuses being more mature. Due to the increasing of women′s conceptional age and the application of assisted reproductive technology, the occurrence rate of multiple pregnancy has increased gradually. After the abortion or preterm delivery of fetus 1 among multiple pregnancy fetuses, the success rate of DID for the remaining fetuses is also increasing. The indications of DID in multiple pregnancy including: uterine contraction decrease or disappear without premature rupture of membrane (PROM), chorioamnionitis, serious vaginal bleeding, suspected placental abruption or serious complications diseases of internal medicine or surgery of the patients, no intrauterine distress or congenital malformation in the fetus. At present, the clinical treatment measures of DID included ligation of the umbilical cord of the expelled fetus as high as possible, prophylactic use of tocolytic for inhibition of uterine contraction and antimicrobial agents for infections, cervical cerclage and continuous monitorization of the patient, and useing glucocorticoid to promote fetal lung maturity if necessary. It is very important to determine the delivery time after DID for the remaining fetuses. This article focuses on the latest research progresses on necessity, applicable population, clinical management, clinical processes and pregnancy outcomes of DID fetus in multiple pregnancy, in order to provide reference for related clinical research of DID in multiple pregnancy.

[1]
Chasen ST, Chervenak FA. Twin pregnancy: prenatal issues [EB/OL]. (2020-03-13) [2020-03-15].

URL    
[2]
Porreco RP, Farkouh LJ. Delayed-interval delivery in multifetal pregnancy [EB/OL]. 2018[2020-03-15].

URL    
[3]
Arabin B, van Eyck J. Delayed-interval delivery in twin and triplet pregnancies: 17 years of experience in 1 perinatal center [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 200(2): 154.e1-154.e8. DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.046.
[4]
劳子僖,梁永昌,马润玫,等. 双胎妊娠中第2个胎儿延迟分娩[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2006, 41(4): 281-283. DOI: 10.3760/j.issn:0529-567X.2006.04.023.
[5]
朱慧莉,陈悦悦,周容. 三胎妊娠延迟分娩1例[J]. 实用妇产科杂志,2016, 32(8): 633-635.
[6]
Beinder E, Lang N. Delayed interval delivery in a twin pregnancy with monochorionic placenta [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1997, 176(1 Pt 1): 254. DOI:10.1016/S0002-9378(97)80044-0.
[7]
Baltus T, Martin M L. Successful delayed-interval delivery in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy: a case report [J]. Case Rep Womens Health, 2018, 21: e00093. DOI: 10.1016/j.crwh.2018.e00093.
[8]
Cao S, Walter L, Valenzuela GJ, et al. Delayed-interval delivery of twin gestation via cesarean section: a case report [J]. Am J Case Rep, 2019, 20: 739-742. DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.915196.
[9]
Arias F. Delayed delivery of multifetal pregnancies with premature rupture of membranes in the second trimester [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1994, 170(5): 1233-1237. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(94)70132-6.
[10]
Roman AS, Fishman S, Fox N, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after delayed-interval delivery of multifetal pregnancies [J]. Am J Perinatol, 2011, 28(2): 91-96. DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1262513.
[11]
Farkouh LJ, Sabin ED, Heyborne KD, et al. Delayed-interval delivery: extended series from a single maternal-fetal medicine practice [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2000, 183(6): 1499-1503. DOI: 10.1067/mob.2000.107319.
[12]
Fayad S, Bongain A, Holhfeld P, et al. Delayed delivery of second twin: a multicentre study of 35 cases [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2003, 109(1): 16-20. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00430-x.
[13]
Abboud P, Gallais A, Janky E. Intentional delayed delivery in twin pregnancy: two additional cases and literature review [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reproduct Biol, 1997, 75(2): 139-143. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(97)00111-5.
[14]
Platt JS, Rosa C. Delayed interval delivery in multiple gestations [J]. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 1999, 54(5): 343-348. DOI: 10.1097/00006254-199905000-00025.
[15]
Zhang J, Johnson CD, Hoffman M. Cervical cerclage in delayed interval delivery in a multifetal pregnancy: a review of seven case series [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reproduct Biol, 2003, 108(2): 126-130. DOI: 10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00479-7.
[16]
Doger E, Cakiroglu Y, Ceylan Y, et al. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes of delayed interval delivery in cerclage and non-cerclage cases: an analysis of 20 multiple pregnancies [J]. J Obstet and Gynaecol Res, 2014, 40(7): 1853-1861. DOI: 10.1111/jog.12435.
[17]
Rafael TJ, Berghella V, Alfirevic Z. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in multiple pregnancy [J]. Cochrane Database Sys Rev, 2014, (9): CD009166. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009166.pub2.
[18]
Zhang J, Hamilton B, Martin J, et al. Delayed interval delivery and infant survival: a population-based study [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 191(2): 470-476. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.002.
[19]
Benito Vielba M, De Bonrostro Torralba C, Pallares Arnal V, et al. Delayed-interval delivery in twin pregnancies: report of three cases and literature review [J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2019, 32(2): 351-355. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1378336.
[20]
Rosbergen M, Vogt HP, Baerts W, et al. Long-term and short-term outcome after delayed-interval delivery in multi-fetal pregnancies [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2006, 122(1): 66-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.11.036.
[21]
Kalchbrenner MA, Weisenborn EJ, Chyu JK, et al. Delayed delivery of multiple gestations: maternal and neonatal outcomes [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1998, 179(5): 1145-1149. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70122-x.
[22]
Oyelese Y, Ananth CV, Smulian JC, et al. Delayed interval delivery in twin pregnancies in the United States: impact on perinatal mortality and morbidity [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 192(2): 439-444. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.07.055.
[23]
Livingston JC, Livingston LW, Ramsey R, et al. Second-trimester asynchronous multifetal delivery results in poor perinatal outcome [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 103(1): 77-81. DOI: 10.1097/01.aog.0000103995.79536.9c.
[24]
Padilla-Iserte P, Vila-Vives JM, Ferri B, et al. Delayed interval delivery of the second twin: obstetric management, neonatal outcomes, and 2-year follow-up [J]. Obstet Gynaecol India, 2014, 64(5): 344-348. DOI: 10.1007/s13224-014-0544-1.
[1] Haoyuan Yang, Jie Gong, Qingwei Zou, Hang Ruan. Current research status on adverse pregnancy outcomes of maternal and infant in pregnant women with asthma[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 522-529.
[2] Tiantian Chen, Xiaodong Wang, Haiyan Yu. Pregnancy outcome of twin pregnancy with Gitelman syndrome: a case report and literature review[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 559-568.
[3] Xiaoqing Ju, Yunjie Jin, Xiaoyan Wang. Influencing factors of uterine rupture during vaginal delivery in patients with scarred uterus after cesarean section[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 575-581.
[4] Juan Gu, Qingqing Sun, Fangfang Hu, Yijuan Cao, Yujuan Qi. Clinical application of endometrial receptivity array to improve pregnancy outcomes in women with repeated embryo implantation failure[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 582-587.
[5] Mengling Zhou, Zhiwei Xue, Shu Zhou. Changes in size of uterine myoma during pregnancy and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(05): 611-615.
[6] Li Chen, Xueqin Lei, Lian Duan, Yue Zeng, Guolin He. Analysis of influencing factors of success of trial of labor after twice cesarean sections and its pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 287-294.
[7] Ying Chen, Yanli Chen. Causes of heart rate variability and perinatal outcomes in elderly pregnant women[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 295-301.
[8] Danyan Feng, Xiaohui Cao, Yuxia Shi. Effect of serum adiponectin and placental leucine aminopeptidase levels on pregnancy outcome in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics(Electronic Edition), 2023, 19(03): 302-308.
[9] Qiong Ren, Dongyan Wu, Zhonghua Li, Jing Shi, Jing Zhang, Liwei Geng. Diagnostic value of combined detection of serum pro-calcitonin, matrix metalloproteinase-9 and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 in chorioamnionitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Infectious Diseases(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(03): 194-199.
[10] Guohua Ren, Xiaoxiao Du, Shanling Hong, Shuai Shao. Change and significance of serum interleukin-22, hydrogen sulfide, and osteoprotegerin levels of patients with hypertensive acute kidney injury in pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Kidney Disease Investigation(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(03): 150-155.
[11] Yuyan Zhang, Bin Hu, Weihong Zhang, Mei Xu, Hui Zhu, Xinyue Yang, Hailing Liu. Relationship between echocardiography parameters and liver function during the second trimester of pregnancy and their predictive value for adverse pregnancy outcomes[J]. Chinese Journal of Digestion and Medical Imageology(Electronic Edition), 2023, 13(06): 499-504.
[12] Xin Wang, Lin Liu, Zhejia Wen, Chunling Liu, Hong Zhang, Fang Lyu. Effect of stress exposure before pregnancy on subsequent pregnancy outcomes in mice[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 431-437.
[13] Xiaoxiang Wu, Bo Yang, Jingxuan Li, Fengling Zhang, Guihui Guo, Shaopei Zheng. Predictive value of umbilical artery ultrasonography parameters, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, and sFlt-1/PLGF ratio for adverse pregnancy outcomes in patients with pregnancy induced hypertension syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(03): 266-271.
[14] Lizi Zhang, Dunjin Chen. Adverse outcomes and long­term prognosis of placenta accreta spectrum disorders[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(03): 155-158.
[15] Xiaofang Zheng, Songquan Wei, Zhenxuan Huang, Wenshi Wu, Guimin Li, Hongxia Zhang, Qingping Jiang, Dunjin Chen, Lin Yu. Pregnancy outcome and pathological changes of the placenta in preeclampsia with fetal growth restriction[J]. Chinese Journal of Obstetric Emergency(Electronic Edition), 2023, 12(02): 85-92.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract